Google's security.txt
Anyone from Google, You might want to fix a tiny typo in your security.txt. RFC9116 uses American spelling, not British spelling, like you did. Check here: https://www.uriports.com/tools?method=securitytxt=google.com It's only a small issue, but it might spread when people start using Google's security.txt for inspiration. -- 퓜퓪퓻퓬퓸
IPv6 connectivity to mx[1-4].smtp.goog.
Hi, At https://internet.nl we're seeing IPv6 connection issues on TCP port 25 (SMTP) to mx[1-4].smtp.goog. Either 100% DROP (so no TCP connection) or ⅔ failure to setup connection. Further testing seems to confirm the problem is bigger and on Google's side. So, this fails: echo 'quit' | nc -6 -w 3 mx1.smtp.goog. 25 and this works: echo 'quit' | nc -4 -w 3 mx1.smtp.goog. 25 (on MacOS use -G instead of -w) Is anyone else seeing this? Any idea what is causing this? -- Marco
Re: starlink ixp peering progress
Or this? https://bgp.he.net/AS14593#_peers6 Op 27/02/2024 om 13:17 schreef b...@uu3.net: Well, for some basic overview you can use CAIDA AS rank. You can use it directly, or you may try my (more user friendly) frontend for it: http://as-rank.uu3.net/?as=14593 -- Original message -- From: Dave Taht To: NANOG Subject: starlink ixp peering progress Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 02:54:44 -0500 One of the things I learned today was that starlink has published an extensive guide as to how existing BGP AS holders can peer with them to get better service. https://starlink-enterprise-guide.readme.io/docs/peering-with-starlink I am curious if there is a way to see how many have peered already, how many they could actually peer with?, and progress over time since inception what would be the right tools for that? This is pretty impressive for peering so far: https://www.peeringdb.com/net/18747 Is there a better email list to discuss ixp stuff? -- Marco
Re: Anyone else seeing DNSSEC failures from EU Commission ? (european-union.europa.eu)
Hi Laura, Something seems the matter, indeed: https://dnsviz.net/d/european-union.europa.eu/YbCzrQ/dnssec/ It's weird; 1.1.1.1 resolves, 8.8.8.8 and 9.9.9.9 return SERVFAIL. -- Marco Op 08-12-2021 om 14:27 schreef Laura Smith via NANOG: Bit of a long stretch given the US audience, but I'm seeing lots of things like this at the moment: info: validation failure : key for validation european-union.europa.eu. is marked as invalid because of a previous validation failure : DS got unsigned CNAME answer from 2600:9000:5301:a200::1 and 34.255.155.194 for DS european-union.europa.eu. while building chain of trust info: validation failure : DS got unsigned CNAME answer from 2600:9000:5302:9a00::1 and 34.255.155.194 for DS european-union.europa.eu. while building chain of trust validation failure : signatures from unknown keys from 147.67.12.3 info: validation failure : signatures from unknown keys from 147.67.12.3
Trying to get in touch: ntp.org sites broken
Hello, I'm trying to get in touch with webmas...@ntp.org. But so far without luck. Maybe this route will help. I noticed that quit a number of pages you mention on https://www.ntp.org/ are no longer functioning. Like http://lists.ntp.org/ and http://support.ntp.org/. If anyone knows a way to get this fixed, please help. Thank you. -- Marco
Re: Update to BCP-38?
On 03/10/2019 15:51, Stephen Satchell wrote: > For a start, *add* IPv6 examples in parallel with the IPv4 examples. 1000 times +1 We need (much) more IPv6 examples! -- Marco (pushing for IPv6 examples since 2007 or so like in: https://youtu.be/OLEizGPoB5w?t=30)
