RE: OVH datacenter SBG2 in Strasbourg on fire ????
> -Original Message- > From: NANOG On Behalf Of > David Hubbard > Sent: Friday, March 12, 2021 9:47 AM > To: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: OVH datacenter SBG2 in Strasbourg on fire > > After sending them abuse reports for years with only an increase in malicious > traffic, I have no expectation of anything they do getting better or being > for the benefit of the internet as a > whole. Only reason this is probably > getting any attention from them is in hopes they don’t irreparably damage > their IPO; they seem to have no issues with their customers' compromised > servers damaging the businesses of others on a continuous basis. Based on previous outages, I wouldn't agree. http://status.ovh.net/?do=details&id=15162#comment18119 I will agree about the spam issues, but Octave Klaba has usually been pretty honest comparatively with what I'm used to from typical US based ILECs on outages. Sincerely, Eric Tykwinski TrueNet, Inc. P: 610-429-8300
Just a heads up, apparently Ubiquiti had a breach.
Official statement: https://mailchi.mp/ubnt/account-notification?e=30527b2904 Sincerely, Eric Tykwinski TrueNet, Inc. P: 610-429-8300
RE: DNSSEC and ISPs faking DNS responses
Actually, how are other places implementing these lists? I would have thought to use RPZ, but as far as I know if the blocked DNS domain is using DNSSEC it wouldn't work. Sincerely, Eric Tykwinski TrueNet, Inc. P: 610-429-8300 F: 610-429-3222 -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of John R. Levine Sent: Friday, November 13, 2015 12:33 PM To: Owen DeLong Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: DNSSEC and ISPs faking DNS responses I doubt the ISPs in Québec would have much sympathy for this proposed law. It makes their life harder and provides them no benefit. Should it pass (remember, it's just proposed), I expect they'd just adjust their DNS caches to block responses for the list of domains that the government mails them and claim they're in full compliance. R's, John
Synful Knock questions...
I'm sure most have already seen the CVE from Cisco, and I was just reading through the documentation from FireEye: https://www.fireeye.com/blog/threat-research/2015/09/synful_knock_-_acis.htm l Question is that it looks to me like they are over-writing the ospf response for "show ip ospf timers lsa-group"? And if that's the case I'm guessing the router would need to have ospf enabled to be able to see the response? Sincerely, Eric Tykwinski TrueNet, Inc. P: 610-429-8300 F: 610-429-3222
RE: outlook.com outgoing blacklists?
The only example I could come up with is an IDN, which Todd already said wasn't the case. At least I know Unicode domains didn't work on Exchange 2013 OWA, but worked when changed to ASCII. It may have changed by now though. Sincerely, Eric Tykwinski TrueNet, Inc. P: 610-429-8300 F: 610-429-3222 -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Steve Atkins Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2015 2:44 PM To: nanog list Subject: Re: outlook.com outgoing blacklists? > > Anybody have some recommendations on how I resolve this The most likely explanation is a configuration error at your end, so the first step is to share what the domain is. Cheers, Steve
RE: Anyone else having trouble reaching thepiratebay.se? AS39138
Javier, I can't get to www.rrbone.net, an upstream provider to the IP I was given for thepiratebay.se. I tested on VZ FiOS and Wireless in Philadelphia area and both die within the VZ network. For Comcast, it looks like the space isn't showing up in the BGP table: route-server.newyork.ny.ibone>show ip bgp 194.71.107.27 % Network not in table No clue what the cause is, but it bigger than just the PirateBay. Sincerely, Eric Tykwinski TrueNet, Inc. P: 610-429-8300 F: 610-429-3222 -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Javier J Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 1:44 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Anyone else having trouble reaching thepiratebay.se? AS39138 I confirmed It is also blocked for Comcast users. Even Comcast business users. This is starting to look like censorship to me.
RE: BGPMON Alert Questions
Sadly, it doesn't look like this is the first for Indosat either: January 14th, 2011 http://www.bgpmon.net/hijack-by-as4761-indosat-a-quick-report/ Sincerely, Eric Tykwinski TrueNet, Inc. P: 610-429-8300 F: 610-429-3222 -Original Message- From: Þórhallur Hálfdánarson [mailto:thorhallur.halfdanar...@advania.is] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2014 2:59 PM To: Joseph Jenkins Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: BGPMON Alert Questions I have received those for two prefixes so far. Same origin+transit Br, Tolli
Any experience with Comcast digital voice for OOB (offlist is fine)
Sincerely, Eric Tykwinski TrueNet, Inc. P: 610-429-8300 F: 610-429-3222
