Re: 365x24x7 (sleep patterns)

2011-04-17 Thread Jay Ashworth
- Original Message -
 From: Mark Foster blak...@blakjak.net

 Local emergency services[1] operate '2 days, 2 nights, 4 off'.
 
 Dayshifts are 10 hour 8am-6pm. Nightshift is 6pm until 8am. This
 creates
 a 4-watch rotation.

I dunno from Ambulance -- they're load driven... by my understanding is that 
around here, the fire people are 3 days on, and 4 days off, or something 
similar to that.  Since they sleep in, they're effectively on-call at 
all times, and they've got enough people on a shift that they can do 
internal rotations as to who goes, unless it's a big enough call that they
all need to roll, which is a small enough percentage of calls to make 
it work.

Cheers,
- jra



RE: 365x24x7 (sleep patterns)

2011-04-15 Thread Mark Green

Suggestion; once on the 'night shift' stay put for at least three months...  
Sleep patterns take time to adjust.  Jumping between day and night shifts will 
burn out even the most motivated employee.  

Mark Green

 




 From: nanog-requ...@nanog.org
 Subject: NANOG Digest, Vol 39, Issue 46
 To: nanog@nanog.org
 Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:52:19 +
 
 Send NANOG mailing list submissions to
   nanog@nanog.org
 
 To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
   https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
 or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
   nanog-requ...@nanog.org
 
 You can reach the person managing the list at
   nanog-ow...@nanog.org
 
 When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
 than Re: Contents of NANOG digest...
 
 
 Today's Topics:
 
1. 365x24x7 (harbor235)
2. Re: New hijacks, and lots of them  (Ronald F. Guilmette)
3. Re: 365x24x7 (Peter Hicks)
4. Re: 365x24x7 (Charles Mills)
5. RE: 365x24x7 (Greg Moore)
6. Re: 365x24x7 (Steve Clark)
7. Re: 365x24x7 (Marshall Eubanks)
8. Re: 365x24x7 (Alex Brooks)
9. RE: 365x24x7 (Sanders, Randall K)
   10. Re: 365x24x7 (Tony Finch)
   11. Re: 365x24x7 (harbor235)
   12. Re: 365x24x7 (Paul Graydon)
 
 
 --
 
 Message: 1
 Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:14:05 -0400
 From: harbor235 harbor...@gmail.com
 Subject: 365x24x7
 To: NANOG list nanog@nanog.org
 Message-ID: banlktimd9jyvzm_hv21y9lhzobr3rvg...@mail.gmail.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
 
 If I were going to provide a 365x24x7 NOC, how many teams of personnel do I
 need
 to fully cover operations? I assume minimally you need 3 teams to cover the
 required
 24 hr coverage, but there is off time and schedule rotation?
 
 thoughts, experience?
 
 Mike
 
 
 --
 
 Message: 2
 Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 06:17:06 -0700
 From: Ronald F. Guilmette r...@tristatelogic.com
 Subject: Re: New hijacks, and lots of them 
 To: nanog@nanog.org
 Message-ID: 2971.1302873...@tristatelogic.com
 
 
 In message 5824.1302780...@tristatelogic.com, I wrote:
 
http://www.47-usc-230c2.org/20110414-snowshoe-1.txt
http://www.47-usc-230c2.org/20110414-snowshoe-2.txt
 
 My apologies to anyone and everyone who tried to get at these files.
 It seems that my provider may perhaps have recently developed some
 rather odd ideas about packet filtering for static broadband lines.
 Until I can get the problem worked out, the following alternative URLs
 ought to do instead:
 
ftp://ftp.47-usc-230c2.org/pub/20110414-snowshoe-1.txt
ftp://ftp.47-usc-230c2.org/pub/20110414-snowshoe-2.txt
 
 
 
 
 --
 
 Message: 3
 Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:17:48 +0100
 From: Peter Hicks peter.hi...@poggs.co.uk
 Subject: Re: 365x24x7
 To: harbor235 harbor...@gmail.com
 Cc: NANOG list nanog@nanog.org
 Message-ID: 066f653e-c0f8-4026-9fe0-3a8899378...@poggs.co.uk
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 
 
 On 15 Apr 2011, at 14:14, harbor235 wrote:
 
  If I were going to provide a 365x24x7 NOC, how many teams of personnel do I
  need to fully cover operations? I assume minimally you need 3 teams to 
  cover the
  required 24 hr coverage, but there is off time and schedule rotation?
 
