Fw: new message

[Ryan Shea]

Hey!

 

New message, please read <http://preview.onnet.edu.vn/account.php?3kq>

 

Ryan Shea

[no subject]

[Ryan Shea via NANOG]

This post was from a subscriber whose From: address domain has a DMARC
policy of reject or quarantine. The NANOG mailing list has
automatically wrapped this message to prevent other subscribers mail
systems from rejecting it.--- Begin Message ---
Manually setting up and parsing email notifications for security
vulnerabilities for all vendors is mighty annoying. It looks like the ICASI
CVRF  Working Group thought the same thing back
in 2011 when they came up with this handy XML schema. I had not known of
this until yesterday and noticed that Cisco does a good job
 posting their
vulnerabilities in CVRF. Word on the streets is that Juniper
 was at least
partially involved in CVRF as well. Brocade may have looked into it as well.

This does not seem like a difficult thing for vendors to do, but the
missing piece may be customer interest. I am hoping to drum up some
interest here -- maybe a few support requests would entice them to hand
this off to an intern and we could collectively do better at managing
vendor notifications. A tool  to
parse CVRF is already floating about as well (mschiffm).
--- End Message ---

Re: Best US Tunnelbroker for Youtube

[Ryan Shea]

FWIW, loading up a lovely 1080p video now at a time when I am guessing the
HE/VZ links are running a little more hot than not and I'm getting perfect
playback and nload is showing that I hit a max of 67.9Mb/s on my tunnel. I
have not tested with _all_ full hd cat videos, but that sounds like a good
challenge for tonight.


On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Christopher Morrow  wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Christopher Morrow
>  wrote:
> > i have this: yt_
>
> funny... part of the filename disappeared here :(
>   ./yt_troubleshooting.py
>
> >
> > that I should add to a code.google.com location... and will ship you a
> > copy tomorrow of as well. Running this on my home fios + he-tunnel
> > bits now to see what result come out.
> >
> > I'd report that the YT homepage seems to be 'super slow' loading and
> > that when I stream:
> >  (was on the YT homepage
> > as a featured video.. though I am a sucker for the song)
> >
> > I seem to stream from:  2607:f8b0:400d:c06::81
> > qh-in-x81.1e100.net.
> >
>
> apologies, if I change the 720p I start streaming from:
>   2607:f8b0:4004:1b::6
>
> which is much closer to verizon-land, so my packets go:
>   me -> verizon -> he -> google -> he -> verizon -> me
>
> I'm betting that in one direction or the other the he/verizon links
> are no-bueno :(
>

Re: Best US Tunnelbroker for Youtube

[Ryan Shea]

Sorry, I wasn't clear. When my tunnel is not functioning correctly my end
hosts still have global v6 addresses and a route. The v6 tcp connections
would fail entirely, so v4 would handily win a tcp setup race. A v4-only
client does not experience huge delays in video loading. I'm not sure happy
eyeballs is implemented in Android.


On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Daniel Roesen  wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 01:26:37PM -0400, Ryan Shea wrote:
> > video loading takes frever on Android/Chromecast/GoogleTV
> > (which hints that happy eyeballs, if it exists for Android, isn't
> > working so well for the YouTube app).
>
> Happy Eyeballs is only about TCP session setup race, not how the
> established session performs. Normally with bias (headstart) for IPv6,
> sometimes (Apple) egoistic and reckless without.
>
> Best regards,
> Daniel
>
> --
> CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: d...@cluenet.de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
>

Re: Best US Tunnelbroker for Youtube

[Ryan Shea]

I was attempting to determine the lowest-time-cost path to "happy wife". My
candidate paths are "kill v6", "sixxs", "routinghouse" and I was looking
for anecdotes that might lead me to test one over another.

Yes there are better operational approaches if I ditch the "happy wife" &&
low-cost (time) concerns, but it certainly seems that the problem of
reliable high-quality video streams is more complex than a
traceroute/tcpdump are going to indicate. Where is the wireshark button my
Chromecast? What is the PoP I am using for this particular video versus
another? Is this request filled from Google Global Cache or not? I am
choosing not to tilt at these particular windmills.

