Contacts for AT&T Postmaster, AWS WAF, Azure WAF
Hi All, We recently obtained our first /24 from the ARIN waiting list. We've been testing it out the past few weeks, and we're finding that it's blocked in a couple places. Geolocation data has already been updated with the major providers, and the range is not listed in any known blocklists. I'm looking for contacts for the following. Please reach out off-list if you can assist. Thank you in advance! * AT&T Postmaster - getting 521 errors, already emailed 'abuse_...@abuse-att.net' multiple times but no response. * AWS WAF - some sites that use awselb/2.0 are throwing a "403 Forbidden." They work fine from an older IP. Product vendors are unable to resolve so far. * Azure WAF - one site is completely resetting our connection attempts. Works fine from an older IP. Product vendor is unable to resolve so far. Vishal Malli IT Systems Engineer City of Manteca, CA vma...@manteca.gov<mailto:vma...@manteca.gov>
Anyone from Microsoft Postmaster/SNDS/JMRP?
Can anyone from Microsoft Postmaster/SNDS/JMRP team kindly contact me off list? Dealing with the support team seems to have hit a roadblock. Many thanks. -- Kushal R. | Management WhatsApp Host4Geeks Global: +1-9547374335 WhatsApp Host4Geeks India: +91-9834801976 host4geeks.com [https://host4geeks.com] host4geeks.in [https://host4geeks.in] [https://facebook.com/host4geeks] [https://twitter.com/host4geeks]
Re: Postmaster@
I presume you were contacting them due to their (apparently) bogus SPF parsing? Seems they recently broke something and email servers I've been sending from for 10 years without much configuration change recently started getting generic SPF-looking failure messages (I guess they don't properly parse "+MX -ALL"?). Given the automated form linked at that page also returns garbage about how my IPs look fine and aren't blacklisted and there is no reason why mail shouldn't deliver (why bother having a box to put the error message?), can someone over there contact off-list? Matt On 6/15/19 1:44 AM, Gary E. Miller wrote: > Yo All! > > Is it no longer required to monitor the postmaster@ ? > > Did RFC 822 and RFC 5321 get repealed? Or is M$ more special than the > rest of us? > > RGDS > GARY > --- > Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703 > g...@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588 > > Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas? > "If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin > > > Begin forwarded message: > > Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2019 01:38:16 + > From: The Outlook.com Team > To: > Subject: Fw: gem : rellim541 > > > This email address is not monitored. Please visit > http://postmaster.outlook.com for information about sending email to > Outlook.com, including troubleshooting information. If you are an > Outlook.com user please visit http://answers.microsoft.com/ to learn > more about our services, find answers to your questions, and share your > feedback. > > Sincerely, > > Outlook.com Team > Microsoft > One Microsoft Way. Redmond, WA 98052, USA. > > > > Microsoft respects your privacy. To learn more, please read our online > Privacy Statement at http://privacy.microsoft.com >
Re: Postmaster@
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 6:44 PM Gary E. Miller wrote: > Is it no longer required to monitor the postmaster@ ? > > Did RFC 822 and RFC 5321 get repealed? Or is M$ more special than the > rest of us? Where have you been? The champions of the cause gave up years ago. http://www.h-online.com/security/news/item/RFC-Ignorant-org-blacklist-closes-down-1724814.html You could still try http://rfc-clueless.org/ but it doesn't look especially maintained. -- William Herrin b...@herrin.us https://bill.herrin.us/
Re: Postmaster@
I wonder how much do-not-reply@ and similar is spammed? On June 15, 2019 at 01:47 m...@beckman.org (Mel Beckman) wrote: > Postmaster@ is so widely spammed as to be useless. Standards, and even laws, > can be overcome by reality. Witness the DoNotCall list. > > -mel beckman > > > On Jun 14, 2019, at 6:45 PM, Gary E. Miller wrote: > > > > Yo All! > > > > Is it no longer required to monitor the postmaster@ ? > > > > Did RFC 822 and RFC 5321 get repealed? Or is M$ more special than the > > rest of us? > > > > RGDS > > GARY > > --- > > Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703 > >g...@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588 > > > >Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas? > >"If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin > > > > > > Begin forwarded message: > > > > Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2019 01:38:16 + > > From: The Outlook.com Team > > To: > > Subject: Fw: gem : rellim541 > > > > > > This email address is not monitored. Please visit > > http://postmaster.outlook.com for information about sending email to > > Outlook.com, including troubleshooting information. If you are an > > Outlook.com user please visit http://answers.microsoft.com/ to learn > > more about our services, find answers to your questions, and share your > > feedback. > > > > Sincerely, > > > > Outlook.com Team > > Microsoft > > One Microsoft Way. Redmond, WA 98052, USA. > > > > > > > > Microsoft respects your privacy. To learn more, please read our online > > Privacy Statement at http://privacy.microsoft.com -- -Barry Shein Software Tool & Die| b...@theworld.com | http://www.TheWorld.com Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD | 800-THE-WRLD The World: Since 1989 | A Public Information Utility | *oo*
Re: Postmaster@
On Fri, 14 Jun 2019, Gary E. Miller wrote: Is it no longer required to monitor the postmaster@ ? Did RFC 822 and RFC 5321 get repealed? Or is M$ more special than the rest of us? It is monitored just not by humans and you did receive a response that could be useful though you didn't like it. Microsoft is hardly the only company that prefers web pages over e-mail these days. /mark
Re: Postmaster@
* m...@beckman.org (Mel Beckman) [Sat 15 Jun 2019, 03:49 CEST]: Postmaster@ is so widely spammed as to be useless. Not my experience at all (*knocks wood*). RIPE database contacts, on the other hand... -- Niels.
Re: Postmaster@
Gary E. Miller wrote: > Is it no longer required to monitor the postmaster@ ? > > Did RFC 822 and RFC 5321 get repealed? Or is M$ more special than the > rest of us? Not just M$ but Cloudflare too: https://www.cloudflare.com/abuse Worse is that you might need to complete a CAPTCHA just to get to that page, /me barfs -- S.C.
Re: Postmaster@
Postmaster@ is so widely spammed as to be useless. Standards, and even laws, can be overcome by reality. Witness the DoNotCall list. -mel beckman > On Jun 14, 2019, at 6:45 PM, Gary E. Miller wrote: > > Yo All! > > Is it no longer required to monitor the postmaster@ ? > > Did RFC 822 and RFC 5321 get repealed? Or is M$ more special than the > rest of us? > > RGDS > GARY > --- > Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703 >g...@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588 > >Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas? >"If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin > > > Begin forwarded message: > > Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2019 01:38:16 + > From: The Outlook.com Team > To: > Subject: Fw: gem : rellim541 > > > This email address is not monitored. Please visit > http://postmaster.outlook.com for information about sending email to > Outlook.com, including troubleshooting information. If you are an > Outlook.com user please visit http://answers.microsoft.com/ to learn > more about our services, find answers to your questions, and share your > feedback. > > Sincerely, > > Outlook.com Team > Microsoft > One Microsoft Way. Redmond, WA 98052, USA. > > > > Microsoft respects your privacy. To learn more, please read our online > Privacy Statement at http://privacy.microsoft.com
Postmaster@
Yo All! Is it no longer required to monitor the postmaster@ ? Did RFC 822 and RFC 5321 get repealed? Or is M$ more special than the rest of us? RGDS GARY --- Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703 g...@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588 Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas? "If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin Begin forwarded message: Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2019 01:38:16 + From: The Outlook.com Team To: Subject: Fw: gem : rellim541 This email address is not monitored. Please visit http://postmaster.outlook.com for information about sending email to Outlook.com, including troubleshooting information. If you are an Outlook.com user please visit http://answers.microsoft.com/ to learn more about our services, find answers to your questions, and share your feedback. Sincerely, Outlook.com Team Microsoft One Microsoft Way. Redmond, WA 98052, USA. Microsoft respects your privacy. To learn more, please read our online Privacy Statement at http://privacy.microsoft.com pgpkDdtkBanIy.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Need abuse/postmaster contact for AT&T to resolve IP block
