Re: Outage between GBLX and HE?
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Mike wrote: > Tammy A. Wisdom wrote: > >> - Original Message - >> >> >>> From: "Mike" >>> Cc: nanog@nanog.org >>> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 9:38:57 PM >>> Subject: Re: Outage between GBLX and HE? >>> Brielle Bruns wrote: >>> >>> On 11/16/10 8:32 PM, Brielle Bruns wrote: >>> *snip* >> >> >> >>> Did you reboot your computer? >>> >>> (running and ducking!) >>> >>> >> >> Gee so helpful. >> I hope you enjoyed looking like a fuckwit on nanog. >> >> > are you sure that's appropriate here? > > > > I'm seeing he.net routes via GBLX peer 3549 6939 6939 Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, external Community: 3549:4143 3549:30840 GBLX looking glass returns proper peering 1 64.214.13.1 (64.214.13.1) 135.800 ms 151.677 ms 2 Hurrican-Electric-LLC.Port-channel100.ar3.SJC2.gblx.net(64.214.174.246) 86.407 ms 76.988 ms 3 10gigabitethernet1-1.core1.fmt1.he.net (72.52.92.109) 79.397 ms 90.276 ms I'm going with reboot computer
Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions
Between the lines: Comcast wants to end mutual peering agreements (due to: ratios, politics , greed) but we are going to spin it due to net neutrality making it main stream media and hoping we can get comcast clients to complain... Not the worse angle we've seen > >
Internap FCP
Greetings Nanog, Looking for some off-list reviews/insight on the FCP, We are looking into the device for purchase over the next few months, We are in the 10G range of products. Thank you
Re: {Spam?} Re: Request Spamhaus contact
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Jeffrey Lyon wrote: > I've tried taking it to Spamhaus directly on a few occasions but we > continue to get treated like crap. At least this way the public can > see that we have infact acted on the complaints. > > We have found Spamhaus to work well with us. In the bringing we had to prove responsibly but after that they are one of the easier to work with. > Jeff > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote: > > On 18/01/2011 00:38, Jeffrey Lyon wrote: > >> > >> All of this IP space is null routed. The customer has been served with > >> notice to vacate. What more are you asking for? > > > > Summarising other people positions: a functional abuse desk, a less > > defensive attitude when people point out serious abuse going on in your > > network, and the slightest inclination to investigate really serious crap > on > > your network when it's brought to your attention in the clearest terms > > possible. > > > > E&OE > > > > > > Nick > > -- > > p.s. less megaphone diplomacy would help, if you can clean enough egg off > > your face to manage this. > > > > > > > > -- > Jeffrey Lyon, Leadership Team > jeffrey.l...@blacklotus.net | http://www.blacklotus.net > Black Lotus Communications - AS32421 > First and Leading in DDoS Protection Solutions > >
Re: Request Spamhaus contact
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 8:36 PM, William Pitcock wrote: > On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:28:55 -0500 > Jeffrey Lyon wrote: > > > Rhetorical question. Probably PCCW isn't accepting the null routes. > > Why not blacklist them for having messed up communities? > > Why not actually nullroute the IPs instead of depending on BGP tagging? > Again: "ip route 208.64.120.197 255.255.255.255 Null0" > > William > > I prefer ip route 208.64.120.197 255.255.255.255 Null0 tag Serves both purposes well
Clued contact at Brighthouse
Anyone have a way to contact brighthouse network that doesn't end up in residential support? Thanks folks
SOS: Cogent NOC Conact
if there's a Cogent NOC admin here, can you please contact meoff the list. thanks. -mw
Embratel or GVT contact
Is there anyone from GVT or Embratel with a clue willing to help me with a BGP route issue we are seeing? Thanks
