Announcing APNIC IP's in ARIN region

2012-09-25 Thread Brandon Wade

Hello,

I was wondering if there are any problems originating APNIC IP's in the 
ARIN region through transit providers? I have a Singapore-based prospect 
who would like to do business with us, but I'm not sure if I'll run into 
problems originating their IP's in the US - which were assigned to them 
from APNIC.


Best regards,
Brandon Wade
iCastCenter.com



Re: Announcing APNIC IP's in ARIN region

2012-09-25 Thread Jeroen Massar
On 2012-09-21 01:57, Brandon Wade wrote:
 Hello,
 
 I was wondering if there are any problems originating APNIC IP's in the
 ARIN region through transit providers? I have a Singapore-based prospect
 who would like to do business with us, but I'm not sure if I'll run into
 problems originating their IP's in the US - which were assigned to them
 from APNIC.

As this Internet thing is a global thing, why would that be an issue?

(unless it is a spammer outfit of course ;)

Greets,
 Jeroen




Re: Announcing APNIC IP's in ARIN region

2012-09-25 Thread Wayne E Bouchard
It presents no technical problem but has always been considered
politically inadvisable. I mean, there are multiple registries for a
reason that goes beyond mere oranization and load sharing.
Increasingly, governments are trying to take more control over packets
(there is ever the push for geographic maping mechanisms and so on)
and that may introduce potential legal problems in the future,
depending on the nation you're in and how paranoid they become.

So in short, do what you need to do. Just be aware of sub-optimal.

-Wayne

On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:30:59AM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
 On 2012-09-21 01:57, Brandon Wade wrote:
  Hello,
  
  I was wondering if there are any problems originating APNIC IP's in the
  ARIN region through transit providers? I have a Singapore-based prospect
  who would like to do business with us, but I'm not sure if I'll run into
  problems originating their IP's in the US - which were assigned to them
  from APNIC.
 
 As this Internet thing is a global thing, why would that be an issue?
 
 (unless it is a spammer outfit of course ;)
 
 Greets,
  Jeroen
 

---
Wayne Bouchard
w...@typo.org
Network Dude
http://www.typo.org/~web/



Re: Announcing APNIC IP's in ARIN region

2012-09-25 Thread Mark Andrews

In message 505bad72.9070...@icastcenter.com, Brandon Wade writes:
 Hello,
 
 I was wondering if there are any problems originating APNIC IP's in the 
 ARIN region through transit providers? I have a Singapore-based prospect 
 who would like to do business with us, but I'm not sure if I'll run into 
 problems originating their IP's in the US - which were assigned to them 
 from APNIC.
 
 Best regards,
 Brandon Wade
 iCastCenter.com

There should be no problems.

-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org



Re: Announcing APNIC IP's in ARIN region

2012-09-25 Thread Mark Andrews

In message 20120925090534.ga7...@wakko.typo.org, Wayne E Bouchard writes:
 It presents no technical problem but has always been considered
 politically inadvisable. I mean, there are multiple registries for a
 reason that goes beyond mere oranization and load sharing.

There are multiple registries because it is easier to deal with
someone the speaks you language / is in the same approximate time
zone.  The SG site has got addresses from APNIC.  There is no
requirement to connect in the APNIC region.  Lots of APNIC sites
connect to the rest of the world in the US.

 Increasingly, governments are trying to take more control over packets
 (there is ever the push for geographic maping mechanisms and so on)
 and that may introduce potential legal problems in the future,
 depending on the nation you're in and how paranoid they become.
 
 So in short, do what you need to do. Just be aware of sub-optimal.
 
 -Wayne

 On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:30:59AM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
  On 2012-09-21 01:57, Brandon Wade wrote:
   Hello,
   
   I was wondering if there are any problems originating APNIC IP's in the
   ARIN region through transit providers? I have a Singapore-based prospect
   who would like to do business with us, but I'm not sure if I'll run into
   problems originating their IP's in the US - which were assigned to them
   from APNIC.
  
  As this Internet thing is a global thing, why would that be an issue?
  
