Re: Windstream Issues

[Viral Vira]

We are also seeing problem with Windstream that's affecting our link in
Sanford.They have major outage going on and there is no ETR given.

-Thanks,
Viral

On 8 February 2013 18:41, Mike Walter mwal...@3z.net wrote:

 Is everyone having Windstream issues?  Our BGP sessions are down and MPLS
 network connectivity as of 2/8 @ 3:56 am EST.

 -Mike

Re: L3 East cost maint / fiber 05FEB2012 maintenance

[Viral Vira]

We also noticed outage due to L3 Maintenance that went into the outage. We
were not even notified about the Maintenance itself.

We also noticed black hauling in their network.

-Thanks,
Viral

On 5 February 2013 21:09, Josh Reynolds ess...@gmail.com wrote:

 I know a lot of you are out of the office right now, but does anybody have
 any info on what happened with L3 this morning? They went into a 5 hour
 maintenance window with expected downtime of about 30 minutes while they
 upgraded something like *40* of their core routers (their words), but
 also did this during some fiber work and completely cut off several of
 their east coast peers for the entirety of the 5 hour window.

 If anybody has any more info on this, on a NOC contact for them on the East
 Coast for future issues, you can hit me off off-list if you don't feel
 comfortable replying with that info here.

 Thanks, and I hope hope you guys are enjoying Orlando.

 --
 *Josh Reynolds*
 ess...@gmail.com - (270) 302-3552

Re: Flood affecting US east coast communication facilities?

[Viral Vira]

I think XO circuits are also affected due to Sandy

-Thanks,
Viral

On 30 October 2012 13:16, Kauto Huopio ka...@huopio.fi wrote:

 Greetings all,

 Any reports on damage to communications facilities on US east coast?

 --Kauto

 --
 Kauto Huopio - ka...@huopio.fi
 (dayjob @ CERT-FI )

Re: he.net down?

[Viral Vira]

Its working fine from India as well...

-Thanks,
Viral.

On 4 October 2011 04:05, Aiden Sullivan ai...@sullivan.in wrote:

 www.he.net seems to be down on both IPv4 and IPv6 -- does anyone know what
 is
 going on?

 --
 Aiden

Re: A BGP issue?

[Viral Vira]

I have seen this kind of problems in our customers networks and this is
motly related to MTU/MSS. Network reachability is fine but applciations does
not work. Apply the MSS on the LAN interface which is around 100 bytes less
than the MTU on the WAN interface.

-Thanks,
Viral.

On 8 March 2011 16:11, Vadim Antonov a...@kotovnik.com wrote:

  On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 09:25 +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
  At 21:49 07/03/2011 -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
  On Mar 7, 2011, at 14:27, Greg Ihnen os10ru...@gmail.com wrote:
  
I run a small network on a mission base in the Amazon jungle which is
   fed by a satellite internet connection. We had an outage from Feb 25th
 to
   the 28th where we had no connectivity with email, http/s, ftp, Skype
   would indicate it's connected but even chatting failed, basically
   everything stopped working except for ICMP. I could ping everywhere
 just
   fine. I started doing traceroutes and they all were very odd, all not
   reaching their destination and some hopping all over creation before
   dying. But if I did traceroute with ICMP it worked fine. Does this
   indicate our upstream (Bantel.net) had a BGP issue? Bantel blamed
   Hughesnet which is the service they resell. I'm wondering what kind of
   problem would let ping work fine but not any of the other protocols. It
   also seems odd that I could traceroute via UDP part way to a
 destination
   but then it would fail if the problem was my own provider. Thanks.
   
If this is the wrong forum for this post I'm sorry and please just
 hit
   delete. If this is the wrong forum but you'd be kind enough to share
 your
   expertise please reply off-list. Thanks!
  
  Honestly, I would rate this as one of the most on-topic posts in a
 while.
 
  +1.
  When you have http working I suggest running:
  http://netalyzr.icsi.berkeley.edu/index.html
  to give you a benchmark of what your connection can do in the way of
 protocols.
 
  Regards,
  Hank


 Greg - you may want try doing pings with large packets. You may have MTU
 mismatch or some other problem with a link with lets small ICMP pings
 through but mangles or discards large packets.

 --vadim