Re: ????[00275] ?????????????
Unfortunately, the require_explicit_destination option was not set in the MailMan config for the NANOG list. This has been corrected. Regards, Larry Blunk Merit Marc-Antoine.Chabot wrote: Interesting.. It's bouncing from a yahoo.co.jp group to the Nanog list. Anyone know a live contact for abuse at [NANOG]? *grin* -Original Message- From: Colin Alston [mailto:karna...@karnaugh.za.net] Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 9:11 AM To: NANOG list Subject: Re: [00275] ? On 2009/04/28 02:58 PM Steven Walker wrote: Sorry about that NANOG. I though it was more junk from the HK spammers. Don't NANOG people have far better ways to deal with spammers than yelling at them?
RE: ????[00275] ?????????????
Interesting.. It's bouncing from a yahoo.co.jp group to the Nanog list. Anyone know a live contact for abuse at [NANOG]? *grin* -Original Message- From: Colin Alston [mailto:karna...@karnaugh.za.net] Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 9:11 AM To: NANOG list Subject: Re: [00275] ? On 2009/04/28 02:58 PM Steven Walker wrote: > Sorry about that NANOG. I though it was more junk from the HK spammers. Don't NANOG people have far better ways to deal with spammers than yelling at them?
Re: ????[00275] ?????? ???????
On 2009/04/28 02:58 PM Steven Walker wrote: Sorry about that NANOG. I though it was more junk from the HK spammers. Don't NANOG people have far better ways to deal with spammers than yelling at them?
