Re: ATT - Qwest ... Localpref issue?

2011-08-08 Thread Alan Bryant
Graham,

We have the same issue as you, although it has been that way since the
beginning. Our primary is Level 3, and backup CenturyLink.

We have been forced to only announce certain prefixes out each in
order to get a balance. CenturyLink has told me that they do not
support communities.

Unfortunately I have much longer on my contract than you.

We are even having problems routing to AOL  Yahoo on CenturyLink.
I've had to refuse those routes from CenturyLink since Yahoo prepends
out Level 3.

On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Graham Wooden gra...@g-rock.net wrote:
 I should also note that Centurylink has been less than cooperative on even
 thinking about changing my routes to a pref of 70 on our behalf (they don't
 accept communities). I think time to get the account rep involved ...


 On 8/7/11 8:30 AM, Graham Wooden gra...@g-rock.net wrote:

 Thanks Paul.

 Localpref with Qwest on my ATT prefixes was 100 until last week ... So my
 prepends to balance between the two was working just fine for the past 2
 years or so.
 My announcements to CenturyLink to Qwest are coming out as 100.

 I am not a direct customer of Qwest, so sending the community of 209:70
 won¹t work (already tried that).  I am a direct customer of CenturyLink and
 unfortunately the two networks haven¹t really come together as one just yet.
 I sent a note to ATT ­ maybe the can help do something, as I reviewed the
 communities with them and I am already doing what I need to do.

 The main problem here is that our CenturyLink connection is pure crap ...
 Even originating routes from their network, I had them take our ATT (the
 other transit at this particular POP) - faster and less hops (go figure).
 At our other pops with more than 1 transits, we like to utilize both as much
 as possible.

 Contract is up in December ... can¹t wait until it¹s gone.


 On 8/6/11 11:57 PM, PC paul4...@gmail.com wrote:

 Qwest uses 80 for peers; 100 for customers.  As I'm sure Qwest had ATT as a
 peer prior to today (and you tagged as a customer), it probably should have
 been 80 since the beginning.  What was the local pref to ATT before?  Maybe
 they found a misconfiguration on a router.

 If your only objective is to make your Qwest peering backup, send 
 community
 209:70 to Qwest and it'll drop your local pref on their network to 70.  This
 will cause their 80 local pref peering with ATT to be preferred.

 I also suggest you read:
 http://www.onesc.net/communities/as209/
 and
 http://www.onesc.net/communities/as7018/

 However, depending on if your network topology and situational circumstances
 permit it, it may not be a bad idea to take on-net customer routes for
 performance reasons.

 On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Graham Wooden gra...@g-rock.net wrote:
 Hi folks,

 Anyone else noticed a localpref change on Qwest network in regards to ATT
 prefixes?  I noticed my ATT assigned prefixes dropping to 80, causing my
 backup transit peering with Centurylink to take preference with Qwest
 originators ...  All was working fine with my prepends .. But not 
 anymore...

 Any insight would be great. I haven¹t reached out to ATT or Qwest yet.
 Curious if this is a bigger change than just me.

 Thanks,

 -graham










-- 
Alan Bryant
Gtek Computers  Wireless L.L.C.
Office: 361-777-1400 | Fax: 361-777-1405
a...@gtekcommunications.com | www.gtek.biz

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication (including any attachments)
may contain privileged or confidential information intended for a
specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are
not the intended recipient, you should delete this communication
and/or shred the materials and any attachments and are hereby notified
that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this communication,
or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. Thank
you.



Re: ATT - Qwest ... Localpref issue?

2011-08-08 Thread PC
I don't like it as it's a slower to converge solution, but look into BGP
conditional advertising.

Or better yet, tell AM you want to move to the Qwest internet product.
You want to peer with AS 209.

On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Graham Wooden gra...@g-rock.net wrote:

  Thanks Paul.

 Localpref with Qwest on my ATT prefixes was 100 until last week ... So my
 prepends to balance between the two was working just fine for the past 2
 years or so.
 My announcements to CenturyLink to Qwest are coming out as 100.

 I am not a direct customer of Qwest, so sending the community of 209:70
 won’t work (already tried that).  I am a direct customer of CenturyLink and
 unfortunately the two networks haven’t really come together as one just yet.
I sent a note to ATT – maybe the can help do something, as I reviewed
 the communities with them and I am already doing what I need to do.

 The main problem here is that our CenturyLink connection is pure crap ...
 Even originating routes from their network, I had them take our ATT (the
 other transit at this particular POP) - faster and less hops (go figure).
  At our other pops with more than 1 transits, we like to utilize both as
 much as possible.

 Contract is up in December ... can’t wait until it’s gone.



