Amazon Prime Video Contact?
Hello, I'm looking to catch someone off list who could look into some issues we're noticing since yesterday evening with some of our residential IP blocks being marked as a VPN or Proxying service. Unfortunately, our old contact for this may no longer be with the company. Alternatively, if anybody has dealt with this more recently and has had success in resolving this issue quickly, I'm all ears! Regards, -- Ryan Gard
Twitter (AS13414) Peering Contact
Afternoon, If there's anybody on the list from Twitter AS13414, if they could contact me off list? Further, if you have contact info outside of the standard peering email, that would be fantastic. We've made a few attempts over the last year give or take to reach out, and unfortunately we've seen nothing but silence in response. Thanks! -- Ryan Gard
Google Scholar Contact?
Hey, Can someone reach out to me off list in regards to Google Scholar? Been dealing with an issue in which a recently acquired IP block appears to have been blacklisted in the past and is impacting end users. Thanks! -- Ryan Gard
Apple Contact
Hello, If someone from Apple could contact me off list. Need to resolve some Geo-location issues. Thanks! -- Ryan Gard
Re: Leasing /22
The biggest problems that start to run with cases of CGN or any other v4 aggregation method are services that still continue to treat single IP addresses as a single entity (a certain event ticket vendor comes to mind). Until these organizations either start opening a line of communications with ISPs, changing their methodology when handling traffic from v4 addresses, and/or deploying v6, the song and dance for v4 addressing will continue. On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 7:57 PM, Lee Howard <l...@asgard.org> wrote: > > > From: Michael Crapse <mich...@wi-fiber.io> > Date: Monday, January 22, 2018 at 5:27 PM > To: Mark Andrews <ma...@isc.org> > Cc: Lee Howard <l...@asgard.org>, NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org> > Subject: Re: Leasing /22 > > > Customers on ps4s and xboxes will hate you. They will always get > "strict" nat, > > and it's your fault not mega corporation X's fault for not releasing > IPv4s > > Maybe. You don’t have to configure strict NAT on your translator (DS-Lite’s > pretty good at this, and although I’m a few weeks away from testing > consoles > through 464xlat and MAP, they should work, too). And their NAT workarounds > are pretty sophisticated now. > > There comes a point when winning your customers’ love isn’t profitable. I > don’t know if that point is $16/address for you, or $30, or $40, or $90. > Maybe it varies, depending on the customer. > > That’s why I suggested in “TCO of CGN”[1] that everyone figure out for > themselves how much money you might lose to unhappy customers via CGN, and > compare it to how much addresses cost, and at what price point you might > turn around and sell addresses. My findings then, based on assumptions that > almost certainly are not true for any particular network, and which may > have > changed, suggest that buying addresses still makes sense. > > > Lee > > [1] http://ipv6.nanog.org/meetings/abstract?id=2025 > > > > > > On 22 January 2018 at 15:23, Mark Andrews <ma...@isc.org> wrote: > >> Add to that CGN from RFC 6598 addresses (100.64/10) + IPv6 though that > >> reaches its limit at ~4M customers. > >> > >> Native IPv4 with a GUA to customers is essentially unavailable for new > >> ISPs. It’s a matter of picking which flavour of NAT you and your > >> customers are going to use. The sooner ALL ISP’s provide IPv6 to their > >> customers the sooner we restore delivering the Internet to the > customers. > >> > >> Mark > >> > >>> > On 23 Jan 2018, at 9:05 am, Lee Howard <l...@asgard.org> wrote: > >>> > > >>> > IPv6 still solves your problem if you add any of NAT64, DS-Lite, > 464xlat, > >>> > MAP-T, MAP-E. > >>> > > >>> > Yes, you’re NATing, but only the traffic to places like Hulu, and it > will > >>> > decrease over time. And while you need addresses for the outside of > the > >>> > translator, you don’t need as many (or to get more as frequently). > >>> > > >>> > Lee > >>> > > >>> > On 1/20/18, 10:20 AM, "NANOG on behalf of Mike Hammett" > >>> > <nanog-boun...@nanog.org on behalf of na...@ics-il.net> wrote: > >>> > > >>>> >> It's not really scraping the bottom of the barrel if your > customers are > >>>> >> using Hulu and they're complaining because Hulu isn't responsive to > >>>> >> fixing their problems (geo-location, v6, etc.). > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> - > >>>> >> Mike Hammett > >>>> >> Intelligent Computing Solutions > >>>> >> http://www.ics-il.com > >>>> >> > >>>> >> Midwest-IX > >>>> >> http://www.midwest-ix.com > >>>> >> > >>>> >> - Original Message - > >>>> >> > >>>> >> From: "Ca By" <cb.li...@gmail.com> > >>>> >> To: "Michael Crapse" <mich...@wi-fiber.io> > >>>> >> Cc: "NANOG list" <nanog@nanog.org> > >>>> >> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 9:54:23 PM > >>>> >> Subject: Re: Leasing /22 > >>>> >> > >>>> >> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 5:48 PM Michael Crapse < > mich...@wi-fiber.io> > >>>> >> wrote: > >>>> >> > >&
Leasing /22
We're on the hunt yet again for an additional /22 to lease, and are wondering what the best options are out there? Our usual suspects that we've reached out to in the past seem to be plum out... Any recommendations? Thanks! -- Ryan Gard
Amazon Contact
Hello, Hoping to chase down a contact off-list for someone who deals with Amazon Instant Video Streaming. Running into an issue with a few blocks being mismarked this morning. Thanks! -- Ryan Gard
Re: Ticketmaster?
