Re: AOL postmaster rejections.
On 11/19/15 6:08 AM, John Peach wrote: > Has anyone else with relatively large volumes of email seen a huge > spike in rejections from AOL recently? We also saw a large increase in this "AOL will not accept delivery of this message" problem earlier this week, despite also having "good reputation" on the affected IP addresses, no changes in what we send, no DNS changes, etc. It happened on about half our outbound mail server IP addresses, but not on the others. We temporarily switched to using only the "good" IP addresses to send to AOL, and they happily accept the same messages. -- Robert L Mathews, Tiger Technologies, http://www.tigertech.net/
Re: AOL postmaster rejections.
On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 13:30:17 -0600 Blake Hudson wrote: > > > John Peach wrote on 11/19/2015 8:08 AM: > > Has anyone else with relatively large volumes of email seen a huge > > spike in rejections from AOL recently? > Yes. > > > There is no obvious reason why they are being rejected as it is a > > generic message: > > > > Nov 18 12:10:39 pp-serve02 sendmail[1391]: tAIHAcPT001383: > > mailin-04.mx.aol.com.: SMTP DATA-2 protocol error: 521 5.2.1 : AOL > > will not accept delivery of this message. > > > > Looking back through my logs, I can see we've always had a few, but > > we are now receiving a lot of complaints from users (physicians who > > cannot email their patients) and I see this, starting on Monday: > > > > syslog-2015-11-16 > > 588 > > syslog-2015-11-17 > > 1668 > > syslog-2015-11-18 > > 1937 > > > > and I already have 55 for today. > Same; started this week. Only appears to affect one of our servers. Now that is interesting; I hadn't though to check that, but it is affecting 3 out of our 4 and they are all in the same subnet. > > Rejected messages by date: > 2015-11-15 > 9 > 2015-11-15 > 4 > 2015-11-16 > 400 > 2015-11-17 > 710 > 2015-11-18 > 683 > > > > > We have a whitelist / feedback loop set up with AOL, our IPs show > > clean with them and our DNS / reverse DNS has not changed and > > resolves properly. > Same here > > > > > We did raise a ticket with them, but it seems to have gone to the > > usual /dev/null. > Same here. I'm recommending AOL customers contact AOL for support. > > > > > To reply off-list, please remove the VERP -nanog from my email > > address, > signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: AOL postmaster rejections.
John Peach wrote on 11/19/2015 8:08 AM: Has anyone else with relatively large volumes of email seen a huge spike in rejections from AOL recently? Yes. There is no obvious reason why they are being rejected as it is a generic message: Nov 18 12:10:39 pp-serve02 sendmail[1391]: tAIHAcPT001383: mailin-04.mx.aol.com.: SMTP DATA-2 protocol error: 521 5.2.1 : AOL will not accept delivery of this message. Looking back through my logs, I can see we've always had a few, but we are now receiving a lot of complaints from users (physicians who cannot email their patients) and I see this, starting on Monday: syslog-2015-11-16 588 syslog-2015-11-17 1668 syslog-2015-11-18 1937 and I already have 55 for today. Same; started this week. Only appears to affect one of our servers. Rejected messages by date: 2015-11-15 9 2015-11-15 4 2015-11-16 400 2015-11-17 710 2015-11-18 683 We have a whitelist / feedback loop set up with AOL, our IPs show clean with them and our DNS / reverse DNS has not changed and resolves properly. Same here We did raise a ticket with them, but it seems to have gone to the usual /dev/null. Same here. I'm recommending AOL customers contact AOL for support. To reply off-list, please remove the VERP -nanog from my email address,
AOL postmaster rejections.
