Re: Strange L2 failure

2011-02-10 Thread Jens Link
Jack Bates jba...@brightok.net writes:

Hi,

a little late, but just catching up the list.

 Has anyone seen issues with IOS where certain MACs fail?

 54:52:00 (kvm) fails out an old 10mbit port on a 7206 running 12.2
 SRE. I've never seen anything like this. DHCP worked, ARP worked, and
 arp debugging showed responses for arp to the MAC, however, tcpdump on
 the host system 

I had something similar using a Catalyst 3550. Very simple setup:

Host  - Cat3550 - Router

You could see arp-request from the host to the router and arp-replies
from the router using tcpdump, but the arp-replies didn't make it to the
host. No change in the interface counters on the switch either. 

When using a static arp-entry on the host and then ping the router you
could the echo-request and echo-replies there but still no answers. 

Jens
-- 
-
| Foelderichstr. 40   | 13595 Berlin, Germany| +49-151-18721264 |
| http://blog.quux.de | jabber: jensl...@guug.de | ---  | 
-



Re: Strange L2 failure

2011-02-02 Thread ML

On 1/29/2011 10:05 PM, Jack Bates wrote:

On 1/29/2011 8:47 PM, ML wrote:

I just ran into something like this yesterday. A Belkin router with a
MAC of 9444.52dc. was properly learned at the IDF switch but the
upstream agg switch/router wouldn't learn it. I even tried to static
the MAC into the CAM..router refused.


That's what really tripped me out, was that the router actually did
place an ARP entry and pretended like everything should be working.
Scheduling some more direct tests with packet sniffers next week when I
get back in the office.

I'm curious now if IOS has the issue or the line card, so we'll test off
different cards direct and monitor results.

Jack



Turns out I ran out of space in the CAM..embarrassing.

What didn't happen was frame flooding.  Since this device was part of 
the ME34xx product line I'd wager Cisco thought it better to drop frames 
than leak data.


I upgraded the IOS to 12.2(50)SE5 from 12.2(25)SEG.  Somehow there is 
more space in the TCAM for unicast MACs between software versions.





Re: Strange L2 failure

2011-01-30 Thread Herro91
I had an issue on the 28xx with a static NAT that just stopped working. The
router would not publish the MAC for the nat entry. I removed the NAT entry
and reapplied - and magically it worked again.

On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Jack Bates jba...@brightok.net wrote:

 On 1/29/2011 8:47 PM, ML wrote:

 I just ran into something like this yesterday.  A Belkin router with a MAC
 of 9444.52dc. was properly learned at the IDF switch but the upstream
 agg switch/router wouldn't learn it.  I even tried to static the MAC into
 the CAM..router refused.


 That's what really tripped me out, was that the router actually did place
 an ARP entry and pretended like everything should be working. Scheduling
 some more direct tests with packet sniffers next week when I get back in the
 office.

 I'm curious now if IOS has the issue or the line card, so we'll test off
 different cards direct and monitor results.

 Jack




Strange L2 failure

2011-01-29 Thread Jack Bates

Has anyone seen issues with IOS where certain MACs fail?

54:52:00 (kvm) fails out an old 10mbit port on a 7206 running 12.2 SRE. 
I've never seen anything like this. DHCP worked, ARP worked, and arp 
debugging showed responses for arp to the MAC, however, tcpdump on the 
host system showed no unicast or arp responses coming from the router, 
while the switch management ip and other stuff on the local segment 
communicated fine with the vm. This broke for IPv6 as well.


I changed the vm's MAC to 54:51:00, 50:52:00 and still failed. Changed 
it to 40:52:00 and it works for both v4 and v6. Was there a change which 
would cause certain hardware to not accept a MAC starting with 50: or 
higher?



Jack



Re: Strange L2 failure

2011-01-29 Thread ML

On 1/29/2011 4:24 PM, Jack Bates wrote:

Has anyone seen issues with IOS where certain MACs fail?

54:52:00 (kvm) fails out an old 10mbit port on a 7206 running 12.2 SRE.
I've never seen anything like this. DHCP worked, ARP worked, and arp
debugging showed responses for arp to the MAC, however, tcpdump on the
host system showed no unicast or arp responses coming from the router,
while the switch management ip and other stuff on the local segment
communicated fine with the vm. This broke for IPv6 as well.

I changed the vm's MAC to 54:51:00, 50:52:00 and still failed. Changed
it to 40:52:00 and it works for both v4 and v6. Was there a change which
would cause certain hardware to not accept a MAC starting with 50: or
higher?


Jack




I just ran into something like this yesterday.  A Belkin router with a 
MAC of 9444.52dc. was properly learned at the IDF switch but the 
upstream agg switch/router wouldn't learn it.  I even tried to static 
the MAC into the CAM..router refused.


After changing the MAC address, everything worked.

Best I can figure the router treated it like a broadcast MAC. DHCP 
snooping at the IDF and the upstream aggregation switch/router learned 
the IP/MAC/interface lease information.  ARP entry at the router had the 
correct IP/MAC binding. Nothing in the CAM for the MAC of that darn Belkin.




Re: Strange L2 failure

2011-01-29 Thread Jack Bates

On 1/29/2011 8:47 PM, ML wrote:
I just ran into something like this yesterday.  A Belkin router with a 
MAC of 9444.52dc. was properly learned at the IDF switch but the 
upstream agg switch/router wouldn't learn it.  I even tried to static 
the MAC into the CAM..router refused. 


That's what really tripped me out, was that the router actually did 
place an ARP entry and pretended like everything should be working. 
Scheduling some more direct tests with packet sniffers next week when I 
get back in the office.


I'm curious now if IOS has the issue or the line card, so we'll test off 
different cards direct and monitor results.


Jack