No NAT employed in any way, shape or form currently. On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 10:34 PM, Doug Barton <do...@dougbarton.us> wrote: > On 12/02/2017 02:39 PM, Ryan Gard wrote: > >> *Oh, you must be sharing your IP with everyone else in your area* >> > > CGNAT by any chance? > > -- Ryan Gard
Ticketmaster?
Can somebody from ticketmaster contact me off list? These arbitrary blocks are getting ridiculous, and we continue to field a large number of customer complaints from this. Also not impressed with front end customer support continuing to lay blame at the service provider's feet and spread misinformation to end users so they walk away washing their hands for a situation created by ticketmaster (*Oh, you must be sharing your IP with everyone else in your area*) Secondly, if anybody's had luck actually waking somebody up with some sort of sway or pull at ticketmaster, shoot me a line off list if you could. I'd be eternally grateful. Thanks! -- Ryan Gard
Re: Private Link between TOR and CHI
Just an update -- We've sourced a solution and have moved forward with it. Thanks for all the replies with vendors -- It definitely helped with the sourcing process to find vendors that service both locales :) On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Ryan Gard <ryang...@gmail.com> wrote: > Trying to source some cost effective solutions or vendors that could > provide connectivity in this scenario. Essentially I'll be looking to > expand presence into Chicago, and as such, will need to source a third > party to provide connectivity from 151 Front Street in Toronto to 350 > Cermak in Chicago. Specifically, we're looking to build a presence in > Chicago to pursue peering agreements with other providers at 350 Cermak. > > If you're aware of any providers that would be able to provide this > connectivity, that would be perfect. > > Thanks! > > -- > Ryan Gard > -- Ryan Gard
Private Link between TOR and CHI
Trying to source some cost effective solutions or vendors that could provide connectivity in this scenario. Essentially I'll be looking to expand presence into Chicago, and as such, will need to source a third party to provide connectivity from 151 Front Street in Toronto to 350 Cermak in Chicago. Specifically, we're looking to build a presence in Chicago to pursue peering agreements with other providers at 350 Cermak. If you're aware of any providers that would be able to provide this connectivity, that would be perfect. Thanks! -- Ryan Gard
Rogers Peering Request
Looking for a Rogers contact to get things moving on a peering request. Been trying to shout into their ear for well over a month, and haven't heard anything back. Further, PeeringDB information seems egregiously outdated as the URLs listed no longer are serviceable. Hoping this is the last ditch effort to wake somebody up in the red tower. Thanks! -- Ryan Gard
Re: Netflix NOC? VPN Mismarked?
To offer some closure on this, after digging up the NOC contact and sending them a lengthy eMail detailing the issue and the ip blocks in question, they were quick to resolve the issue and get the clients up and rolling again. Thanks again for everyone's insight. On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: > Use cdnet...@netflix.com > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 10:32 PM, Ryan Gard <ryang...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hey, >> >> Per chance if someone @ Netflix could reach me off list? Seems that as of >> this weekend there's a number of our clients (residential internet) who >> are >> unable to utilize Netflix directly, instead being presented with a message >> advising them they're using a VPN service... Have a feeling that our IP >> blocks were lumped in with someone somehow... >> >> Thanks! >> >> -- >> Ryan Gard >> > > -- Ryan Gard
Ticketmaster Blocking IPs?
Hello folks, I'm grasping a bit at straws here, and really hope maybe somebody has some knowledge that may assist in getting an answer where we've been met with silence. We're a small isp who unfortunately is dealing with our entire range of IP blocks being restricted on what appears to be a permanent basis from TicketMaster's services. We've attempted all avenues available to reach out to them, between their NOC contact and their... client support contacts... to no avail. Unfortunately, the ones caught out in the cold at this point have been the end users who as a result cannot utilize Ticketmaster... I'm hoping someone can offer some insight if they've been down this path before, or further, if you're from Ticketmaster, contact me off list to trade coordinates so we can resolve this quickly. Thanks! -- Ryan Gard
Netflix NOC? VPN Mismarked?
