Re: google troubles?

2013-07-10 Thread Mike Jackson
9.85.241.222 [AS 15169] [MPLS: Label 632535 Exp 4] 32 msec 32
> msec
> >>>   9 216.239.48.159 [AS 15169] 36 msec 32 msec
> >>> 216.239.48.59 [AS 15169] 32 msec
> >>>  10 www.google.com (74.125.26.147) [AS 15169] 32 msec 32 msec 32 msec
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> AS812 (Rogers Looking Glass https://supernoc.rogerstelecom.net/lg/)
> >>> ===
> >>>
> >>> *Query:* *tr 64.71.249.45*
> >>>
> >>> Type escape sequence to abort.
> >>> Tracing the route to 64.71.249.45
> >>>
> >>>   1 64.71.255.62 0 msec 0 msec 0 msec
> >>>   2 ge-4-3-0.gw02.ym.phub.net.cable.ROGERS.com (66.185.82.237) 4 msec
> 4 msec 4 msec
> >>>   3 69.63.250.189 4 msec 4 msec 4 msec
> >>>   4 69.63.250.174 4 msec 4 msec 4 msec
> >>>   5  *  *  *
> >>>   6  *  *  *
> >>>   7  *  *  *
> >>>   8  *  *  *
> >>>   9  *  *  *
> >>>  10  *  *  *
> >>>  11  *  *  *
> >>>  12  *  *  *
> >>>  13  *  *  *
> >>>  14  *  *  *
> >>>  15  *  *  *
> >>>  16  *  *  *
> >>>  17  *  *  *
> >>>  18  *  *  *
> >>>  19  *  *  *
> >>>  20  *  *  *
> >>>  21  *  *  *
> >>>  22  *  *  *
> >>>  23  *  *  *
> >>>  24  *  *  *
> >>>  25  *  *  *
> >>>  26  *  *  *
> >>>  27  *  *  *
> >>>  28  *  *  *
> >>>  29  *  *  *
> >>>  30  *  *  *
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>>
> >>>   - MJ
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -Original Message-
> >>>> From: Grant Ridder [mailto:shortdudey...@gmail.com]
> >>>> Sent: July-10-13 10:57 AM
> >>>> To: John York
> >>>> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> >>>> Subject: Re: google troubles?
> >>>>
> >>>> Does anyone have traceroutes showing where the issues are?
> >>>>
> >>>> -Grant
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:45 AM, John York
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> > We saw the same thing, but seems to be cleared up now. All our
> >>>> > providers that routed to Google addresses in ATL had the issue. We
> >>>> > have one provider that lands on Google addresses in DFW, and it was
> >>>> working.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > ...And now I see that it isn't completely resolved. Some Google apps
> >>>> > are still inaccessible via the Atlanta routes.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Blair Trosper
> >>>> >  >>>> > >wrote:
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > Seeing lots of reports of people unable to get to many Google
> >>>> services.
> >>>> > >  Seems to be affecting Comcast users disproportionately.  It's
> fine
> >>>> > > for
> >>>> > me,
> >>>> > > but a lot of my staff are basically out of luck...but according to
> >>>> > > the Google Apps Status page, everything is fine.
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > It's anecdotal, but it would seem like there's an issue based on
> >>>> > > these reports.
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > Oh, and this:
> >>>> > > http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/10/tech/web/google-down/index.html
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > Anyone know what's up?  Fiber cut?  DC outages?
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > -- blair
> >>>> > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > --
> >>>> >
> >>>> > John York
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Information Technology | Network Administrator
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Phone: 615-399-7000 x:333
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Griffin Technology
> >>>> > 2030 Lindell Avenue Nashville, TN  37203 USA
> >>>> >
> >>>> > This message and any attachments should be treated as confidential
> >>>> > information of Griffin Technology, Inc.
> >>>> >
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
>


Re: google troubles?