Try posting that to the mailop list. I had been having trouble with att.net for about a month, and I filled out the form at http://att.net/blocks/ 3 times with no response. I posted to mailop a few days ago and they resolved the issue within an hour. ...then a few days later I received the response to the form that my IP had already been unblocked. Even though they say they will get back to you within 2-3 days, it's more like 10-14. -A On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 6:22 AM, Webhosting.net Admin wrote: > A few of our exchange IPs get blocked intermittently, but only by ATT. Ips > are clean, no issues, we’re diligent about finding and fixing these types > of issues as it has a large impact. > > It would be very helpful to know why the IP below got blocked so we can > find and fix the problem to prevent further listing. We have a few ips in > rotation and some have no issue. It’s a “blind” listing, so we only find > out about it when customers complain that they getting blocked. > > ff-ip4-mx-vip1.prodigy.net # 5.3.0 flph399 DNSBL:ATTRBL 521< 67.215.167.170 >_is_blocked.__For_ > information_see_http://att.net/blocks> #SMTP# > > Any info/help would be most helpful. > > Many thanks, > > Webhosting.net Postmaster > > > > > > >
Re: Need abuse/postmaster contact for AT&T to resolve IP block
Gmail here, went to my Inbox. On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Jay Farrell via NANOG wrote: > Interestingly, your mail to the nanog list went to my spam folder, rather > than my nanog folder (I'm using gmail or domains for my mail.) That rarely > happens. > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Webhosting.net Admin < > ad...@webhosting.net> > wrote: > > > A few of our exchange IPs get blocked intermittently, but only by ATT. > Ips > > are clean, no issues, we’re diligent about finding and fixing these types > > of issues as it has a large impact. > > > > It would be very helpful to know why the IP below got blocked so we can > > find and fix the problem to prevent further listing. We have a few ips in > > rotation and some have no issue. It’s a “blind” listing, so we only find > > out about it when customers complain that they getting blocked. > > > > ff-ip4-mx-vip1.prodigy.net # > 5.3.0 flph399 DNSBL:ATTRBL 521< 67.215.167.170 >_is_blocked.__For_ > > information_see_http://att.net/blocks> #SMTP# > > > > Any info/help would be most helpful. > > > > Many thanks, > > > > Webhosting.net Postmaster > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: Need abuse/postmaster contact for AT&T to resolve IP block
Interestingly, your mail to the nanog list went to my spam folder, rather than my nanog folder (I'm using gmail or domains for my mail.) That rarely happens. On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Webhosting.net Admin wrote: > A few of our exchange IPs get blocked intermittently, but only by ATT. Ips > are clean, no issues, we’re diligent about finding and fixing these types > of issues as it has a large impact. > > It would be very helpful to know why the IP below got blocked so we can > find and fix the problem to prevent further listing. We have a few ips in > rotation and some have no issue. It’s a “blind” listing, so we only find > out about it when customers complain that they getting blocked. > > ff-ip4-mx-vip1.prodigy.net # 5.3.0 flph399 DNSBL:ATTRBL 521< 67.215.167.170 >_is_blocked.__For_ > information_see_http://att.net/blocks> #SMTP# > > Any info/help would be most helpful. > > Many thanks, > > Webhosting.net Postmaster > > > > > > >
Need abuse/postmaster contact for AT&T to resolve IP block
A few of our exchange IPs get blocked intermittently, but only by ATT. Ips are clean, no issues, we’re diligent about finding and fixing these types of issues as it has a large impact. It would be very helpful to know why the IP below got blocked so we can find and fix the problem to prevent further listing. We have a few ips in rotation and some have no issue. It’s a “blind” listing, so we only find out about it when customers complain that they getting blocked. ff-ip4-mx-vip1.prodigy.net #_is_blocked.__For_information_see_http://att.net/blocks> #SMTP# Any info/help would be most helpful. Many thanks, Webhosting.net Postmaster
Re: Yahoo Postmaster or Email Admin
Thanks to everyone who helped with this issue. All cleared up now. Mark On 7/27/2016 1:05 PM, Mark Stevens wrote: I have been to https://postmaster.yahoo.com and even filled out a bulk email form (explained the issue in the notes section) but still no go. I even have a ticket opened with their support but you can guess how that is going. This is why I asked if anyone has a contact or if in fact a sysadmin @ yahoo is on nanog and could contact me. I will keep working at this, thanks for the info! Mark On 7/27/2016 12:53 PM, Kain, Rebecca (.) wrote: Maybe they could get their email working. it's been hanging, not sending mail, for 4 days, as far my experience has been. -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Elizabeth Zwicky via NANOG Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 12:50 PM To: Josh Luthman Cc: NANOG list Subject: Re: Yahoo Postmaster or Email Admin Yes, yes I do. On Wednesday, July 27, 2016 9:44 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: Do you mean https://postmaster.yahoo.com/ ? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Elizabeth Zwicky via NANOG wrote: We encourage people to start at https://postmaster.yaho.com but I can help people who have filed tickets there and not had any luck can contact me, specifying a) what IP addresses and From: line they're talking about and b) exactly what error message they are getting when they try to send us mail. Elizabeth On Wednesday, July 27, 2016, 5:31:55 AM PDT, Mark Stevens wrote:Good Morning, If there is a Yahoo postmaster or email Admin that could contact me offline concerning a deferred IP address it would be great. Thanks Mark
Re: Yahoo Postmaster or Email Admin
Thanks Elizabeth, I sent you a direct email with what you need to (hopefully) assist me. Thanks Mark On 7/27/2016 12:39 PM, Elizabeth Zwicky wrote: We encourage people to start at https://postmaster.yaho.com but I can help people who have filed tickets there and not had any luck can contact me, specifying a) what IP addresses and From: line they're talking about and b) exactly what error message they are getting when they try to send us mail. Elizabeth On Wednesday, July 27, 2016, 5:31:55 AM PDT, Mark Stevens wrote: Good Morning, If there is a Yahoo postmaster or email Admin that could contact me offline concerning a deferred IP address it would be great. Thanks Mark
Re: Yahoo Postmaster or Email Admin
To quote Elizabeth... "but I can help people who have filed tickets there and not had any luck can contact me, specifying a) what IP addresses and From: line they're talking about and b) exactly what error message they are getting when they try to send us mail." On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Mark Stevens wrote: > I have been to https://postmaster.yahoo.com and even filled out a bulk > email form (explained the issue in the notes section) but still no go. > I even have a ticket opened with their support but you can guess how that > is going. > This is why I asked if anyone has a contact or if in fact a sysadmin @ > yahoo is on nanog and could contact me. > I will keep working at this, thanks for the info! > > Mark > > > On 7/27/2016 12:53 PM, Kain, Rebecca (.) wrote: > >> Maybe they could get their email working. it's been hanging, not sending >> mail, for 4 days, as far my experience has been. >> >> -Original Message- >> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Elizabeth >> Zwicky via NANOG >> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 12:50 PM >> To: Josh Luthman >> Cc: NANOG list >> Subject: Re: Yahoo Postmaster or Email Admin >> >> >> Yes, yes I do. >> >> On Wednesday, July 27, 2016 9:44 AM, Josh Luthman < >> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >> >> Do you mean https://postmaster.yahoo.com/ ? >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Elizabeth Zwicky via NANOG < >> nanog@nanog.org> wrote: >> >> We encourage people to start at https://postmaster.yaho.com but I can >> help people who have filed tickets there and not had any luck can contact >> me, specifying a) what IP addresses and From: line they're talking about >> and b) exactly what error message they are getting when they try to send us >> mail. >> Elizabeth >> On Wednesday, July 27, 2016, 5:31:55 AM PDT, Mark Stevens < >> mana...@monmouth.com> wrote:Good Morning, >> >> If there is a Yahoo postmaster or email Admin that could contact me >> offline concerning a deferred IP address it would be great. >> >> >> Thanks >> >> Mark >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
Re: Yahoo Postmaster or Email Admin
I have been to https://postmaster.yahoo.com and even filled out a bulk email form (explained the issue in the notes section) but still no go. I even have a ticket opened with their support but you can guess how that is going. This is why I asked if anyone has a contact or if in fact a sysadmin @ yahoo is on nanog and could contact me. I will keep working at this, thanks for the info! Mark On 7/27/2016 12:53 PM, Kain, Rebecca (.) wrote: Maybe they could get their email working. it's been hanging, not sending mail, for 4 days, as far my experience has been. -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Elizabeth Zwicky via NANOG Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 12:50 PM To: Josh Luthman Cc: NANOG list Subject: Re: Yahoo Postmaster or Email Admin Yes, yes I do. On Wednesday, July 27, 2016 9:44 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: Do you mean https://postmaster.yahoo.com/ ? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Elizabeth Zwicky via NANOG wrote: We encourage people to start at https://postmaster.yaho.com but I can help people who have filed tickets there and not had any luck can contact me, specifying a) what IP addresses and From: line they're talking about and b) exactly what error message they are getting when they try to send us mail. Elizabeth On Wednesday, July 27, 2016, 5:31:55 AM PDT, Mark Stevens wrote:Good Morning, If there is a Yahoo postmaster or email Admin that could contact me offline concerning a deferred IP address it would be great. Thanks Mark