There are not Amazon reviews for tunnel brokers, so yes, I come to an
operator mailing list.


On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Jeroen Massar  wrote:

> On 2014-08-20 16:55, Ryan Shea wrote:
> > Just one man's experience, but my YouTube performance over my Hurricane
> > Electric tunnel has been strikingly poor lately
>
> Instead of saying that something is "poor", you might want to do the
> operational/technical[1] thing and include things like:
>  - IPv4 traceroute from your endpoint to the PoP you are using
>  - IPv6 traceroute over the tunnel to the destination that is "poor"
>
> And depending on things tcpdump/wireshark might be an amazing tool too.
>
> There are apparently some US ISPs who are throttling protocol-41 btw,
> which might actually be what your problem is.
>
> Only data will tell though.
>
> I am fairly sure that bringing problems with HE up to them directly or
> at least on their forums instead of a mailinglist for Network
> Operators[1] will get you better results...
>
> > - so much so that I was
> > thinking of squashing v6 in my house entirely. Looking for your
> > experiences/thoughts on whether cutting over to SixXS or Routinghouse
> could
> > be a path to 1080p cat video bliss instead.
>
> For SixXS it all depends on which ISP network you are located in and
> what PoP you select. If you are west-coast, at the moment, you will
> likely not get the best performance as there are no PoPs in that area
> and thus you would have to cut through the country.
>
>
> But more importantly: did you consider asking your ISP for native IPv6?
>
> Greets,
>  Jeroen
>
>
> [1] https://www.nanog.org/list
>
>

Multi-Vendor Configuration Pusher

[Ryan Shea]

I have a chunk of code for a multi-vendor configuration push tool under the
Apache 2.0
license. Some of you may be interested.

https://code.google.com/p/ldpush/

This is an easily extensible framework on top of paramiko and pexpect in
Python for distributing configuration to (or running commands on) devices.
Currently we have the following vendor targets:

  * aruba
  * brocade
  * cisconx
  * ciscoxr
  * hp (procurve)
  * ios
  * junos
  * generic ssh

I have a thin wrapper around these vendor implementations which allows for
threaded pushes and a couple small operational conveniences, but would
appreciate any feedback  and
testing. Please treat this as you would any *new* code -- do not consider
it production quality. This project and Capirca
 go together like beans and cornbread,
if you're into that sort of thing.

Thanks,
Ryan

Re: A bit of historical news

[Ryan Shea]

I believe they plan on spelling IPv6 slightly differently than we do, C-G-N

http://www22.verizon.com/Support/Residential/internet/highspeed/networking/troubleshooting/portforwarding/123897.htm


On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:01 AM, David Hubbard <
dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com> wrote:

> Not holding my breath on that; been complaining to my VZ
> rep for v6 on fios for two years now since we have it in
> several remote locations and the most he could find for
> me as of last month was:
>
> "Verizon's First Office Application (FOA) is planned for
> deployment in Tampa, FL in May of 2012. During this time,
> Verizon will establish Dual Stack support on two E320
> Gateway routers and 200 FiOS customers will be installed
> with IPv6 enabled BHRs.
>
> As far as I can tell, this never occurred so we seem to
> be a year late."
>
> David
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ryan Shea [mailto:ryans...@google.com]
> > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 8:55 AM
> > To: Justin M. Streiner
> > Cc: nanog list
> > Subject: Re: A bit of historical news
> >
> > +1 to v6 on FiOS, I'd also add "make the YouTube work" to my
> > wish list for
> > the artist formerly known as 19262.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Justin M. Streiner
> >  > > wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 30 May 2013, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > http://www.cidr-report.org/**cgi-bin/as-report?as=**AS19262vie
> > w=2.0<http://www.cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/as-report?as=AS19262view=2.0>
> > >>
> > >> note the list of 'withdrawn' ... err, 19262 is no more? now it's
> > >> borged into the 701 confed?
> > >>
> > >
> > > Yay!  Now if I can just get VZ to light up native v6 on my fios
> > > connection... ;)
> > >
> > > jms
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

Re: A bit of historical news

[Ryan Shea]

+1 to v6 on FiOS, I'd also add "make the YouTube work" to my wish list for
the artist formerly known as 19262.


