Re: AOL postmaster rejections.

[John Peach]

On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 13:30:17 -0600
Blake Hudson  wrote:

> 
> 
> John Peach wrote on 11/19/2015 8:08 AM:
> > Has anyone else with relatively large volumes of email seen a huge
> > spike in rejections from AOL recently?
> Yes.
> 
> > There is no obvious reason why they are being rejected as it is a
> > generic message:
> >
> > Nov 18 12:10:39 pp-serve02 sendmail[1391]: tAIHAcPT001383:
> > mailin-04.mx.aol.com.: SMTP DATA-2 protocol error: 521 5.2.1 :  AOL
> > will not accept delivery of this message.
> >
> > Looking back through my logs, I can see we've always had a few, but
> > we are now receiving a lot of complaints from users (physicians who
> > cannot email their patients) and I see this, starting on Monday:
> >
> > syslog-2015-11-16
> > 588
> > syslog-2015-11-17
> > 1668
> > syslog-2015-11-18
> > 1937
> >
> > and I already have 55 for today.
> Same; started this week. Only appears to affect one of our servers.


Now that is interesting; I hadn't though to check that, but it is
affecting 3 out of our 4 and they are all in the same subnet.


> 
> Rejected messages by date:
> 2015-11-15
> 9
> 2015-11-15
> 4
> 2015-11-16
> 400
> 2015-11-17
> 710
> 2015-11-18
> 683
> 
> >
> > We have a whitelist / feedback loop set up with AOL, our IPs show
> > clean with them and our DNS / reverse DNS has not changed and
> > resolves properly.
> Same here
> 
> >
> > We did raise a ticket with them, but it seems to have gone to the
> > usual /dev/null.
> Same here. I'm recommending AOL customers contact AOL for support.
> 
> >
> > To reply off-list, please remove the VERP -nanog from my email
> > address,
> 


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: AOL postmaster rejections.

[Blake Hudson]

John Peach wrote on 11/19/2015 8:08 AM:

Has anyone else with relatively large volumes of email seen a huge
spike in rejections from AOL recently?

Yes.


There is no obvious reason why they are being rejected as it is a
generic message:

Nov 18 12:10:39 pp-serve02 sendmail[1391]: tAIHAcPT001383:
mailin-04.mx.aol.com.: SMTP DATA-2 protocol error: 521 5.2.1 :  AOL
will not accept delivery of this message.

Looking back through my logs, I can see we've always had a few, but we
are now receiving a lot of complaints from users (physicians who cannot
email their patients) and I see this, starting on Monday:

syslog-2015-11-16
588
syslog-2015-11-17
1668
syslog-2015-11-18
1937

and I already have 55 for today.

Same; started this week. Only appears to affect one of our servers.

Rejected messages by date:
2015-11-15
9
2015-11-15
4
2015-11-16
400
2015-11-17
710
2015-11-18
683



We have a whitelist / feedback loop set up with AOL, our IPs show clean
with them and our DNS / reverse DNS has not changed and resolves
properly.

Same here



We did raise a ticket with them, but it seems to have gone to the
usual /dev/null.

Same here. I'm recommending AOL customers contact AOL for support.



To reply off-list, please remove the VERP -nanog from my email address,

Re: AOL postmaster rejections.

[Robert L Mathews]

On 11/19/15 6:08 AM, John Peach wrote:
> Has anyone else with relatively large volumes of email seen a huge
> spike in rejections from AOL recently?

We also saw a large increase in this "AOL will not accept delivery of
this message" problem earlier this week, despite also having "good
reputation" on the affected IP addresses, no changes in what we send, no
DNS changes, etc.

It happened on about half our outbound mail server IP addresses, but not
on the others. We temporarily switched to using only the "good" IP
addresses to send to AOL, and they happily accept the same messages.

-- 
Robert L Mathews, Tiger Technologies, http://www.tigertech.net/

AOL postmaster rejections.

[John Peach]

Has anyone else with relatively large volumes of email seen a huge
spike in rejections from AOL recently?

There is no obvious reason why they are being rejected as it is a
generic message:

Nov 18 12:10:39 pp-serve02 sendmail[1391]: tAIHAcPT001383:
mailin-04.mx.aol.com.: SMTP DATA-2 protocol error: 521 5.2.1 :  AOL
will not accept delivery of this message.