Has anyone else with relatively large volumes of email seen a huge spike in rejections from AOL recently? There is no obvious reason why they are being rejected as it is a generic message: Nov 18 12:10:39 pp-serve02 sendmail[1391]: tAIHAcPT001383: mailin-04.mx.aol.com.: SMTP DATA-2 protocol error: 521 5.2.1 : AOL will not accept delivery of this message. Looking back through my logs, I can see we've always had a few, but we are now receiving a lot of complaints from users (physicians who cannot email their patients) and I see this, starting on Monday: syslog-2015-11-16 588 syslog-2015-11-17 1668 syslog-2015-11-18 1937 and I already have 55 for today. We have a whitelist / feedback loop set up with AOL, our IPs show clean with them and our DNS / reverse DNS has not changed and resolves properly. We did raise a ticket with them, but it seems to have gone to the usual /dev/null. To reply off-list, please remove the VERP -nanog from my email address, signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: AOL Postmaster
On Feb 25, 2015, at 5:54 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > You think every accountant, realtor, coffee shop etc uses their own domain? No. But they should not, and in many cases *cannot*, rely on aol or yahoo addresses. It would suck for them to have to change all their contact information, business cards, and so on - but a) they chose their email provider unwisely and that's the cost of relying on an inappropriate vendor and b) they don't really need to - inbound mail to those addresses is mostly fine, so they just need to get a second email address and gradually migrate their outbound usage to that. Because the root cause of this issue is a long series of security mistakes by those providers, allowing 3rd parties to have access to user's (supposedly private) account information, the issue is specific to those providers, and there's no strong argument that other email providers are likely to make the same business choices. Cheers, Steve
Re: AOL Postmaster
they seem to use gmail and actually get their email. /kc On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 07:24:35AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian said: > You think every accountant, realtor, coffee shop etc uses their own > domain? > -- Ken Chase - k...@heavycomputing.ca skype:kenchase23 +1 416 897 6284 Toronto Canada Heavy Computing - Clued bandwidth, colocation and managed linux VPS @151 Front St. W.
Re: AOL Postmaster
You think every accountant, realtor, coffee shop etc uses their own domain? On Feb 26, 2015 3:12 AM, "Bill Patterson" wrote: > That was my first response as well. But that response was frowned upon by > my customer service reps. > On Feb 25, 2015 8:56 AM, "Ken Chase" wrote: > > > Simple, one simply does not conduct business email over an AOL account. > > > > This is what I've been telling several of my customers about their > > contacts for a while now. > > > > /kc > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 05:24:12AM -0500, Rich Kulawiec said: > > > > > >Their own announcement: > > > > > > > > > http://postmaster-blog.aol.com/2014/04/22/aol-mail-updates-dmarc-policy-to-reject/ > > > > > >says that DMARC issues should be referred here: > > > > > > dmarc-h...@teamaol.com > > > > > >(And before anyone asks, yes, the headers on mailing list traffic > > >have been modified precisely as that page stipulates.) > > > > > >Perhaps it's too much to expect that in 2015 system and network admins > > >will actually demonstrate baseline professionalism and competence by > > >reading and answering role account email. > > > > > >---rsk > > > > -- > > Ken Chase - Toronto Canada > > >
Re: AOL Postmaster
That was my first response as well. But that response was frowned upon by my customer service reps. On Feb 25, 2015 8:56 AM, "Ken Chase" wrote: > Simple, one simply does not conduct business email over an AOL account. > > This is what I've been telling several of my customers about their > contacts for a while now. > > /kc > > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 05:24:12AM -0500, Rich Kulawiec said: > > > >Their own announcement: > > > > > http://postmaster-blog.aol.com/2014/04/22/aol-mail-updates-dmarc-policy-to-reject/ > > > >says that DMARC issues should be referred here: > > > > dmarc-h...@teamaol.com > > > >(And before anyone asks, yes, the headers on mailing list traffic > >have been modified precisely as that page stipulates.) > > > >Perhaps it's too much to expect that in 2015 system and network admins > >will actually demonstrate baseline professionalism and competence by > >reading and answering role account email. > > > >---rsk > > -- > Ken Chase - Toronto Canada >
Re: AOL Postmaster