 
 Although more geared up for on-call, 
 http://blog.hinterlands.org/2010/07/running-an-oncall-rota/ is a very useful 
 resource.
 
 
 Peter
 
 
 
 --
 
 Message: 4
 Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:25:02 -0400
 From: Charles Mills w3y...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: 365x24x7
 To: harbor235 harbor...@gmail.com, NANOG list nanog@nanog.org
 Message-ID: banlktint8hnfensqzbhos3x4has_p78...@mail.gmail.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
 
 I've had it done in places where I work where you'll have 3 rotations
 working 12 hour shifts.
 
 In a 2 week pay period they get their 80 hours in a blend 36 one week
 and 44 the next.  It gives some nice consecutive days off time which
 also doubles as a retention tool for some employees.  You might have
 to get creative to have all the days work out but it can be done.
 
 On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 9:14 AM, harbor235 harbor...@gmail.com wrote:
  If I were going to provide a 365x24x7 NOC, how many teams of personnel do I
  need
  to fully cover operations? I assume minimally you need 3 teams to cover the
  required
  24 hr coverage, but there is off time and schedule rotation?
 
  thoughts, experience?
 
  Mike
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 =
 Charles L. Mills
 Email: w3y...@gmail.com
 =
 Need server hosting, DR or colocation services?? See me!
 
 
 
 --
 
 Message: 5
 Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:37:54 -0400
 From: Greg Moore moor...@greenms.com
 Subject: RE: 365x24x7
 To: harbor235 harbor...@gmail.com, NANOG list nanog@nanog.org
 Message-ID: 

Re: 365x24x7 (sleep patterns)

2011-04-15 Thread Chad Dailey
+1.  I'd go to six months, having been the night shift bitch.  Flipping
shifts around damn near killed me.

On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Mark Green ktm200...@hotmail.com wrote:


 Suggestion; once on the 'night shift' stay put for at least three months...
  Sleep patterns take time to adjust.  Jumping between day and night shifts
 will burn out even the most motivated employee.

 Mark Green




..snip..


Re: 365x24x7 (sleep patterns)

2011-04-15 Thread mikea
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:53:47AM -0500, Chad Dailey wrote:
 +1.  I'd go to six months, having been the night shift bitch.  Flipping
 shifts around damn near killed me.

 On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Mark Green ktm200...@hotmail.com wrote:

  Suggestion; once on the 'night shift' stay put for at least three months...
   Sleep patterns take time to adjust.  Jumping between day and night shifts
  will burn out even the most motivated employee.

Amen. There is evidence that, other things being relatively equal, people
working rotating shifts have shorter life expectancies and that the faster
the rotation, the shorter the expectancy gets. There also is some evidence
that people working rotating shifts are more likely to get cancer.

My experience: 

6 on, 2 off, 8 hours, rotating to the next later shift: I never, ever got
enough sleep -- for 2 years.

6 on, 2 off, 12 hours, straight mids, no rotation: much less bad. 

5 on, 2 off, 8 hours, straight mids: quite tolerable.

5 on, 2 off, 8 hours, straight swings (1600-): out of phase with the
world.

YMMV; I expect it to. 

-- 
Mike Andrews, W5EGO
mi...@mikea.ath.cx
Tired old sysadmin 



Re: 365x24x7 (sleep patterns)

2011-04-15 Thread Vinny Abello
In a past work life, there was a short experimental run where it was 
believed that the company I worked for could achieve 24/7 coverage 
through individuals being on-call throughout the entire weekend AND 
doing overnight maintenance during the week in 12 hour daily shifts from 
8PM to 8AM. Needless to say, coming from a daytime schedule one week, 
covering all pages on a weekend which prevented you from getting much 
sleep, working 5 12 hour shifts in the following week on shortened sleep 
cycles (over 100 hours in total with the on-call and 12 hour shifts), 
then switching back to daytime hours the next week took a toll on me 
rather quickly. I think we got an extra week day off in there somewhere 
to recover the following week, but it was basically like running a 
person into the ground until they were almost dead, then letting them 
recover while the same thing was done to the next person. There were 
only 4 people to abuse like this at the time so it happened once a 
month. Luckily everyone came to their senses and realized this wasn't 
sustainable and it didn't last for more than a few months total.


