RE: Residential CPE suggestions

2014-05-13 Thread Deepak Jain
 
 Thanks to everyone who responded. The picture/spec on this page shows a
 single SFP, not dual.  Hopefully they will come out with something that
 supports dual SFP.
 
 I am looking for something suitable for an active Ethernet fiber-to-X
 deployment. The Ubiquiti routers don't support dual SFP until you get to the
 PRO (too bad no Wifi, emailed them. :)

Self-quoting here: 

CRS226-24G-2S from Mikrotik is using a new chipset, supposedly. I suspect that 
more vendors will be releasing configs like this if the silicon is becoming 
more prevalent. The thing has SFP+ ports (10G) which is cool, especially at the 
price point, but overkill.  It has 24x gigabit ports which is definitely 
overkill, so ideally I can find a slimmer switch. :)

List price under $300 looks like.

This guy fits the bill (port config) more closely but also costs 3x more 
(faster cpu, more ram, etc). 

Neat stuff, either way. 

Deepak




RE: Residential CPE suggestions

2014-05-12 Thread Deepak Jain

 On 9 May 2014 12:05, Aled Morris al...@qix.co.uk wrote:
 
  Indeed.  Mikrotik are promising a CCR1009 with 2xSFP and 8xUTP GE
  ports (and dual PSU) for $425 but it isn't an access switch (so no
  Q-in-Q) though it does support MPLS/VPLS.
 
 
 Apologies for correcting myself, but I just checked and Q-in-Q is supported in
 Mikrotik RouterOS, so this might be the ideal box for you (if it were
 orderable.)
 
 I forgot to include the link too - http://routerboard.com/CCR1009-8G-1S

Thanks to everyone who responded. The picture/spec on this page shows a single 
SFP, not dual.  Hopefully they will come out with something that supports dual 
SFP. 

I am looking for something suitable for an active Ethernet fiber-to-X 
deployment. The Ubiquiti routers don't support dual SFP until you get to the 
PRO (too bad no Wifi, emailed them. :)

Thanks,

Deepak


Re: Residential CPE suggestions

2014-05-09 Thread Aled Morris
On 8 May 2014 17:30, Randy Carpenter rcar...@network1.net wrote:


 I would love to see the EdgeRouter Lite, or something similar with 2 SFP
 ports and 2 1000bT ports (Which would fit with the OP's question). Q-in-Q
 tunneling and basic routing required, but not much else for me. Bonus
 points points for something like that with redundant power supplies for $1k


Indeed.  Mikrotik are promising a CCR1009 with 2xSFP and 8xUTP GE ports
(and dual PSU) for $425 but it isn't an access switch (so no Q-in-Q) though
it does support MPLS/VPLS.

Aled


Re: Residential CPE suggestions

2014-05-09 Thread Aled Morris
On 9 May 2014 12:05, Aled Morris al...@qix.co.uk wrote:

 Indeed.  Mikrotik are promising a CCR1009 with 2xSFP and 8xUTP GE ports
 (and dual PSU) for $425 but it isn't an access switch (so no Q-in-Q) though
 it does support MPLS/VPLS.


Apologies for correcting myself, but I just checked and Q-in-Q is supported
in Mikrotik RouterOS, so this might be the ideal box for you (if it were
orderable.)

I forgot to include the link too - http://routerboard.com/CCR1009-8G-1S

Aled


RE: Residential CPE suggestions

2014-05-08 Thread Nolan Rollo
We’ve had two of the ER3s in production. One of which has had no problems to 
date, the other one had several issues just staying online. It would randomly 
drop out from time to time (no ICMP, didn't pass traffic; basically a flashing 
brick). These were both single homed stub networks on older firmware so your 
results may vary. In my past experience the Ubiquiti release cycle is:

Announce Product -- (1 year later) -- Reannounce Product /Start Shipping -- 
(4 months later) -- Claim it's still on the boat and will reach distributors 
soon -- (2 months later) -- Begin shipping from Distribution with defunct 
firmware -- (8 months later and a few firmware updates) -- Release a stable 
firmware version

TL;DR: Ubiquiti has good, inexpensive equipment but it might not always be 
ready for production networks or very patient customers. For what you’re 
looking for though no one else can match that price point.

-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Jimmy Hess
Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 9:13 PM
To: sur...@mauigateway.com
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: Residential CPE suggestions

On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Scott Weeks sur...@mauigateway.com wrote:

I wouldn't worry.  A fancy GUI  without intelligent engineering and design 
leveraged is just more rope for everyone to hang themselves with,  esp.  when 
something in the GUI inevitably doesn't work quite like it's supposed to.