Simple, one simply does not conduct business email over an AOL account. This is what I've been telling several of my customers about their contacts for a while now. /kc On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 05:24:12AM -0500, Rich Kulawiec said: > >Their own announcement: > > http://postmaster-blog.aol.com/2014/04/22/aol-mail-updates-dmarc-policy-to-reject/ > >says that DMARC issues should be referred here: > > dmarc-h...@teamaol.com > >(And before anyone asks, yes, the headers on mailing list traffic >have been modified precisely as that page stipulates.) > >Perhaps it's too much to expect that in 2015 system and network admins >will actually demonstrate baseline professionalism and competence by >reading and answering role account email. > >---rsk -- Ken Chase - Toronto Canada
Re: AOL Postmaster
Their own announcement: http://postmaster-blog.aol.com/2014/04/22/aol-mail-updates-dmarc-policy-to-reject/ says that DMARC issues should be referred here: dmarc-h...@teamaol.com (And before anyone asks, yes, the headers on mailing list traffic have been modified precisely as that page stipulates.) Perhaps it's too much to expect that in 2015 system and network admins will actually demonstrate baseline professionalism and competence by reading and answering role account email. ---rsk
Re: AOL Postmaster
For anyone having issues with AOL right now, if you would like, contact me offlist and I will see what I can do about getting it in front of our contact at AOL. Please be as specific as you can be about the issue, about who controls the IPs, about your own role and authority over the IPs and the email that flows through them, and please include at least one sample if possible. Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. CEO/President ISIPP SuretyMail Email Reputation, Accreditation & Certification Your mail system + SuretyMail accreditation = delivered to their inbox! http://www.SuretyMail.com/ http://www.SuretyMail.eu/ Author: Section 6 of the Federal CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 Member, California Bar Cyberspace Law Committee Ret. Professor of Law, Lincoln Law School of San Jose 303-731-2121 | amitch...@isipp.com | @AnnePMitchell | Facebook/AnnePMitchell
Re: AOL Postmaster
The quickest way of contacting the AOL Mail Team I'm aware of is through their Twitter account at @AOLMail (https://twitter.com/AOLMail). Tell them @6 sent you. ;) Cordially, A - ~~ vox: +1 202 459 9800 x.1300 // secure: +1 410 874 0050 (phone calls need to be arranged in advance) e: adr...@2600.com // e: adrian.l...@us.army.mil GPG/PGP public key: https://keybase.io/comsec/key.asc PGP Fingerprint (64 bit): 324B EE81 A275 E619 (COMSEC First! Verify fingerprint before using key.) ~~ El 2015-02-24 13:03, Suresh Ramasubramanian escribió: And how many users do you have, again? On Feb 24, 2015 6:29 PM, "Colin Johnston" wrote: block aol like china blocks with no engagement of comms as justification colin Sent from my iPhone > On 24 Feb 2015, at 12:36, Rich Kulawiec wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 03:19:06AM +0100, Fred wrote: >> Having exactly the same issue. Also never received any response from >> AOL. Quite annoying. > > I've been waiting since January 26th for a response from dmarc-h...@teamaol.com, > which is their stipulated contact point for DMARC issues. > > Of course I wouldn't *need* a response about that if they hadn't implemented > DMARC so foolishly. > > It seems that the days when Carl Hutzler ran the place -- and ran it well -- > are now well behind them. I didn't always agree with their decisions, > but it was obvious that they were working hard and trying to make AOL a > good network neighbor, so even when I disagreed I could at least acknowledge > their good intentions. It seems now that AOL is determined to permit > unlimited abuse directed at the entire rest of the Internet while > simultaneously making life as difficult as possible for everyone who > *doesn't* abuse...and is counting on their size to make them immune from > the consequences of that decision. > > ---rsk
Re: AOL Postmaster
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 08:45:15 -0500, Rich Kulawiec said: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 06:33:08PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > > And how many users do you have, again? > > So professionalism, competence, diligence, etc. are reserved for > only the operations considered large enough? Good to know. No, but being able to ignore 800 pound gorillas *is* reserved for only the operations considered small enough pgpQBI7FY5qdW.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: AOL Postmaster
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 06:33:08PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > And how many users do you have, again? So professionalism, competence, diligence, etc. are reserved for only the operations considered large enough? Good to know. ---rsk
