POLL: 802.1x deployment

2012-09-24 Thread Jay Ashworth
I'm tech-reading an upcoming book, and it makes the implication that 802.1x
is not very widely deployed... which seems possibly an overly narrow view
of the Real World.

If you regularly use one or more 802.1x protected networks, could you take
a moment to reply off-list, and tell me the size of the network (homelab,
smb, enterprise, carrier), and, if you know, how long 802.1x has been deployed
there?  I'm also interested in whether any network you use has dropped .1x.

I'll summarize to the list if there's interest.  Thanks.

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth  Baylink   j...@baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think   RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA   #natog  +1 727 647 1274



Re: POLL: 802.1x deployment

2012-09-24 Thread Michael Muller

Hi,

I´d suggest you to ask the guys from Enterasys mailing list. Sorry, 
couldn´t resist ;-)


Michael

P.S.: No, I don´t have 802.1x enabled on LAN for my users sitting in 
their offices.




FOLO: POLL: 802.1x deployment

2012-09-25 Thread Jay Ashworth
I've gotten quite a number of useful responses so far; I'll keep aggregating
them until tomorrow afternoon or so, and then post a summary.

I propose to mention educational institutions by name, but companies only
by market segment, and not to mention any contributors names; if that's not
opaque enough for anyone who replied, please let me know.

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth  Baylink   j...@baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think   RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA   #natog  +1 727 647 1274



Re: POLL: 802.1x deployment

2012-09-25 Thread Carsten Bormann
> If you regularly use one or more 802.1x protected networks, could you take
> a moment to reply off-list, and tell me the size of the network (homelab,
> smb, enterprise, carrier), and, if you know, how long 802.1x has been deployed
> there?  

Surely you are joking, Mr. Ashworth.

The entirety of eduroam is on 802.1X (better known as WPA Enterprise).
That must be an 8-digit number of users.
If you need a list of sites, start with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eduroam
(but, aside from the US, it mostly lists just the countries).
When you are done drilling down, there should be about 6500 names of sites on 
the list.

If you are talking about wired .1X: It is relatively common for eduroam-enabled
institutions to also provide publicly accessible wired ports controlled by .1X
and connected to the same RADIUS servers.  But I don't have any numbers at all.

> I'm also interested in whether any network you use has dropped .1x.

eduroam deployment started in 2003.
Your university academic computing environment would need to be pretty stupid 
to leave eduroam once it is deployed.
But stranger things have happened.
If your academic computing environment is not yet on eduroam, they still almost 
certainly use .1X for the wireless.
Not all 100+ million students worldwide have access to on-campus WiFi, but 
nowadays most do.

Grüße, Carsten




Re: POLL: 802.1x deployment

2012-09-25 Thread Jimmy Hess
On 9/25/12, Carsten Bormann  wrote:
> Surely you are joking, Mr. Ashworth.
> The entirety of eduroam is on 802.1X (better known as WPA Enterprise).

ding ding ding.   WPA Ent  wireless authentication calls upon  802.1X.

And  802.1X wired port security is also a feature of many switches,
and provides stronger protection than MAC-address based port security
functionality;  and 802.1x option  may be used by at least some
organizations,  to  protect against unauthorized connections to secure
wired networks, and/or  to force guests / salespeople / vendors
plugging in their laptop,  to be placed in a  guest LAN;  instead of
gaining access to the company's secure internal network,  if they
sneak over to someone's desk, unplug the desktop, and plug in their
laptop to attempt some covert network scanning.


Wired switch vendors don't add 802.1X to their switches for their
health, it would be less expensive to make a product without the
development effort to add the function;  someone wants the feature.

In this case,  the remaining burden of proof should be on whomever
wants to claim it's not widely deployed.

> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eduroam
> (but, aside from the US, it mostly lists just the countries).
> When you are done drilling down, there should be about 6500 names of sites
> on the list.

