RE: OT: Voice Operators' Group forming
We're almost there, expect a list posting here in the next couple of days with the details. -Scott -Original Message- From: Carlos Alcantar [mailto:car...@race.com] Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 10:57 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: OT: Voice Operators' Group forming How's the startup of the list looking? -Original Message- From: Chris Meidinger [mailto:cmeidin...@sendmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 2:42 PM To: Jason LeBlanc Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: OT: Voice Operators' Group forming On 29.07.2009, at 22:52, Jason LeBlanc wrote: Brandon Butterworth wrote: NAVOG works for me. I'd prefer Voice Operators' Group Online Network brandon *claps* Imagine the poetry you have to listen to when _those_ guys put you on hold...
RE: OT: Voice Operators' Group forming
How's the startup of the list looking? -Original Message- From: Chris Meidinger [mailto:cmeidin...@sendmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 2:42 PM To: Jason LeBlanc Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: OT: Voice Operators' Group forming On 29.07.2009, at 22:52, Jason LeBlanc wrote: Brandon Butterworth wrote: NAVOG works for me. I'd prefer Voice Operators' Group Online Network brandon *claps* Imagine the poetry you have to listen to when _those_ guys put you on hold...
RE: OT: Voice Operators' Group forming
Hi All, We're making progress... I registered the domains voiceops.org and voiceops.net. No matter what the final name becomes, at least we've got some domains that aren't too hard on the eyes. Some noble souls have already volunteered to host it on a proper mailman server. Nothing is set up yet, but it's coming together. Thanks, David Hiers -Original Message- From: Charles Wyble [mailto:char...@thewybles.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 3:17 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: OT: Voice Operators' Group forming jamie wrote: puck.nether.net http://puck.nether.net. Right. That's what I meant. way to volunteer someone else's box :-) Good point. My apologies. Google groups then. :) This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system.
Re: OT: Voice Operators' Group forming
Brandon Butterworth wrote: NAVOG works for me. I'd prefer Voice Operators' Group Online Network brandon *claps*
Re: OT: Voice Operators' Group forming
On 29.07.2009, at 22:52, Jason LeBlanc wrote: Brandon Butterworth wrote: NAVOG works for me. I'd prefer Voice Operators' Group Online Network brandon *claps* Imagine the poetry you have to listen to when _those_ guys put you on hold...
Re: OT: Voice Operators' Group forming
Hiers, David wrote: Hi NANOG, I'd like to announce the formation of a NANOG-knockoff group for voice operators, the Voice Operators' Group. Very cool! :) Voice network operators share many of the same challenges as IP network operators; we register with registrars (CILLI, OCN, and ACNA as well as ASN and DNS), route traffic (point codes as well as IP addresses), resolve names (CNAM as well as DNS), manage reachability (to countries, LATAs and NPA/NXXs as well as to IP networks), and deal with equipment issues. Indeed we do! NANOG has been so useful at the IP layer that it seems like a good idea to try to duplicate it a little further up the stack. Yep. For now, the group is on Yahoo: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/voip_operators_group/ Of course, we're looking for a better place, name, and charter. Might I recommend google groups, or puck.nether.org. An IPTV list was recently formed. NAVOG works for me.
Re: OT: Voice Operators' Group forming
I second the idea of google groups or some other group provider; Yahoo groups are known within many circles for having long email delays. Charles Wyble wrote: Hiers, David wrote: Hi NANOG, I'd like to announce the formation of a NANOG-knockoff group for voice operators, the Voice Operators' Group. Very cool! :) Voice network operators share many of the same challenges as IP network operators; we register with registrars (CILLI, OCN, and ACNA as well as ASN and DNS), route traffic (point codes as well as IP addresses), resolve names (CNAM as well as DNS), manage reachability (to countries, LATAs and NPA/NXXs as well as to IP networks), and deal with equipment issues. Indeed we do! NANOG has been so useful at the IP layer that it seems like a good idea to try to duplicate it a little further up the stack. Yep. For now, the group is on Yahoo: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/voip_operators_group/ Of course, we're looking for a better place, name, and charter. Might I recommend google groups, or puck.nether.org. An IPTV list was recently formed. NAVOG works for me.
Re: OT: Voice Operators' Group forming
puck.nether.net. way to volunteer someone else's box :-) -j On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Charles Wyble char...@thewybles.comwrote: Hiers, David wrote: Hi NANOG, I'd like to announce the formation of a NANOG-knockoff group for voice operators, the Voice Operators' Group. Very cool! :) Voice network operators share many of the same challenges as IP network operators; we register with registrars (CILLI, OCN, and ACNA as well as ASN and DNS), route traffic (point codes as well as IP addresses), resolve names (CNAM as well as DNS), manage reachability (to countries, LATAs and NPA/NXXs as well as to IP networks), and deal with equipment issues. Indeed we do! NANOG has been so useful at the IP layer that it seems like a good idea to try to duplicate it a little further up the stack. Yep. For now, the group is on Yahoo: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/voip_operators_group/ Of course, we're looking for a better place, name, and charter. Might I recommend google groups, or puck.nether.org. An IPTV list was recently formed. NAVOG works for me.
Re: OT: Voice Operators' Group forming
jamie wrote: puck.nether.net http://puck.nether.net. Right. That's what I meant. way to volunteer someone else's box :-) Good point. My apologies. Google groups then. :)
Re: OT: Voice Operators' Group forming
Dear Brandon; Are you planning to favor this new group with any poetry readings ? Regards Marshall On Jul 28, 2009, at 5:49 PM, Brandon Butterworth wrote: NAVOG works for me. I'd prefer Voice Operators' Group Online Network brandon
RE: OT: Voice Operators' Group forming
So has someone created the google group yet? -Original Message- From: Marshall Eubanks [mailto:t...@americafree.tv] Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 3:23 PM To: Brandon Butterworth Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: OT: Voice Operators' Group forming Dear Brandon; Are you planning to favor this new group with any poetry readings ? Regards Marshall On Jul 28, 2009, at 5:49 PM, Brandon Butterworth wrote: NAVOG works for me. I'd prefer Voice Operators' Group Online Network brandon
Re: OT: Voice Operators' Group forming
On Jul 28, 2009, at 5:16 PM, Jack Carrozzo wrote: Are you planning to favor this new group with any poetry readings ? I for one am looking forward to the haikus. a voice group forming can we cancel the echoes of bellcore e-mail Owen
