Re: Marriott wifi blocking
On 4 Oct 2014, at 12:35, Michael Thomas wrote: On 10/04/2014 10:23 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote: So I work in a small office in a building that has many enterprise wifi's I can see whether I like it or not. What if one of them decided that our wifi was rogue and started trying to stamp it out? It happens daily. We have 22 offices around the world, each in downtown towers. We use Cisco WLCs, and those controllers see constant deauth frames coming from people above us, below us, and from the four sides around us. It is a real battle. The only thing to do is use lots of APs in the office so as to keep the power levels down. In a couple of cases our office managers personally visited the offices of people above, below, and across from us and discussed the problem. It helped. Mike, this seems like it might be a universally bad idea... It isn't a bad idea, as we need to protect our corporate networks. But there are unintended consequences, to be sure.
Re: [NANOG] Microsoft.com PMTUD black hole?
On 7-May-2008, at 17:07:06, Deepak Jain wrote: Many non-SP IT folks think they understand TCP, grudgingly accept UDP for DNS from external sources and think everything else is bollocks. Many *might* have a fit if they saw Microsoft accepting ICMPs because that seems inconsistent with their knowledge of turn- the-knob network security. To their view, their Linksys/Netgear/ whathaveyou COTS firewalls block everything too. I don't think I'm exaggerating here. No, you are not. I have seen the same from firewall engineers at large companies, people who, supposedly, have done network security for years. Even after showing them numerous Web sites detailing current best practices, especially Rob Thomas's fine site, these folks would not change their practices. Some days it is hard to not give in to the I give up feelings. ___ NANOG mailing list NANOG@nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