RE: Yahoo Postmaster or Email Admin
Maybe they could get their email working. it's been hanging, not sending mail, for 4 days, as far my experience has been. -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Elizabeth Zwicky via NANOG Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 12:50 PM To: Josh Luthman Cc: NANOG list Subject: Re: Yahoo Postmaster or Email Admin Yes, yes I do. On Wednesday, July 27, 2016 9:44 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: Do you mean https://postmaster.yahoo.com/ ? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Elizabeth Zwicky via NANOG wrote: We encourage people to start at https://postmaster.yaho.com but I can help people who have filed tickets there and not had any luck can contact me, specifying a) what IP addresses and From: line they're talking about and b) exactly what error message they are getting when they try to send us mail. Elizabeth On Wednesday, July 27, 2016, 5:31:55 AM PDT, Mark Stevens wrote:Good Morning, If there is a Yahoo postmaster or email Admin that could contact me offline concerning a deferred IP address it would be great. Thanks Mark
Re: Yahoo Postmaster or Email Admin
Yes, yes I do. On Wednesday, July 27, 2016 9:44 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: Do you mean https://postmaster.yahoo.com/ ? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Elizabeth Zwicky via NANOG wrote: We encourage people to start at https://postmaster.yaho.com but I can help people who have filed tickets there and not had any luck can contact me, specifying a) what IP addresses and From: line they're talking about and b) exactly what error message they are getting when they try to send us mail. Elizabeth On Wednesday, July 27, 2016, 5:31:55 AM PDT, Mark Stevens wrote:Good Morning, If there is a Yahoo postmaster or email Admin that could contact me offline concerning a deferred IP address it would be great. Thanks Mark
Re: Yahoo Postmaster or Email Admin
Do you mean https://postmaster.yahoo.com/ ? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Elizabeth Zwicky via NANOG < nanog@nanog.org> wrote: > We encourage people to start at https://postmaster.yaho.com but I can > help people who have filed tickets there and not had any luck can contact > me, specifying a) what IP addresses and From: line they're talking about > and b) exactly what error message they are getting when they try to send us > mail. > Elizabeth > On Wednesday, July 27, 2016, 5:31:55 AM PDT, Mark Stevens < > mana...@monmouth.com> wrote:Good Morning, > > If there is a Yahoo postmaster or email Admin that could contact me > offline concerning a deferred IP address it would be great. > > > Thanks > > Mark >
Re: Yahoo Postmaster or Email Admin
We encourage people to start at https://postmaster.yaho.com but I can help people who have filed tickets there and not had any luck can contact me, specifying a) what IP addresses and From: line they're talking about and b) exactly what error message they are getting when they try to send us mail. Elizabeth On Wednesday, July 27, 2016, 5:31:55 AM PDT, Mark Stevens wrote:Good Morning, If there is a Yahoo postmaster or email Admin that could contact me offline concerning a deferred IP address it would be great. Thanks Mark
Re: Yahoo Postmaster or Email Admin
*https://postmaster.yahoo.com <https://postmaster.yahoo.com>* *https://help.yahoo.com/kb/postmaster/postmaster-sending-issues-sln22608.html <https://help.yahoo.com/kb/postmaster/postmaster-sending-issues-sln22608.html>* On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Tony Finch wrote: > For this kind of question you might hav emore luck on the mailop list, > https://chilli.nosignal.org/mailman/listinfo/mailop > > Tony. > -- > f.anthony.n.finchhttp://dotat.at/ - I xn--zr8h > punycode > North Fitzroy, Sole, Lundy, Fastnet: Westerly 5 or 6. Moderate, > occasionally > rough later. Rain or drizzle. Moderate or poor, occasionally good. >
Re: Yahoo Postmaster or Email Admin
For this kind of question you might hav emore luck on the mailop list, https://chilli.nosignal.org/mailman/listinfo/mailop Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finchhttp://dotat.at/ - I xn--zr8h punycode North Fitzroy, Sole, Lundy, Fastnet: Westerly 5 or 6. Moderate, occasionally rough later. Rain or drizzle. Moderate or poor, occasionally good.
Re: Yahoo Postmaster or Email Admin
Good afternoon, Does anyone have a contact at Yahoo that could help with getting an IP de-listed from Yahoo email blacklist? Thanks Mark On 7/27/2016 8:28 AM, Mark Stevens wrote: Good Morning, If there is a Yahoo postmaster or email Admin that could contact me offline concerning a deferred IP address it would be great. Thanks Mark
Yahoo Postmaster or Email Admin
Good Morning, If there is a Yahoo postmaster or email Admin that could contact me offline concerning a deferred IP address it would be great. Thanks Mark
Re: Comcast postmaster?
Taken care of, thanks! On 7/11/2016 2:46 PM, Brian Rak wrote: Is there anyone here that can put me in touch with a Comcast mail server administrator? It seems that they've firewalled off some of our IPv6 space, and I can't seem to find any contact information. Interestingly, I can't even fill out their blocklist removal form, because it only accepts IPv4 addresses.
Comcast postmaster?
Is there anyone here that can put me in touch with a Comcast mail server administrator? It seems that they've firewalled off some of our IPv6 space, and I can't seem to find any contact information. Interestingly, I can't even fill out their blocklist removal form, because it only accepts IPv4 addresses.
AT&T postmaster
I help run a community machine (not for my employer) and we've been trying unsuccessfully for a month to get off AT&T's email blacklist; their automated systems claim we're off, but mail is still being blocked. Can an AT&T postmaster drop me an email to help work through this? Thanks. -d
Re: AOL postmaster rejections.
On 11/19/15 6:08 AM, John Peach wrote: > Has anyone else with relatively large volumes of email seen a huge > spike in rejections from AOL recently? We also saw a large increase in this "AOL will not accept delivery of this message" problem earlier this week, despite also having "good reputation" on the affected IP addresses, no changes in what we send, no DNS changes, etc. It happened on about half our outbound mail server IP addresses, but not on the others. We temporarily switched to using only the "good" IP addresses to send to AOL, and they happily accept the same messages. -- Robert L Mathews, Tiger Technologies, http://www.tigertech.net/
Re: AOL postmaster rejections.
On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 13:30:17 -0600 Blake Hudson wrote: > > > John Peach wrote on 11/19/2015 8:08 AM: > > Has anyone else with relatively large volumes of email seen a huge > > spike in rejections from AOL recently? > Yes. > > > There is no obvious reason why they are being rejected as it is a > > generic message: > > > > Nov 18 12:10:39 pp-serve02 sendmail[1391]: tAIHAcPT001383: > > mailin-04.mx.aol.com.: SMTP DATA-2 protocol error: 521 5.2.1 : AOL > > will not accept delivery of this message. > > > > Looking back through my logs, I can see we've always had a few, but > > we are now receiving a lot of complaints from users (physicians who > > cannot email their patients) and I see this, starting on Monday: > > > > syslog-2015-11-16 > > 588 > > syslog-2015-11-17 > > 1668 > > syslog-2015-11-18 > > 1937 > > > > and I already have 55 for today. > Same; started this week. Only appears to affect one of our servers. Now that is interesting; I hadn't though to check that, but it is affecting 3 out of our 4 and they are all in the same subnet. > > Rejected messages by date: > 2015-11-15 > 9 > 2015-11-15 > 4 > 2015-11-16 > 400 > 2015-11-17 > 710 > 2015-11-18 > 683 > > > > > We have a whitelist / feedback loop set up with AOL, our IPs show > > clean with them and our DNS / reverse DNS has not changed and > > resolves properly. > Same here > > > > > We did raise a ticket with them, but it seems to have gone to the > > usual /dev/null. > Same here. I'm recommending AOL customers contact AOL for support. > > > > > To reply off-list, please remove the VERP -nanog from my email > > address, > signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: AOL postmaster rejections.
John Peach wrote on 11/19/2015 8:08 AM: Has anyone else with relatively large volumes of email seen a huge spike in rejections from AOL recently? Yes. There is no obvious reason why they are being rejected as it is a generic message: Nov 18 12:10:39 pp-serve02 sendmail[1391]: tAIHAcPT001383: mailin-04.mx.aol.com.: SMTP DATA-2 protocol error: 521 5.2.1 : AOL will not accept delivery of this message. Looking back through my logs, I can see we've always had a few, but we are now receiving a lot of complaints from users (physicians who cannot email their patients) and I see this, starting on Monday: syslog-2015-11-16 588 syslog-2015-11-17 1668 syslog-2015-11-18 1937 and I already have 55 for today. Same; started this week. Only appears to affect one of our servers. Rejected messages by date: 2015-11-15 9 2015-11-15 4 2015-11-16 400 2015-11-17 710 2015-11-18 683 We have a whitelist / feedback loop set up with AOL, our IPs show clean with them and our DNS / reverse DNS has not changed and resolves properly. Same here We did raise a ticket with them, but it seems to have gone to the usual /dev/null. Same here. I'm recommending AOL customers contact AOL for support. To reply off-list, please remove the VERP -nanog from my email address,
AOL postmaster rejections.