2013-07-10 Thread Mike Jackson
32 msec
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> AS812 (Rogers Looking Glass https://supernoc.rogerstelecom.net/lg/)
> >> ===
> >>
> >> *Query:* *tr 64.71.249.45*
> >>
> >> Type escape sequence to abort.
> >> Tracing the route to 64.71.249.45
> >>
> >>   1 64.71.255.62 0 msec 0 msec 0 msec
> >>   2 ge-4-3-0.gw02.ym.phub.net.cable.ROGERS.com (66.185.82.237) 4 msec
> 4 msec 4 msec
> >>   3 69.63.250.189 4 msec 4 msec 4 msec
> >>   4 69.63.250.174 4 msec 4 msec 4 msec
> >>   5  *  *  *
> >>   6  *  *  *
> >>   7  *  *  *
> >>   8  *  *  *
> >>   9  *  *  *
> >>  10  *  *  *
> >>  11  *  *  *
> >>  12  *  *  *
> >>  13  *  *  *
> >>  14  *  *  *
> >>  15  *  *  *
> >>  16  *  *  *
> >>  17  *  *  *
> >>  18  *  *  *
> >>  19  *  *  *
> >>  20  *  *  *
> >>  21  *  *  *
> >>  22  *  *  *
> >>  23  *  *  *
> >>  24  *  *  *
> >>  25  *  *  *
> >>  26  *  *  *
> >>  27  *  *  *
> >>  28  *  *  *
> >>  29  *  *  *
> >>  30  *  *  *
> >>
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >>   - MJ
> >>
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >>> From: Grant Ridder [mailto:shortdudey...@gmail.com]
> >>> Sent: July-10-13 10:57 AM
> >>> To: John York
> >>> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> >>> Subject: Re: google troubles?
> >>>
> >>> Does anyone have traceroutes showing where the issues are?
> >>>
> >>> -Grant
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:45 AM, John York
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > We saw the same thing, but seems to be cleared up now. All our
> >>> > providers that routed to Google addresses in ATL had the issue. We
> >>> > have one provider that lands on Google addresses in DFW, and it was
> >>> working.
> >>> >
> >>> > ...And now I see that it isn't completely resolved. Some Google apps
> >>> > are still inaccessible via the Atlanta routes.
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Blair Trosper
> >>> >  >>> > >wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > > Seeing lots of reports of people unable to get to many Google
> >>> services.
> >>> > >  Seems to be affecting Comcast users disproportionately.  It's fine
> >>> > > for
> >>> > me,
> >>> > > but a lot of my staff are basically out of luck...but according to
> >>> > > the Google Apps Status page, everything is fine.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > It's anecdotal, but it would seem like there's an issue based on
> >>> > > these reports.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Oh, and this:
> >>> > > http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/10/tech/web/google-down/index.html
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Anyone know what's up?  Fiber cut?  DC outages?
> >>> > >
> >>> > > -- blair
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > --
> >>> >
> >>> > John York
> >>> >
> >>> > Information Technology | Network Administrator
> >>> >
> >>> > Phone: 615-399-7000 x:333
> >>> >
> >>> > Griffin Technology
> >>> > 2030 Lindell Avenue Nashville, TN  37203 USA
> >>> >
> >>> > This message and any attachments should be treated as confidential
> >>> > information of Griffin Technology, Inc.
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>


Re: google troubles?

2013-07-10 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Mike Jackson  wrote:
> Hey Chris, long time!
>
> From what I can tell, it's only Google Services (that I've found so far;
> other things appear to resolve correctly).  I'm wondering if they're
> bouncing Google based traffic through some type of caching / accelerator?
> Or maybe it's an NSA/DPI box ;)

in .CA? :) don't you mean the meat-helmet-wearing CSE folks? :)

> I've tested Maps, Gmail, Translate as well as www.google.com, www.google.ca
> and they're all hijacked replies >>
>

yup... well, not hijacked in a bad sense... it's actually supposed to
be making things better.

>
> Translating "www.google.com"...domain server (8.8.8.8) [OK]
>
> (www.google.com)
>
> Type escape sequence to abort.
> Tracing the route to www.google.com (66.185.84.44)
>
> (www.google.ca)
>
> Type escape sequence to abort.
> Tracing the route to www.google.ca (66.185.95.44)
>
> (gmail)
>
> Type escape sequence to abort.
> Tracing the route to www3.l.google.com (66.185.85.39)
>
> (maps)
>
> Type escape sequence to abort.
> Tracing the route to maps.l.google.com (64.71.249.114)
>
> (translate)
>
> Type escape sequence to abort.
> Tracing the route to www3.l.google.com (66.185.84.30)

those all seem properly done, yes.

