Thank you both. Strict mode uRPF was indeed the problem. Took awhile for
them to fix it for me, but at least it's fixed.
-- am
Anders Lindbäck wrote:
On 7 jan 2009, at 21.05, Niels Bakker wrote:
* aaron.milli...@bright.net (Aaron Millisor) [Wed 07 Jan 2009, 20:53
CET]:
[..]
If I were to prepend the network 1.1.1.0 to come in on 'sprint 1',
but have a route to 2.2.2.0 via 'sprint 2' so that traffic comes in
on one circuit but returns on the other, routing is broken. If I
change my route so that packets directed to 2.2.2.0 return on the
same circuit that the traffic is received on, everything works fine.
You might be running into uRPF (unicast reverse path forward
verification).
-- Niels.
Strict-mode uRPF will couse this, I am sure sprint support can help you
with it..
--
Anders Lindbäck
anders.lindb...@dnz.se