Looking back through my logs, I can see we've always had a few, but we
are now receiving a lot of complaints from users (physicians who cannot
email their patients) and I see this, starting on Monday:

syslog-2015-11-16
588
syslog-2015-11-17
1668
syslog-2015-11-18
1937

and I already have 55 for today.

We have a whitelist / feedback loop set up with AOL, our IPs show clean
with them and our DNS / reverse DNS has not changed and resolves
properly.

We did raise a ticket with them, but it seems to have gone to the
usual /dev/null.

To reply off-list, please remove the VERP -nanog from my email address,


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: AOL Postmaster

[Steve Atkins]

On Feb 25, 2015, at 5:54 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian ops.li...@gmail.com wrote:

 You think every accountant, realtor, coffee shop etc uses their own domain?

No.

But they should not, and in many cases *cannot*, rely on aol or yahoo addresses.

It would suck for them to have to change all their contact information, 
business cards,
and so on - but a) they chose their email provider unwisely and that's the cost 
of
relying on an inappropriate vendor and b) they don't really need to - inbound 
mail to
those addresses is mostly fine, so they just need to get a second email address
and gradually migrate their outbound usage to that.

Because the root cause of this issue is a long series of security mistakes by 
those
providers, allowing 3rd parties to have access to user's (supposedly private) 
account
information, the issue is specific to those providers, and there's no strong 
argument that
other email providers are likely to make the same business choices.

Cheers,
  Steve

Re: AOL Postmaster

[Ken Chase]

Simple, one simply does not conduct business email over an AOL account.

This is what I've been telling several of my customers about their contacts for 
a while now.

/kc


On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 05:24:12AM -0500, Rich Kulawiec said:
  
  Their own announcement:
  
  
http://postmaster-blog.aol.com/2014/04/22/aol-mail-updates-dmarc-policy-to-reject/
  
  says that DMARC issues should be referred here:
  
   dmarc-h...@teamaol.com
  
  (And before anyone asks, yes, the headers on mailing list traffic
  have been modified precisely as that page stipulates.)
  
  Perhaps it's too much to expect that in 2015 system and network admins
  will actually demonstrate baseline professionalism and competence by
  reading and answering role account email.
  
  ---rsk

--
Ken Chase - Toronto Canada

Re: AOL Postmaster

[Bill Patterson]

That was my first response as well. But that response was frowned upon by
my customer service reps.
On Feb 25, 2015 8:56 AM, Ken Chase m...@sizone.org wrote:

 Simple, one simply does not conduct business email over an AOL account.

 This is what I've been telling several of my customers about their
 contacts for a while now.

 /kc


 On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 05:24:12AM -0500, Rich Kulawiec said:
   
   Their own announcement:
   
   
 http://postmaster-blog.aol.com/2014/04/22/aol-mail-updates-dmarc-policy-to-reject/
   
   says that DMARC issues should be referred here:
   
dmarc-h...@teamaol.com
   
   (And before anyone asks, yes, the headers on mailing list traffic
   have been modified precisely as that page stipulates.)
   
   Perhaps it's too much to expect that in 2015 system and network admins
   will actually demonstrate baseline professionalism and competence by
   reading and answering role account email.
   
   ---rsk

 --
 Ken Chase - Toronto Canada

Re: AOL Postmaster

[Suresh Ramasubramanian]

You think every accountant, realtor, coffee shop etc uses their own domain?
On Feb 26, 2015 3:12 AM, Bill Patterson billpatterso...@gmail.com wrote:

 That was my first response as well. But that response was frowned upon by
 my customer service reps.
 On Feb 25, 2015 8:56 AM, Ken Chase m...@sizone.org wrote:

  Simple, one simply does not conduct business email over an AOL account.
 
  This is what I've been telling several of my customers about their
  contacts for a while now.
 
  /kc
 
 
  On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 05:24:12AM -0500, Rich Kulawiec said:

Their own announcement:


 
 http://postmaster-blog.aol.com/2014/04/22/aol-mail-updates-dmarc-policy-to-reject/

says that DMARC issues should be referred here:

 dmarc-h...@teamaol.com

(And before anyone asks, yes, the headers on mailing list traffic
have been modified precisely as that page stipulates.)

Perhaps it's too much to expect that in 2015 system and network admins
will actually demonstrate baseline professionalism and competence by
reading and answering role account email.

---rsk
 
  --
  Ken Chase - Toronto Canada
 

Re: AOL Postmaster

[Ken Chase]

they seem to use gmail and actually get their email.

