Re: T1 aggregation and data center gateways
Isn't that just CYA? Thank the lawyers and corporate compliance offices and professional whiners. Scott John Peach wrote: On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 20:00:45 -0500 Tim Sanderson [1]t...@donet.com wrote: [snip] THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE INDIVIDUA L OR ENTITY TO WHOM IT IS ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEG ED, CONFIDENTIAL, AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent respons ible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notifi ed that you have received this message in error and that any review, disseminati on, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail or telephone, and delete the original message immediately. Thank you. Things get sillier by the day. A sig of more than 4 lines is too long, let alone all this completely unenforceable BS. If anyone sends me an email by mistake it will be published for all to see. References 1. mailto:t...@donet.com
Re: T1 aggregation and data center gateways
Isn't that just CYA? Thank the lawyers and corporate compliance offices and professional whiners. The obvious answer is that if your corporate email policy makes you look like an idiot, post to mailing lists from a personal email address that doesn't make you look like an idiot. This also spares the list from out-of-office messages from Exchange servers too stupid to refrain from sending such messages to mailing lists. Regards, Tim.
Re: T1 aggregation and data center gateways
On Wednesday 10 March 2010 14:09:18 Tim Franklin wrote: Isn't that just CYA? Thank the lawyers and corporate compliance offices and professional whiners. The obvious answer is that if your corporate email policy makes you look like an idiot, post to mailing lists from a personal email address that doesn't make you look like an idiot. This also spares the list from out-of-office messages from Exchange servers too stupid to refrain from sending such messages to mailing lists. I think I'll leave this to my new sig. -- The only thing worse than e-mail disclaimers...is people who send e-mail to lists complaining about them signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: T1 aggregation and data center gateways
On 03/09/2010 08:00 PM, Tim Sanderson wrote: Currently have T1 aggregation on some Cisco 7206VXR routers. Core switches and data center gateways on a couple of Cisco 6509's. Looking for a model that could collapse both functions into just two devices, one being for hardware redundancy. Any recommendations on a good L3 switch that is also a good T1 aggregation device? Anyone have any experience with the newer Cisco stuff like the ASR 1000/7600/CRS-1? Forgive the dumb question, but what's wrong with using a 6509 as a T1 aggregation device? Port density not cost-effective? I've seen it used that way on a number of occasions with cheap M13 muxes and DS3 interfaces. -- Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems LLC Tel: +1 678-954-0670 Direct : +1 678-954-0671 Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
Re: T1 aggregation and data center gateways
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 20:00:45 -0500 Tim Sanderson t...@donet.com wrote: [snip] THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO WHOM IT IS ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL, AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail or telephone, and delete the original message immediately. Thank you. Things get sillier by the day. A sig of more than 4 lines is too long, let alone all this completely unenforceable BS. If anyone sends me an email by mistake it will be published for all to see. -- John
Re: T1 aggregation and data center gateways
Hi Tim: On 3/9/10 5:00 PM, Tim Sanderson t...@donet.com wrote: Currently have T1 aggregation on some Cisco 7206VXR routers. Core switches and data center gateways on a couple of Cisco 6509's. Looking for a model that could collapse both functions into just two devices, one being for hardware redundancy. Any recommendations on a good L3 switch that is also a good T1 aggregation device? Anyone have any experience with the newer Cisco stuff like the ASR 1000/7600/CRS-1? Tim Sanderson You might want to post this over to cisco-nsp because there are lots of options depending upon your configuration. If you're looking at port density it seems to me you would want your router/switch to have the biggest mux ports possible. So, you could look at OC-3 or even higher in the router platforms. You can get up to an OC-12 channelized, but it all depends upon your configuration. Regards, Mike
