Comcast email contact
Can someone from comcast email please contact me off-list. You all appear to be black holing email received from $DAYJOBS domain. Your support from indicates we are not blocked. Our logs indicate the mail is accepted for delivery but they never make it to users inboxes, or junk/spam folders. Thanks, Josh Smith
Comcast DNS contact
Can some from Comcast DNS contact me off list. A colleague made a mistake in one of our DNS zones and the incorrect data is cached on your end and causing our users fits. Thanks, Josh -- Josh Smith KD8HRX email/jabber: juice...@gmail.com phone: 304.237.9369(c)
Re: VMware ESX LACP Support
ESX does NOT support LACP out of the box. Not sure about the nexus 1kv. Thanks, Josh Smith KD8HRX email/jabber: juice...@gmail.com phone: 304.237.9369(c) On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Manu Chao wrote: > I would like to design VSS LACP based MECs with ESX hosts. > > Does VMware ESX support LACP? > > Do we need Nexus 1000 for ESX LACP support? > > R/ > Manu >
Re: IPv6 mistakes, was: Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 6:07 AM, Arturo Servin wrote: > > On 11 Feb 2011, at 04:51, Ricky Beam wrote: > >> On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 00:31:21 -0500, David Conrad >> wrote: >>> Amusingly enough, I personally (along with others) made arguments along >>> these lines back in 1995 or so when the IAB was coming out with >>> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1814.txt. Given the publication of 1814, you >>> can probably guess how far those arguments fared. >> >> You missed the "anticipates external connectivity to the Internet" part. >> Networks that never touch the internet have RFC1918 address space to use. >> (and that works 99.999% of the time.) >> > > Except in acquisitions and private peering. > > as Especially during acquisitions, my $EMPLOYEER has made several acquisitions recently and every one of them was wrought with painful RFC1918 overlap problems. Thanks, Josh Smith KD8HRX email/jabber: juice...@gmail.com phone: 304.237.9369(c)
Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 4:18 PM, George Bonser wrote: >> Are you sure about that - I'm a comcast subscriber and see no signs >> that I am being natted? >> > > Josh, maybe it is different in different markets. When I had Comcast, I was > behind a NAT. > > > George, Perhaps I misunderstood you - I am not behind any sort of large scale NAT, however my CPE, self supplied router (actually an old sun blade 100 running openbsd) does provide nat for the other devices on my home LAN. Thanks, Josh Smith KD8HRX email/jabber: juice...@gmail.com phone: 304.237.9369(c)
Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 3:50 PM, George Bonser wrote: >> >> I never thought it was that bad. In some 3G/wireless networks in >> Germany >> the providers use NAT and transparent HTTP-proxy. But this is only >> wireless. I'm not aware of any DSL or Cable provider NATing their >> customers. >> >> Jens > > Practically all broadband providers NAT their customers in the US. If > you look at the largest ones which are probably Comcast, Verizon, and > AT&T, you have the majority of US broadband subscribers right there. > > > > Are you sure about that - I'm a comcast subscriber and see no signs that I am being natted? Thanks, -- Josh Smith KD8HRX email/jabber: juice...@gmail.com phone: 304.237.9369(c)
Re: Weekend Gedankenexperiment - The Kill Switch
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Ryan Wilkins wrote: > > On Feb 7, 2011, at 3:53 PM, Josh Smith wrote: > >> I agree that setting up "local" connectivity between the folks in my >> neighborhood wouldn't be too much of a challenge. Getting anything >> much beyond that up and running would be a stretch. > > Yeah, but the more people communicating the better. I don't know what all my > neighbors are capable of doing. Some of them may be capable of helping the > cause in ways that I hadn't considered. > > Regards, > Ryan Wilkins > > Ryan, I agree the more people communicating the better. I was just commenting on what my own, and suspect many others on the list's capabilities are. While I would love to have access to a satellite type of data service as a backup link its simply not in my budget and even if it was I suspect any service available via satellite might suffer from similar problems if the methods used to disrupt connectivity in Egypt were employed here. Thanks, -- Josh Smith KD8HRX email/jabber: juice...@gmail.com phone: 304.237.9369(c)
Re: Weekend Gedankenexperiment - The Kill Switch
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Ryan Wilkins wrote: > > On Feb 3, 2011, at 10:10 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote: > >> Original Message - >>> What do you do when you get home to put it back on the air -- let's >>> say email as a base service, since it is -- do you have the gear laying >>> around, >>> and how long would it take? >> >> Focus on this part, BTW, folks; let's ignore the politics behind the >> shutdown. :-) >> > > So if I get what you're saying, I could have something operational from > scratch in a few hours. I've got a variety of Cisco routers and switches, > Linux and Mac OS X boxes in various shapes and sizes, and a five CPE + one AP > 5 GHz Mikrotik RouterOS-based radio system, 802.11b/g wireless AP, 800' of > Cat 5e cable, connectors, and crimpers. The radios, if well placed, could > allow me to connect up several strategic locations, or perhaps use them to > connect to other sources of Internet access, if available. If it really came > down to it, I could probably gather enough satellite communications gear from > the office to allow me to stand up satellite Internet to someone. Of course, > the trick would be to talk to that "someone" to coordinate connectivity over > the satellite which may be hard to do given the communications outage you > described. I wouldn't be so worried about transmitting to the satellite, in > this case I'd just transmit without authorization, but someone needs to be > receiving my transmission and vice versa for this to be useful. At a > minimum, I could enable communications between my neighbors. > > Regards, > Ryan Wilkins > I agree that setting up "local" connectivity between the folks in my neighborhood wouldn't be too much of a challenge. Getting anything much beyond that up and running would be a stretch. -- Josh Smith KD8HRX email/jabber: juice...@gmail.com phone: 304.237.9369(c)
Re: It's the end of IPv4 as we know it... and I feel fine..