/kc

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 07:24:35AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian said:
 You think every accountant, realtor, coffee shop etc uses their own
 domain?
  

-- 
Ken Chase - k...@heavycomputing.ca skype:kenchase23 +1 416 897 6284 Toronto 
Canada
Heavy Computing - Clued bandwidth, colocation and managed linux VPS @151 Front 
St. W.

Re: AOL Postmaster

[Rich Kulawiec]

Their own announcement:


http://postmaster-blog.aol.com/2014/04/22/aol-mail-updates-dmarc-policy-to-reject/

says that DMARC issues should be referred here:

dmarc-h...@teamaol.com

(And before anyone asks, yes, the headers on mailing list traffic
have been modified precisely as that page stipulates.)

Perhaps it's too much to expect that in 2015 system and network admins
will actually demonstrate baseline professionalism and competence by
reading and answering role account email.

---rsk

RE: AOL Postmaster

[David Hofstee]

Same here. I want to solve things that they seem to have issues with. But when 
I ask what is wrong they either don't respond (in any meaningful manner) or say 
that they 'solved it', without me ever knowing what 'it' was.  

I prefer swimming in seaweed instead of contacting Yahoo (or MS for that 
matter). And the seaweed here is quite gross. 


David Hofstee

Deliverability Management
MailPlus B.V. Netherlands (ESP)

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] Namens Fred
Verzonden: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 3:19 AM
Aan: nanog@nanog.org
Onderwerp: Re: AOL Postmaster

Having exactly the same issue. Also never received any response from AOL. Quite 
annoying.

John Zettlemoyer:
 No, started using an IP address that hasn’t been used since we got the 
 range from Arin, and got this - 554- (RTR:BL) Tried to contact AOL through 
 normal channels, and no response in over a week.  Feedback loop has been in 
 place for years, and we check it every day (its clean).

 John Zettlemoyer


 From: Bill Patterson [mailto:billpatterso...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 3:46 PM
 To: John Zettlemoyer
 Cc: nanog@nanog.org
 Subject: Re: AOL Postmaster

 Did you suddenly start getting AOL will not accept delivery of this message 
 bounce backs?
 On Feb 23, 2015 3:30 PM, John Zettlemoyer j...@west-canaan.net wrote:
 Could someone from AOL who deals with the email systems please contact me 
 off-list.
 Thank you.

 John Zettlemoyer
 WCiT LLC
 856.310.1375 x221
 j...@wcit.net

Re: AOL Postmaster

[Rich Kulawiec]

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 03:19:06AM +0100, Fred wrote:
 Having exactly the same issue. Also never received any response from
 AOL. Quite annoying.

I've been waiting since January 26th for a response from dmarc-h...@teamaol.com,
which is their stipulated contact point for DMARC issues.

Of course I wouldn't *need* a response about that if they hadn't implemented
DMARC so foolishly.

It seems that the days when Carl Hutzler ran the place -- and ran it well --
are now well behind them.  I didn't always agree with their decisions,
but it was obvious that they were working hard and trying to make AOL a
good network neighbor, so even when I disagreed I could at least acknowledge
their good intentions.   It seems now that AOL is determined to permit
unlimited abuse directed at the entire rest of the Internet while
simultaneously making life as difficult as possible for everyone who
*doesn't* abuse...and is counting on their size to make them immune from
the consequences of that decision.

---rsk

Re: AOL Postmaster

[Colin Johnston]

block aol like china blocks with no engagement of comms as justification

colin

Sent from my iPhone

 On 24 Feb 2015, at 12:36, Rich Kulawiec r...@gsp.org wrote:
 
 On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 03:19:06AM +0100, Fred wrote:
 Having exactly the same issue. Also never received any response from
 AOL. Quite annoying.
 
 I've been waiting since January 26th for a response from 
 dmarc-h...@teamaol.com,
 which is their stipulated contact point for DMARC issues.
 
 Of course I wouldn't *need* a response about that if they hadn't implemented
 DMARC so foolishly.
 
 It seems that the days when Carl Hutzler ran the place -- and ran it well --
 are now well behind them.  I didn't always agree with their decisions,
 but it was obvious that they were working hard and trying to make AOL a
 good network neighbor, so even when I disagreed I could at least acknowledge
 their good intentions.   It seems now that AOL is determined to permit
 unlimited abuse directed at the entire rest of the Internet while
 simultaneously making life as difficult as possible for everyone who
 *doesn't* abuse...and is counting on their size to make them immune from
 the consequences of that decision.
 