-chris



Re: google troubles?

2013-07-10 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Mike Jackson  wrote:
> That makes sense, I figured it was some type of a CDN caching environment.

I forget that we do this at times... :)

> I've found that youtube.com is in the same boat:
>
> Translating "www.youtube.com"...domain server (8.8.8.8) [OK]

yup, so this makes sense as well... good.



Re: google troubles?

2013-07-10 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Christopher Morrow
 wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Mike Jackson  wrote:
>> I just realized that it's not Google IP space (74.125.0.0/16), Rogers is
>> hijacking the DNS and resolving www.google.com to space within
>> 64.71.240.0/20 which is Rogers IP space! (note the name server set as
>> 8.8.8.8)
>>
>
> so:
>  1) rogers is hijacking traffic to 8.8.8.8
>  2) the copy of 8.8.8.8 in rogers-land is replying with incorrect
> information for google properties (at least).
>
> err... any idea if it's lying about other things too? :)
>

oops, so a polite caller noted that google often ships people at a
local 'google global cache' node if they have one... it seems like
that might be what's going on here with 8.8.8.8 sending you to 64.71
and/or 66.185 addresses.

so maybe rogers isn't doing something untoward after all!

-chris
(thanks for the headslap polite caller)

>> davinci#traceroute www.google.com
>>
>> Translating "www.google.com"...domain server (8.8.8.8) [OK]
>>
>> Type escape sequence to abort.
>> Tracing the route to www.google.com (66.185.85.29)
>>
>>   1 x.x.x.x [AS 812] 4 msec 4 msec 4 msec
>>   2 so-4-0-2.gw02.ym.phub.net.cable.rogers.com (66.185.82.129) [AS 812] 8
>> msec 8 msec 4 msec
>>   3 69.63.252.222 [AS 812] 4 msec 0 msec 8 msec
>>   4 69.63.250.162 [AS 812] 4 msec 4 msec 4 msec
>>   5  *  *  *
>>   6  *  *  *
>>   7  *  *  *
>>   8  *  *  *
>>   9  *  *  *
>>  10  *  *  *
>>
>> TOR2-CORE-R1#show ip bgp 66.185.85.29
>> BGP routing table entry for 66.185.80.0/20, version 13095115
>> Paths: (1 available, best #1, table default)
>>   Advertised to update-groups:
>>  14
>>   701 6461 812
>> 205.205.23.121 from 205.205.23.121 (137.39.8.42)
>>   Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, external, best
>> TOR2-CORE-R1#
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>   - Mike
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Mike Jackson  wrote:
>>
>>> I can see the Google IP space (64.71.240.0/20) from Verizon/AS701, but
>>> not from Rogers/AS812 in Toronto.  I've done a few other test traceroutes
>>> through Rogers to verify that they didn't filter UDP/ICMP.  At this point
>>> nothing would surprise me from Rogers.
>>>
>>> AS701
>>> =
>>>
>>> TOR2-CORE-R1#traceroute www.google.com
>>> Translating "www.google.com"...domain server (8.8.8.8) [OK]
>>>
>>> Type escape sequence to abort.
>>> Tracing the route to www.google.com (74.125.26.99)
>>> VRF info: (vrf in name/id, vrf out name/id)
>>>   1 x.x.x.x [AS701] 4 msec 0 msec 0 msec
>>>   2 0.ge-11-0-0.XT4.TOR2.ALTER.NET (152.63.133.78) [AS 701] 4 msec 0 msec
>>> 4 msec
>>>   3 0.so-4-0-3.XT2.NYC4.ALTER.NET (152.63.0.73) [AS 701] 16 msec 16 msec
>>> 16 msec
>>>   4 TenGigE0-7-1-0.GW8.NYC4.ALTER.NET (152.63.21.125) [AS 701] 20 msec
>>> TenGigE0-5-1-0.GW8.NYC4.ALTER.NET (152.63.21.73) [AS 701] 16 msec
>>> TenGigE0-5-4-0.GW8.NYC4.ALTER.NET (152.63.18.206) [AS 701] 20 msec
>>>   5 72.14.238.232 [AS 15169] 16 msec 16 msec 20 msec
>>>   6 72.14.236.208 [AS 15169] [MPLS: Label 680976 Exp 4] 16 msec 16 msec
>>> 72.14.236.206 [AS 15169] [MPLS: Label 533197 Exp 4] 20 msec
>>>   7 209.85.249.11 [AS 15169] [MPLS: Label 16668 Exp 4] 24 msec
>>> 72.14.239.93 [AS 15169] [MPLS: Label 14644 Exp 4] 24 msec
>>> 209.85.249.11 [AS 15169] [MPLS: Label 13978 Exp 4] 24 msec
>>>   8 209.85.243.114 [AS 15169] [MPLS: Label 568789 Exp 4] 32 msec
>>> 209.85.241.222 [AS 15169] [MPLS: Label 632535 Exp 4] 32 msec 32 msec
>>>   9 216.239.48.159 [AS 15169] 36 msec 32 msec
>>> 216.239.48.59 [AS 15169] 32 msec
>>>  10 www.google.com (74.125.26.147) [AS 15169] 32 msec 32 msec 32 msec
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> AS812 (Rogers Looking Glass https://supernoc.rogerstelecom.net/lg/)
>>> ===
>>>
>>> *Query:* *tr 64.71.249.45*
>>>
>>> Type escape sequence to abort.
>>> Tracing the route to 64.71.249.45
>>>
>>>   1 64.71.255.62 0 msec 0 msec 0 msec
>>>   2 ge-4-3-0.gw02.ym.phub.net.cable.ROGERS.com (66.185.82.237) 4 msec 4 
>>> msec 4 msec
>>>   3 69.63.250.189 4 msec 4 msec 4 msec
>>>   4 69.63.250.174 4 msec 4 msec 4 msec
>>>   5  *  *  *
>>>   6  *  *  *
>>>   7  *  *  *
>>>   8  *  *  *
>>>   9  * 