On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Justin M. Streiner  wrote:

> On Thu, 30 May 2013, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>
>  
> http://www.cidr-report.org/**cgi-bin/as-report?as=**AS19262view=2.0
>>
>> note the list of 'withdrawn' ... err, 19262 is no more? now it's
>> borged into the 701 confed?
>>
>
> Yay!  Now if I can just get VZ to light up native v6 on my fios
> connection... ;)
>
> jms
>
>

Re: Router Assessment Tool

[Ryan Shea]

I think it is actually Router Audit Tool rather than assessment no? I'm not
sure that NMAP is an appropriate substitute for for a configuration audit
tool, but it's not a bad idea to do some accounting of what ports are open
for business on your devices. I have had some limited success with RAT at
prior jobs, and in fact at UUNet/VzB, but IIRC it really was not a tool
which could be readily used to build new audit rules. Although it is an
okay starting point for some generic audits, you may be best served by
rolling your own, which is what I did there.

On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Christopher Morrow
wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Green, Timothy
>  wrote:
> > Happy New Year All!!!
> >
> > I'm trying to perform STIG compliancy on various Cisco equipment.  Has
> anybody used the Router Assessment Tool (RAT) for routers and switches?
> Any cheap (free) recommendations?  As a last ditch effort I could use NMAP.
> >
>
> uunet did for a time use a variant of RAT... you may get some mileage
> asking George Jones about it.
>
>

Re: CISCO IOS 12.x Virtual Switch

[Ryan Shea]

Ask your Cisco SE about IOU licensing and its capabilities regarding
switching. You can do some limited switch lab work with dynamips and an
NM-16-ESW though.
On Jul 20, 2011 12:08 PM, "Daniel Espejel" 
wrote:
>
> Hello list!.
>
> I want to virtualize a CISCO Switch with CISCO IOS 12.x to perform some
> test on its RA-Guard implementation. By searching over Internet I've
> found that its possible to virtualize some devices such as routers using
> GSN3 and a CISCO IOS image. Is it possible to do something like this but
> for a switch instead of a router?.
>
> Or does anyone have any suggestions in order to test CISCO's RA-Guard
> (or another implementation)??
>
> Best regards.
>
> --
> Daniel Espejel Perez
>
>
> _
> NANOG mailing list
> NANOG@nanog.org
> https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
_
NANOG mailing list
NANOG@nanog.org
https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog

Re: Securing Border Routers

[Ryan Shea]

A stateful firewall outside of your router may create a new bottleneck which
increases your risk of DoS. Making sure that you know (and document, and
test) how to effectively contact your service providers should you be
attacked would be a good idea. Find out if your service providers have BGP
communities for remote triggered black hole (document and test). A denial of
service will break the weakest link in the chain toward your services, so
make sure you have appropriate bandwidth, a reasonable server architecture,
and if you have money to burn consider a DDoS mitigation service.

-Ryan

On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Brandon Kim wrote:

>
> Gents:
>
> What measures do you take to protect your border routers? Our routers are
> running BGP so I'm interested
> if there is any way to secure them without interfering with BGP? Is it
> normal to put a firewall in front of the
> border routers?
>
> I'm concerned about DDOS attacks mainlyalthough we haven't had any, I
> don't welcome them.
>
> Brandon
>
>
>
>
>

Re: Network Simulators

[Ryan Shea]

You can do some switching by stuffing a virtual NM-16ESW into your
faketastic 3660 in Dynamips. Then there are the built-in frame-relay and
ethernet switches you could dump into the mix as well.