Re: AOL Postmaster
And how many users do you have, again? On Feb 24, 2015 6:29 PM, "Colin Johnston" wrote: > block aol like china blocks with no engagement of comms as justification > > colin > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On 24 Feb 2015, at 12:36, Rich Kulawiec wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 03:19:06AM +0100, Fred wrote: > >> Having exactly the same issue. Also never received any response from > >> AOL. Quite annoying. > > > > I've been waiting since January 26th for a response from > dmarc-h...@teamaol.com, > > which is their stipulated contact point for DMARC issues. > > > > Of course I wouldn't *need* a response about that if they hadn't > implemented > > DMARC so foolishly. > > > > It seems that the days when Carl Hutzler ran the place -- and ran it > well -- > > are now well behind them. I didn't always agree with their decisions, > > but it was obvious that they were working hard and trying to make AOL a > > good network neighbor, so even when I disagreed I could at least > acknowledge > > their good intentions. It seems now that AOL is determined to permit > > unlimited abuse directed at the entire rest of the Internet while > > simultaneously making life as difficult as possible for everyone who > > *doesn't* abuse...and is counting on their size to make them immune from > > the consequences of that decision. > > > > ---rsk >
Re: AOL Postmaster
block aol like china blocks with no engagement of comms as justification colin Sent from my iPhone > On 24 Feb 2015, at 12:36, Rich Kulawiec wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 03:19:06AM +0100, Fred wrote: >> Having exactly the same issue. Also never received any response from >> AOL. Quite annoying. > > I've been waiting since January 26th for a response from > dmarc-h...@teamaol.com, > which is their stipulated contact point for DMARC issues. > > Of course I wouldn't *need* a response about that if they hadn't implemented > DMARC so foolishly. > > It seems that the days when Carl Hutzler ran the place -- and ran it well -- > are now well behind them. I didn't always agree with their decisions, > but it was obvious that they were working hard and trying to make AOL a > good network neighbor, so even when I disagreed I could at least acknowledge > their good intentions. It seems now that AOL is determined to permit > unlimited abuse directed at the entire rest of the Internet while > simultaneously making life as difficult as possible for everyone who > *doesn't* abuse...and is counting on their size to make them immune from > the consequences of that decision. > > ---rsk
Re: AOL Postmaster
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 03:19:06AM +0100, Fred wrote: > Having exactly the same issue. Also never received any response from > AOL. Quite annoying. I've been waiting since January 26th for a response from dmarc-h...@teamaol.com, which is their stipulated contact point for DMARC issues. Of course I wouldn't *need* a response about that if they hadn't implemented DMARC so foolishly. It seems that the days when Carl Hutzler ran the place -- and ran it well -- are now well behind them. I didn't always agree with their decisions, but it was obvious that they were working hard and trying to make AOL a good network neighbor, so even when I disagreed I could at least acknowledge their good intentions. It seems now that AOL is determined to permit unlimited abuse directed at the entire rest of the Internet while simultaneously making life as difficult as possible for everyone who *doesn't* abuse...and is counting on their size to make them immune from the consequences of that decision. ---rsk
RE: AOL Postmaster
Same here. I want to solve things that they seem to have issues with. But when I ask what is wrong they either don't respond (in any meaningful manner) or say that they 'solved it', without me ever knowing what 'it' was. I prefer swimming in seaweed instead of contacting Yahoo (or MS for that matter). And the seaweed here is quite gross. David Hofstee Deliverability Management MailPlus B.V. Netherlands (ESP) -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] Namens Fred Verzonden: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 3:19 AM Aan: nanog@nanog.org Onderwerp: Re: AOL Postmaster Having exactly the same issue. Also never received any response from AOL. Quite annoying. John Zettlemoyer: > No, started using an IP address that hasn’t been used since we got the > range from Arin, and got this - 554- (RTR:BL) Tried to contact AOL through > normal channels, and no response in over a week. Feedback loop has been in > place for years, and we check it every day (its clean). > > John Zettlemoyer > > > From: Bill Patterson [mailto:billpatterso...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 3:46 PM > To: John Zettlemoyer > Cc: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: AOL Postmaster > > Did you suddenly start getting "AOL will not accept delivery of this message" > bounce backs? > On Feb 23, 2015 3:30 PM, "John Zettlemoyer" wrote: > Could someone from AOL who deals with the email systems please contact me > off-list. > Thank you. > > John Zettlemoyer > WCiT LLC > 856.310.1375 x221 > j...@wcit.net >