 ---rsk

Re: AOL Postmaster

[Suresh Ramasubramanian]

And how many users do you have, again?
On Feb 24, 2015 6:29 PM, Colin Johnston col...@gt86car.org.uk wrote:

 block aol like china blocks with no engagement of comms as justification

 colin

 Sent from my iPhone

  On 24 Feb 2015, at 12:36, Rich Kulawiec r...@gsp.org wrote:
 
  On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 03:19:06AM +0100, Fred wrote:
  Having exactly the same issue. Also never received any response from
  AOL. Quite annoying.
 
  I've been waiting since January 26th for a response from
 dmarc-h...@teamaol.com,
  which is their stipulated contact point for DMARC issues.
 
  Of course I wouldn't *need* a response about that if they hadn't
 implemented
  DMARC so foolishly.
 
  It seems that the days when Carl Hutzler ran the place -- and ran it
 well --
  are now well behind them.  I didn't always agree with their decisions,
  but it was obvious that they were working hard and trying to make AOL a
  good network neighbor, so even when I disagreed I could at least
 acknowledge
  their good intentions.   It seems now that AOL is determined to permit
  unlimited abuse directed at the entire rest of the Internet while
  simultaneously making life as difficult as possible for everyone who
  *doesn't* abuse...and is counting on their size to make them immune from
  the consequences of that decision.
 
  ---rsk

Re: AOL Postmaster

[Rich Kulawiec]

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 06:33:08PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
 And how many users do you have, again?

So professionalism, competence, diligence, etc. are reserved for
only the operations considered large enough?  Good to know.

---rsk

Re: AOL Postmaster

[Valdis . Kletnieks]

On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 08:45:15 -0500, Rich Kulawiec said:
 On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 06:33:08PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
  And how many users do you have, again?

 So professionalism, competence, diligence, etc. are reserved for
 only the operations considered large enough?  Good to know.

No, but being able to ignore 800 pound gorillas *is* reserved for
only the operations considered small enough


pgpQBI7FY5qdW.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: AOL Postmaster

[Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.]

For anyone having issues with AOL right now, if you would like, contact me 
offlist and I will see what I can do about getting it in front of our contact 
at AOL.  Please be as specific as you can be about the issue, about who 
controls the IPs, about your own role and authority over the IPs and the email 
that flows through them, and please include at least one sample if possible.

Anne

Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
CEO/President
ISIPP SuretyMail Email Reputation, Accreditation  Certification
Your mail system + SuretyMail accreditation = delivered to their inbox!
http://www.SuretyMail.com/
http://www.SuretyMail.eu/

Author: Section 6 of the Federal CAN-SPAM Act of 2003
Member, California Bar Cyberspace Law Committee
Ret. Professor of Law, Lincoln Law School of San Jose
303-731-2121 | amitch...@isipp.com | @AnnePMitchell | Facebook/AnnePMitchell 

Re: AOL Postmaster

[Adrian Lamo]

The quickest way of contacting the AOL Mail Team I'm aware of is through 
their Twitter account at @AOLMail (https://twitter.com/AOLMail). Tell 
them @6 sent you. ;)


Cordially,
A

-


~~
vox: +1 202 459 9800 x.1300 // secure: +1 410 874 0050
(phone calls need to be arranged in advance)
e: adr...@2600.com // e: adrian.l...@us.army.mil

GPG/PGP public key: https://keybase.io/comsec/key.asc
PGP Fingerprint (64 bit): 324B EE81 A275 E619
(COMSEC First! Verify fingerprint before using key.)
~~



El 2015-02-24 13:03, Suresh Ramasubramanian escribió:

And how many users do you have, again?
On Feb 24, 2015 6:29 PM, Colin Johnston col...@gt86car.org.uk 
wrote:


block aol like china blocks with no engagement of comms as 
justification


colin

Sent from my iPhone

 On 24 Feb 2015, at 12:36, Rich Kulawiec r...@gsp.org wrote:

 On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 03:19:06AM +0100, Fred wrote:
 Having exactly the same issue. Also never received any response from
 AOL. Quite annoying.

 I've been waiting since January 26th for a response from
dmarc-h...@teamaol.com,
 which is their stipulated contact point for DMARC issues.

 Of course I wouldn't *need* a response about that if they hadn't
implemented
 DMARC so foolishly.

