Re: 2017 NANOG Elections General Information
Have we considered "grooming" folks via the committees? Seems like a better place to allow folks to dip their toes in. But maybe I'm too timid. --- Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2017 10:59:32 -0700 From: Dave TemkinTo: memb...@nanog.org, "North American Network Operators' Group" Subject: Re: 2017 NANOG Elections General Information Message-ID:
Documentation on generating IOS-XR prefix and as path sets with rtconfig
Can anyone point me to examples of using rtconfig to generate IOS-XR configs? Specifically prefix and as-path sets. My Google skills are coming up short. The man page for rtconfig does not mention IOS-XR but it is supposedly supported. I get no farther than 'rtconfig -config ciscoxr'. Thanks.
Re: Anyone else having trouble reaching thepiratebay.se? AS39138
Only one of their /24's is in TATA's(AS6453) table. http://bgp.he.net/AS51040#_prefixes http://lg.as6453.net Router: gin-aeq-tcore1 Site: US, Ashburn, AEQ Command: show route protocol bgp 194.71.107.0/24 terse exact {master} Router: gin-aeq-tcore1 Site: US, Ashburn, AEQ Command: show route protocol bgp 194.14.56.0/24 terse exact inet.0: 520187 destinations, 3597636 routes (519993 active, 9 holddown, 1053 hidden) Restart Complete + = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both A V DestinationP Prf Metric 1 Metric 2 Next hopAS path * ? 194.14.56.0/24 B 197595 51040 I unverified 216.6.87.1 ?B 197595 51040 I unverified 216.6.87.1 ?B 197595 51040 I unverified 216.6.87.1 ?B 1239 1257 197595 51040 I unverified 144.232.7.61 {master} On 11/26/14, 2:01 PM, eric-l...@truenet.com eric-l...@truenet.com wrote: Javier, I can't get to www.rrbone.net, an upstream provider to the IP I was given for thepiratebay.se. I tested on VZ FiOS and Wireless in Philadelphia area and both die within the VZ network. For Comcast, it looks like the space isn't showing up in the BGP table: route-server.newyork.ny.iboneshow ip bgp 194.71.107.27 % Network not in table No clue what the cause is, but it bigger than just the PirateBay. Sincerely, Eric Tykwinski TrueNet, Inc. P: 610-429-8300 F: 610-429-3222 -Original Message- From: NANOG [ mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org ] On Behalf Of Javier J Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 1:44 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Anyone else having trouble reaching thepiratebay.se? AS39138 I confirmed It is also blocked for Comcast users. Even Comcast business users. This is starting to look like censorship to me.
Re: Internet Routing Registries - RADb, etc
On 16/01/2014 14:32, Blake Hudson wrote: Thanks for the responses, these objects are all older. However, none of them are stale or from previous owners, allocations, etc. Each of these objects were posted to their respective IRR's after the IP space was allocated to us. This leads me to believe that the individual IRR's really do very little checking for accuracy and their usefulness is then questionable. Oh yeah. I got hit by that sort of thing a week or two back. It wasn't origin: AS14179 / mnt-by: MAINT-AS28071, by any chance? AS14179 have been hijacking chunks of space from the various registries. Nick -- Another possible scenario. a.b.c.d/24-small_isp-regional_isp-Level3 Imagine a regional ISP is a customer of Level3. Level3 filters the regional ISP based on Regional ISP's IRR objects. Small ISP buys access from Regional. Small ISP doesn't maintain their own objects. Regional ISP wants Small's business so doesn't force the issue. Regional manually maintains the filters. Regional adds objects under Regional's maintainer whenever Small request a filter change. If they don’t, Level3 wont accept the announcement from them. Customer with a.b.c.d/24 has no idea about any of this. Now we are years later. Customer has either moved to another small ISP or Small ISP found a different regional ISP. a.b.c.d/24-small_isp-new_regional_isp-Level3 or a.b.c.d/24-new_small_isp-new_regional_isp-Level3 The original Regional ISP didnt remember to delete all the objects related to Small ISP's customers. The objects just sit there until one day customer has interest in registring their own object. Customer sees entries for their /24 under Regional ISP's objects. Customer knows they have never done business with Regional. Also the objects are newer than the customer's allocation from their RIR. Customer comes to the conclusion that Regional ISP must have been hi-jacking their space or doing some other naughtiness. Proxy registering objects isn't a good idea. However, the number of networks with allocations from ARIN registering objects in any IRR appears to be extremely low. ARIN doesn’t charge you more to use rr.arin.net. Folks seem to not be aware of IRR or perceive it provides no benefit to them. Will RPKI adoption suffer the same fate?
Looking for a Illinois Century Network(AS6325) contact
Looking for a network engineering contact at ICN(AS6325). I'm trying to find out if they have BGP communities for their customers to use. Please reply off list. Thanks.
Anyone having issues updating RADB tonight?
Anyone having issues updating RADB tonight? I am getting 403 message from URL to web form. No response from two updates I submitted this evening via email. I noticed a few other URL's are also giving a 403 message. http://www.radb.net/cgi-bin/radb/irr-web.cgi http://www.radb.net/faq.html http://www.radb.net/emailupdates.html