Re: Ghosts in our 6 New Ubiquity Pros - provision issues.

2015-06-19 Thread Sam Tetherow
The IP can change on the UniFi without having to re-adopt or 
re-provision.  APs are identified by MAC address at the UniFi protocol 
level (not layer 2).


On 06/19/2015 09:09 AM, Naslund, Steve wrote:

Here is another though.  If your APs are re-provisioning every eight hours, 
what is your DHCP lease time?  Are you sure the APs are able to renew their 
leases (if not, could your scope be full)?  Do you see the IP addresses on the 
APs changing when they come back up?  These could indicate a DHCP server issue. 
 If the AP gets a new IP address it will likely have to be re-adopted to the 
controller.  You might want to static address one or more APs to test this 
theory.

Steven Naslund
Chicago IL




Re: Ghosts in our 6 New Ubiquity Pros - provision issues.

2015-06-19 Thread Sam Tetherow
Only have 1 Pro on my network and it hasn't given me any issues, several 
of the original AP and AP-LR as well without issues.


What is the uptime on the AP?  You should be able to ssh into the APs 
using the controller username and password.  It is a linux base so 
'uptime' will tell you.  You can also check for ethernet errors using 
'ip -s link' on the AP side.


On 06/19/2015 11:45 AM, Bob Evans wrote:

We have all APs set with static addresses. EdgeMax only hands out IPs to
clients using the APs.

This happens when people are using the APs and when no one is even in the
building  at 2am when there are no clients connected. It can happen to one
then 5 hours later it happens again...then doesn't happen again for 12
hours. Totally random no interval.

It is nice to know that others have no issues with these UniFi AP Pros.
They seem to be fine except for the 2 mins or so they randomly drop link
and reboot themselves. All are on APC UPSes and other devices in the same
switch , like voip phones, never drop the ports.

They are all new, delivered in various batches over time. We checked and
all are the latest versions.

Bob Evans





The IP can change on the UniFi without having to re-adopt or
re-provision.  APs are identified by MAC address at the UniFi protocol
level (not layer 2).

On 06/19/2015 09:09 AM, Naslund, Steve wrote:

Here is another though.  If your APs are re-provisioning every eight
hours, what is your DHCP lease time?  Are you sure the APs are able to
renew their leases (if not, could your scope be full)?  Do you see the
IP addresses on the APs changing when they come back up?  These could
indicate a DHCP server issue.  If the AP gets a new IP address it will
likely have to be re-adopted to the controller.  You might want to
static address one or more APs to test this theory.

Steven Naslund
Chicago IL








Re: FCC form 477 geocoding

2015-03-03 Thread Sam Tetherow

Address to lat/lng using google api
http://maps.googleapis.com/maps/api/geocode/json?address=$addresssensor=true

Lat/Lng to Census Block via FCC
http://data.fcc.gov/api/block/2010/find?latitude=$latitudelongitude=$longitudeshowall=trueformat=JSON


On 03/03/2015 05:06 PM, Jay Hennigan wrote:

On 3/3/15 14:59, Josh Luthman wrote:

Well you'll need to translate those into addresses.  That should be easy
with Google or Bing.

We have the addresses, need census tract and block.


--
Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - j...@impulse.net
Impulse Internet Service  -  http://www.impulse.net/
Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV




Re: [tor-talk] William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if you can.

2012-11-30 Thread Sam Tetherow

On 11/30/2012 03:30 PM, Naslund, Steve wrote:

WAIT A SECOND HERE!?!?

I just read below that this guy runs a large ISP in Austria.  I thought
his Tor node was hosted with an external provider.  If he runs the ISP,
why would he not host his own server in house?  I suppose there are
reasons but I can't think of one, especially if you feel so strongly
about this being your right.

He talks about moving it to another ISP in the article interviewing him.
How about moving it to the large ISP you run?

If he runs a large ISP he must not be very good at it if he needs our
donations to help him defend himself from a crime he has not been
charged with yet.  Most of the guys I know that run large ISPs have
legal guys available to them.  They could also come up with 1EUR if
necessary.

What is he going to do with this money if no charges are filed and they
give his gear back?  If he believes that he is innocent of any crime
then he should be confident they won't find anything to charge him with,
right?


If convicted i could face up to 6 years in jail, of course i do not
want that and i also want to try to set a legal base for running Tor
exit nodes in Austria or even the EU.


Six years in jail for what?  They didn't arrest you yet.  How do you
know what the charges are?  The cops must not be too worried about the
Tor node if they did not seize it.  They seem a lot more interested in
his personal storage devices.  He seems to have a lot of data at home,
not illegal (possibly) but I am wondering what it all might be.  The
cops have a lot of looking around ahead of them.  Seems awful worried
for a guy who claims to be innocent.  I am wondering why he seems so
sure he will be charged that he is building a legal defense fund before
being arrested.



