Re: [SPAM]RE: [SPAM]RE: Mikrotik Cloud Core Router and BGP real life experiences?

2014-01-02 Thread Rob Seastrom

Justin Wilson li...@mtin.net writes:

   The biggest problem with Mikrotik is you just can¹t call them up for
 support on buggy code. In a critical network this can be a major problem.

I've contacted them (via email) and the experience seems to be exactly
the same as dealing with first level TAC at the big guys: the guy you
contact doesn't care much about your problem once he realizes that
it's a legitimate issue with their stuff and not simply a case of
pilot error for which he can refer you to the documentation, and
eventually you give up and develop a workaround, such as it is.

-r





RE: [SPAM]RE: [SPAM]RE: Mikrotik Cloud Core Router and BGP real life experiences?

2014-01-02 Thread Dennis Burgess
Mikrotik really relies on its list of consultants and trainers, these are all 
outside companies, yes such as mine, that provide the higher class of support 
than MikroTik own e-mail. .  While their e-mail does have a lack of 
responsiveness, I was told the volume that they do get form other parts of the 
world, not saying that's an excuse, but it is what it is.

Many people in the WISP and smaller ISP markets rely on these consulting 
companies to not only help them with MikroTik but other hardware/software and 
business decisions, LTI (yes the company I work for) has more certified 
trainers and engineers for MikroTik than any other in North America, but there 
is a list from MikroTik that lists certified consultants available as well.

Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer Author of Learn RouterOS- Second 
Edition 
 Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services 
   
 Office: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net - Skype: linktechs  
   
 -- Create Wireless Coverage's with www.towercoverage.com - 900Mhz - LTE - 3G - 
3.65 - TV Whitespace  


-Original Message-
From: Rob Seastrom [mailto:r...@seastrom.com] 
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2014 6:16 AM
To: Justin Wilson
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: [SPAM]RE: [SPAM]RE: Mikrotik Cloud Core Router and BGP real life 
experiences?


Justin Wilson li...@mtin.net writes:

   The biggest problem with Mikrotik is you just can¹t call them up for 
 support on buggy code. In a critical network this can be a major problem.

I've contacted them (via email) and the experience seems to be exactly the same 
as dealing with first level TAC at the big guys: the guy you contact doesn't 
care much about your problem once he realizes that it's a legitimate issue with 
their stuff and not simply a case of pilot error for which he can refer you to 
the documentation, and eventually you give up and develop a workaround, such as 
it is.

-r






Re: [SPAM]RE: [SPAM]RE: Mikrotik Cloud Core Router and BGP real life experiences?

2014-01-02 Thread Rob Seastrom

Dennis Burgess dmburg...@linktechs.net writes:

 Mikrotik really relies on its list of consultants and trainers,
 these are all outside companies, yes such as mine, that provide the
 higher class of support than MikroTik own e-mail. .  While their
 e-mail does have a lack of responsiveness, I was told the volume
 that they do get form other parts of the world, not saying that's an
 excuse, but it is what it is.

This wasn't a support issue; it was bug reports.  Things such as:

* your CLI has an incomplete implementation of the Emacs key bindings
  (detailed list elided here on nanog@for brevity's sake but if you've ever
  used Mikrotik kit and are a seasoned CLI user on C and J platforms
  you know what I'm talking about); please consider fixing or adopting
  libcli, gnu readline, or somesuch in future releases.

* your GRE implementation always has a protocol type of 0x0800 in the
  GRE header even when it is forwarding an IPv6 packet (packet dumps
  attached).

* ssh sessions crash when ServerAliveInterval SSH application layer
  keepalives kick off.  See http://www.openssh.org/faq.html section
  2.12 or http://www.kehlet.cx/articles/129.html To replicate: ssh -o
  ServerAliveInterval=120 admin@myrouter (to their credit this was
  eventually fixed in 5.x - this behavior was observed in 5.0rc4)

* /ping and /tool/traceroute fail for a DNS name for which there is
  no A record, only an  record (although both commands will
  accept an IPv6 address as digits).  This is still a problem today.

* When trying to remove files, it seems that they are not removed by
  number, but rather by name, despite what the online help says.

There was more stuff along those lines.  Thanks for the bug reports;
I made sure to open tickets for them but we can't commit to when or if
they'll get addressed due to competing priorities but they've
absolutely been documented would have been a fine reply; I completely
understand the Real World considerations involved and that my
priorities were not necessarily their priorities.  Unfortunately the
return email left me with the impression that nobody cared and that
they were not equipped to handle issues brought to their attention by
people with field experience, hence the unfavorable parallels to the
big guys.

Note that this has not kept my from speccing their kit when the task
calls for something that's surprisingly good considering how
inexpensive it is!  So maybe from a business perspective they were
entirely correct to blow me off - at least where it comes to revenue
attributable to Rob Seastrom, the negative impact has been nil.

-r




Re: [SPAM]RE: [SPAM]RE: Mikrotik Cloud Core Router and BGP real life experiences?