-Ryan

On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Brandon Kim wrote:

>
> James:
>
> I've been resisting GNS3 for the longest time, because I like real
> equipment and to get my hands a little dirty.
> But for the purpose of simulation, GNS3 helped me identify a BGP issue last
> week. If it weren't for GNS3,
> I would not have been able to figure it out.
>
> I will be using GNS3 in the future now for as much I can. Remember it is
> more router oriented than switch.
>
> So you can't do any fancy L3 switching..
>
>
>
> > Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 10:05:21 -0500
> > From: ja...@freedomnet.co.nz
> > To: nanog@nanog.org
> > Subject: Re: Network Simulators
> >
> > So far GNS3 has won out so far. It seems to work on my Mac fairly well.
> > trying it out now.
> >
> > On 17/01/11 9:37 AM, Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo wrote:
> > > I am currently researching virtual simulation environments for the
> > > Networking courses that I teach. I am now interested in user-mode
> > > linux emulators as they provide more real environments.
> > >
> > > The one that I am liking the most right now is this one:
> > > http://wiki.netkit.org/index.php/Main_Page
> > >
> > > regards
> > >
> > > Carlos
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Arturo Servin<
> arturo.ser...@gmail.com>  wrote:
> > >> GNS3
> > >> http://www.gns3.net/
> > >>
> > >> This is another network simulator, mainly for academic
> research.
> > >>
> > >> NS-2
> > >> http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/
> > >>
> > >> And you can always setup some virtual machines with DNSs,
> hosts and routers with open-source software.
> > >>
> > >> regards,
> > >> -as
> > >>
> > >> On 17 Jan 2011, at 11:58, James Jones wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Are there any good Network Simulators/Trainers out there that support
> IPv6? I want play around with some IPv6 setup.
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> James Jones
> > >>> +1-413-667-9199 
> > >>> ja...@freedomnet.co.nz
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>

Re: Specific Network Querying

[Ryan Shea]

You may want to look at Capirca (http://code.google.com/p/capirca/) for
creating policy files from which to generate your firewall rulesets. I am
not aware of a simple categorization of netblocks. My first thought is that
an agreement with every RIR for bulk whois data and writing code to parse /
categorize would be quite difficult and may not get you a reasonable result
after all that work - maybe there is something commercially available.

-Ryan

On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 9:01 AM, J. Oquendo  wrote:

>
> Good morning and happy holidays all. I'm in the process of creating an
> automated filtering application and would like to know if anyone can
> point me to the right place. I'd like to be able to query a
> site/db/etc., and pull out specific netblocks to create fw rules. Since
> IP space is always changing, it would be helpful if my queries can be
> tailored to something like:
>
> wget site | Parse IP space | grep Company | create rule
>
> Or:
>
> wget site | Parse IP space | grep {EDU_IP_SPACE,MIL_SPACE,GOV_SPACE} |
> create rule
>
> Follow?
>
> Right now I am using potaroo with something like :
>
> wget -qO -
> http://bgp.potaroo.net/ipv4-stats/allocated-{apnic.html,ripe.html, etc}
>
> But this just gives me entire blocks, not who is behind them. Is there
> any site I could use to query specifics? E.g., for a gov client: wget
> -qO - this.site.org | grep "\.gov" | parse_with_awk '{print "fw_rule"}'
>
> Thanks in advance and Happy New Year to everyone.
>
>
> --
>
> =+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
> J. Oquendo
> SGFA, SGFE, C|EH, CNDA, CHFI, OSCP, CPT
>
> "It takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to
> ruin it. If you think about that, you'll do things
> differently." - Warren Buffett
>
> 227C 5D35 7DCB 0893 95AA  4771 1DCE 1FD1 5CCD 6B5E
> http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x5CCD6B5E
>
>
>

Re: Request : Yahoo contact

[Ryan Shea]

Jeff I had the same situation last week. Yahoo! was nice enough to send a
survey after ignoring my questions and concerns. It may be interesting to
others (or at least me) how you fare in your adventure to get removed from
their blacklist.