Re: AOL Postmaster
Having exactly the same issue. Also never received any response from AOL. Quite annoying. John Zettlemoyer: No, started using an IP address that hasn’t been used since we got the range from Arin, and got this - 554- (RTR:BL) Tried to contact AOL through normal channels, and no response in over a week. Feedback loop has been in place for years, and we check it every day (its clean). John Zettlemoyer From: Bill Patterson [mailto:billpatterso...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 3:46 PM To: John Zettlemoyer Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: AOL Postmaster Did you suddenly start getting "AOL will not accept delivery of this message" bounce backs? On Feb 23, 2015 3:30 PM, "John Zettlemoyer" wrote: Could someone from AOL who deals with the email systems please contact me off-list. Thank you. John Zettlemoyer WCiT LLC 856.310.1375 x221 j...@wcit.net
RE: AOL Postmaster
Ok, it took 21 days from the time I opened a ticket with them last month for them to respond to me. I ended up having to have our ISP update our rDNS. Not sure if it's something similar for you but I felt the same way after a week of waiting for a response from them. On Feb 23, 2015 3:56 PM, "John Zettlemoyer" wrote: > No, started using an IP address that hasn’t been used since we got the > range from Arin, and got this - 554- (RTR:BL) > > Tried to contact AOL through normal channels, and no response in over a > week. Feedback loop has been in place for years, and we check it every day > (its clean). > > > > John Zettlemoyer > > > > *From:* Bill Patterson [mailto:billpatterso...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Monday, February 23, 2015 3:46 PM > *To:* John Zettlemoyer > *Cc:* nanog@nanog.org > *Subject:* Re: AOL Postmaster > > > > Did you suddenly start getting "AOL will not accept delivery of this > message" bounce backs? > > On Feb 23, 2015 3:30 PM, "John Zettlemoyer" wrote: > > Could someone from AOL who deals with the email systems please contact me > off-list. > Thank you. > > John Zettlemoyer > WCiT LLC > 856.310.1375 x221 > j...@wcit.net >
RE: AOL Postmaster
No, started using an IP address that hasn’t been used since we got the range from Arin, and got this - 554- (RTR:BL) Tried to contact AOL through normal channels, and no response in over a week. Feedback loop has been in place for years, and we check it every day (its clean). John Zettlemoyer From: Bill Patterson [mailto:billpatterso...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 3:46 PM To: John Zettlemoyer Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: AOL Postmaster Did you suddenly start getting "AOL will not accept delivery of this message" bounce backs? On Feb 23, 2015 3:30 PM, "John Zettlemoyer" wrote: Could someone from AOL who deals with the email systems please contact me off-list. Thank you. John Zettlemoyer WCiT LLC 856.310.1375 x221 j...@wcit.net
Re: AOL Postmaster
Did you suddenly start getting "AOL will not accept delivery of this message" bounce backs? On Feb 23, 2015 3:30 PM, "John Zettlemoyer" wrote: > Could someone from AOL who deals with the email systems please contact me > off-list. > Thank you. > > John Zettlemoyer > WCiT LLC > 856.310.1375 x221 > j...@wcit.net >
AOL Postmaster
Could someone from AOL who deals with the email systems please contact me off-list. Thank you. John Zettlemoyer WCiT LLC 856.310.1375 x221 j...@wcit.net
AOL Postmaster
Can a AOL Postmaster hit me off-list please J Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition <http://www.wlan1.com/product_p/mikrotik%20book-2.htm> " Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services Office: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net <http://www.linktechs.net/> - Skype: linktechs -- Create Wireless Coverage's with www.towercoverage.com <http://www.towercoverage.com/> - 900Mhz - LTE - 3G - 3.65 - TV Whitespace
AOL Postmaster
Could someone from the AOL mail group (AOL Postmaster) please contact me off list. Thank you. John Zettlemoyer Sr. Director of I.T. Infrastructure WCiT - West-Canaan LLC j...@wcit.net
Re: aol postmaster?
On Aug 24, 2010, at 8:43 PM, Matt Kelly wrote: > If there is an AOL postmaster contact available, can you please contact me > off list? Have you tried http://postmaster.aol.com? The vast majority of the AOL Postmaster team was laid off back in January (and will be missed), so YMMV these days. -- Marc
aol postmaster?