Has anyone else with relatively large volumes of email seen a huge spike in rejections from AOL recently? There is no obvious reason why they are being rejected as it is a generic message: Nov 18 12:10:39 pp-serve02 sendmail[1391]: tAIHAcPT001383: mailin-04.mx.aol.com.: SMTP DATA-2 protocol error: 521 5.2.1 : AOL will not accept delivery of this message. Looking back through my logs, I can see we've always had a few, but we are now receiving a lot of complaints from users (physicians who cannot email their patients) and I see this, starting on Monday: syslog-2015-11-16 588 syslog-2015-11-17 1668 syslog-2015-11-18 1937 and I already have 55 for today. We have a whitelist / feedback loop set up with AOL, our IPs show clean with them and our DNS / reverse DNS has not changed and resolves properly. We did raise a ticket with them, but it seems to have gone to the usual /dev/null. To reply off-list, please remove the VERP -nanog from my email address, signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: AT&T att.net postmaster contact needed
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:47:30PM -0500, Larry Sheldon wrote: > Seems like this exact question comes up pretty frequently. > > Maybe NANOG should consider a repository of frequent inquiries... Maybe AT&T and others should consider reading RFC 2142 and implementing it properly, like every competent/professional operation on the planet already does. Doing so would render these questions unnecessary. ---rsk
Re: AT&T att.net postmaster contact needed
On 8/10/2015 12:43, Ken Chase wrote: please reply offlist, mutual customer issue. Seems like this exact question comes up pretty frequently. Maybe NANOG should consider a repository of frequent inquiries... -- sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? (Juvenal)
AT&T att.net postmaster contact needed
please reply offlist, mutual customer issue. /kc -- Ken Chase - m...@sizone.org Toronto Canada
Paging postmaster at gmx.net/gmx.de et.al.
[ Tried this over on mailop; no response, so now trying here. ] I've noticed that one of my servers has been unable to establish port 25 connections to hosts such as mx00.emig.gmx.net for over a week...and I'm entirely puzzled as to why, since it only sends a trickle of traffic to a handful of users @gmx.net/@gmx.de etc. (They're on a couple of small, low-volume Mailman-managed lists, and have been for time periods ranging from "over a year" to "most of a decade" without any issues.) Some help figuring out why this is happening would be entirely welcome. Thanks, ---rsk
Yahoo postmaster
One of our user’s e-mail messages to Yahoo bounced with the following link for more information: http://postmaster.yahoo.com/errors/postmaster-27.html which redirects to https://help.yahoo.com/kb/postmaster/SLN5067.html?impressions=true That page contains a link to “Yahoo Mail and Yahoo Messenger Terms of Service”, which is broken! http://https//info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/mail/en-us/<http://https/info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/mail/en-us/> It redirects to an https link saying, Server not found. I hope someone from Yahoo can fix this. matthew black california state university, long beach
Re: Comcast Postmaster IPv6 issue
Someone will reach out. In the future, FYI: http://postmaster.comcast.net/ Thx - Jason On 3/27/15, 12:17 PM, "Drew Linsalata" wrote: >We're wresting with a Comcast IPv6 SMTP block and none of the Comcast >postmaster communication tools allows entering an IPv6 address. End >result >= brick wall. > >If anyone from the Comcast postmaster team is listening, a message >off-list >would be most appreciated.
Comcast Postmaster IPv6 issue
We're wresting with a Comcast IPv6 SMTP block and none of the Comcast postmaster communication tools allows entering an IPv6 address. End result = brick wall. If anyone from the Comcast postmaster team is listening, a message off-list would be most appreciated.
Re: AOL Postmaster
On Feb 25, 2015, at 5:54 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > You think every accountant, realtor, coffee shop etc uses their own domain? No. But they should not, and in many cases *cannot*, rely on aol or yahoo addresses. It would suck for them to have to change all their contact information, business cards, and so on - but a) they chose their email provider unwisely and that's the cost of relying on an inappropriate vendor and b) they don't really need to - inbound mail to those addresses is mostly fine, so they just need to get a second email address and gradually migrate their outbound usage to that. Because the root cause of this issue is a long series of security mistakes by those providers, allowing 3rd parties to have access to user's (supposedly private) account information, the issue is specific to those providers, and there's no strong argument that other email providers are likely to make the same business choices. Cheers, Steve
Re: AOL Postmaster
they seem to use gmail and actually get their email. /kc On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 07:24:35AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian said: > You think every accountant, realtor, coffee shop etc uses their own > domain? > -- Ken Chase - k...@heavycomputing.ca skype:kenchase23 +1 416 897 6284 Toronto Canada Heavy Computing - Clued bandwidth, colocation and managed linux VPS @151 Front St. W.
Re: AOL Postmaster
You think every accountant, realtor, coffee shop etc uses their own domain? On Feb 26, 2015 3:12 AM, "Bill Patterson" wrote: > That was my first response as well. But that response was frowned upon by > my customer service reps. > On Feb 25, 2015 8:56 AM, "Ken Chase" wrote: > > > Simple, one simply does not conduct business email over an AOL account. > > > > This is what I've been telling several of my customers about their > > contacts for a while now. > > > > /kc > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 05:24:12AM -0500, Rich Kulawiec said: > > > > > >Their own announcement: > > > > > > > > > http://postmaster-blog.aol.com/2014/04/22/aol-mail-updates-dmarc-policy-to-reject/ > > > > > >says that DMARC issues should be referred here: > > > > > > dmarc-h...@teamaol.com > > > > > >(And before anyone asks, yes, the headers on mailing list traffic > > >have been modified precisely as that page stipulates.) > > > > > >Perhaps it's too much to expect that in 2015 system and network admins > > >will actually demonstrate baseline professionalism and competence by > > >reading and answering role account email. > > > > > >---rsk > > > > -- > > Ken Chase - Toronto Canada > > >
Re: AOL Postmaster
That was my first response as well. But that response was frowned upon by my customer service reps. On Feb 25, 2015 8:56 AM, "Ken Chase" wrote: > Simple, one simply does not conduct business email over an AOL account. > > This is what I've been telling several of my customers about their > contacts for a while now. > > /kc > > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 05:24:12AM -0500, Rich Kulawiec said: > > > >Their own announcement: > > > > > http://postmaster-blog.aol.com/2014/04/22/aol-mail-updates-dmarc-policy-to-reject/ > > > >says that DMARC issues should be referred here: > > > > dmarc-h...@teamaol.com > > > >(And before anyone asks, yes, the headers on mailing list traffic > >have been modified precisely as that page stipulates.) > > > >Perhaps it's too much to expect that in 2015 system and network admins > >will actually demonstrate baseline professionalism and competence by > >reading and answering role account email. > > > >---rsk > > -- > Ken Chase - Toronto Canada >
Re: AOL Postmaster
Simple, one simply does not conduct business email over an AOL account. This is what I've been telling several of my customers about their contacts for a while now. /kc On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 05:24:12AM -0500, Rich Kulawiec said: > >Their own announcement: > > http://postmaster-blog.aol.com/2014/04/22/aol-mail-updates-dmarc-policy-to-reject/ > >says that DMARC issues should be referred here: > > dmarc-h...@teamaol.com > >(And before anyone asks, yes, the headers on mailing list traffic >have been modified precisely as that page stipulates.) > >Perhaps it's too much to expect that in 2015 system and network admins >will actually demonstrate baseline professionalism and competence by >reading and answering role account email. > >---rsk -- Ken Chase - Toronto Canada
Re: AOL Postmaster
Their own announcement: http://postmaster-blog.aol.com/2014/04/22/aol-mail-updates-dmarc-policy-to-reject/ says that DMARC issues should be referred here: dmarc-h...@teamaol.com (And before anyone asks, yes, the headers on mailing list traffic have been modified precisely as that page stipulates.) Perhaps it's too much to expect that in 2015 system and network admins will actually demonstrate baseline professionalism and competence by reading and answering role account email. ---rsk
Re: AOL Postmaster
For anyone having issues with AOL right now, if you would like, contact me offlist and I will see what I can do about getting it in front of our contact at AOL. Please be as specific as you can be about the issue, about who controls the IPs, about your own role and authority over the IPs and the email that flows through them, and please include at least one sample if possible. Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. CEO/President ISIPP SuretyMail Email Reputation, Accreditation & Certification Your mail system + SuretyMail accreditation = delivered to their inbox! http://www.SuretyMail.com/ http://www.SuretyMail.eu/ Author: Section 6 of the Federal CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 Member, California Bar Cyberspace Law Committee Ret. Professor of Law, Lincoln Law School of San Jose 303-731-2121 | amitch...@isipp.com | @AnnePMitchell | Facebook/AnnePMitchell
Re: AOL Postmaster
The quickest way of contacting the AOL Mail Team I'm aware of is through their Twitter account at @AOLMail (https://twitter.com/AOLMail). Tell them @6 sent you. ;) Cordially, A - ~~ vox: +1 202 459 9800 x.1300 // secure: +1 410 874 0050 (phone calls need to be arranged in advance) e: adr...@2600.com // e: adrian.l...@us.army.mil GPG/PGP public key: https://keybase.io/comsec/key.asc PGP Fingerprint (64 bit): 324B EE81 A275 E619 (COMSEC First! Verify fingerprint before using key.) ~~ El 2015-02-24 13:03, Suresh Ramasubramanian escribió: And how many users do you have, again? On Feb 24, 2015 6:29 PM, "Colin Johnston" wrote: block aol like china blocks with no engagement of comms as justification colin Sent from my iPhone > On 24 Feb 2015, at 12:36, Rich Kulawiec wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 03:19:06AM +0100, Fred wrote: >> Having exactly the same issue. Also never received any response from >> AOL. Quite annoying. > > I've been waiting since January 26th for a response from dmarc-h...@teamaol.com, > which is their stipulated contact point for DMARC issues. > > Of course I wouldn't *need* a response about that if they hadn't implemented > DMARC so foolishly. > > It seems that the days when Carl Hutzler ran the place -- and ran it well -- > are now well behind them. I didn't always agree with their decisions, > but it was obvious that they were working hard and trying to make AOL a > good network neighbor, so even when I disagreed I could at least acknowledge > their good intentions. It seems now that AOL is determined to permit > unlimited abuse directed at the entire rest of the Internet while > simultaneously making life as difficult as possible for everyone who > *doesn't* abuse...and is counting on their size to make them immune from > the consequences of that decision. > > ---rsk