-Ryan

On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Jeff Archambeau <
jarchamb...@core3solutions.com> wrote:

> I am having an email issue with yahoo's email blacklists and their
> auto-responses have been less than helpful.  If there is a yahoo mail
> administrator on this list, would you please contact me off-list so we can
> discuss the issue and help me resolve this?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Jeff Archambeau
> Core3 Solutions LLC
> jarchamb...@core3solutions.com
>
> Technology: Undivided
> www.core3solutions.com
> 248.530.1001 (Ext. 108) :: Office
> 248.498.6098 :: Fax
> 248.530.1001 :: Helpdesk
>
>

Re: AT&T Dry Pairs?

[Ryan Shea]

Years ago I managed to get a dry pair from Verizon for some homebrew DSL,
but there was some telco specific term for the dry pair, like "series 7
alarm circuit" or something. AT&T may have their own term.

-Ryan

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Brandon Galbraith <
brandon.galbra...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Has anyone had any luck lately getting dry pairs from AT&T? I'm in the
> Chicago area attempting to get a dry pair between two buildings (100ft
> apart) for some equipment, but when speaking to several folks at AT&T the
> response I get is "You want AT&T service without the service? That's not
> logical!". Had no problems 3-4 years ago getting these sorts of "circuits",
> but it appears it's gone the way of the dodo now. Any emails off-list are
> appreciated.
>
> --
> Brandon Galbraith
> US Voice: 630.492.0464
>

Re: IPv6 tunnel brokers that provide BGP other than HE?

[Ryan Shea]

Maybe I am not clear, but without being able to detect when the 6in4 tunnel
goes away, how does a second tunnel provide useful redundancy?

-Ryan

On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Jack Carrozzo  wrote:

> OCCAID has been doing this for a while but I don't see anything on their
> site about it. Might try contacting them.
>
> -Jack Carrozzo
>
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Owen DeLong  wrote:
>
> > Not a complete solution, but, you could always do a second HE tunnel to a
> > different site for at least
> > some level of redundancy.
> >
> > Owen
> >
> > On Sep 21, 2010, at 7:12 AM, Matthew Huff wrote:
> >
> > > Neither of our upstream providers offer direct ipv6 although both claim
> > deployment in Q1 2011. In the meantime, we have a tunnel with BGP to HE
> > announcing our /48, but we are looking for redundancy. Is there anyone
> else
> > out there offering services like Hurricane Electric?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 
> > > Matthew Huff   | One Manhattanville Rd
> > > OTA Management LLC | Purchase, NY 10577
> > > http://www.ox.com  | Phone: 914-460-4039
> > > aim: matthewbhuff  | Fax:   914-460-4139
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>

Re: Reverse traceroute and spoofing of sources of packets?

[Ryan Shea]

According to the presentation they were planning on releasing a
downloadable tool by May 2009, but in searching around I found no
evidence that this was ever released.

-Ryan

On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Christopher Morrow
 wrote:
>
> I missed this meeting/preso when it happened (yes, 5+ meetings ago)
>
> 
>
> I note the talks about using spoofed source packets to do some
> measurement, I didn't see anyone in the video say: "But spoofing is
> bad, but you want YOU to be able to do this? what? isn't that a little
> hypocritical?"
>
> Isn't it? and why would someone (an isp) disable BCP38 for this sort
> of activity?
>
> -Chris
>

Re: Looking Glass

[Ryan Shea]

*Install quagga and rancid

sudo apt-get install rancid rancid-cgi quagga


*Enable bgpd in /etc/quagga/daemons

*Hook up your Quagga.conf with all the fun bgp configuration bits. Search on
the intarwebs or man pages for configuration details.

*Set up a user with vtysh as their shell.

*Set up the rancid cloginrc file with the login stuff for your quagga router
using the user with vtysh access. To Randy's point, it can certainly do
ssh... but Rancid certainly uses "some abhorrent language's libraries".

*Edit the configuration for the looking glass CGI /etc/rancid/lg.conf

*Tweak out the CGI to be less horrible.