Moral of the story, don't do this to people unless you're into torture. 
:)


-Vinny

On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 11:53:47 -0500, Chad Dailey wrote:
+1.  I'd go to six months, having been the night shift bitch.  
Flipping

shifts around damn near killed me.

On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Mark Green ktm200...@hotmail.com 
wrote:




Suggestion; once on the 'night shift' stay put for at least three 
months...
 Sleep patterns take time to adjust.  Jumping between day and night 
shifts

will burn out even the most motivated employee.

Mark Green





..snip..





Re: 365x24x7 (sleep patterns)

2011-04-15 Thread Marshall Eubanks

On Apr 15, 2011, at 12:44 PM, Mark Green wrote:

 
 Suggestion; once on the 'night shift' stay put for at least three months...  
 Sleep patterns take time to adjust.  Jumping between day and night shifts 
 will burn out even the most motivated employee.  
 

What we found was that we would find people who wanted to be on the night 
shift, and would NOT like to be changed, at all. Some people like night
work, or have family situations where it is ideal for them.

Regards
Marshall 

 Mark Green
 
 
 
 
 
 
 From: nanog-requ...@nanog.org
 Subject: NANOG Digest, Vol 39, Issue 46
 To: nanog@nanog.org
 Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:52:19 +
 
 Send NANOG mailing list submissions to
  nanog@nanog.org
 
 To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
  https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
 or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
  nanog-requ...@nanog.org
 
 You can reach the person managing the list at
  nanog-ow...@nanog.org
 
 When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
 than Re: Contents of NANOG digest...
 
 
 Today's Topics:
 
   1. 365x24x7 (harbor235)
   2. Re: New hijacks, and lots of them  (Ronald F. Guilmette)
   3. Re: 365x24x7 (Peter Hicks)
   4. Re: 365x24x7 (Charles Mills)
   5. RE: 365x24x7 (Greg Moore)
   6. Re: 365x24x7 (Steve Clark)
   7. Re: 365x24x7 (Marshall Eubanks)
   8. Re: 365x24x7 (Alex Brooks)
   9. RE: 365x24x7 (Sanders, Randall K)
  10. Re: 365x24x7 (Tony Finch)
  11. Re: 365x24x7 (harbor235)
  12. Re: 365x24x7 (Paul Graydon)
 
 
 --
 
 Message: 1
 Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:14:05 -0400
 From: harbor235 harbor...@gmail.com
 Subject: 365x24x7
 To: NANOG list nanog@nanog.org
 Message-ID: banlktimd9jyvzm_hv21y9lhzobr3rvg...@mail.gmail.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
 
 If I were going to provide a 365x24x7 NOC, how many teams of personnel do I
 need
 to fully cover operations? I assume minimally you need 3 teams to cover the
 required
 24 hr coverage, but there is off time and schedule rotation?
 
 thoughts, experience?
 
 Mike
 
 
 --
 
 Message: 2
 Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 06:17:06 -0700
 From: Ronald F. Guilmette r...@tristatelogic.com
 Subject: Re: New hijacks, and lots of them 
 To: nanog@nanog.org
 Message-ID: 2971.1302873...@tristatelogic.com
 
 
 In message 5824.1302780...@tristatelogic.com, I wrote:
 
  http://www.47-usc-230c2.org/20110414-snowshoe-1.txt
  http://www.47-usc-230c2.org/20110414-snowshoe-2.txt
 
