TelePacific a good choice?
Hiya, We're looking at TelePacific as a possible solution for some of our transit needs. If you have an honest experience with them, positive or negative, I'd like to hear from you. Simply email me off line with your experiences, thanks! Jeff Harper, CCIE (W) | www.well.com ip access-list extended jeff permit tcp any any eq intelligence deny tcp any any eq stupid-people
Re: TelePacific a good choice?
The lack of IPv6 implementation: http://bgp.he.net/AS14265#_asinfo should be the only feedback you need. On 2/19/13, Jeff Harper wrote: > Hiya, > > We're looking at TelePacific as a possible solution for some of our transit > needs. If you have an honest experience with them, positive or negative, > I'd like to hear from you. > > Simply email me off line with your experiences, thanks! > > Jeff Harper, CCIE (W) | www.well.com > ip access-list extended jeff > permit tcp any any eq intelligence > deny tcp any any eq stupid-people > > >
Re: TelePacific a good choice?
I've used them at a previous employer, mainly for PRI termination but also for some transit and colo services. They were decent. Didn't have any major complaints. If IPv6 is important for you...per what Paul said, they probably wouldn't be your best choice. If IPv6 doesn't matter to you, they're good enough. On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Paul WALL wrote: > The lack of IPv6 implementation: > > http://bgp.he.net/AS14265#_asinfo > > should be the only feedback you need. > > On 2/19/13, Jeff Harper wrote: >> Hiya, >> >> We're looking at TelePacific as a possible solution for some of our transit >> needs. If you have an honest experience with them, positive or negative, >> I'd like to hear from you. >> >> Simply email me off line with your experiences, thanks! >> >> Jeff Harper, CCIE (W) | www.well.com >> ip access-list extended jeff >> permit tcp any any eq intelligence >> deny tcp any any eq stupid-people >> >> >> > -- 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
Re: TelePacific a good choice?
We have a customer who used them for IP transit at an office in San Francisco. They seemed to have issues with International peering. Traffic to Asia / Australia seemed to be bottlenecked. This was a year ago and the bottleneck was between TelePacific and Global Crossing at the time. The customer has moved to another provider and no longer has issues. ~Jared On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:10 PM, Mike Hale wrote: > I've used them at a previous employer, mainly for PRI termination but > also for some transit and colo services. > > They were decent. Didn't have any major complaints. > > If IPv6 is important for you...per what Paul said, they probably > wouldn't be your best choice. If IPv6 doesn't matter to you, they're > good enough. > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Paul WALL wrote: > > The lack of IPv6 implementation: > > > > http://bgp.he.net/AS14265#_asinfo > > > > should be the only feedback you need. > > > > On 2/19/13, Jeff Harper wrote: > >> Hiya, > >> > >> We're looking at TelePacific as a possible solution for some of our > transit > >> needs. If you have an honest experience with them, positive or > negative, > >> I'd like to hear from you. > >> > >> Simply email me off line with your experiences, thanks! > >> > >> Jeff Harper, CCIE (W) | www.well.com > >> ip access-list extended jeff > >> permit tcp any any eq intelligence > >> deny tcp any any eq stupid-people > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 > >
