Re: IRR Cleanliness

2018-12-20 Thread Mick O'Donovan
On Sat 15 Dec 2018 at 09:17, Joe Provo  wrote:

> Being listed in an as-macro doesn't affect your use of the AS
> or use of it in any IRR.
>
> Many providers will list customers (for filter generation) without
> express consent. Some folks will lump peers in categories through
> IRR data. There's certainly nothing amiss in using as-macros even
> for non-neighbors in a number of cases, enumerting ASNs one will
> [de]preference from a certain set of peers or will drop entirely
> for example.
>
> Often such policies exist but aren't published. ;-)
>
> Cheers!
>
> Joe
>
> --
> Posted from my personal account - see X-Disclaimer header.
> Joe Provo / Gweep / Earthling


+1

I wouldn’t see this as odd behaviour either.

Mick


>


Re: IRR Cleanliness

2018-12-15 Thread Joe Provo
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 02:19:10PM +, Graham Johnston wrote:
[snip]
> While doing this I was using the nlnog IRR explorer website and
> found that a company that I peer with on a public exchange has my
> ASN listed in an as-macro that they control. The way the as-macro

Being listed in an as-macro doesn't affect your use of the AS 
or use of it in any IRR. 

Many providers will list customers (for filter generation) without 
express consent. Some folks will lump peers in categories through
IRR data. There's certainly nothing amiss in using as-macros even
for non-neighbors in a number of cases, enumerting ASNs one will
[de]preference from a certain set of peers or will drop entirely 
for example.

Often such policies exist but aren't published. ;-)

Cheers!

Joe

-- 
Posted from my personal account - see X-Disclaimer header.
Joe Provo / Gweep / Earthling 


RE: IRR Cleanliness

2018-12-14 Thread David Guo via NANOG
Hi Graham,

Maybe your ASN is not a virgin ASN, someone used it.

You should notify every object's former owner or the current maintainer to 
remove it, or contact RADb or ARIN to help you remove them. But I think that 
RADb was easier to use than ARIN before, the current version of RADb is not 
user-friendly.

Regards,

David

From: NANOG  On Behalf Of Graham Johnston
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2018 10:19 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: IRR Cleanliness

Hi,

I'm in the middle of transitioning all of my IRR data from RADb to ARIN and as 
part of this I am trying to get old stale IRR data cleaned up that other 
providers have put in place in the past.  While doing this I was using the 
nlnog IRR explorer website and found that a company that I peer with on a 
public exchange has my ASN listed in an as-macro that they control. The way the 
as-macro is named I am reasonably confident that they aren't using it for 
transit related activity, rather they are likely using it for controlling 
peering activity and filtering on the IX in question. Part of me is okay with 
this, but given that I've never seen this behavior from any other provider on 
the three reasonably large exchanges that we participate on I am curious what 
the community thinks about this. Is this uncommon but acceptable in the eyes of 
community?

Thanks,
Graham


IRR Cleanliness

2018-12-14 Thread Graham Johnston
Hi,

I'm in the middle of transitioning all of my IRR data from RADb to ARIN and as 
part of this I am trying to get old stale IRR data cleaned up that other 
providers have put in place in the past.  While doing this I was using the 
nlnog IRR explorer website and found that a company that I peer with on a 
public exchange has my ASN listed in an as-macro that they control. The way the 
as-macro is named I am reasonably confident that they aren't using it for 
transit related activity, rather they are likely using it for controlling 
peering activity and filtering on the IX in question. Part of me is okay with 
this, but given that I've never seen this behavior from any other provider on 
the three reasonably large exchanges that we participate on I am curious what 
the community thinks about this. Is this uncommon but acceptable in the eyes of 
community?

Thanks,
Graham