Re: AOL Postmaster
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 08:45:15 -0500, Rich Kulawiec said: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 06:33:08PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > > And how many users do you have, again? > > So professionalism, competence, diligence, etc. are reserved for > only the operations considered large enough? Good to know. No, but being able to ignore 800 pound gorillas *is* reserved for only the operations considered small enough pgpQBI7FY5qdW.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: AOL Postmaster
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 06:33:08PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > And how many users do you have, again? So professionalism, competence, diligence, etc. are reserved for only the operations considered large enough? Good to know. ---rsk
Re: AOL Postmaster
And how many users do you have, again? On Feb 24, 2015 6:29 PM, "Colin Johnston" wrote: > block aol like china blocks with no engagement of comms as justification > > colin > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On 24 Feb 2015, at 12:36, Rich Kulawiec wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 03:19:06AM +0100, Fred wrote: > >> Having exactly the same issue. Also never received any response from > >> AOL. Quite annoying. > > > > I've been waiting since January 26th for a response from > dmarc-h...@teamaol.com, > > which is their stipulated contact point for DMARC issues. > > > > Of course I wouldn't *need* a response about that if they hadn't > implemented > > DMARC so foolishly. > > > > It seems that the days when Carl Hutzler ran the place -- and ran it > well -- > > are now well behind them. I didn't always agree with their decisions, > > but it was obvious that they were working hard and trying to make AOL a > > good network neighbor, so even when I disagreed I could at least > acknowledge > > their good intentions. It seems now that AOL is determined to permit > > unlimited abuse directed at the entire rest of the Internet while > > simultaneously making life as difficult as possible for everyone who > > *doesn't* abuse...and is counting on their size to make them immune from > > the consequences of that decision. > > > > ---rsk >
Re: AOL Postmaster
block aol like china blocks with no engagement of comms as justification colin Sent from my iPhone > On 24 Feb 2015, at 12:36, Rich Kulawiec wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 03:19:06AM +0100, Fred wrote: >> Having exactly the same issue. Also never received any response from >> AOL. Quite annoying. > > I've been waiting since January 26th for a response from > dmarc-h...@teamaol.com, > which is their stipulated contact point for DMARC issues. > > Of course I wouldn't *need* a response about that if they hadn't implemented > DMARC so foolishly. > > It seems that the days when Carl Hutzler ran the place -- and ran it well -- > are now well behind them. I didn't always agree with their decisions, > but it was obvious that they were working hard and trying to make AOL a > good network neighbor, so even when I disagreed I could at least acknowledge > their good intentions. It seems now that AOL is determined to permit > unlimited abuse directed at the entire rest of the Internet while > simultaneously making life as difficult as possible for everyone who > *doesn't* abuse...and is counting on their size to make them immune from > the consequences of that decision. > > ---rsk
Re: AOL Postmaster
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 03:19:06AM +0100, Fred wrote: > Having exactly the same issue. Also never received any response from > AOL. Quite annoying. I've been waiting since January 26th for a response from dmarc-h...@teamaol.com, which is their stipulated contact point for DMARC issues. Of course I wouldn't *need* a response about that if they hadn't implemented DMARC so foolishly. It seems that the days when Carl Hutzler ran the place -- and ran it well -- are now well behind them. I didn't always agree with their decisions, but it was obvious that they were working hard and trying to make AOL a good network neighbor, so even when I disagreed I could at least acknowledge their good intentions. It seems now that AOL is determined to permit unlimited abuse directed at the entire rest of the Internet while simultaneously making life as difficult as possible for everyone who *doesn't* abuse...and is counting on their size to make them immune from the consequences of that decision. ---rsk
RE: AOL Postmaster
Same here. I want to solve things that they seem to have issues with. But when I ask what is wrong they either don't respond (in any meaningful manner) or say that they 'solved it', without me ever knowing what 'it' was. I prefer swimming in seaweed instead of contacting Yahoo (or MS for that matter). And the seaweed here is quite gross. David Hofstee Deliverability Management MailPlus B.V. Netherlands (ESP) -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] Namens Fred Verzonden: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 3:19 AM Aan: nanog@nanog.org Onderwerp: Re: AOL Postmaster Having exactly the same issue. Also never received any response from AOL. Quite annoying. John Zettlemoyer: > No, started using an IP address that hasn’t been used since we got the > range from Arin, and got this - 554- (RTR:BL) Tried to contact AOL through > normal channels, and no response in over a week. Feedback loop has been in > place for years, and we check it every day (its clean). > > John Zettlemoyer > > > From: Bill Patterson [mailto:billpatterso...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 3:46 PM > To: John Zettlemoyer > Cc: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: AOL Postmaster > > Did you suddenly start getting "AOL will not accept delivery of this message" > bounce backs? > On Feb 23, 2015 3:30 PM, "John Zettlemoyer" wrote: > Could someone from AOL who deals with the email systems please contact me > off-list. > Thank you. > > John Zettlemoyer > WCiT LLC > 856.310.1375 x221 > j...@wcit.net >
Re: AOL Postmaster
Having exactly the same issue. Also never received any response from AOL. Quite annoying. John Zettlemoyer: No, started using an IP address that hasn’t been used since we got the range from Arin, and got this - 554- (RTR:BL) Tried to contact AOL through normal channels, and no response in over a week. Feedback loop has been in place for years, and we check it every day (its clean). John Zettlemoyer From: Bill Patterson [mailto:billpatterso...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 3:46 PM To: John Zettlemoyer Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: AOL Postmaster Did you suddenly start getting "AOL will not accept delivery of this message" bounce backs? On Feb 23, 2015 3:30 PM, "John Zettlemoyer" wrote: Could someone from AOL who deals with the email systems please contact me off-list. Thank you. John Zettlemoyer WCiT LLC 856.310.1375 x221 j...@wcit.net
RE: AOL Postmaster
Ok, it took 21 days from the time I opened a ticket with them last month for them to respond to me. I ended up having to have our ISP update our rDNS. Not sure if it's something similar for you but I felt the same way after a week of waiting for a response from them. On Feb 23, 2015 3:56 PM, "John Zettlemoyer" wrote: > No, started using an IP address that hasn’t been used since we got the > range from Arin, and got this - 554- (RTR:BL) > > Tried to contact AOL through normal channels, and no response in over a > week. Feedback loop has been in place for years, and we check it every day > (its clean). > > > > John Zettlemoyer > > > > *From:* Bill Patterson [mailto:billpatterso...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Monday, February 23, 2015 3:46 PM > *To:* John Zettlemoyer > *Cc:* nanog@nanog.org > *Subject:* Re: AOL Postmaster > > > > Did you suddenly start getting "AOL will not accept delivery of this > message" bounce backs? > > On Feb 23, 2015 3:30 PM, "John Zettlemoyer" wrote: > > Could someone from AOL who deals with the email systems please contact me > off-list. > Thank you. > > John Zettlemoyer > WCiT LLC > 856.310.1375 x221 > j...@wcit.net >
RE: AOL Postmaster
No, started using an IP address that hasn’t been used since we got the range from Arin, and got this - 554- (RTR:BL) Tried to contact AOL through normal channels, and no response in over a week. Feedback loop has been in place for years, and we check it every day (its clean). John Zettlemoyer From: Bill Patterson [mailto:billpatterso...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 3:46 PM To: John Zettlemoyer Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: AOL Postmaster Did you suddenly start getting "AOL will not accept delivery of this message" bounce backs? On Feb 23, 2015 3:30 PM, "John Zettlemoyer" wrote: Could someone from AOL who deals with the email systems please contact me off-list. Thank you. John Zettlemoyer WCiT LLC 856.310.1375 x221 j...@wcit.net
Re: AOL Postmaster
Did you suddenly start getting "AOL will not accept delivery of this message" bounce backs? On Feb 23, 2015 3:30 PM, "John Zettlemoyer" wrote: > Could someone from AOL who deals with the email systems please contact me > off-list. > Thank you. > > John Zettlemoyer > WCiT LLC > 856.310.1375 x221 > j...@wcit.net >
AOL Postmaster
Could someone from AOL who deals with the email systems please contact me off-list. Thank you. John Zettlemoyer WCiT LLC 856.310.1375 x221 j...@wcit.net
Postmaster @ charter.net
Hi all, Sorry for the noise, but my emails to postmas...@charter.net are getting rejected. Our mail server is being rejected by charter.net for not having a reverse DNS PTR record, but all the publicly available DNS servers I am able to query are resolving the PTR without any errors. If anyone has a direct contact within Charter that they could put me in contact with it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Tim Donahue
Re: .mil postmaster Contacts?
