Re: Quakecon: Network Operations Center tour

2015-08-03 Thread Mr Bugs
The WiFi jammers have an interesting MO. They don't throw up static on the
frequency, that would also block their own wifi. They spoof
de-authentication packets. I've been looking for a way to detect this kind
of jamming because my WiFi sucks and I live next to three hotels, what you
get for living in downtown Atlanta.

On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Roland Dobbins  wrote:

> On 4 Aug 2015, at 4:03, mikea wrote:
>
> In the US, the FCC has ruled that wifi jammers violate one or more parts
>> of the FCC Rules and Regs.
>>
>
> I travel quite a bit worldwide, and I've never run into this.  I run my
> portable AP on 5GHz, FWIW.
>
> ---
> Roland Dobbins 
>


Re: Comcast thinks it ok to install public wifi in your house

2014-12-10 Thread Mr Bugs
The technical aside, you could make it opt in and let people who opted in
use the public network free, and charge people not signed up or not even
Comcast customers for profit. This way it makes it feel more like building
a community to the consumer rather than big biz pulling one over on the
little guy.

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:55 PM, Phil Bedard  wrote:

> It won't overlap with the one you are using for yourself on the same
> device.
>
> DOCSIS has service flows with different priorities.  I don't know if they
> are allocating specific channels for it or if it's just a different service
> flow, but either way it is a lower priority and should not cause contention
> with regular user traffic.
>
> Really it is just the power they seem to be complaining about.
>
> Phil
> --
> From: Harald Koch 
> Sent: ‎12/‎10/‎2014 10:21 PM
> To: Mr Bugs 
> Cc: NANOG list 
> Subject: Re: Comcast thinks it ok to install public wifi in your house
>
> On 10 December 2014 at 21:50, Mr Bugs  wrote:
>
> > however they use a separate DOCSIS and 802.11 channel so if would follow
> > that it would be a separate IP tied to comcast corporate and not the
> > subscriber as well as not taking up your bandwidth.
>
>
>
> IIRC there are only three non-overlapping channels on 802.11g and six on
> 802.11n; I can see more networks than that from my basement.
>
> I haven't been keeping up with the technology, but in the ancient of days
> wasn't the uplink side of DOCSIS also a limited-bandwidth, shared resource?
>
> --
> Harald
>


Re: Comcast thinks it ok to install public wifi in your house

2014-12-10 Thread Mr Bugs
Comcast is pushing DOCSIS 3.0 heavily, and the channel allocation and
configuration in DOCSIS 3.0 is much more flexible, allowing speed
configurations by bonding channels. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DOCSIS

But the wifi, this is of course making an already crowded and noisy space
much worse. I live in a high density area with people that have wifi, and
its nearly useless. My devices that can be wired are, my 4G cell is often
faster and more reliable than trying to go 2.4ghz 802.11* on the same cell
phone. 5ghz is pretty empty, and I'm about to move to all Asus EA-N66 wifi
network on 5ghz.

I understand what Comcast is trying to do, but I think it should be an
opt-in type of thing instead.

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Harald Koch  wrote:

> On 10 December 2014 at 21:50, Mr Bugs  wrote:
>
>> however they use a separate DOCSIS and 802.11 channel so if would follow
>> that it would be a separate IP tied to comcast corporate and not the
>> subscriber as well as not taking up your bandwidth.
>
>
>
> IIRC there are only three non-overlapping channels on 802.11g and six on
> 802.11n; I can see more networks than that from my basement.
>
> I haven't been keeping up with the technology, but in the ancient of days
> wasn't the uplink side of DOCSIS also a limited-bandwidth, shared resource?
>
> --
> Harald
>
>


RE: Comcast thinks it ok to install public wifi in your house

2014-12-10 Thread Mr Bugs
Jeroen,

Not that I agree with this practice, I specifically got my own modem
because of this (and to have it directly attached to a real router) ,
however they use a separate DOCSIS and 802.11 channel so if would follow
that it would be a separate IP tied to comcast corporate and not the
subscriber as well as not taking up your bandwidth.
The bandwidth issue seems to be the only thing they can imagine people
being worried about and when you complain its the only thing they talk
about, making sure you know it wont take up any of your speed or quota.