Sadly we have nothing like the EFF here that could help me in this
case by legal assistance, so i'm on my own and require a good

lawyer.

Thus i'm accepting donations for my legal expenses which i expect to
be around 5000-1 EUR.

So you know how much it costs to defend a case with unknown charges and
without knowing if you will be arrested yet?!?!?!

This whole thing sounds flakier with every new detail.

Steven Naslund

-Original Message-
From: Eugen Leitl [mailto:eu...@leitl.org]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 1:25 AM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] William was raided for running a Tor exit node.
Please help if you can.

- Forwarded message from Asad Haider a...@asadhaider.co.uk -

From: Asad Haider a...@asadhaider.co.uk
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 19:37:24 +
To: tor-t...@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] William was raided for running a Tor exit node.
Please help if you can.
Reply-To: tor-t...@lists.torproject.org

William will be posting a statement soon which will explain everything
that's happened and give a detailed account of events, along with
evidence including pictures showing the aftermath of the raid in his
apartment, as well as copies of the warrant and inventory of seized
items.

He runs a large ISP in Austria and is a well respected member of the
community, a lot of us have already sent in donations.

His blog is https://rdns.im/ and I'm guessing the statement will be
posted on there, I'll send everyone a link once it's finished being
written.

On 29 November 2012 19:22, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote:


- Forwarded message from Emily Ozols win...@team-metro.net -

From: Emily Ozols win...@team-metro.net
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 01:14:08 +1100
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please

help if

 you can.

Hi,

I gotta ask and I'm sure someone would if I didn't, but how do we know
this guy is legit?
He's jumped up on a forum saying, Hey, police raided me, help. gib
mone plz and failed to provide and reason as to how he's real and not
just making it up.

Maybe if there's a way to know this guy is legit, I'll help out if
possible, but until then I'm just going to watch others with caution
and I suggest others do as well.

On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Chris cal...@gmail.com wrote:

I'm not William and a friend pasted a link on IRC to me. I'm going
to send him a few bucks because I know how it feels to get
blindsided by the police on one random day and your world is turned

upside down.

Source:

http://www.lowendtalk.com/discussion/6283/raided-for-running-a-tor-exi
t-accepting-donations-for-legal-expenses

 From the URL:

Yes, it happened to me now as well - Yesterday i got raided for
someone sharing child pornography over one of my Tor exits.
I'm good so far, not in jail, but all my computers and hardware have
been confiscated.
(20 computers, 100TB+ storage, My Tablets/Consoles/Phones)

If convicted i could face up to 6 years in jail, of course i do not
want that and i also want to try to set a legal base for running Tor
exit nodes in Austria or even the EU.

Sadly we have nothing like the EFF here that could help me in this
case by legal 

Re: Operation Ghost Click

2012-04-27 Thread Sam Tetherow

On 04/26/2012 05:00 PM, Andrew Latham wrote:

On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Kyle Creytskyle.cre...@gmail.com  wrote:

http://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2011/november/malware_110911/DNS-changer-malware.pdf

On Apr 26, 2012 5:48 PM, Leigh Porterleigh.por...@ukbroadband.com
wrote:


On 26 Apr 2012, at 22:47, Andrew Latham
lath...@gmail.commailto:lath...@gmail.com  wrote:


On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Jeroen van Aart
jer...@mompl.netmailto:jer...@mompl.net  wrote:

Yes its a major problem for the users unknowingly infected.  To them
it will look like their Internet connection is down.  Expect ISPs to
field lots of support s

Is there a list of these temporary servers so I can see what customers are
using them (indicating infection) and head off a support call with some
contact?

--
Leigh

85.255.112.0 through 85.255.127.255
67.210.0.0 through 67.210.15.255
93.188.160.0 through 93.188.167.255
77.67.83.0 through 77.67.83.255
213.109.64.0 through 213.109.79.255
64.28.176.0 through 64.28.191.255


Or for those that don't want to do the math, here they are in CIDR notation

85.255.112.0/20
67.210.0.0/20
93.188.160.0/21
77.67.83.0/24
213.109.64.0/20
64.28.176.0/20



Re: Any recommended router. They are reliable and have good support.

2011-11-22 Thread Sam Tetherow
http://imagestream.com

On 11/22/11 9:38 AM, Deric Kwok wrote:
 Hi

 Can I know any selection of Linux routers except cisco / juniper?

 They are reliable and have  good support provided

 We would like to get one for testing.

 Thank you