Well the servers for DISA.MIL are not EDNS compliant, they drop EDNS version 1 queries and unless you are running a experimental nameserver which expects EDNS version negotiation to work it shouldn't be causing you issues yet. Otherwise the lookups of the MX records succeed. There is no good reason to block EDNS version 1 queries. All it does is break EDNS version negotiation. Mark In message <20141029150034.ga25...@esri.com>, Ray Van Dolson writes: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:43:34AM -0400, Chuck Church wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Alain Hebert > > Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 9:14 AM > > To: nanog@nanog.org > > Subject: Re: .mil postmaster Contacts? > > > > > Might be related to the news (CNN this morning) about the WH network bein > g > > exploited for a few days now. > > > They might be going after some .mil to and the tightening up of those > > networks may cause disruption. > > > > > > I think it has to do with DNSSEC. The google DNS FAQ mentions (along with > > someone else who emailed me off-list) checking DNSVIZ for issues. So > > looking at: > > http://dnsviz.net/d/disa.mil/dnssec/ > > > > seems to indicate some issues. RRSET TTL MISMATCH I think they all are. > > Any DISA people on here? Using a non-Google DNS (which I guess isn't doing > > DNSSEC validation) does resolve the names fine. > > > > Chuck > > I saw the same errors in dnsviz, but was unsure if they were sufficient > to cause lookup failures (they were "warnings" only). > > # dig @8.8.8.8 disa.mil MX +dnssec > > ; <<>> DiG 9.8.2rc1-RedHat-9.8.2-0.23.rc1.el6_5.1 <<>> @8.8.8.8 disa.mil MX + > dnssec > ; (1 server found) > ;; global options: +cmd > ;; Got answer: > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 9111 > ;; flags: qr rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 4, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 > > ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: > ; EDNS: version: 0, flags: do; udp: 512 > ;; QUESTION SECTION: > ;disa.mil. IN MX > > ;; ANSWER SECTION: > disa.mil. 20039 IN MX 5 indal.disa.mil. > disa.mil. 20039 IN MX 0 pico.disa.mil. > disa.mil. 20039 IN MX 10 dnipro.disa.mil. > disa.mil. 20039 IN RRSIG MX 8 2 86400 2014112128 2 > 014102228 40608 disa.mil. lC2W9knYgviYJUKMYw9FJueUk4cR19spu7QsX3novmYrlOI > 70F0Rrzxm adU17tvfq1vbtzgYH0FriGIMdywPu/ssO7mK4KGhDj7pkQCcJZzlbrMe OlJOcC9mQc > jgb6nt5KREBaIGzTGY0gA7AM6X2Ft/t9ZdsE/K+jNejgEc 4+M= > > I see the "ad" flag in the query response flags, so am thinking this > lookup succeeded and was validated? > > I do note that once we disabled DNSSEC on our resolvers we were able to > push mail out to these domains. May have been coincidental -- needs > further testing. > > Ray -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
Re: .mil postmaster Contacts?
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:43:34AM -0400, Chuck Church wrote: > > -Original Message- > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Alain Hebert > Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 9:14 AM > To: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: .mil postmaster Contacts? > > > Might be related to the news (CNN this morning) about the WH network being > exploited for a few days now. > > They might be going after some .mil to and the tightening up of those > networks may cause disruption. > > > I think it has to do with DNSSEC. The google DNS FAQ mentions (along with > someone else who emailed me off-list) checking DNSVIZ for issues. So > looking at: > http://dnsviz.net/d/disa.mil/dnssec/ > > seems to indicate some issues. RRSET TTL MISMATCH I think they all are. > Any DISA people on here? Using a non-Google DNS (which I guess isn't doing > DNSSEC validation) does resolve the names fine. > > Chuck I saw the same errors in dnsviz, but was unsure if they were sufficient to cause lookup failures (they were "warnings" only). # dig @8.8.8.8 disa.mil MX +dnssec ; <<>> DiG 9.8.2rc1-RedHat-9.8.2-0.23.rc1.el6_5.1 <<>> @8.8.8.8 disa.mil MX +dnssec ; (1 server found) ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 9111 ;; flags: qr rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 4, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags: do; udp: 512 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;disa.mil. IN MX ;; ANSWER SECTION: disa.mil. 20039 IN MX 5 indal.disa.mil. disa.mil. 20039 IN MX 0 pico.disa.mil. disa.mil. 20039 IN MX 10 dnipro.disa.mil. disa.mil. 20039 IN RRSIG MX 8 2 86400 2014112128 2014102228 40608 disa.mil. lC2W9knYgviYJUKMYw9FJueUk4cR19spu7QsX3novmYrlOI70F0Rrzxm adU17tvfq1vbtzgYH0FriGIMdywPu/ssO7mK4KGhDj7pkQCcJZzlbrMe OlJOcC9mQcjgb6nt5KREBaIGzTGY0gA7AM6X2Ft/t9ZdsE/K+jNejgEc 4+M= I see the "ad" flag in the query response flags, so am thinking this lookup succeeded and was validated? I do note that once we disabled DNSSEC on our resolvers we were able to push mail out to these domains. May have been coincidental -- needs further testing. Ray
RE: .mil postmaster Contacts?
-Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Alain Hebert Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 9:14 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: .mil postmaster Contacts? > Might be related to the news (CNN this morning) about the WH network being exploited for a few days now. > They might be going after some .mil to and the tightening up of those networks may cause disruption. I think it has to do with DNSSEC. The google DNS FAQ mentions (along with someone else who emailed me off-list) checking DNSVIZ for issues. So looking at: http://dnsviz.net/d/disa.mil/dnssec/ seems to indicate some issues. RRSET TTL MISMATCH I think they all are. Any DISA people on here? Using a non-Google DNS (which I guess isn't doing DNSSEC validation) does resolve the names fine. Chuck
Re: .mil postmaster Contacts?
On 10/27/14 21:03, Chuck Church wrote: > You sure it's not a DNS issue? I've had problems resolving various > *.disa.mil sites today. Google DNS claims they don't exist. > > Chuck > > -Original Message- > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Ray Van Dolson > Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 1:52 PM > To: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: .mil postmaster Contacts? > > We're seeing issues deliving email to certain .mil domains. MX hosts for > these domains are not responding on port 25 and have verified from > off-network as well. > > Anyone else seeing the same or can point me to a technical POC to start > with? > > navy.mil, usmc.mil, uscg.mil are just a few that seem to be having issues. > > Ray Might be related to the news (CNN this morning) about the WH network being exploited for a few days now. They might be going after some .mil to and the tightening up of those networks may cause disruption.
Re: .mil postmaster Contacts?
It *might* have been. Things cleared up yesterday. I initially thought it was the result of disabling DNSSEC on our primary resolvers, but am less certain that was the "fix" now as I don't see any issues with their config (per dnsviz). Ray On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 09:03:15PM -0400, Chuck Church wrote: > You sure it's not a DNS issue? I've had problems resolving various > *.disa.mil sites today. Google DNS claims they don't exist. > > Chuck > > -Original Message- > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Ray Van Dolson > Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 1:52 PM > To: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: .mil postmaster Contacts? > > We're seeing issues deliving email to certain .mil domains. MX hosts for > these domains are not responding on port 25 and have verified from > off-network as well. > > Anyone else seeing the same or can point me to a technical POC to start > with? > > navy.mil, usmc.mil, uscg.mil are just a few that seem to be having issues. > > Ray
RE: .mil postmaster Contacts?