Network vendor GUIs never work 100% like they are supposed to; there's always 
eventually some bug or another,  or limitation requiring some workaround.

And  IPv6 is a game-changer.

 It looks like everyone here should start looking for a new
 career: Next-generation user experience allows anyone to quickly 
 become a routing expert.

 ;-)
 scott
--
-JH


Re: Residential CPE suggestions

2014-05-08 Thread Jared Mauch

On May 8, 2014, at 12:19 PM, Nolan Rollo nro...@kw-corp.com wrote:

 TL;DR: Ubiquiti has good, inexpensive equipment but it might not always be 
 ready for production networks or very patient customers. For what you’re 
 looking for though no one else can match that price point.

+1

If you have hardware in-hand and don't mind support via their 'free' forums.  
If you can reproduce any issues, they will promptly recreate it and fix it.  
You may end up waiting awhile for the software, but even $big_vendor has that 
issue.

I'm using both the nanobridge/nanobeam hardware as well as edgerouter and unifi 
and they work quite well.

- Jared

Re: Residential CPE suggestions

2014-05-08 Thread Randy Carpenter

I would love to see the EdgeRouter Lite, or something similar with 2 SFP ports 
and 2 1000bT ports (Which would fit with the OP's question). Q-in-Q tunneling 
and basic routing required, but not much else for me. Bonus points points for 
something like that with redundant power supplies for $1k

There really does not seem to be anything in that space that is viable and 
inexpensive.


thanks,
-Randy

- Original Message -
 We’ve had two of the ER3s in production. One of which has had no problems to
 date, the other one had several issues just staying online. It would
 randomly drop out from time to time (no ICMP, didn't pass traffic; basically
 a flashing brick). These were both single homed stub networks on older
 firmware so your results may vary. In my past experience the Ubiquiti
 release cycle is:
 
 Announce Product -- (1 year later) -- Reannounce Product /Start Shipping
 -- (4 months later) -- Claim it's still on the boat and will reach
 distributors soon -- (2 months later) -- Begin shipping from Distribution
 with defunct firmware -- (8 months later and a few firmware updates) --
 Release a stable firmware version
 
 TL;DR: Ubiquiti has good, inexpensive equipment but it might not always be
 ready for production networks or very patient customers. For what you’re
 looking for though no one else can match that price point.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Jimmy Hess
 Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 9:13 PM
 To: sur...@mauigateway.com
 Cc: NANOG list
 Subject: Re: Residential CPE suggestions
 
 On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Scott Weeks sur...@mauigateway.com wrote:
 
 I wouldn't worry.  A fancy GUI  without intelligent engineering and design
 leveraged is just more rope for everyone to hang themselves with,  esp.
 when something in the GUI inevitably doesn't work quite like it's supposed
 to.
 
 Network vendor GUIs never work 100% like they are supposed to; there's always
 eventually some bug or another,  or limitation requiring some workaround.
 
 And  IPv6 is a game-changer.
 
  It looks like everyone here should start looking for a new
  career: Next-generation user experience allows anyone to quickly
  become a routing expert.
 
  ;-)
  scott
 --
 -JH
 


Re: Residential CPE suggestions

2014-05-08 Thread Warren Bailey
I still get email updates on the thread I created in mid 2013. In my experience 
their forum is a good excuse for not EVER answering the phone. And when I say 
ever.. I mean.. They don't even take sales calls.

(the issue is still there.. By the way.)


Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device



 Original message 
From: Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net
Date: 05/08/2014 9:28 AM (GMT-08:00)
To: Nolan Rollo nro...@kw-corp.com
Cc: NANOG list nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Residential CPE suggestions



On May 8, 2014, at 12:19 PM, Nolan Rollo nro...@kw-corp.com wrote:

 TL;DR: Ubiquiti has good, inexpensive equipment but it might not always be 
 ready for production networks or very patient customers. For what you’re 
 looking for though no one else can match that price point.

+1

If you have hardware in-hand and don't mind support via their 'free' forums.  
If you can reproduce any issues, they will promptly recreate it and fix it.  
You may end up waiting awhile for the software, but even $big_vendor has that 
issue.

I'm using both the nanobridge/nanobeam hardware as well as edgerouter and unifi 
and they work quite well.