Re: google troubles?

2013-07-10 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Mike Jackson  wrote:
> I just realized that it's not Google IP space (74.125.0.0/16), Rogers is
> hijacking the DNS and resolving www.google.com to space within
> 64.71.240.0/20 which is Rogers IP space! (note the name server set as
> 8.8.8.8)
>

so:
 1) rogers is hijacking traffic to 8.8.8.8
 2) the copy of 8.8.8.8 in rogers-land is replying with incorrect
information for google properties (at least).

err... any idea if it's lying about other things too? :)

> davinci#traceroute www.google.com
>
> Translating "www.google.com"...domain server (8.8.8.8) [OK]
>
> Type escape sequence to abort.
> Tracing the route to www.google.com (66.185.85.29)
>
>   1 x.x.x.x [AS 812] 4 msec 4 msec 4 msec
>   2 so-4-0-2.gw02.ym.phub.net.cable.rogers.com (66.185.82.129) [AS 812] 8
> msec 8 msec 4 msec
>   3 69.63.252.222 [AS 812] 4 msec 0 msec 8 msec
>   4 69.63.250.162 [AS 812] 4 msec 4 msec 4 msec
>   5  *  *  *
>   6  *  *  *
>   7  *  *  *
>   8  *  *  *
>   9  *  *  *
>  10  *  *  *
>
> TOR2-CORE-R1#show ip bgp 66.185.85.29
> BGP routing table entry for 66.185.80.0/20, version 13095115
> Paths: (1 available, best #1, table default)
>   Advertised to update-groups:
>  14
>   701 6461 812
> 205.205.23.121 from 205.205.23.121 (137.39.8.42)
>   Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, external, best
> TOR2-CORE-R1#
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>   - Mike
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Mike Jackson  wrote:
>
>> I can see the Google IP space (64.71.240.0/20) from Verizon/AS701, but
>> not from Rogers/AS812 in Toronto.  I've done a few other test traceroutes
>> through Rogers to verify that they didn't filter UDP/ICMP.  At this point
>> nothing would surprise me from Rogers.
>>
>> AS701
>> =
>>
>> TOR2-CORE-R1#traceroute www.google.com
>> Translating "www.google.com"...domain server (8.8.8.8) [OK]
>>
>> Type escape sequence to abort.
>> Tracing the route to www.google.com (74.125.26.99)
>> VRF info: (vrf in name/id, vrf out name/id)
>>   1 x.x.x.x [AS701] 4 msec 0 msec 0 msec
>>   2 0.ge-11-0-0.XT4.TOR2.ALTER.NET (152.63.133.78) [AS 701] 4 msec 0 msec
>> 4 msec
>>   3 0.so-4-0-3.XT2.NYC4.ALTER.NET (152.63.0.73) [AS 701] 16 msec 16 msec
>> 16 msec
>>   4 TenGigE0-7-1-0.GW8.NYC4.ALTER.NET (152.63.21.125) [AS 701] 20 msec
>> TenGigE0-5-1-0.GW8.NYC4.ALTER.NET (152.63.21.73) [AS 701] 16 msec
>> TenGigE0-5-4-0.GW8.NYC4.ALTER.NET (152.63.18.206) [AS 701] 20 msec