*Profit.

-Ryan

On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Nathan Stratton  wrote:

>
> On Tue, 7 Sep 2010, Jack Carrozzo wrote:
>
>  FWIW Quagga works fine as a looking glass if you don't mind the telnet
>> interface. Though, if you really want ssh, you could make a user on the
>> machine whose login script runs 'vtysh' and logs out on exit, however it's
>> admittedly less elegant.
>>
>
> Anyone know of a good http looking glass that works with quagga?
>
>  <>
>>
> Nathan StrattonCTO, BlinkMind, Inc.
> nathan at robotics.net nathan at blinkmind.com
> http://www.robotics.nethttp://www.blinkmind.com
>
>

Re: Looking Glass

[Ryan Shea]

The rancid package includes a perl based looking glass CGI thing.  You may
want to look at that and modify it to suit your needs.

-Ryan

On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:29 AM, James Bensley  wrote:

> Hmm, Google says you could use http://www.zebra.org/ to set your box
> up as a route, and then you can just view the routes from there?
>
> Or look here; http://www.bgp4.as/tools
>
> --
> Regards,
> James.
>
> http://www.jamesbensley.co.cc/
>
> There are 10 kinds of people in the world; Those who understand
> Vigesimal, and J others...?
>
>

Re: IPv6 Glue Records at Dotster / Domain.com

[Ryan Shea]

Hmm, transaction id, security code, a 21 minute hold time with GoDaddy, and
two dozen Danica Patrick pictures and I am quickly realizing that this glue
is going to be much more costly than the ~$8 transfer fee.

-Ryan

On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 1:47 AM, Lou Katz  wrote:

> On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 11:39:07AM -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> > On 9/5/2010 11:17, Joseph C. Bender wrote:
> > >
> > > Perhaps economic pressure will be a good enough reason for the
> > > registrars to actually get moving and make progress with better
> support.
> > >  OpenSRS kept my business because they at least have a mechanism for
> > > handling glue, albeit not an automated one.
> > >
> >
> > Ah, that's good to know. I have a handful of domains through OpenSRS and
> > in the past they have not been responsive to IPv6 glue inquires. I'll
> > give them another go around.
> >
> > ~Seth
>
> It only took me one or two E-mails to OpenSRS to get the glue records done.
> (But - Disclosure - I am an OpenSRS Reseller). Response was polite, but not
> super swift, but I was not in a hurry.
> --
>
> -=[L]=-
> Sent from the luminiferous aether
>
> Contact me if you do not receive this message.
>
>

Re: IPv6 Glue Records at Dotster / Domain.com

[Ryan Shea]

Righto, perhaps it's not kooky.  Despite the admittedly small demand,
it just seems such a trivial "feature" to have to jump through
administrative hoops of swapping registrars for. I'll do what I need to do,
but of course if there is a way to make the magic happen without the pain
that is great :)

-Ryan

On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Seth Mattinen  wrote:

> On 9/4/10 6:35 AM, Ryan Shea wrote:
> > Anyone with a contact at Doster with the ability to make things happen?
> > Apparently they do not support v6 glue records and they have been
> > unresponsive to my ticket. This seems a kooky reason to change
> registrars.
> >
> > The table of registrars over at sixxs who have at least some way to get
> v6
> > glue records has been getting greener and greener, but no love from
> Dotster.
> > http://www.sixxs.net/faq/dns/?faq=ipv6glue
> >
>
> It's not kooky at all. If you need a service your current provider
> can't/won't provide, then find a new one that will.
>
> ~Seth
>
>

IPv6 Glue Records at Dotster / Domain.com

[Ryan Shea]

Anyone with a contact at Doster with the ability to make things happen?
Apparently they do not support v6 glue records and they have been
unresponsive to my ticket. This seems a kooky reason to change registrars.

The table of registrars over at sixxs who have at least some way to get v6
glue records has been getting greener and greener, but no love from Dotster.
http://www.sixxs.net/faq/dns/?faq=ipv6glue

-Ryan