Re: Updating Geolocation of /24 within corporate /16

2017-02-21 Thread Richard Hesse
If you have a peering session with Google or one of their cache boxes, you
can set a GeoIP publishing endpoint using their online portal at
isp.google.com. That's only for Google though.

-richard

On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 3:19 AM, David Sotnick 
wrote:

> Hi Tyler,
>
> I have not yet tried this, but am doing so now, thanks!
>
> -Dave
>
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 6:27 PM, Tyler Conrad  wrote:
>
> > Have you tried submitting a correction to some geolocation services
> > directly yet? Maxmind is pretty heavily used.
> >
> > https://support.maxmind.com/correction-faq/submit-a-
> > correction/how-do-i-submit-a-correction-to-geoip-data/
> >
> >
> > On Thursday, February 9, 2017, David Sotnick 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi NANOG,
> >>
> >> You have given good advice on updating IP Geolocation data in the past,
> >> including visiting 'www.google.com' from a mobile device and selecting
> >> "use
> >> exact location [from GPS]". This worked out well for us a few years ago
> >> for
> >> a single IP which we were NATting out of in a new geographic location.
> >>
> >> Now we are in a position where we have been assigned site-local /24 (out
> >> of
> >> the corporation's larger /20 space) networks for a couple of locations
> and
> >> I'm wondering how I go about updating IP Geolocation data to note that
> two
> >> /24 networks are no longer at the Corporate HQ location.
> >>
> >> I understand that when users first start using these site-specific /24
> >> networks, they will be lumped in with the larger /20 space as far as
> their
> >> geolocation goes, but besides the Google/GPS method, is there a
> >> cleaner/better way to do this? Do Geolocation services use SWIP data?
> >> Should I have the /24s have separate SWIP data noting the geo location?
> >> I'd
> >> love a place to be able to say: "This /24 is at this geoloc; this /24 is
> >> at
> >> this geoloc; and the corporate /20 remains where it always has been."
> >>
> >> Many thanks for your insights in this matter,
> >>
> >> -Dave
> >>
> >
>


Re: Updating Geolocation of /24 within corporate /16

2017-02-10 Thread Tyler Conrad
Have you tried submitting a correction to some geolocation services
directly yet? Maxmind is pretty heavily used.

https://support.maxmind.com/correction-faq/submit-a-correction/how-do-i-submit-a-correction-to-geoip-data/

On Thursday, February 9, 2017, David Sotnick  wrote:

> Hi NANOG,
>
> You have given good advice on updating IP Geolocation data in the past,
> including visiting 'www.google.com' from a mobile device and selecting
> "use
> exact location [from GPS]". This worked out well for us a few years ago for
> a single IP which we were NATting out of in a new geographic location.
>
> Now we are in a position where we have been assigned site-local /24 (out of
> the corporation's larger /20 space) networks for a couple of locations and
> I'm wondering how I go about updating IP Geolocation data to note that two
> /24 networks are no longer at the Corporate HQ location.
>
> I understand that when users first start using these site-specific /24
> networks, they will be lumped in with the larger /20 space as far as their
> geolocation goes, but besides the Google/GPS method, is there a
> cleaner/better way to do this? Do Geolocation services use SWIP data?
> Should I have the /24s have separate SWIP data noting the geo location? I'd
> love a place to be able to say: "This /24 is at this geoloc; this /24 is at
> this geoloc; and the corporate /20 remains where it always has been."
>
> Many thanks for your insights in this matter,
>
> -Dave
>


Re: Updating Geolocation of /24 within corporate /16

2017-02-09 Thread David Sotnick
Hi Tyler,

I have not yet tried this, but am doing so now, thanks!

-Dave

On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 6:27 PM, Tyler Conrad  wrote:

> Have you tried submitting a correction to some geolocation services
> directly yet? Maxmind is pretty heavily used.
>
> https://support.maxmind.com/correction-faq/submit-a-
> correction/how-do-i-submit-a-correction-to-geoip-data/
>
>
> On Thursday, February 9, 2017, David Sotnick 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi NANOG,
>>
>> You have given good advice on updating IP Geolocation data in the past,
>> including visiting 'www.google.com' from a mobile device and selecting
>> "use
>> exact location [from GPS]". This worked out well for us a few years ago
>> for
>> a single IP which we were NATting out of in a new geographic location.
>>
>> Now we are in a position where we have been assigned site-local /24 (out
>> of
>> the corporation's larger /20 space) networks for a couple of locations and
>> I'm wondering how I go about updating IP Geolocation data to note that two
>> /24 networks are no longer at the Corporate HQ location.
>>
>> I understand that when users first start using these site-specific /24
>> networks, they will be lumped in with the larger /20 space as far as their
>> geolocation goes, but besides the Google/GPS method, is there a
>> cleaner/better way to do this? Do Geolocation services use SWIP data?
>> Should I have the /24s have separate SWIP data noting the geo location?
>> I'd
>> love a place to be able to say: "This /24 is at this geoloc; this /24 is
>> at
>> this geoloc; and the corporate /20 remains where it always has been."
>>
>> Many thanks for your insights in this matter,
>>
>> -Dave
>>
>


Updating Geolocation of /24 within corporate /16

2017-02-09 Thread David Sotnick
Hi NANOG,

You have given good advice on updating IP Geolocation data in the past,
including visiting 'www.google.com' from a mobile device and selecting "use
exact location [from GPS]". This worked out well for us a few years ago for
a single IP which we were NATting out of in a new geographic location.

Now we are in a position where we have been assigned site-local /24 (out of
the corporation's larger /20 space) networks for a couple of locations and
I'm wondering how I go about updating IP Geolocation data to note that two
/24 networks are no longer at the Corporate HQ location.

I understand that when users first start using these site-specific /24
networks, they will be lumped in with the larger /20 space as far as their
geolocation goes, but besides the Google/GPS method, is there a
cleaner/better way to do this? Do Geolocation services use SWIP data?
Should I have the /24s have separate SWIP data noting the geo location? I'd
love a place to be able to say: "This /24 is at this geoloc; this /24 is at
this geoloc; and the corporate /20 remains where it always has been."

Many thanks for your insights in this matter,

-Dave