You sure it's not a DNS issue? I've had problems resolving various *.disa.mil sites today. Google DNS claims they don't exist. Chuck -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Ray Van Dolson Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 1:52 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: .mil postmaster Contacts? We're seeing issues deliving email to certain .mil domains. MX hosts for these domains are not responding on port 25 and have verified from off-network as well. Anyone else seeing the same or can point me to a technical POC to start with? navy.mil, usmc.mil, uscg.mil are just a few that seem to be having issues. Ray
Re: .mil postmaster Contacts?
Those all appear to be going through DISA's Enterprise Email system. http://www.disa.mil/Services/Computing/~/media/Files/DISA/Services/Computing/DECCServiceDeskContact.pdf If they don't have an option specifically for Enterprise Email, try contacting the extension for Oklahoma City. --- -ITG (ITechGeek) i...@itechgeek.com https://itg.nu/ GPG Keys: https://itg.nu/contact/gpg-key Preferred GPG Key: Fingerprint: AB46B7E363DA7E04ABFA57852AA9910A DCB1191A Google Voice: +1-703-493-0128 / Twitter: ITechGeek / Facebook: http://fb.me/Jbwa.Net On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Mike A wrote: > On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 10:52:07AM -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > > We're seeing issues deliving email to certain .mil domains. MX hosts > > for these domains are not responding on port 25 and have verified from > > off-network as well. > > > > Anyone else seeing the same or can point me to a technical POC to start > > with? > > > > navy.mil, usmc.mil, uscg.mil are just a few that seem to be having > > issues. > > When we (state gummint) had trouble delivering work-related mail to some > .mil > addresses in our state, I found that the best way was to look up the > contacts > on the installation's website, make a phone call, and ask for the IT > people. > > We found that sometimes they shut mail down, sometimes higher HQ publish an > overly wide firewall block list, and sometimes Stuff Just Happens. > > YMMV, as always. > > -- > Mike Andrews, W5EGO > mi...@mikea.ath.cx > Tired old sysadmin >
Re: .mil postmaster Contacts?
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 10:52:07AM -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > We're seeing issues deliving email to certain .mil domains. MX hosts > for these domains are not responding on port 25 and have verified from > off-network as well. > > Anyone else seeing the same or can point me to a technical POC to start > with? > > navy.mil, usmc.mil, uscg.mil are just a few that seem to be having > issues. When we (state gummint) had trouble delivering work-related mail to some .mil addresses in our state, I found that the best way was to look up the contacts on the installation's website, make a phone call, and ask for the IT people. We found that sometimes they shut mail down, sometimes higher HQ publish an overly wide firewall block list, and sometimes Stuff Just Happens. YMMV, as always. -- Mike Andrews, W5EGO mi...@mikea.ath.cx Tired old sysadmin
.mil postmaster Contacts?
We're seeing issues deliving email to certain .mil domains. MX hosts for these domains are not responding on port 25 and have verified from off-network as well. Anyone else seeing the same or can point me to a technical POC to start with? navy.mil, usmc.mil, uscg.mil are just a few that seem to be having issues. Ray
Yahoo Postmaster
Looking for a Yahoo Postmaster to contact me offlist. Thank You --Zach P. JMZ Corporation
verizon postmaster here?
Hi, is there a verizon postmaster around who could contact me off-list? thx -- Mark E. Jeftovic Founder & CEO, easyDNS Technologies Inc. +1-(416)-535-8672 ext 225 Read my blog: http://markable.com
Re: ATT Postmaster Contact
I've had decent luck reaching out to abuse_...@abuse-att.net, any other method of contact seems to just go to /dev/null. It does generally take longer than 2 days to hear back, patience is a virtue. - Original Message - From: "Robert Webb" To: "Suresh Ramasubramanian" Cc: nanog@nanog.org Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2014 9:06:37 PM Subject: Re: ATT Postmaster Contact Thanks. I am the admin of the server. I only have one user of my list that has a bellsouth.net email address. As I stated before, the list might get 15 emails a month sent out. All users are put on the list by request only and only one person has authorization to send out. So there was NO way I was sending any unauthorized email of ANY type in order to get blocked. Robert On 03/16/2014 09:54 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > > They will respond usefully to you if you are the admin of that server. > If you are on shared hosting, you might ask your provider to contact > them. > > And two days is not an unreasonable time to handle a block issue. > > On 17-Mar-2014 3:09 am, "Robert Webb" <mailto:rw...@ropeguru.com>> wrote: > > Anyone have a contact for postmaster at att.net <http://att.net>? > I have one user on an email list I send to and they are blocking > for abuse. This list might get 15 email a month that go out. > > Filled out their "form" but would like to get this resolved in > less than "2 days" as they state. > > Robert >
Re: ATT Postmaster Contact
Thanks. I am the admin of the server. I only have one user of my list that has a bellsouth.net email address. As I stated before, the list might get 15 emails a month sent out. All users are put on the list by request only and only one person has authorization to send out. So there was NO way I was sending any unauthorized email of ANY type in order to get blocked. Robert On 03/16/2014 09:54 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: They will respond usefully to you if you are the admin of that server. If you are on shared hosting, you might ask your provider to contact them. And two days is not an unreasonable time to handle a block issue. On 17-Mar-2014 3:09 am, "Robert Webb" <mailto:rw...@ropeguru.com>> wrote: Anyone have a contact for postmaster at att.net <http://att.net>? I have one user on an email list I send to and they are blocking for abuse. This list might get 15 email a month that go out. Filled out their "form" but would like to get this resolved in less than "2 days" as they state. Robert
Re: ATT Postmaster Contact
They will respond usefully to you if you are the admin of that server. If you are on shared hosting, you might ask your provider to contact them. And two days is not an unreasonable time to handle a block issue. On 17-Mar-2014 3:09 am, "Robert Webb" wrote: > Anyone have a contact for postmaster at att.net? I have one user on an > email list I send to and they are blocking for abuse. This list might get > 15 email a month that go out. > > Filled out their "form" but would like to get this resolved in less than > "2 days" as they state. > > Robert > >
ATT Postmaster Contact
Anyone have a contact for postmaster at att.net? I have one user on an email list I send to and they are blocking for abuse. This list might get 15 email a month that go out. Filled out their "form" but would like to get this resolved in less than "2 days" as they state. Robert
AOL Postmaster
Can a AOL Postmaster hit me off-list please J Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition <http://www.wlan1.com/product_p/mikrotik%20book-2.htm> " Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services Office: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net <http://www.linktechs.net/> - Skype: linktechs -- Create Wireless Coverage's with www.towercoverage.com <http://www.towercoverage.com/> - 900Mhz - LTE - 3G - 3.65 - TV Whitespace
Re: ATT.net postmaster contact
I've had good luck emailing them at abuse_...@abuse-att.net. Takes a couple days to hear back from them, but they do generally reply. On 08/26/2013 01:21 PM, Drew Weaver wrote: > Howdy, > > Does anyone know of a good/working ATT.net postmaster contact? We > have been trying for several weeks to get an IP that has never been > used before removed from the ATT.net blacklist and we aren't > getting replies through the forms on their site. > > Thanks, -Drew >
ATT.net postmaster contact
Howdy, Does anyone know of a good/working ATT.net postmaster contact? We have been trying for several weeks to get an IP that has never been used before removed from the ATT.net blacklist and we aren't getting replies through the forms on their site. Thanks, -Drew
AOL Postmaster
Could someone from the AOL mail group (AOL Postmaster) please contact me off list. Thank you. John Zettlemoyer Sr. Director of I.T. Infrastructure WCiT - West-Canaan LLC j...@wcit.net
verizon postmaster
Could someone from Verizon Postmaster please contact me off list? Thank you John Zettlemoyer Sr. Director of I.T. Infrastructure WCiT - West-Canaan LLC j...@wcit.net
Re: Yahoo Postmaster
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Andy B. wrote: > If there is a YAHOO! Postmaster contact available, can you please > contact me off list? > > I need to investigate a customer's "TS03" listing of a very large > netblock (/16) and I'm afraid regular Yahoo! forms are leading me > nowhere but frustration and no results. > > > Thanks. > > Hi Andy, I'm not a postmaster, but I can probably put you in touch with an appropriate person, Thanks! Matt
Re: Yahoo Postmaster
Hello - I also need to contact a YAHOO! Postmaster about a security related issue. Off-list contacts are appreciated. Mitchell [ CROSS POSTED TO MAILOP ] On Jun 21, 2013, at 5:21 PM, Andy B. wrote: > If there is a YAHOO! Postmaster contact available, can you please > contact me off list? > > I need to investigate a customer's "TS03" listing of a very large > netblock (/16) and I'm afraid regular Yahoo! forms are leading me > nowhere but frustration and no results. > > > Thanks.