> eduroam deployment started in 2003.

Eduroam?   What standard is that?




> Grüße, Carsten
---
-JH



Re: POLL: 802.1x deployment

2012-09-25 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:37:38 +0200, Carsten Bormann said:

> The entirety of eduroam is on 802.1X (better known as WPA Enterprise).
> That must be an 8-digit number of users.
> If you need a list of sites, start with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eduroam

However, that would be more a confederation of deployments than
one single large deployment.


pgp4LSIWVSJ3O.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: POLL: 802.1x deployment

2012-09-26 Thread Mohacsi Janos



On Tue, 25 Sep 2012, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:


On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:37:38 +0200, Carsten Bormann said:


The entirety of eduroam is on 802.1X (better known as WPA Enterprise).
That must be an 8-digit number of users.
If you need a list of sites, start with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eduroam


However, that would be more a confederation of deployments than
one single large deployment.


But each participating institution (more than 5000 universities 
and research centres) deployed 802.1x in their premises. Big bonus that 
they work together seamlessly (inter organisation roaming and 802.1x 
usage).


Have look at the official homepage of eduroam:
http://www.eduroam.org/

Best Regards,
Janos Mohacsi







Re: POLL: 802.1x deployment

2012-09-26 Thread Brent Jones
That is quite impressive that 5,000 orgs got 802.1x working correctly
in this fashion.
I had a lot of questions how they handled auth, but it appears auth is
distributed according to a roaming user's realm/domain suffix.

https://confluence.terena.org/display/H2eduroam/How+to+deploy+eduroam+on-site+or+on+campus

Fairly decent wiki on their site, bet others would find this helpful
for non-eduroam dot1x

On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Mohacsi Janos  wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2012, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:37:38 +0200, Carsten Bormann said:
>>
>>> The entirety of eduroam is on 802.1X (better known as WPA Enterprise).
>>> That must be an 8-digit number of users.
>>> If you need a list of sites, start with
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eduroam
>>
>>
>> However, that would be more a confederation of deployments than
>> one single large deployment.
>
>
> But each participating institution (more than 5000 universities and research
> centres) deployed 802.1x in their premises. Big bonus that they work
> together seamlessly (inter organisation roaming and 802.1x usage).
>
> Have look at the official homepage of eduroam:
> http://www.eduroam.org/
>
> Best Regards,
> Janos Mohacsi
>
>>
>



-- 
Brent Jones
br...@brentrjones.com



Re: POLL: 802.1x deployment

2012-09-26 Thread Peter J. Cherny

I've (re)sent this to the list as no-one else has noted it 

Possibly a game-changer in the (academic) 802.1x space ...
  http://www.project-moonshot.org/diary
  http://www.painless-security.com/blog/



Re: FOLO: POLL: 802.1x deployment

2012-09-25 Thread Tim Chown
On 25 Sep 2012, at 14:50, Jay Ashworth  wrote:
> 
> I propose to mention educational institutions by name, 

There's an awful lot of those using 802.1x.  It'll be some list :)

Tim



The optimistically named Project Moonshot (was Re: POLL: 802.1x deployment)

2012-09-26 Thread Jay Ashworth
- Original Message -
> From: "Peter J. Cherny" 

> I've (re)sent this to the list as no-one else has noted it 
> 
> Possibly a game-changer in the (academic) 802.1x space ...
> http://www.project-moonshot.org/diary
> http://www.painless-security.com/blog/

I did see that come in, and was going to look into it more deeply tonight;
if it is -- as it appears to be -- a framework for globally federated 
identification/authentication, then it will probably hit the same walls
(of theory, not merely implementation) which other earlier attempts
have hit: privacy and non-correlation being prime among them.

It's orthogonal to 802.1x, though, unless anyone's shipping code to hook
a dot1x server to it as you would, say, a Radius server.  :-)

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth  Baylink   j...@baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think   RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA   #natog  +1 727 647 1274