Patch Management - Windows RHEL/CentOS based on Date

2012-06-13 Thread Wade Peacock
Hi All,

Does anyone know of a patch management system that will allow us to control the 
roll out of patches, specifically for Windows but Linux would be nice too, that 
can use a date to limit whether a patch is rolled out.

Ie.

Patch to date set to2012-06-10

So all patches released up to 2012-06-10 will be offer to requesting client. 
Any patches released after 2012-06-10 will be hidden/not offered until the 
Patch to Date is moved forward.

Wade Peacock
Production IT | Vision Critical
direct  604.629.9358
mobile  604.363.8137

www.visioncritical.comhttp://www.visioncritical.com/

New York  |  London  |  Vancouver |  Paris  | Sydney  |  Chicago |  San 
Francisco | Toronto | Montreal | Calgary



Akamai - Timouts (TCP Stalls) at the SIX

2011-02-01 Thread Wade Peacock
We've been experiencing issue with content coming from Akamai servers located in Seattle since Thursday 
January 27, 2011.


Our upstream peers directly with Akamai as the SIX (Seattle Internet Exchange).

We've been seeing timeouts/partial loads for sites with content delivered from 
IP block 96.17.8.0/24.

Known impacted site for our customers:  www.cbc.ca www.ebay.ca 
www.westjet.ca(redirect to www.westjet.com)

We've opened tickets with our upstream and Akamai, but we are curious if others 
are experiencing the same issues.


Wade Peacock
Network Administrator

Sun Country Cablevision Ltd
Sunwave Internet Department
Tel: (250) 832-9711 or (250) 546-9667
Dir: (250) 832-5123 x 220
Web: http://www.sunwave.net
Email: wade.peac...@sunwave.net
Support Email: supp...@sunwave.net




Re: Future timestamps in /var/log/secure

2010-02-26 Thread Wade Peacock

It is classic syslogd
syslogd -v


syslogd 1.4.1

I was thinking timezone but we are PST (-8:00) so I can not explain the
+12:00 difference.



Isn't the timestamps inserted by syslog rather then the reporting
program itself?

What syslog do you use - classic (ie: sysklogd) or a modern one like
rsyslog? It almost looks like the timezone got changed from local to GMT
or similar, then swapped back (as odd as it may sound).

Perhaps time to file a bug report with the author of the syslog daemon
you use?






Re: Future timestamps in /var/log/secure

2010-02-26 Thread Wade Peacock

the proftpd line happened to be the next line in the log.  the
next simular ssh lines looks like (duplicate removed)

Feb 26 10:08:48 mx sshd[22165]: Did not receive identification string from 
UNKNOWN
Feb 26 10:09:27 mx sshd[22261]: Failed password for root from 219.137.192.231 
port 54111 ssh2




Been a long time since I've dealt with this stuff, but it looks like the
shell for proftpd has a different TZ from the one running the other
stuff.  (syslogd runs in the shell of the caller, right?)





Re: Future timestamps in /var/log/secure

2010-02-26 Thread Wade Peacock

It might be prudent to mention that all of the connections of this type are
null routed via an iptables drop rule after three failed attempts via a home
grown daemon similar to DENYHOSTS. All traffic from host is DENIED for 120 days
unless we manually over ride it.

I do appreciate the cautionary, better have a look around just to be sure 
comments

Wade





Re: Future timestamps in /var/log/secure

2010-02-26 Thread Wade Peacock

That does make sense. I will try to simulate that with a temporary
virtual machine as a different timezone.

Wade

aha! there you go, mine doesn't but maybe yours does?


The specification for the syslog protocol is that timestamps embedded in
the message should be used instead of syslogd's time.  Most syslog
daemons as a result apply this concept to both local and remote
messages.

You have to keep in mind that syslogd can also send/receive messages
to/from remote destinations.

William






ATT / Bellsouth Email Feedback Loop

2010-02-25 Thread Wade Peacock

Greetings Brain Trust,

We have found ATT to be heavy handed with their email (spam) filtering. Without warn all of our mail servers 
will be denied from delivering email to their many domains (att.net, bellsouth.net, etc). They have a removal 
request form (like most other large ISPs) which takes 2 days to process. We never find out why the we get 
listed. We always check as many email reputation systems and rbl searches to determine why.  Everywhere we
look we see no evidence of a problem. We have joined other ISP feedback look system, (AOL, Yahoo and even 
Hotmail/Live) which all have helped stop issues (comprised accounts, bots, etc) before they get to the point 
of a listing/block.


I have searched and I can not find out definitively whether ATT has or does not has a feedback loop system. 
Anyone out there know?



--
Wade Peacock
Network Administrator

Sun Country Cablevision Ltd
Sunwave Internet Department
Tel: (250) 832-9711 or (250) 546-9667
Web: http://www.sunwave.net
Email: wade.peac...@sunwave.net
Support Email: supp...@sunwave.net



Re: Network Provider Recommendation in Edmonton AB

2010-01-18 Thread Wade Peacock

Have you tried contacting Shaw Business Solutions (Formally BigPipe Inc) or 
Bell (GT /360 Networks) or even Telus?

I would expect that all should be able to provide symmetric (non cable or adsl) 
solution.

Wade

Lyndon Nerenberg (VE6BBM/VE7TFX) wrote:

I have a client in Edmonton who's looking for a network drop to their
office, something in the 2-10 MB/s range. The location is at 46 Ave.
and 99 St.

The core requirement is for a bare unfiltered *symmetric* pipe (no
ADSL).  Traffic volume will be low: 2-4 laptop VPNs plus some light
web server and email traffic.  2 Mb/s as a lower bound should be fine,
with a /28 IPv4 address block (either bridged or routed).

I've been away from Edmonton long enough now that I no longer know
who's active there, so any and all feedback is welcome.  (Vendors,
too, provided you include some real content.)  Please respect the
Reply-To header.

Cheers,

--lyndon






Consumer Grade - IPV6 Enabled Router Firewalls.

2009-12-02 Thread Wade Peacock

We had a discussion today about IPv6 today. During our open thinking the topic 
of client equipment came up.
We all commented that we have not seen any consumer grade IPv6 enable internet gateways (routers/firewalls), a 
kin to the ever popular Linksys 54G series, DLinks , SMCs or Netgears.


Does anyone have any leads to information about such products (In production or 
planned production)?

We are thinking that most vendors are going to wait until Ma and Pa home user 
are screaming for them.

Thoughts?


--
Wade Peacock
Sun Country Cablevision Ltd
attachment: wade_peacock.vcf

Re: Consumer Grade - IPV6 Enabled Router Firewalls.

2009-12-02 Thread Wade Peacock

Matthew Dodd wrote:
Apple has been shipping the Airport Extreme and Express (consumer 
router) with v6 support since 2007, if I recall correctly. They can also 
create a 4to6 tunnel automatically.




By 4to6 to you mean IPv4 on the inside and IPv6 on the outside?


Wade Peacock
Sun Country Cablevision Ltd

attachment: wade_peacock.vcf