 On 8/6/11 11:57 PM, PC paul4...@gmail.com wrote:

 Qwest uses 80 for peers; 100 for customers.  As I'm sure Qwest had ATT as
 a peer prior to today (and you tagged as a customer), it probably should
 have been 80 since the beginning.  What was the local pref to ATT before?
 Maybe they found a misconfiguration on a router.

 If your only objective is to make your Qwest peering backup, send
 community 209:70 to Qwest and it'll drop your local pref on their network to
 70.  This will cause their 80 local pref peering with ATT to be preferred.

 I also suggest you read:
 http://www.onesc.net/communities/as209/
 and
 http://www.onesc.net/communities/as7018/

 However, depending on if your network topology and situational
 circumstances permit it, it may not be a bad idea to take on-net customer
 routes for performance reasons.

 On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Graham Wooden gra...@g-rock.net wrote:

 Hi folks,

 Anyone else noticed a localpref change on Qwest network in regards to ATT
 prefixes?  I noticed my ATT assigned prefixes dropping to 80, causing my
 backup transit peering with Centurylink to take preference with Qwest
 originators ...  All was working fine with my prepends .. But not
 anymore...

 Any insight would be great. I haven’t reached out to ATT or Qwest yet.
 Curious if this is a bigger change than just me.

 Thanks,

 -graham






Re: ATT - Qwest ... Localpref issue?

2011-08-07 Thread Graham Wooden
Thanks Paul.

Localpref with Qwest on my ATT prefixes was 100 until last week ... So my
prepends to balance between the two was working just fine for the past 2
years or so.
My announcements to CenturyLink to Qwest are coming out as 100.

I am not a direct customer of Qwest, so sending the community of 209:70
won¹t work (already tried that).  I am a direct customer of CenturyLink and
unfortunately the two networks haven¹t really come together as one just yet.
I sent a note to ATT ­ maybe the can help do something, as I reviewed the
communities with them and I am already doing what I need to do.

The main problem here is that our CenturyLink connection is pure crap ...
Even originating routes from their network, I had them take our ATT (the
other transit at this particular POP) - faster and less hops (go figure).
At our other pops with more than 1 transits, we like to utilize both as much
as possible.  

Contract is up in December ... can¹t wait until it¹s gone.


On 8/6/11 11:57 PM, PC paul4...@gmail.com wrote:

 Qwest uses 80 for peers; 100 for customers.  As I'm sure Qwest had ATT as a
 peer prior to today (and you tagged as a customer), it probably should have
 been 80 since the beginning.  What was the local pref to ATT before?  Maybe
 they found a misconfiguration on a router.
 
 If your only objective is to make your Qwest peering backup, send community
 209:70 to Qwest and it'll drop your local pref on their network to 70.  This
 will cause their 80 local pref peering with ATT to be preferred.
 
 I also suggest you read:
 http://www.onesc.net/communities/as209/
 and
 http://www.onesc.net/communities/as7018/
 
 However, depending on if your network topology and situational circumstances
 permit it, it may not be a bad idea to take on-net customer routes for
 performance reasons.
 
 On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Graham Wooden gra...@g-rock.net wrote:
 Hi folks,
 
 Anyone else noticed a localpref change on Qwest network in regards to ATT
 prefixes?  I noticed my ATT assigned prefixes dropping to 80, causing my
 backup transit peering with Centurylink to take preference with Qwest
 originators ...  All was working fine with my prepends .. But not anymore...
 
 Any insight would be great. I haven¹t reached out to ATT or Qwest yet.
 Curious if this is a bigger change than just me.
 
 Thanks,
 
 -graham
 
 



Re: ATT - Qwest ... Localpref issue?

2011-08-07 Thread Graham Wooden
I should also note that Centurylink has been less than cooperative on even
thinking about changing my routes to a pref of 70 on our behalf (they don't
accept communities). I think time to get the account rep involved ...


On 8/7/11 8:30 AM, Graham Wooden gra...@g-rock.net wrote:

 Thanks Paul.
 
 Localpref with Qwest on my ATT prefixes was 100 until last week ... So my
 prepends to balance between the two was working just fine for the past 2
 years or so.
 My announcements to CenturyLink to Qwest are coming out as 100.
 
 I am not a direct customer of Qwest, so sending the community of 209:70
 won¹t work (already tried that).  I am a direct customer of CenturyLink and
 unfortunately the two networks haven¹t really come together as one just yet.
 I sent a note to ATT ­ maybe the can help do something, as I reviewed the
 communities with them and I am already doing what I need to do.
 
 The main problem here is that our CenturyLink connection is pure crap ...
 Even originating routes from their network, I had them take our ATT (the
 other transit at this particular POP) - faster and less hops (go figure).
 At our other pops with more than 1 transits, we like to utilize both as much
 as possible.  
 
