Re: New BCOPs in Progress

2014-07-02 Thread Yardiel D. Fuentes


OK NANOGers,

Some of us got the call to arms from Chris G email below and the NANOG BCOP 
Committee and now we are interested in generating DoS attack-related Best 
Common Practices (BCOP) appeal to serve the entire NANOG community.

This document, as other BCOP appeals are expected to be as brief as possible 
and to the point in order to keep it practical and useful.

The goal is to generate a set of best practices of what to do 
before/during/after a DoS/DDoS attack -- including what seems to have worked 
best and what hasn't. Time dedicated to this effort should extensive and 
participation can be non-real-time given that  it can be done over email with 
no need for conference calls if desired.

DoS and DDoS attacks have been a topic that have captured high interest from 
NANOGers based on the archived list topics and email threads. So, now is your 
time to help shape a NANOG BCOP Appeal on this topic.

Please contact me off-list if you want participate by either sharing your 
experience, expertise or opinions towards generating a DoS Attack BCOP.


Yardiel Fuentes
yard...@gmail.com
twitter: #techguane



On Jun 1, 2014, at 5:25 PM, Chris Grundemann wrote:

> Hail NANOGers!
> 
> As most of you hopefully know, NANOG now has a BCOP Ad Hoc Committee
> and we are pushing forward with new BCOPs!
> http://nanog.org/governance/bcop
> 
> We currently have three BCOPs in active development:
> 
> eBGP configuration, shepherd Bill Armstrong
> Public Peering Exchange update, shepherd Shawn Hsiao
> Ethernet OAM, shepherd Mark Calkins
> 
> All three of these nascent BCOPs will be presented in the BCOP Track
> on Monday: http://nanog.org/meetings/abstract?id=2348
> 
> We have also collected a list of Appeals (BCOPs that need to be
> written): http://bcop.nanog.org/index.php/Appeals
> 
> If you would like to help out with any of these BCOPs (or others yet
> to be identified) please join the BCOP mailing list and reach out to
> the shepherd (if applicable of course):
> http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/bcop
> 
> Our committee is brand new and we are still finding and smoothing
> wrinkles, etc. We would love your help in any capacity. As a BCOP
> shepherd or SME or just to point out potential pit falls or room for
> improvement, with the process, the wiki, a BCOP or anything at all
> really.
> 
> This is a bottom-up, community led effort and it will only succeed
> with your help - join us in creating what I believe will be a vital
> and long-lasting institution!
> 
> Cheers,
> ~Chris
> 
> -- 
> @ChrisGrundemann
> http://chrisgrundemann.com



New BCOPs in Progress

2014-06-01 Thread Chris Grundemann
Hail NANOGers!

As most of you hopefully know, NANOG now has a BCOP Ad Hoc Committee
and we are pushing forward with new BCOPs!
http://nanog.org/governance/bcop

We currently have three BCOPs in active development:

eBGP configuration, shepherd Bill Armstrong
Public Peering Exchange update, shepherd Shawn Hsiao
Ethernet OAM, shepherd Mark Calkins

All three of these nascent BCOPs will be presented in the BCOP Track
on Monday: http://nanog.org/meetings/abstract?id=2348

We have also collected a list of Appeals (BCOPs that need to be
written): http://bcop.nanog.org/index.php/Appeals

If you would like to help out with any of these BCOPs (or others yet
to be identified) please join the BCOP mailing list and reach out to
the shepherd (if applicable of course):
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/bcop

Our committee is brand new and we are still finding and smoothing
wrinkles, etc. We would love your help in any capacity. As a BCOP
shepherd or SME or just to point out potential pit falls or room for
improvement, with the process, the wiki, a BCOP or anything at all
really.

This is a bottom-up, community led effort and it will only succeed
with your help - join us in creating what I believe will be a vital
and long-lasting institution!

Cheers,
~Chris

-- 
@ChrisGrundemann
http://chrisgrundemann.com