- Jared


Re: Residential CPE suggestions

2014-05-07 Thread Joe Greco
 It uses a Cavium Octeon processor which does have dedicated HW packet proce=
 ssing.  A moderate number of  prefixes won't slow it down doing vanilla for=
 warding, not sure about 2 million though...  I believe they have recently o=
 ptimized some of the FW stuff to take advantage of the HW as well. =20
 
 Layering services like FW, NAT, and tunneling definitely drops the packet r=
 ate significantly, but it is still capable of 100+Mbps at IMIX packet sizes=
 .=20
 
 I think there are a couple of in depth tests out there.
 
 In my experience the ERL works really well for a $99 device.=20

I sent them an inquiry and they sent a friendly but fact-free response
so it is probably safe to assume that it is relatively good at basic
packet forwarding but the services will kill it.

... JG
-- 
Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI - http://www.sol.net
We call it the 'one bite at the apple' rule. Give me one chance [and] then I
won't contact you again. - Direct Marketing Ass'n position on e-mail spam(CNN)
With 24 million small businesses in the US alone, that's way too many apples.


Re: Residential CPE suggestions

2014-05-06 Thread Jared Mauch
I was also going to recommend the EdgeRouter Pro as it has dual SFP ports and 
the Vyatta/Linux stuff works quite well.

I suspect you will be very surprised with the quality experience.  If you've 
not used Vyatta, it's very JunOS-like.

- Jared

On May 5, 2014, at 8:14 PM, Cryptographrix cryptograph...@gmail.com wrote:

 I've used both the Ubiquiti EdgeRouter and Cisco RV042G.
 
 The EdgeRouter runs a modified version of Vyatta that's incredibly
 versatile.
 
 The RV042G is your standard Cisco SOHO Dual-WAN router - it has telnet, but
 is limited, and otherwise is solid.
 
 
 
 
 On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Deepak Jain dee...@ai.net wrote:
 
 
 Any recommendation for a residential CPE that supports dual SFP uplinks
 (WAN) with either a routing protocol or a resilient Ethernet solution?
 Ideally, LAN port should be 100/1000 CAT5.  I've looking at Mikrotik,
 Draytek and others. Looking something in a lower three-digit price point.
 Otherwise I might have to do a pair of media converters on a copper
 switch/router that can do it (ugly!).
 
 Thanks in advance!
 
 DJ
 



Re: Residential CPE suggestions

2014-05-06 Thread Joe Greco
 I was also going to recommend the EdgeRouter Pro as it has dual SFP =
 ports and the Vyatta/Linux stuff works quite well.
 
 I suspect you will be very surprised with the quality experience.  If =
 you've not used Vyatta, it's very JunOS-like.

Does anyone have any practical experience with the EdgeRouter with a
largish number of prefixes?

http://dl.ubnt.com/datasheets/edgemax/EdgeRouter_DS.pdf

The 2 million+ packets per second leads me to believe that this is
merely a highly optimized software based router, but under Hardware
Specs it specifically says hardware acceleration for packet 
processing.

I have no idea what's being accelerated since the layer 3 forwarding
performance specs for the FR-8 are 2Mpps (an 800MHz CPU) and the 
FRPro-8 are 2.4Mpps (1GHz) which suggests software lookup.

Do these things suffer if you load them down with a full table?  Or
a handful of firewall rules?

... JG
-- 
Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI - http://www.sol.net
We call it the 'one bite at the apple' rule. Give me one chance [and] then I
won't contact you again. - Direct Marketing Ass'n position on e-mail spam(CNN)
With 24 million small businesses in the US alone, that's way too many apples.


RE: Residential CPE suggestions

2014-05-06 Thread bedard.phil
It uses a Cavium Octeon processor which does have dedicated HW packet 
processing.  A moderate number of  prefixes won't slow it down doing vanilla 
forwarding, not sure about 2 million though...  I believe they have recently 
optimized some of the FW stuff to take advantage of the HW as well.  

Layering services like FW, NAT, and tunneling definitely drops the packet rate 
significantly, but it is still capable of 100+Mbps at IMIX packet sizes. 

I think there are a couple of in depth tests out there.

In my experience the ERL works really well for a $99 device. 

Phil

-Original Message-
From: Joe Greco jgr...@ns.sol.net
Sent: ‎5/‎6/‎2014 7:39 AM
To: ja...@puck.nether.net (Jared Mauch) ja...@puck.nether.net (Jared Mauch)
Cc: NANOG nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Residential CPE suggestions

 I was also going to recommend the EdgeRouter Pro as it has dual SFP =
 ports and the Vyatta/Linux stuff works quite well.
 