Seth, What sort of ISP do your "not technically inclined" parents have that offers native ipv6? :-) -- Josh Smith KD8HRX email/jabber: juice...@gmail.com phone: 304.237.9369(c) On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote: > On 2/3/11 7:36 AM, Jared Mauch wrote: >> (apologies to REM) >> >> On Feb 3, 2011, at 10:11 AM, Jon Lewis wrote: >> >>> The real fun's going to be over the next several years as the RIR's become >>> irrelevant in the acquisition of scarce IPv4 resources...and things become >>> less stable as lots of orgs rush to implement a strange new IP version. >> >> There's clearly two things that need to be done: >> >> 1) Major infrastructure (ie: backhaul, corporate, ISP gateway) need to be >> upgraded/configured to support IPv6 >> 2) Edge networks need to start to hand out IPv6 addresses and name servers. >> I think it would be great if providers started handing out IPv6 addressed >> name servers when an IPv4 client does a dhcp renew, etc. >> > > > Well, I'm doing my part by turning up native IPv6 at my parent's house > this week or next. They are not technically inclined and I'm confident > it won't be a problem. ;) > > ~Seth > >
Re: Comcast IPv6 Native Dual Stack Trials
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Jared Mauch wrote: > John, > > Congratulations on this important step! > > - Jared > > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 03:26:19PM +, Brzozowski, John wrote: >> Comcast Activates First Users With IPv6 Native Dual Stack Over DOCSIS >> >> http://blog.comcast.com/2011/01/comcast-activates-first-users-with-ipv6-nat >> ive-dual-stack-over-docsis.html >> >> John >> = >> John Jason Brzozowski >> Comcast Cable >> e) mailto:john_brzozow...@cable.comcast.com >> o) 609-377-6594 >> m) 484-962-0060 >> w) http://www.comcast6.net >> = >> >> >> > > -- > Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net > clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine. > > Congratulations. Hopefully this trial makes its way to the Morgantown, WV area sooner rather than later (I'm not holding my breath) and I'll be able to reach the ipv6 internet natively instead of over my HE tunnel. Thanks, Josh Smith KD8HRX email/jabber: juice...@gmail.com phone: 304.237.9369(c)
Re: 5.7/5.8 GHz 802.11n dual polarity MIMO through office building glass, 1.5 km distance
> Combine that with the Linux/SDK stuff and you can do some interesting things > with it that you can't do with other devices. > > - Jared Jared, I don't really have any experience with the Linux/SDK stuff care to share what you're using it for? Thanks, -- Josh Smith KD8HRX email/jabber: juice...@gmail.com phone: 304.237.9369(c)
Re: 5.7/5.8 GHz 802.11n dual polarity MIMO through office building glass, 1.5 km distance
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Bryan Fields wrote: > On 12/29/2010 08:19, Robert E. Seastrom wrote: >> >> Most of these regulations are centered on the concern that your >> building not look like a tower site. An antenna that is sufficiently >> small that it can not be seen from the ground without resorting to >> optics may be on their "oh, that's fine" list once they see one >> sitting on the table in front of them. > > Don't forget about OTARD, where so long as you control the space in your > lease, no local government regulations can prevent installation of a internet > reception radio. > > Also, the Ubiquiti is crap from a build/reliability standpoint. If you're > doing anything serious, it would be worth it to buy a better product. I'm > partial to the Alvarion and Motorola PtP links. > > > -- > Bryan Fields > > 727-409-1194 - Voice > 727-214-2508 - Fax > http://bryanfields.net > > While certainly not the best stuff made I've found the ubiquiti equipment to be very nice for the price and have a few of their AP's which have been in service 24x7 for a couple of years now. Thanks, -- Josh Smith KD8HRX email/jabber: juice...@gmail.com phone: 304.237.9369(c)
cold.net contact
Could someone who has insight into DNS for it.colt.net please contact me off list. I am having sporadic difficulty resolving a domain you are providing DNS for. Thanks -- Josh Smith KD8HRX email/jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone: 304.237.9369(c) () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