Yahoo Postmaster
If there is a YAHOO! Postmaster contact available, can you please contact me off list? I need to investigate a customer's "TS03" listing of a very large netblock (/16) and I'm afraid regular Yahoo! forms are leading me nowhere but frustration and no results. Thanks.
AT&T postmaster/mail admin
If there are eyeballs from AT&T's postmaster group here, would you please contact me off list regarding a rather major blocking issue. Thanks. Regards, Annette
Comcast Postmaster...
Would a comcast postmaster be so kind as to contact me off list? Thanks. -- Matt
In need of a Microsoft Postmaster
I am in great hopes that a Microsoft Postmaster could get in contact with me. This is dealing with a delisting of a banned IP "blocked using Blocklist 3, mail from IP banned" My client is e-mailing a vendor of theirs who's mail goes to "mail.messaging.microsoft.com" We have submitted a request to delist it but have not heard back from anyone for about 2 weeks now. Our client is up in arms and all that. There has been no know reasons for why the ban would have taken place. It is possible this is an old ban from before we had the IP space which we got 1-2 years ago. :( Sincerely, Mark Keymer CFO/COO Vivio Technologies
Is a postmaster from csod.com/cornerstoneondemand.com present?
la4prd4.mx.csod.com seems to be having trouble saying helo/ehlo and disconnects after our welcome banner Users think we're blocking training registration emails from your large wholesale energy customer in the N.E. area; we're not. Please get in touch. 860.823.4118 if email fails. ~JasonG
Looking for Postmaster contact for js.pentagon.mil
We have a client that we resent moved to some new address space (We have had the the space for a couple of years now) However it looks like the mail server for js.pentagon.mil are droping all packet to them. :( If anyone had some leads on a way to contact them. Please contact me off-list. We did try the number in the whois for the IP. The phone rang and rang. :( Thank you all. Sincerely, Mark Keymer
Fasthosts postmaster
Can someone who's a mail admin at Fasthosts Ltd. in the UK/AS15148 contact this customer off list? Messagelabs is rejecting random e-mail from one of your SMTP boxes (error 553: Spam, exchange-out-45.livemail.co.uk/213.171.216.45). Your phone number goes to people who don't know what a postmaster is, and your whois tech contact goes to the sales desk. Meanwhile, our ticket has been assigned to someone who wants to know "your e-mail address and password". Hint: 1) of those is in the to: field, and 2) is perfectly useless - how exactly do you login to the mail server's admin interface with a user's address and SMTP pwd? Further, not so sure about sending passwords about in cleartext e-mail to some outsourced thing or other. I've verified that neither us, nor that host, is in any of the major *BLs. (PS, if anyone from Messagelabs is around and can fix the problem without going through Fasthosts, that would be optimal:-)) Sorry for the noise, list. This may be e-mail related, but it is operational. -- The only thing worse than e-mail disclaimers...is people who send e-mail to lists complaining about them signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Windows Live Mail/Hotmail Postmaster Contact?
Can anyone provide me with an alternative contact to someone at Hotmail? I've tried their support form over at https://support.msn.com/eform.aspx?productKey=edfsmsbl&ct=eformts&st=1&wfxredirect=1which doesn't seem to ever generate even an auto-reply anymore. Feel free to contact me off-list.
Re: aol postmaster?
On Aug 24, 2010, at 8:43 PM, Matt Kelly wrote: > If there is an AOL postmaster contact available, can you please contact me > off list? Have you tried http://postmaster.aol.com? The vast majority of the AOL Postmaster team was laid off back in January (and will be missed), so YMMV these days. -- Marc
aol postmaster?
If there is an AOL postmaster contact available, can you please contact me off list? Thanks. -- Matt
Re: AOL Postmaster
On Mar 22, 2010, at 12:23 PM, Larry Sheldon wrote: > On 3/22/2010 14:03, Mark Keymer wrote: >> Hi, >> >> If at all possible can a AOL Postmaster please get a hold of me. I have >> a client that co-lo's with use and we do the support for them and we >> need some help on getting mail to be delivering again to AOL. > > Didn't I read that all of the AOL Postmasters had beenwhat is the > word this week...made redundant? Most, but not all. You can reach those who remain via http://postmaster.aol.net/, just as before. -- J.D. Falk Return Path Inc
Re: AOL Postmaster
On 3/22/2010 14:03, Mark Keymer wrote: > Hi, > > If at all possible can a AOL Postmaster please get a hold of me. I have > a client that co-lo's with use and we do the support for them and we > need some help on getting mail to be delivering again to AOL. Didn't I read that all of the AOL Postmasters had beenwhat is the word this week...made redundant? -- Democracy: Three wolves and a sheep voting on the dinner menu. Requiescas in pace o email Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Eppure si rinfresca ICBM Targeting Information: http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml
AOL Postmaster
Hi, If at all possible can a AOL Postmaster please get a hold of me. I have a client that co-lo's with use and we do the support for them and we need some help on getting mail to be delivering again to AOL. Thank You in advance. Sincerely, Mark Keymer
Yahoo Postmaster Contact
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Will a Yahoo Postmaster please contact me off list? No one is responding to my web based complaints about Yahoo dropping email we are sending to our own staff's Yahoo email accounts. TIA! Jon Kibler - -- Jon R. Kibler Chief Technical Officer Advanced Systems Engineering Technology, Inc. Charleston, SC USA o/c/s: 843-849-8214 / 843-813-2924 / 843-564-4224 e: jon.kib...@aset.com or jon.r.kib...@gmail.com s: JonRKibler http://www.linkedin.com/in/jonrkibler My PGP Fingerprint is: BAA2 1F2C 5543 5D25 4636 A392 515C 5045 CF39 4253 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAktTWv0ACgkQUVxQRc85QlNwjACfQ13IYf08/LLjqZo0Bg9QQ9WE 5J0AnAsRk9uajgbm/hV2j1wOrU7ED78D =MVEN -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: Calling Comcast Postmaster or whomever actually is responsible for Comcast RBL maintenance
On 12/3/09 12:10 PM, "Chris Stebner" wrote: > For over a month now I've been fighting with Comcast Customer Security > Assurance regarding a simple BlackList issue. Apparently there is some > disconnect between internal applications and their ability to report > BlackList status accurately and the 'actual' BlackList rule-set. Supposedly > the ticket has been escalated to 'admin' and 'engineering' multiple times to > no avail. Currently we are waiting for engineering again to examine the > issue. > > The block is owned by us, a facilities based CLEC in business for over 10 > years. The /24 in question is used for business T1's. > > If anyone has any contacts, ideas or the power to resolve the issue I'd be > elated to hear from you. > > > Thank you all for your time, > > Chris Stebner > 970-403-0102 I have send this issue on to the right team and you should hear back from them shortly. Thanks for posting. -- Chris Griffiths Comcast Cable Communications, Inc. National Engineering and Technical Operations
Calling Comcast Postmaster or whomever actually is responsible for Comcast RBL maintenance
For over a month now I've been fighting with Comcast Customer Security Assurance regarding a simple BlackList issue. Apparently there is some disconnect between internal applications and their ability to report BlackList status accurately and the 'actual' BlackList rule-set. Supposedly the ticket has been escalated to 'admin' and 'engineering' multiple times to no avail. Currently we are waiting for engineering again to examine the issue. The block is owned by us, a facilities based CLEC in business for over 10 years. The /24 in question is used for business T1's. If anyone has any contacts, ideas or the power to resolve the issue I'd be elated to hear from you. Thank you all for your time, Chris Stebner 970-403-0102
Hotmail Postmaster
Can someone from Hotmail contact me off list? Sorry for the SPAM posting, we've tried other methods. Thanks -b -- Bill Blackford Senior Network Engineer Technology Systems Group Northwest Regional ESD my /home away from home
Re: AOL Postmaster
I sent your email to their team. -Dennis On Jun 1, 2009, at June 1,9:04 PM, Aaron Wendel wrote: Yes. For the last 2 months I've been getting the nice auto reply/ ticket number but no other contact. Aaron -Original Message- From: Mike Walter [mailto:mwal...@3z.net] Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 12:23 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: AOL Postmaster Have you been through http://postmaster.aol.com/? Mike -Original Message- From: Aaron Wendel [mailto:aa...@wholesaleinternet.com] Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 12:48 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: AOL Postmaster Is anyone from AOL lurking on the list that could contact me of-list? I'm having some issues with mail being rejected because AOL believes our IPs are dynamic. Aaron