 I suspect you will be very surprised with the quality experience.  If =
 you've not used Vyatta, it's very JunOS-like.

Does anyone have any practical experience with the EdgeRouter with a
largish number of prefixes?

http://dl.ubnt.com/datasheets/edgemax/EdgeRouter_DS.pdf

The 2 million+ packets per second leads me to believe that this is
merely a highly optimized software based router, but under Hardware
Specs it specifically says hardware acceleration for packet 
processing.

I have no idea what's being accelerated since the layer 3 forwarding
performance specs for the FR-8 are 2Mpps (an 800MHz CPU) and the 
FRPro-8 are 2.4Mpps (1GHz) which suggests software lookup.

Do these things suffer if you load them down with a full table?  Or
a handful of firewall rules?

... JG
-- 
Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI - http://www.sol.net
We call it the 'one bite at the apple' rule. Give me one chance [and] then I
won't contact you again. - Direct Marketing Ass'n position on e-mail spam(CNN)
With 24 million small businesses in the US alone, that's way too many apples.


Re: Residential CPE suggestions

2014-05-06 Thread Cryptographrix
It also has support for some type of ipv4 and ipv6 offload.



On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Joe Greco jgr...@ns.sol.net wrote:

  I was also going to recommend the EdgeRouter Pro as it has dual SFP =
  ports and the Vyatta/Linux stuff works quite well.
 
  I suspect you will be very surprised with the quality experience.  If =
  you've not used Vyatta, it's very JunOS-like.

 Does anyone have any practical experience with the EdgeRouter with a
 largish number of prefixes?

 http://dl.ubnt.com/datasheets/edgemax/EdgeRouter_DS.pdf

 The 2 million+ packets per second leads me to believe that this is
 merely a highly optimized software based router, but under Hardware
 Specs it specifically says hardware acceleration for packet
 processing.

 I have no idea what's being accelerated since the layer 3 forwarding
 performance specs for the FR-8 are 2Mpps (an 800MHz CPU) and the
 FRPro-8 are 2.4Mpps (1GHz) which suggests software lookup.

 Do these things suffer if you load them down with a full table?  Or
 a handful of firewall rules?

 ... JG
 --
 Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI - http://www.sol.net
 We call it the 'one bite at the apple' rule. Give me one chance [and]
 then I
 won't contact you again. - Direct Marketing Ass'n position on e-mail
 spam(CNN)
 With 24 million small businesses in the US alone, that's way too many
 apples.



Re: Residential CPE suggestions

2014-05-06 Thread Steven Miano
You could also go Supermicro, and build out a 1U with SFP/Copper
connections and put VyOS/vyatta as a linux based routing platform

going that way you'll be strictly CPU/software bound though (Intel
wrote up this interesting report:
http://www.csit-sun.pub.ro/~cpop/Documentatie_SM/Intel_Microprocessor_Systems/Intel_ProcessorNew/Intel%20White%20Paper/Integrating%20Services%20at%20the%20Edge%20for%20Intel%20Xeon%205500.pdfwhich
is no longer available on their site seemingly).

Totally built out you'd be looking at high triple digits (the SFP PCIe card
and chassis/motherboard would be your biggest hits).



On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Cryptographrix cryptograph...@gmail.comwrote:

 It also has support for some type of ipv4 and ipv6 offload.



 On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Joe Greco jgr...@ns.sol.net wrote:

   I was also going to recommend the EdgeRouter Pro as it has dual SFP =
   ports and the Vyatta/Linux stuff works quite well.
  
   I suspect you will be very surprised with the quality experience.  If =
   you've not used Vyatta, it's very JunOS-like.
 
  Does anyone have any practical experience with the EdgeRouter with a
  largish number of prefixes?
 
  http://dl.ubnt.com/datasheets/edgemax/EdgeRouter_DS.pdf
 
  The 2 million+ packets per second leads me to believe that this is
  merely a highly optimized software based router, but under Hardware
  Specs it specifically says hardware acceleration for packet
  processing.
 
  I have no idea what's being accelerated since the layer 3 forwarding
  performance specs for the FR-8 are 2Mpps (an 800MHz CPU) and the
  FRPro-8 are 2.4Mpps (1GHz) which suggests software lookup.
 
  Do these things suffer if you load them down with a full table?  Or
  a handful of firewall rules?
 
  ... JG
  --
  Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI -
 http://www.sol.net
  We call it the 'one bite at the apple' rule. Give me one chance [and]
  then I
  won't contact you again. - Direct Marketing Ass'n position on e-mail
  spam(CNN)
  With 24 million small businesses in the US alone, that's way too many
  apples.
 