 Contract is up in December ... can¹t wait until it¹s gone.
 
 
 On 8/6/11 11:57 PM, PC paul4...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Qwest uses 80 for peers; 100 for customers.  As I'm sure Qwest had ATT as a
 peer prior to today (and you tagged as a customer), it probably should have
 been 80 since the beginning.  What was the local pref to ATT before?  Maybe
 they found a misconfiguration on a router.
 
 If your only objective is to make your Qwest peering backup, send community
 209:70 to Qwest and it'll drop your local pref on their network to 70.  This
 will cause their 80 local pref peering with ATT to be preferred.
 
 I also suggest you read:
 http://www.onesc.net/communities/as209/
 and
 http://www.onesc.net/communities/as7018/
 
 However, depending on if your network topology and situational circumstances
 permit it, it may not be a bad idea to take on-net customer routes for
 performance reasons.
 
 On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Graham Wooden gra...@g-rock.net wrote:
 Hi folks,
 
 Anyone else noticed a localpref change on Qwest network in regards to ATT
 prefixes?  I noticed my ATT assigned prefixes dropping to 80, causing my
 backup transit peering with Centurylink to take preference with Qwest
 originators ...  All was working fine with my prepends .. But not anymore...
 
 Any insight would be great. I haven¹t reached out to ATT or Qwest yet.
 Curious if this is a bigger change than just me.
 
 Thanks,
 
 -graham
 
 
 





Re: ATT - Qwest ... Localpref issue?

2011-08-07 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Sun, 07 Aug 2011 08:53:05 CDT, Graham Wooden said:
 I should also note that Centurylink has been less than cooperative on even
 thinking about changing my routes to a pref of 70 on our behalf (they don't
 accept communities). I think time to get the account rep involved ...

they don't accept communities??!? Just... wow. ;)

(That's if they flat out don't support it - there's a separate ring of Hell
reserved for the ones who do support it but forget to document the part
about singing the Zimbabwe national anthem backwards while standing on
your head...)


pgp0LElBopvOs.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: ATT - Qwest ... Localpref issue?

2011-08-07 Thread Joel Jaeggli
This is one of the reasons that I thought a useful output from the opsec or idr 
working group would be a documented set of community functions. Not mapped to 
values mind you. but I really like to say to providers do you support rfc blah 
communities or what's your rfc blah community mapping rather than what 
communities do you support.



On Aug 7, 2011, at 8:39 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:

 On Sun, 07 Aug 2011 08:53:05 CDT, Graham Wooden said:
 I should also note that Centurylink has been less than cooperative on even
 thinking about changing my routes to a pref of 70 on our behalf (they don't
 accept communities). I think time to get the account rep involved ...
 
 they don't accept communities??!? Just... wow. ;)
 
 (That's if they flat out don't support it - there's a separate ring of Hell
 reserved for the ones who do support it but forget to document the part
 about singing the Zimbabwe national anthem backwards while standing on
 your head...)




ATT - Qwest ... Localpref issue?

2011-08-06 Thread Graham Wooden
Hi folks,

Anyone else noticed a localpref change on Qwest network in regards to ATT
prefixes?  I noticed my ATT assigned prefixes dropping to 80, causing my
backup transit peering with Centurylink to take preference with Qwest
originators ...  All was working fine with my prepends .. But not anymore...

Any insight would be great. I haven¹t reached out to ATT or Qwest yet.
Curious if this is a bigger change than just me.

Thanks,

-graham


Re: ATT - Qwest ... Localpref issue?

2011-08-06 Thread PC
Qwest uses 80 for peers; 100 for customers.  As I'm sure Qwest had ATT as a
peer prior to today (and you tagged as a customer), it probably should have
been 80 since the beginning.  What was the local pref to ATT before?  Maybe
they found a misconfiguration on a router.

If your only objective is to make your Qwest peering backup, send
community 209:70 to Qwest and it'll drop your local pref on their network to
70.  This will cause their 80 local pref peering with ATT to be preferred.

I also suggest you read:
http://www.onesc.net/communities/as209/
and
http://www.onesc.net/communities/as7018/

However, depending on if your network topology and situational circumstances
permit it, it may not be a bad idea to take on-net customer routes for
performance reasons.

On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Graham Wooden gra...@g-rock.net wrote:

 Hi folks,

 Anyone else noticed a localpref change on Qwest network in regards to ATT
 prefixes?  I noticed my ATT assigned prefixes dropping to 80, causing my
 backup transit peering with Centurylink to take preference with Qwest
 originators ...  All was working fine with my prepends .. But not
 anymore...

 Any insight would be great. I haven¹t reached out to ATT or Qwest yet.
 Curious if this is a bigger change than just me.

 Thanks,

 -graham