 It seems that the days when Carl Hutzler ran the place -- and ran it
well --
 are now well behind them.  I didn't always agree with their decisions,
 but it was obvious that they were working hard and trying to make AOL a
 good network neighbor, so even when I disagreed I could at least
acknowledge
 their good intentions.   It seems now that AOL is determined to permit
 unlimited abuse directed at the entire rest of the Internet while
 simultaneously making life as difficult as possible for everyone who
 *doesn't* abuse...and is counting on their size to make them immune from
 the consequences of that decision.

 ---rsk

RE: AOL Postmaster

[John Zettlemoyer]

No, started using an IP address that hasn’t been used since we got the range 
from Arin, and got this - 554- (RTR:BL)
Tried to contact AOL through normal channels, and no response in over a week.  
Feedback loop has been in place for years, and we check it every day (its 
clean).
 
John Zettlemoyer 

 
From: Bill Patterson [mailto:billpatterso...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 3:46 PM
To: John Zettlemoyer
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: AOL Postmaster
 
Did you suddenly start getting AOL will not accept delivery of this message 
bounce backs?
On Feb 23, 2015 3:30 PM, John Zettlemoyer j...@west-canaan.net wrote:
Could someone from AOL who deals with the email systems please contact me 
off-list.
Thank you.

John Zettlemoyer
WCiT LLC
856.310.1375 x221
j...@wcit.net

Re: AOL Postmaster

[Bill Patterson]

Did you suddenly start getting AOL will not accept delivery of this
message bounce backs?
On Feb 23, 2015 3:30 PM, John Zettlemoyer j...@west-canaan.net wrote:

 Could someone from AOL who deals with the email systems please contact me
 off-list.
 Thank you.

 John Zettlemoyer
 WCiT LLC
 856.310.1375 x221
 j...@wcit.net

RE: AOL Postmaster

[Bill Patterson]

Ok, it took 21 days from the time I opened a ticket with them last month
for them to respond to me. I ended up having to have our ISP update our
rDNS. Not sure if it's something similar for you but I felt the same way
after a week of waiting for a response from them.
On Feb 23, 2015 3:56 PM, John Zettlemoyer j...@west-canaan.net wrote:

 No, started using an IP address that hasn’t been used since we got the
 range from Arin, and got this - 554- (RTR:BL)

 Tried to contact AOL through normal channels, and no response in over a
 week.  Feedback loop has been in place for years, and we check it every day
 (its clean).



 John Zettlemoyer



 *From:* Bill Patterson [mailto:billpatterso...@gmail.com]
 *Sent:* Monday, February 23, 2015 3:46 PM
 *To:* John Zettlemoyer
 *Cc:* nanog@nanog.org
 *Subject:* Re: AOL Postmaster



 Did you suddenly start getting AOL will not accept delivery of this
 message bounce backs?

 On Feb 23, 2015 3:30 PM, John Zettlemoyer j...@west-canaan.net wrote:

 Could someone from AOL who deals with the email systems please contact me
 off-list.
 Thank you.

 John Zettlemoyer
 WCiT LLC
 856.310.1375 x221
 j...@wcit.net

AOL Postmaster

[John Zettlemoyer]

Could someone from AOL who deals with the email systems please contact me 
off-list.
Thank you.
 
John Zettlemoyer 
WCiT LLC
856.310.1375 x221
j...@wcit.net

Re: AOL Postmaster

[Fred]

Having exactly the same issue. Also never received any response from 
AOL. Quite annoying.


John Zettlemoyer:

No, started using an IP address that hasn’t been used since we got the range 
from Arin, and got this - 554- (RTR:BL)
Tried to contact AOL through normal channels, and no response in over a week.  
Feedback loop has been in place for years, and we check it every day (its 
clean).

John Zettlemoyer


From: Bill Patterson [mailto:billpatterso...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 3:46 PM
To: John Zettlemoyer
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: AOL Postmaster

Did you suddenly start getting AOL will not accept delivery of this message 
bounce backs?
On Feb 23, 2015 3:30 PM, John Zettlemoyer j...@west-canaan.net wrote:
Could someone from AOL who deals with the email systems please contact me 
off-list.
Thank you.