If there is an AOL postmaster contact available, can you please contact me off list? Thanks. -- Matt
Re: AOL Postmaster
On Mar 22, 2010, at 12:23 PM, Larry Sheldon wrote: > On 3/22/2010 14:03, Mark Keymer wrote: >> Hi, >> >> If at all possible can a AOL Postmaster please get a hold of me. I have >> a client that co-lo's with use and we do the support for them and we >> need some help on getting mail to be delivering again to AOL. > > Didn't I read that all of the AOL Postmasters had beenwhat is the > word this week...made redundant? Most, but not all. You can reach those who remain via http://postmaster.aol.net/, just as before. -- J.D. Falk Return Path Inc
Re: AOL Postmaster
On 3/22/2010 14:03, Mark Keymer wrote: > Hi, > > If at all possible can a AOL Postmaster please get a hold of me. I have > a client that co-lo's with use and we do the support for them and we > need some help on getting mail to be delivering again to AOL. Didn't I read that all of the AOL Postmasters had beenwhat is the word this week...made redundant? -- Democracy: Three wolves and a sheep voting on the dinner menu. Requiescas in pace o email Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Eppure si rinfresca ICBM Targeting Information: http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml
AOL Postmaster
Hi, If at all possible can a AOL Postmaster please get a hold of me. I have a client that co-lo's with use and we do the support for them and we need some help on getting mail to be delivering again to AOL. Thank You in advance. Sincerely, Mark Keymer
Re: AOL Postmaster
I sent your email to their team. -Dennis On Jun 1, 2009, at June 1,9:04 PM, Aaron Wendel wrote: Yes. For the last 2 months I've been getting the nice auto reply/ ticket number but no other contact. Aaron -Original Message- From: Mike Walter [mailto:mwal...@3z.net] Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 12:23 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: AOL Postmaster Have you been through http://postmaster.aol.com/? Mike -Original Message- From: Aaron Wendel [mailto:aa...@wholesaleinternet.com] Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 12:48 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: AOL Postmaster Is anyone from AOL lurking on the list that could contact me of-list? I'm having some issues with mail being rejected because AOL believes our IPs are dynamic. Aaron
RE: AOL Postmaster
Yes. For the last 2 months I've been getting the nice auto reply/ticket number but no other contact. Aaron -Original Message- From: Mike Walter [mailto:mwal...@3z.net] Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 12:23 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: AOL Postmaster Have you been through http://postmaster.aol.com/? Mike -Original Message- From: Aaron Wendel [mailto:aa...@wholesaleinternet.com] Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 12:48 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: AOL Postmaster Is anyone from AOL lurking on the list that could contact me of-list? I'm having some issues with mail being rejected because AOL believes our IPs are dynamic. Aaron
RE: AOL Postmaster
Have you been through http://postmaster.aol.com/? Mike -Original Message- From: Aaron Wendel [mailto:aa...@wholesaleinternet.com] Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 12:48 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: AOL Postmaster Is anyone from AOL lurking on the list that could contact me of-list? I'm having some issues with mail being rejected because AOL believes our IPs are dynamic. Aaron
AOL Postmaster
Is anyone from AOL lurking on the list that could contact me of-list? I'm having some issues with mail being rejected because AOL believes our IPs are dynamic. Aaron
seeking AOL postmaster with clue... (sorry)
I'm pretty much ready to take my life over having to deal with AOL's Postmaster. If anyone has a contact or lead at AOL with a clue, could you please respond off-list? I am at wits end. A thousand apologies for the noise, Taylor Neill
RE: AOL Postmaster?
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 14:39 -0400, David Hubbard wrote: > I'm still getting feedback on netblocks we haven't been > associated with in several years and I've tried about > 20 times to get them to stop it but cannot. If you call > they just tell you to email, if you email you get nowhere. I've had that experience in the past too. Even today, despite periodic emails to them, I still get daily "Current IP Address(es) Listed with AOL" emails from [EMAIL PROTECTED], yet the IP addresses are an incomplete list of IPs that they have been provided and that they have accepted. I can delete the daily emails, but to me it is symptomatic of underlying problems with their FBL system. If anyone from AOL wants to debug this... here are some of your Message-id's: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you can figure out why you are sending me daily emails, I certainly would appreciate it. Previous calls and emails have been fruitless, but not frustrating. -Jim P.
RE: AOL Postmaster?
I found the following website to be very helpful when dealing with AOL email issues: http://postmaster.info.aol.com/ <http://postmaster.info.aol.com/> Hope that helps, Adam Stasiniewicz From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Vish Yelsangikar Sent: Fri 4/13/2007 1:16 PM To: NANOG list Subject: AOL Postmaster? Anybody from AOL on this list? Could you please send me an email offlist? I need some help. Thanks. Vish
AOL Postmaster?
Anybody from AOL on this list? Could you please send me an email offlist? I need some help. Thanks. Vish