Hey, Per chance if someone @ Netflix could reach me off list? Seems that as of this weekend there's a number of our clients (residential internet) who are unable to utilize Netflix directly, instead being presented with a message advising them they're using a VPN service... Have a feeling that our IP blocks were lumped in with someone somehow... Thanks! -- Ryan Gard
Re: FTTH and DSLAM Access Vendors
I would definitely find any information on this quite useful. I've had clients try to make this very comparison in the past, and it can become quite tedious when dealing with sales staff from 6 different companies who want to sell you something, while not explaining further as to why their platform is better than 'xyz' On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Colton Conor colton.co...@gmail.com wrote: I am looking for comparisons between the following FTTH GPON and VDSL2 access platforms. Has anyone recently compared the capabilities of each of these platforms? Alcatel-Lucent 7360 ISAM Adtran Total Access 5000 Calix E7 Cisco ME4600 Huawei MA5600T Zhone MXK They all look great on paper, but there has to be some key differences other than price. Besides the vendors listed above, is there anyone else in this market? -- Ryan Gard
Re: ADVANCE WARNING: Google moving to 2048-bit SSL and root keys
From what it looks like, I'd assume they'll be sticking with a CA that has a 2048 bit certificate as well. Seems they also put a sandbox for testing together. That being said, they won't confirm or deny whether or not they'll be using the same CA as they have in the sandbox... https://cert-test.sandbox.google.com/ On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Jimmy Hess mysi...@gmail.com wrote: On 5/24/13, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote: Hm.. this might be no big deal if not for public key pinning and CA pinning in modern browsers of certain sites, they could just get themselves 2048 bit certificates from any CA... So what could otherwise be a routine certificate change, may have some unusual extra baggage attached to it -- requiring end users performing software code update in their only slightly outdated browsers, instead of just switching certificates, so they stop getting big red SSL errors when trying to perform searches via Google... Via PRIVACY Forum: - Forwarded Message - From: PRIVACY Forum mailing list priv...@vortex.com Google moving to longer SSL keys http://j.mp/10YAWaC (Google Online Security Blog) -- -JH -- Ryan Gard
Re: What hath god wrought?
Smells more like a honeypot than anything. Now that this guy's clearly decided to open his mouth and claim he's got the green light from the Fed, I wouldn't be surprised if they change their mind. On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Phil Fagan philfa...@gmail.com wrote: HAH! Thats pretty funnythe tinfoil piece. On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:13 AM, jim deleskie deles...@gmail.com wrote: Maybe my tinfoil isn't on tight enough, or maybe I give to much credit to a gov't, or perhaps I'm just feeding the trolls, but I have a very hard time believing that DHS, launched a DoS from their own machines. -jim On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 12:18 PM, David Conrad d...@virtualized.org wrote: On May 20, 2013, at 9:56 PM, Jay Farrell jay...@jayfar.com wrote: Are you certain it was a DoS attempt? And if you were certain, are you certain the folks at DHS were aware their machine(s) were engaged in a DoS attack? You can find zombies in the oddest places... Regards, -drc -- Phil Fagan Denver, CO 970-480-7618 -- Ryan Gard
Re: High throughput bgp links using gentoo + stipped kernel
Do you have a source on this? Reason I ask is because any recent documentation I've come across indicates that polling is recommended to reduce chances of livelock on a running system. On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Eduardo Schoedler lis...@esds.com.brwrote: 2013/5/19 Andrew Jones a...@jonesy.com.au As for migration to another OS, I find FreeBSD better as a matter of network performance. The last time I checked OpenBSD was either lacking or was in the early stages of multiple cores support. If you do decide to go the FreeBSD route (you can run openbgpd on FreeBSD if you like), check out the POLLING option on ethernet NICs, it cuts down on the number of interrupts and can increase performance, particularly when dealing with smaller packets. Polling on FreeBSD in modern NICs is discouraged. -- Eduardo Schoedler -- Ryan Gard
Re: looking for documents describing frequent causes for line cuts
Here's one I came across from Southern Telecom that seems to give some hard numbers on incidents they've experienced with their fibre lines being severed. Hope this is useful for your needs. Link: http://www.southern-telecom.com/AFL%20Reliability.pdf On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 5:03 AM, Kyle Creyts kyle.cre...@gmail.com wrote: thanks! also amusing: http://blog.lafayetteprofiber.com/2008/06/nutria-ratsand-fiber.html http://news.techeye.net/internet/internet-attacked-by-bears#.TnZXk5rhOv8.reddit but I'm looking for something slightly more efficacious than anecdotal. off-list replies (and, why not, some of them are really funny) anecdotes are welcome. On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 8:00 PM, staticsafe m...@staticsafe.ca wrote: On 5/17/2013 22:16, Kyle Creyts wrote: has anyone come by documents containing some statistics regarding leading causes for cuts in fiber, power, cable lines? I seem to remember one which included % cuts due to equipment failure, maintenance, weather, rodents, boring, car accidents, etc. but alas, I cannot find it in my archives. On an amusing note: http://blog.level3.com/level-3-network/the-10-most-bizarre-and-annoying-causes-of-fiber-cuts/ -- staticsafe O ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org Please don't top post - http://goo.gl/YrmAb Don't CC me! I'm subscribed to whatever list I just posted on. -- Kyle Creyts Information Assurance Professional BSidesDetroit Organizer -- Ryan Gard