John Zettlemoyer
WCiT LLC
856.310.1375 x221
j...@wcit.net

AOL Postmaster

[Dennis Burgess]

Can a AOL Postmaster hit me off-list please J

 

 

Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer Author of Learn RouterOS-
Second Edition http://www.wlan1.com/product_p/mikrotik%20book-2.htm 

 Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services

 Office: 314-735-0270 tel:314-735-0270  Website:
http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/  - Skype: linktechs
skype:linktechs?call

 -- Create Wireless Coverage's with www.towercoverage.com
http://www.towercoverage.com/  - 900Mhz - LTE - 3G - 3.65 - TV
Whitespace  

 

AOL Postmaster

[John Zettlemoyer]

Could someone from the AOL mail group (AOL Postmaster) please contact me off 
list.
Thank you.
 
 
John Zettlemoyer 
Sr. Director of I.T. Infrastructure 
WCiT - West-Canaan LLC 
j...@wcit.net

aol postmaster?

[Matt Kelly]

If there is an AOL postmaster contact available, can you please contact me off 
list?


Thanks.

--
Matt

Re: aol postmaster?

[Marc Powell]

On Aug 24, 2010, at 8:43 PM, Matt Kelly wrote:

 If there is an AOL postmaster contact available, can you please contact me 
 off list?

Have you tried http://postmaster.aol.com? The vast majority of the AOL 
Postmaster team was laid off back in January (and will be missed), so YMMV 
these days.

--
Marc

AOL Postmaster

[Mark Keymer]

Hi,

If at all possible can a AOL Postmaster please get a hold of me. I have
a client that co-lo's with use and we do the support for them and we
need some help on getting mail to be delivering again to AOL.

Thank You in advance.

Sincerely,

Mark Keymer

Re: AOL Postmaster

[Larry Sheldon]

On 3/22/2010 14:03, Mark Keymer wrote:
 Hi,
 
 If at all possible can a AOL Postmaster please get a hold of me. I have
 a client that co-lo's with use and we do the support for them and we
 need some help on getting mail to be delivering again to AOL.

Didn't I read that all of the AOL Postmasters had beenwhat is the
word this week...made redundant?



-- 
Democracy: Three wolves and a sheep voting on the dinner menu.

Requiescas in pace o email
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio
Eppure si rinfresca

ICBM Targeting Information:  http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs
http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml

Re: AOL Postmaster

[Dennis Dayman]

I sent your email to their team.

-Dennis

On Jun 1, 2009, at June 1,9:04 PM, Aaron Wendel wrote:

Yes.  For the last 2 months I've been getting the nice auto reply/ 
ticket

number but no other contact.

Aaron


-Original Message-
From: Mike Walter [mailto:mwal...@3z.net]
Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 12:23 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: AOL Postmaster

Have you been through http://postmaster.aol.com/?

Mike

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Wendel [mailto:aa...@wholesaleinternet.com]
Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 12:48 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: AOL Postmaster

Is anyone from AOL lurking on the list that could contact me of-list?
I'm
having some issues with mail being rejected because AOL believes our  
IPs

are
dynamic.

Aaron

AOL Postmaster

[Aaron Wendel]

Is anyone from AOL lurking on the list that could contact me of-list?  I'm
having some issues with mail being rejected because AOL believes our IPs are
dynamic.

Aaron

RE: AOL Postmaster

[Mike Walter]

Have you been through http://postmaster.aol.com/?

Mike

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Wendel [mailto:aa...@wholesaleinternet.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 12:48 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: AOL Postmaster

Is anyone from AOL lurking on the list that could contact me of-list?
I'm
having some issues with mail being rejected because AOL believes our IPs
are
dynamic.

Aaron

RE: AOL Postmaster

[Aaron Wendel]

Yes.  For the last 2 months I've been getting the nice auto reply/ticket
number but no other contact.

Aaron


-Original Message-
From: Mike Walter [mailto:mwal...@3z.net] 
Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 12:23 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: AOL Postmaster

Have you been through http://postmaster.aol.com/?

Mike

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Wendel [mailto:aa...@wholesaleinternet.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 12:48 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: AOL Postmaster

Is anyone from AOL lurking on the list that could contact me of-list?
I'm
having some issues with mail being rejected because AOL believes our IPs
are
dynamic.

Aaron

seeking AOL postmaster with clue... (sorry)

[Taylor Neill]

I'm pretty much ready to take my life over having to deal with AOL's
Postmaster.

If anyone has a contact or lead at AOL with a clue, could you please respond
off-list?  I am at wits end.

A thousand apologies for the noise,
Taylor Neill