Re: ARIN board accountability to network operators

2014-03-28 Thread Jay Moran
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:

 arin forcing folk to sign
 contracts with clauses saying arin can change the TsCs unilaterally and
 arbitrarily, ...


Exactly! -- Jay


Re: What's up at AOL?

2014-01-02 Thread Jay Moran
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:

 Any chance this is related to the NoVa fiber outage being discussed on
 Outages?


Not related. With the best non-answer I can muster right now: I decided not
to reply after Peter replied. -- Jay Moran


Re: Hilton proxy issue

2013-07-31 Thread Jay Moran
I have BCC'd the likely appropriate Hilton contact for you on this response
so they can take a look at the NANOG emails below regarding their Internet
proxies to see if it looks like something they can assist with. They were
able to have some MTA issues corrected last time Hilton came up on the
NANOG list. Good luck!
--
Jay Moran
http://linked.com/in/jaycmoran

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Grant Ridder shortdudey...@gmail.comwrote:

 Better yet, does anyone have any Hilton contacts they could pass my info
 to?

 -Grant

 On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Grant Ridder shortdudey...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  Anyone from Hilton out there?  We are still having this issue.  It is not
  a wayport address since I looked and they are not registered under
 Hilton's
  name.
 
  -Grant
 
 
  On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Grant Ridder shortdudey...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  The requests are coming from 167.187.100.202 which is in a /16 assigned
  to Hilton.  As far as i know, the waypoint service has its own
 netblocks.
 
  -Grant
 
 
  On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net
 wrote:
 
 
  On Jul 16, 2013, at 3:44 PM, Grant Ridder shortdudey...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 
   Hi,
  
   Anyone from Hilton Hotels NOC or related on here?  We are seeing
 their
   internet proxy doing weird things to http requests to servers at
  $DAYJOB.
 
 
  Many of the hilton properties have migrated to Wayport/attwifi.  Are
  you seeing the requests from ATT/Wayport or from their corporate?
 
  (btw, if you're here and with wayport/attwifi, i would be interested in
  chatting briefly with you).
 
  - Jared



Re: Switch designed for mirroring tap ports

2012-03-01 Thread Jay Moran
Ameen,

We've had very good success using Brocade MLX's for this very thing
(actually, might be older XMRs, but should be same platform at this point).
Check out the transparent-hw-flooding command under a VLAN. It basically
turns off mac learning, and just floods it on the vlan's member ports.

If you want to be creative and say split out port 80 traffic to one port
and the rest to another, you can use policy based routing to change the
destination VLAN for just tcp/80 traffic.

If you want to have many different inputs going to many different outputs
some with PBR, some without, then you may have to get very creative and use
cables coming out of one port on the box and going back into another port.

We're using this successfully with multiple 10GE ports.

Jay
--
Jay Moran
http://tp.org/jay


On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 3:12 PM, A. Pishdadi apishd...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello All,

 We are looking for a switch or a device that we can use for mirroring tap
 ports. For example , take a mirror port off of a core router say a 6509,
 connect it to a port on said device, say port 1. I would like then to be
 able to mirror port 1 on said device to multiple ports,  like port 2 , 3,
 4. We have the need to analyze traffic from one port on multiple devices.
 Seems most switches are limited to mirroring to a max of 1 or 2 ports.


 Any suggestions would be great.

 Thanks,
 Ameen



Re: Whois 172/12

2012-01-15 Thread Jay Moran
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Jon Lewis jle...@lewis.org wrote:


 AOL has and uses (publicly) a bunch of space in 172/8.  In fact, looking
 at a BGP table, I'd say they're by far the largest user (one of the only)
 in that /8.


We, AOL, have 172.128/10, 172.192/12, 172.208/13, 172.216/16. These blocks
represent our dial-up ISP customers that can't seem to get broadband or for
whatever reason, stay on dial-up. Also pretty amazingly is how high the
simultaneous user count has stayed, guess the folks that left weren't the
ones on in the evenings between 7-10pm ET. We (mostly me) are looking into
solutions to be able to remove the reliance on this space. Unfortunately,
most of the developers, who created the various servers/applications that
dole out these addresses, all left in the late 90's with some pretty fat
wallets; at this point... it's an archeology dig.

Jay
--
Jay Moran
http://tp.org/jay


Re: AOL security contact?

2011-07-11 Thread Jay Moran
Chris,

Did you not get my direct email to you? I included the email address there,
here it is again for yourself and others who need to report a security
vulnerability with an AOL property.

secvuln
at
aol
dot
net

Jay
--
Jay Moran
http://tp.org/jay


On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Chris cal...@gmail.com wrote:

 I tried doma...@aol.net, which I got when I did a whois on the IP of
 the affected domain, then hit noc@ and ab...@aol.com

 I fired off an email to iWeb, who is hosting the scam site and is
 notorious for lack of response, and GoDaddy.

 My recommendation to anyone: start blocking .info like how Google delisted
 co.cc

 On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
  - Original Message -
  From: Chris cal...@gmail.com
 
  Anyone have an AOL security contact because like I posted yesterday,
  CNN was hit through a redirect vulnerability in their ad system and
  now AOL is suffering the same thing by having some scammer serving up
  Casey Anthony leaked lawyer video crap as Facebook spam where
  unsuspecting lusers are clicking like wild on it
 
  My recommendation to anyone from Facebook who's listening here:
 
  Block the whole damn domain.  That will get them to contact you.  :-)
 
  Cheers,
  -- jra
  --
  Jay R. Ashworth  Baylink
 j...@baylink.com
  Designer The Things I Think   RFC
 2100
  Ashworth  Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land
 Rover DII
  St Petersburg FL USA  http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727
 647 1274
 
 



 --
 --C

 The dumber people think you are, the more surprised they're going to
 be when you kill them. - Sir William Clayton




Re: Transit from Cogent - thoughts?

2009-11-11 Thread Jay Moran
Adel,

Perhaps the best way for you to get an answer to your question without the
entire list erupting for no good reason is to click on the following link
which will show all messages from the NANOG mailing list about Cogent. Then
you can make your decision based on past conversations as opposed to adding
more messages to that archive on the topic.

BTW, if you don't want to click on the link I've pasted because you are
careful and prudent, just go to the nanog.markmail.org website and search
for Cogent.

http://nanog.markmail.org/search/?q=cogent

Good luck!

Jay


On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 10:04 AM, a...@baklawasecrets.com wrote:



  Contemplating using Cogent Communications for transit as pricing looks
 favourable.  Just trying to get a feel for what sort of a reputation they
 have in the network operators community.  I'm sure people have horror
 stories for every provider, but just trying to get a general idea of what
 sort of regard they are held in the community.

 Thanks

 Adel