 My apologies to anyone and everyone who tried to get at these files.
 It seems that my provider may perhaps have recently developed some
 rather odd ideas about packet filtering for static broadband lines.
 Until I can get the problem worked out, the following alternative URLs
 ought to do instead:
 
   ftp://ftp.47-usc-230c2.org/pub/20110414-snowshoe-1.txt
   ftp://ftp.47-usc-230c2.org/pub/20110414-snowshoe-2.txt
 
 
 
 
 --
 
 Message: 3
 Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:17:48 +0100
 From: Peter Hicks peter.hi...@poggs.co.uk
 Subject: Re: 365x24x7
 To: harbor235 harbor...@gmail.com
 Cc: NANOG list nanog@nanog.org
 Message-ID: 066f653e-c0f8-4026-9fe0-3a8899378...@poggs.co.uk
 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=us-ascii
 
 
 On 15 Apr 2011, at 14:14, harbor235 wrote:
 
 If I were going to provide a 365x24x7 NOC, how many teams of personnel do I
 need to fully cover operations? I assume minimally you need 3 teams to 
 cover the
 required 24 hr coverage, but there is off time and schedule rotation?
 
 
 Although more geared up for on-call, 
 http://blog.hinterlands.org/2010/07/running-an-oncall-rota/ is a very useful 
 resource.
 
 
 Peter
 
 
 
 --
 
 Message: 4
 Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:25:02 -0400
 From: Charles Mills w3y...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: 365x24x7
 To: harbor235 harbor...@gmail.com, NANOG list nanog@nanog.org
 Message-ID: banlktint8hnfensqzbhos3x4has_p78...@mail.gmail.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
 
 I've had it done in places where I work where you'll have 3 rotations
 working 12 hour shifts.
 
 In a 2 week pay period they get their 80 hours in a blend 36 one week
 and 44 the next.  It gives some nice consecutive days off time which
 also doubles as a retention tool for some employees.  You might have
 to get creative to have all the days work out but it can be done.
 
 On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 9:14 AM, harbor235 harbor...@gmail.com wrote:
 If I were going to provide a 365x24x7 NOC, how many teams of personnel do I
 need
 to fully cover operations? I assume minimally you need 3 teams to cover the
 required
 24 hr coverage, but there is off time and schedule rotation?
 
 thoughts, experience?
 
 Mike
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 =
 Charles L. Mills
 Email: w3y...@gmail.com
 =
 Need server hosting, DR or colocation services?? See me!
 
 
 
 

Re: 365x24x7 (sleep patterns)

2011-04-15 Thread Steven Bellovin

On Apr 15, 2011, at 1:41 26PM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:

 
 On Apr 15, 2011, at 12:44 PM, Mark Green wrote:
 
 
 Suggestion; once on the 'night shift' stay put for at least three months...  
 Sleep patterns take time to adjust.  Jumping between day and night shifts 
 will burn out even the most motivated employee.  
 
 
 What we found was that we would find people who wanted to be on the night 
 shift, and would NOT like to be changed, at all. Some people like night
 work, or have family situations where it is ideal for them.
 

Yah.  Read the current news coverage about sleeping U.S. air traffic 
controllers, especially the articles about how hard it is to switch shifts, and 
very especially if you do it often.


--Steve Bellovin, https://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb








RE: 365x24x7 (sleep patterns)

2011-04-15 Thread George Bonser


 
 
 What we found was that we would find people who wanted to be on the
 night shift, and would NOT like to be changed, at all. Some people
like
 night
 work, or have family situations where it is ideal for them.
 
 Regards
 Marshall

+1

I would start by first taking an audit of skills.   Some people are just
really good troubleshooters above and beyond average in that respect.
You want at least one of those on each shift.  Some other people are
really great at attention to every little detail in documentation.  You
want at least one of those, too, on each shift.  Sometimes those skills
overlap but my experience is that they are rooted in different
personality traits and the two complement each other and are only rarely
found in the same person.  Everyone else will be pretty much average in
both respects.

Then look at family situations.  Married with children will probably not
much care for swing shift if their kids are school age as they will
never see them except on their days off.  Mids are difficult for people
with a toddler at home (ever try to sleep with a toddler in the house?)
but work well with school-aged kids (parent can sleep while child is at
school).  Single parents are going to hate mids and swings.