  (unless it is a spammer outfit of course ;)
  
  Greets,
   Jeroen
  
 
 ---
 Wayne Bouchard
 w...@typo.org
 Network Dude
 http://www.typo.org/~web/
 
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org



RE: Announcing APNIC IP's in ARIN region

2012-09-25 Thread Siegel, David
The only problem I've ever run into is with IP geo-location providers using the 
country of origin of the original assignments to determine the locale of the 
IP.  Major CDN providers and content owners then use these geo-location 
providers to provide geography specific content or for content localization.

A problem we saw at GC when using our ARIN space in APAC (which I realize is 
the inverse of your situation) is that our enterprise customers often got 
redirected to a cloud server in the United States rather than in their 
originating country, and this was in spite of their block being SWIP'd out to 
them in that country.

It's conceivable that you could have some sort of similar problem depending on 
the nature of your project and how you are planning to use their IP's.

Dave


-Original Message-
From: Brandon Wade [mailto:brandonw...@icastcenter.com] 
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 5:58 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Announcing APNIC IP's in ARIN region

Hello,

I was wondering if there are any problems originating APNIC IP's in the ARIN 
region through transit providers? I have a Singapore-based prospect who would 
like to do business with us, but I'm not sure if I'll run into problems 
originating their IP's in the US - which were assigned to them from APNIC.

Best regards,
Brandon Wade
iCastCenter.com




Re: Announcing APNIC IP's in ARIN region

2012-09-25 Thread David Conrad
On Sep 25, 2012, at 2:05 AM, Wayne E Bouchard w...@typo.org wrote:
 It presents no technical problem but has always been considered
 politically inadvisable. I mean, there are multiple registries for a
 reason that goes beyond mere oranization and load sharing.

Always? Actually, no.

Back when the RIRs were first starting up, we pushed multinationals to obtain 
their addresses from the RIR that served the region in which their headquarters 
were located. The theory was that a single RIR would be better able to ensure 
addresses were used efficiently and it was more likely routing announcements 
could be limited. I personally got into a long argument with folks from Shell 
who wanted addresses from APNIC for their AP region networks and were 
displeased when I pushed them to RIPE-NCC (Royal Dutch Shell, headquarters in 
The Hague). I believe Geert Jan DeGroot at RIPE-NCC (who tended to be a 
stickler for those sorts of things) got into similar arguments with folks from 
Mitsubishi in Europe.

Of course, the cynical might suggest that over time, such niceties as 
conserving address space and routing slots would, of course, take a lower 
priority to marking territory and RIR revenues, but who would be that cynical?

Regards,
-drc




Re: Announcing APNIC IP's in ARIN region

2012-09-25 Thread Owen DeLong
Wayne,

This isn't entirely true...

As a general rule, most people have no objection so long as a given
organization that is getting space from RIRs conforms to one of the
following:

Get from the RIR where HQ is located.
Get from the RIR where addresses are deployed.

For example, an organization in the APNIC region that wanted to deploy
a router at a US XP and announce their space there is entirely valid.

An ISP headquartered in the AfriNIC region that expanded into Europe would
be able to use their Afrinic space for that expansion as well.

Owen

On Sep 25, 2012, at 02:05 , Wayne E Bouchard w...@typo.org wrote:

 It presents no technical problem but has always been considered
 politically inadvisable. I mean, there are multiple registries for a
 reason that goes beyond mere oranization and load sharing.
 Increasingly, governments are trying to take more control over packets
 (there is ever the push for geographic maping mechanisms and so on)
 and that may introduce potential legal problems in the future,
 depending on the nation you're in and how paranoid they become.
 
 So in short, do what you need to do. Just be aware of sub-optimal.
 
 -Wayne
 
 On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:30:59AM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
 On 2012-09-21 01:57, Brandon Wade wrote:
 Hello,
 
 I was wondering if there are any problems originating APNIC IP's in the
 ARIN region through transit providers? I have a Singapore-based prospect
 who would like to do business with us, but I'm not sure if I'll run into
 problems originating their IP's in the US - which were assigned to them
 from APNIC.
 
 As this Internet thing is a global thing, why would that be an issue?
 
 (unless it is a spammer outfit of course ;)
 
 Greets,
 Jeroen
 
 
 ---
 Wayne Bouchard
 w...@typo.org
 Network Dude
 http://www.typo.org/~web/