2013-12-31 Thread Justin Wilson
The biggest problem with Mikrotik is you just can¹t call them up for
support on buggy code. In a critical network this can be a major problem.

Justin
---
Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net
MTIN Consulting
Mikrotik ­ UBNT ­ Climbing ­ Network Design
http://www.mtin.net/ http://www.mtin.net/blog
http://www.thebrotherswisp.com




-Original Message-
From: Dale Rumph dale.ru...@gmail.com
Date: Friday, December 27, 2013 at 10:04 AM
To: Dennis Burgess dmburg...@linktechs.net
Cc: NANOG list nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: [SPAM]RE: [SPAM]RE: Mikrotik Cloud Core Router and BGP real
life experiences?

Out of all the network hardware I have worked on in operations these were
by far some of the worst. I read lots of good things but like most things
in life these just dont stack up against a Cisco or Juniper for stability
and reliability. Most of the ISP's I have worked with were HSD but i also
followed the progression path in the industry so i have time with Dial Up,
ADSL/X/...,WISP's, Data Centers etc. and FTTH

I generally only see these in WISP's and some DSL installs. Never anything
with huge traffic load and full tables. Generally always driven by the
cost
factor alone without regard to much else imho. But that's just my
experience. However maybe there are people that have managed to keep these
up and handle all you have requested.

just my 2c


On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Dennis Burgess
dmburg...@linktechs.netwrote:

 We have many with full routing tables.  Load balancing, works fine, I
have
 one site with 8 DSL lines doing balancing across them.   We typically
don't
 use a GRE tunnel, but OpenVPN or IPSEC work great.


 Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer Author of Learn RouterOS-
 Second Edition
  Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support
 Services
  Office: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net - Skype:
 linktechs
  -- Create Wireless Coverage's with www.towercoverage.com - 900Mhz - LTE
 - 3G - 3.65 - TV Whitespace


 -Original Message-
 From: matt kelly [mailto:mjke...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Friday, December 27, 2013 8:41 AM
 To: Raymond Burkholder
 Cc: NANOG list
 Subject: [SPAM]RE: Mikrotik Cloud Core Router and BGP real life
 experiences?

 They can not handle a full routing table. The load balancing doesn't
work.
 They can not properly reassemble fragmented packets, and therefore drop
 all but the first piece. They can not reliably handle traffic loads
over
 maybe 200 Mbps, we needed 4-6 Gbps capacity. They can not hold a gre
tunnel
 connection.

 On Dec 27, 2013 9:07 AM, Raymond Burkholder r...@oneunified.net
wrote:

 
  My real world experience with these is that they suck. Plain and
simple.
  Don't waste your time.
 
  Would you mind elaborating what you were trying to accomplish and what
  failed?
 
  Thank you.
 
  Ray
 
 
  --
  This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
  MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
 
 
 








Re: [SPAM]RE: [SPAM]RE: Mikrotik Cloud Core Router and BGP real life experiences?

2013-12-28 Thread Dale Rumph
Out of all the network hardware I have worked on in operations these were
by far some of the worst. I read lots of good things but like most things
in life these just dont stack up against a Cisco or Juniper for stability
and reliability. Most of the ISP's I have worked with were HSD but i also
followed the progression path in the industry so i have time with Dial Up,
ADSL/X/...,WISP's, Data Centers etc. and FTTH

I generally only see these in WISP's and some DSL installs. Never anything
with huge traffic load and full tables. Generally always driven by the cost
factor alone without regard to much else imho. But that's just my
experience. However maybe there are people that have managed to keep these
up and handle all you have requested.

just my 2c


On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Dennis Burgess dmburg...@linktechs.netwrote:

 We have many with full routing tables.  Load balancing, works fine, I have
 one site with 8 DSL lines doing balancing across them.   We typically don't
 use a GRE tunnel, but OpenVPN or IPSEC work great.


 Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer Author of Learn RouterOS-
 Second Edition
  Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support
 Services
  Office: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net - Skype:
 linktechs
  -- Create Wireless Coverage's with www.towercoverage.com - 900Mhz - LTE
 - 3G - 3.65 - TV Whitespace


 -Original Message-
 From: matt kelly [mailto:mjke...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Friday, December 27, 2013 8:41 AM
 To: Raymond Burkholder
 Cc: NANOG list
 Subject: [SPAM]RE: Mikrotik Cloud Core Router and BGP real life
 experiences?

 They can not handle a full routing table. The load balancing doesn't work.
 They can not properly reassemble fragmented packets, and therefore drop
 all but the first piece. They can not reliably handle traffic loads over
 maybe 200 Mbps, we needed 4-6 Gbps capacity. They can not hold a gre tunnel
 connection.

 On Dec 27, 2013 9:07 AM, Raymond Burkholder r...@oneunified.net wrote:

 
  My real world experience with these is that they suck. Plain and simple.
  Don't waste your time.
 
  Would you mind elaborating what you were trying to accomplish and what
  failed?
 
  Thank you.
 
  Ray
 
 
  --
  This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
  MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.