-- 
http://stevenmiano.com/ Miano, Steven M.
http://stevenmiano.com


Re: Residential CPE suggestions

2014-05-06 Thread Scott Weeks


--- gary.buhrmas...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Gary Buhrmaster gary.buhrmas...@gmail.com
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Deepak Jain dee...@ai.net wrote:

 Any recommendation for a residential CPE that supports dual 
 SFP uplinks snip

Have you looked at the EdgeRouter Pro?  2 SFP links,
routing capability.  http://www.ubnt.com/edgemax
---


It looks like everyone here should start looking for a new
career: Next-generation user experience allows anyone to
quickly become a routing expert.

;-)
scott


Re: Residential CPE suggestions

2014-05-06 Thread Jimmy Hess
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Scott Weeks sur...@mauigateway.com wrote:

I wouldn't worry.  A fancy GUI  without intelligent engineering and
design leveraged is just more rope for everyone to hang themselves
with,  esp.  when something in the GUI inevitably doesn't work quite
like it's supposed to.

Network vendor GUIs never work 100% like they are supposed to;
there's always eventually some bug or another,  or limitation
requiring some workaround.

And  IPv6 is a game-changer.

 It looks like everyone here should start looking for a new
 career: Next-generation user experience allows anyone to
 quickly become a routing expert.

 ;-)
 scott
-- 
-JH


Residential CPE suggestions

2014-05-05 Thread Deepak Jain

Any recommendation for a residential CPE that supports dual SFP uplinks (WAN) 
with either a routing protocol or a resilient Ethernet solution? Ideally, LAN 
port should be 100/1000 CAT5.  I've looking at Mikrotik, Draytek and others. 
Looking something in a lower three-digit price point. Otherwise I might have to 
do a pair of media converters on a copper switch/router that can do it (ugly!).

Thanks in advance!

DJ


Re: Residential CPE suggestions

2014-05-05 Thread Gary Buhrmaster
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Deepak Jain dee...@ai.net wrote:

 Any recommendation for a residential CPE that supports dual SFP uplinks (WAN) 
 with either a routing protocol or a resilient Ethernet solution? Ideally, LAN 
 port should be 100/1000 CAT5.  I've looking at Mikrotik, Draytek and others. 
 Looking something in a lower three-digit price point. Otherwise I might have 
 to do a pair of media converters on a copper switch/router that can do it 
 (ugly!).

 Thanks in advance!

(No personal experience, but...)

Have you looked at the EdgeRouter Pro?  2 SFP links,
routing capability.  http://www.ubnt.com/edgemax


Re: Residential CPE suggestions

2014-05-05 Thread Bryan Seitz
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 12:13:34AM +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
 On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Deepak Jain dee...@ai.net wrote:
 
  Any recommendation for a residential CPE that supports dual SFP uplinks 
  (WAN) with either a routing protocol or a resilient Ethernet solution? 
  Ideally, LAN port should be 100/1000 CAT5.  I've looking at Mikrotik, 
  Draytek and others. Looking something in a lower three-digit price point. 
  Otherwise I might have to do a pair of media converters on a copper 
  switch/router that can do it (ugly!).
 
  Thanks in advance!
 
 (No personal experience, but...)
 
 Have you looked at the EdgeRouter Pro?  2 SFP links,
 routing capability.  http://www.ubnt.com/edgemax

+1, hands down one of the better platforms for the money today.  I have 3 
ERLites in service and I know the pro is obviously a larger more powerful 
version so you should have pretty good success.

-- 
 
Bryan G. Seitz


Re: Residential CPE suggestions

2014-05-05 Thread Cryptographrix
I've used both the Ubiquiti EdgeRouter and Cisco RV042G.

The EdgeRouter runs a modified version of Vyatta that's incredibly
versatile.

The RV042G is your standard Cisco SOHO Dual-WAN router - it has telnet, but
is limited, and otherwise is solid.




On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Deepak Jain dee...@ai.net wrote:


 Any recommendation for a residential CPE that supports dual SFP uplinks
 (WAN) with either a routing protocol or a resilient Ethernet solution?
 Ideally, LAN port should be 100/1000 CAT5.  I've looking at Mikrotik,
 Draytek and others. Looking something in a lower three-digit price point.
 Otherwise I might have to do a pair of media converters on a copper
 switch/router that can do it (ugly!).

 Thanks in advance!

 DJ