RE: Level 3 BGP Advertisements

2012-08-29 Thread Hale, William C
No, that's not standard practice.  I do this exact thing with Level 3 and have 
been for many many many years.  Whoever is telling you this must be green.

I would recommend adding the no-export community to your more specific routes 
if you can so as to be a good steward of the ever growing Internet IPv4 table.

From: Nick Olsen [n...@flhsi.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 2:28 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Level 3 BGP Advertisements

Greetings all.

In practice, We've always advertised our space all the way down to /24's
but also the aggregate block (the /20 or the /21). Just so there was still
reachability to our network in the event that someone made the foolish
mistake of filtering lets say prefixes smaller /23...

Anyways, I've always thought that was standard practice. And its never been
a problem. Until we brought up peering with level 3..

I noticed that while the /24's made it out to the world. The larger
counterparts (2 /21's and a /20) did not. So, I start sniffing around. Find
that I do indeed see the prefixes in Level 3's looking glass but they
aren't handing it off to peers. So, Naturally, I land on this being some
kind of prefix filtering issue and open a ticket with Level 3. They tell me
this is standard practice. And If I want to see the /20 or /21's make it
out to the rest of the world, I need to stop sending the /24's.

Does this sound normal?
Is what I'm doing (Advertising the aggregate prefix) a good rule of thumb?

Any other thoughts?

Nick Olsen
Network Operations (855) FLSPEED  x106


--
This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended 
recipient(s). Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is 
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by 
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message and any attachments.



RE: Telx - Atlanta

2010-02-04 Thread Hale, William C
Thanks to all that responded, we received the information needed.

Regards,
Bill  

-Original Message-
From: Hale, William C 
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 2:00 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Telx - Atlanta

Our normal contact for Telx at 56 Marietta has not responded in a couple
of days, does anyone have a 24x7 contact number for Telx at 56 Marietta
in Atlanta?
 
Regards,
Bill 
 
William C. Hale
Sr. Network Design Engineer
Windstream Communications
501.748.6526 office
501.690.0830 mobile
501.748.6487 fax
william.c.h...@windstream.com
 
 



***
The information contained in this message, including attachments, may
contain privileged or confidential information that is intended to be
delivered only to the person identified above. If you are not the
intended recipient, or the person responsible for delivering this
message to the intended recipient, Windstream requests that you
immediately notify the sender and asks that you do not read the message
or its attachments, and that you delete them without copying or sending
them to anyone else.


***
The information contained in this message, including attachments, may contain
privileged or confidential information that is intended to be delivered only to 
the
person identified above. If you are not the intended recipient, or the person
responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, Windstream 
requests
that you immediately notify the sender and asks that you do not read the 
message or its
attachments, and that you delete them without copying or sending them to anyone 
else.


Telx - Atlanta

2010-02-04 Thread Hale, William C
Our normal contact for Telx at 56 Marietta has not responded in a couple
of days, does anyone have a 24x7 contact number for Telx at 56 Marietta
in Atlanta?
 
Regards,
Bill 
 
William C. Hale
Sr. Network Design Engineer
Windstream Communications
501.748.6526 office
501.690.0830 mobile
501.748.6487 fax
william.c.h...@windstream.com
 
 


***
The information contained in this message, including attachments, may contain
privileged or confidential information that is intended to be delivered only to 
the
person identified above. If you are not the intended recipient, or the person
responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, Windstream 
requests
that you immediately notify the sender and asks that you do not read the 
message or its
attachments, and that you delete them without copying or sending them to anyone 
else.