Fwd: hotel
excuse puking on list but the path to nanog admin action seems dead Date: Sun, 01 May 2016 13:48:10 +0900 From: Randy Bush To: action Subject: hotel hi, sorry to bother, but fairmont chicago block supposedly good to 22 may. tried to book just now, arriving 11th leaving 16th. got told "No lodging matches your search criteria. Please change your search options at right and try again." thanks randy
Re: Fwd: hotel
I tried booking earlier today, had the same issue and called in. I was told they were now full, and only non-block rooms were available (@ > $500/night). -- Stephen On 2016-05-02 10:26 PM, Randy Bush wrote: excuse puking on list but the path to nanog admin action seems dead Date: Sun, 01 May 2016 13:48:10 +0900 From: Randy Bush To: action Subject: hotel hi, sorry to bother, but fairmont chicago block supposedly good to 22 may. tried to book just now, arriving 11th leaving 16th. got told "No lodging matches your search criteria. Please change your search options at right and try again." thanks randy
Re: Fwd: hotel
> To: action clue: this address is inactive sincs AMSL left the building ( thanks michael ) randy
Re: Fwd: hotel
> I tried booking earlier today, had the same issue and called in. I was > told they were now full, and only non-block rooms were available (@ > > $500/night). find a non-exhorbitant fall-back? randy
Re: Fwd: hotel
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Randy Bush wrote: > > I tried booking earlier today, had the same issue and called in. I was > > told they were now full, and only non-block rooms were available (@ > > > $500/night). > > find a non-exhorbitant fall-back? The Sheraton Grand Chicago is close and appears to have not-quite-exorbitant rates (~$400).