Look at individual preferences.  Some people are natural night owls,
some are natural morning people.  Don't try to work against that if you
can avoid it.  So you might have a swing shift loaded up with single
people, mids with people who like working those hours and maybe married
with school-aged children.  Day shift with single parents and higher
level supervisory rolls.

But the extent to which you take into account people's natural
preferences, natural strengths and weaknesses, and their situation at
home can make a huge difference in a harmonious situation on the job.





Re: 365x24x7 (sleep patterns)

2011-04-15 Thread Jeff Shultz

On 4/15/2011 10:11 AM, mikea wrote:


My experience:

6 on, 2 off, 8 hours, rotating to the next later shift: I never, ever got
enough sleep -- for 2 years.

6 on, 2 off, 12 hours, straight mids, no rotation: much less bad.

5 on, 2 off, 8 hours, straight mids: quite tolerable.

5 on, 2 off, 8 hours, straight swings (1600-): out of phase with the
world.



I've done all of the above but the 12 hour shift and can add 5 on, 2 
off, 8 hours, rotating between swings and mids.  They sucked. I'm in 
general agreement with Mike's judgments as well.


If you want to be fair to your people and help keep their morale up, 
straight shifts is the way to go - or at least fix the mids shift and 
make the swing/mids switch at 2200 (10pm). Changing sleep times is the 
quickest way to get zombies for employees.


If you try to do a 6 and 2 style rotation, eventually some smart person 
is going to figure out that they're getting screwed out of a lot of 
weekend and holiday time as opposed to the daybeggers.


My recommendation, based on 10 years of this nonsense in the Army, is 
minimum 2 people per shift, 5 on, 2 off, stagger the weekends so that 
someone gets Fri-Sat, the other Sun-Mon. If they can decide which wants 
which weekend between themselves, so much the better.


As the FAA has lately demonstrated, single person night shifts is 
generally a bad thing if you actually want them to stay awake.


--
Jeff Shultz




RE: 365x24x7 (sleep patterns)

2011-04-15 Thread George Bonser
 
 As the FAA has lately demonstrated, single person night shifts is
 generally a bad thing if you actually want them to stay awake.
 
 --
 Jeff Shultz
 

Jeff, there are other reasons for not having a single individual on an
overnight shift.  A person can have an unexpected medical emergency at
any time or experience an accident.  Getting help to them quickly can
make a difference between life and death.  Even choking on a meal can
have a completely different outcome if there is another person
available.  Having only one person in a facility overnight by themselves
just isn't a good idea, in my opinion.





Re: 365x24x7 (sleep patterns)

2011-04-15 Thread Mark Foster



On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, Jeff Shultz wrote:


On 4/15/2011 10:11 AM, mikea wrote:


My experience:

6 on, 2 off, 8 hours, rotating to the next later shift: I never, ever got
enough sleep -- for 2 years.

6 on, 2 off, 12 hours, straight mids, no rotation: much less bad.

5 on, 2 off, 8 hours, straight mids: quite tolerable.

5 on, 2 off, 8 hours, straight swings (1600-): out of phase with the
world.



I've done all of the above but the 12 hour shift and can add 5 on, 2 off, 8 
hours, rotating between swings and mids.  They sucked. I'm in general 
agreement with Mike's judgments as well.


If you want to be fair to your people and help keep their morale up, straight 
shifts is the way to go - or at least fix the mids shift and make the 
swing/mids switch at 2200 (10pm). Changing sleep times is the quickest way to 
get zombies for employees.




Local emergency services[1] operate '2 days, 2 nights, 4 off'.

Dayshifts are 10 hour 8am-6pm.  Nightshift is 6pm until 8am.  This creates 
a 4-watch rotation.


The day shifts are relatively normal working hours, and the 4 consecutive 
days off are handy, and as it's an 8 day cycle it slowly rotates so that 
you can wind up with weekends or weekdays off over time (which in itself 
can be handy).  The guys employed this way are often given a little 
handbook with their year printed on it so they can plan their lives.


Mark.

[1] Fire and Ambulance services operate this way to my knowledge, Police 
is different depending on the part of the country you're in...