>>   5 72.14.238.232 [AS 15169] 16 msec 16 msec 20 msec
>>   6 72.14.236.208 [AS 15169] [MPLS: Label 680976 Exp 4] 16 msec 16 msec
>> 72.14.236.206 [AS 15169] [MPLS: Label 533197 Exp 4] 20 msec
>>   7 209.85.249.11 [AS 15169] [MPLS: Label 16668 Exp 4] 24 msec
>> 72.14.239.93 [AS 15169] [MPLS: Label 14644 Exp 4] 24 msec
>> 209.85.249.11 [AS 15169] [MPLS: Label 13978 Exp 4] 24 msec
>>   8 209.85.243.114 [AS 15169] [MPLS: Label 568789 Exp 4] 32 msec
>> 209.85.241.222 [AS 15169] [MPLS: Label 632535 Exp 4] 32 msec 32 msec
>>   9 216.239.48.159 [AS 15169] 36 msec 32 msec
>> 216.239.48.59 [AS 15169] 32 msec
>>  10 www.google.com (74.125.26.147) [AS 15169] 32 msec 32 msec 32 msec
>>
>>
>>
>> AS812 (Rogers Looking Glass https://supernoc.rogerstelecom.net/lg/)
>> ===
>>
>> *Query:* *tr 64.71.249.45*
>>
>> Type escape sequence to abort.
>> Tracing the route to 64.71.249.45
>>
>>   1 64.71.255.62 0 msec 0 msec 0 msec
>>   2 ge-4-3-0.gw02.ym.phub.net.cable.ROGERS.com (66.185.82.237) 4 msec 4 msec 
>> 4 msec
>>   3 69.63.250.189 4 msec 4 msec 4 msec
>>   4 69.63.250.174 4 msec 4 msec 4 msec
>>   5  *  *  *
>>   6  *  *  *
>>   7  *  *  *
>>   8  *  *  *
>>   9  *  *  *
>>  10  *  *  *
>>  11  *  *  *
>>  12  *  *  *
>>  13  *  *  *
>>  14  *  *  *
>>  15  *  *  *
>>  16  *  *  *
>>  17  *  *  *
>>  18  *  *  *
>>  19  *  *  *
>>  20  *  *  *
>>  21  *  *  *
>>  22  *  *  *
>>  23  *  *  *
>>  24  *  *  *
>>  25  *  *  *
>>  26  *  *  *
>>  27  *  *  *
>>  28  *  *  *
>>  29  *  *  *
>>  30  *  *  *
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>   - MJ
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Grant Ridder [mailto:shortdudey...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: July-10-13 10:57 AM
>>> To: John York
>>> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
>>> Subject: Re: google troubles?
>>>
>>> Does anyone have tracerou

Re: google troubles?

2013-07-10 Thread Mike Jackson
I just realized that it's not Google IP space (74.125.0.0/16), Rogers is
hijacking the DNS and resolving www.google.com to space within
64.71.240.0/20 which is Rogers IP space! (note the name server set as
8.8.8.8)

davinci#traceroute www.google.com

Translating "www.google.com"...domain server (8.8.8.8) [OK]

Type escape sequence to abort.
Tracing the route to www.google.com (66.185.85.29)

  1 x.x.x.x [AS 812] 4 msec 4 msec 4 msec
  2 so-4-0-2.gw02.ym.phub.net.cable.rogers.com (66.185.82.129) [AS 812] 8
msec 8 msec 4 msec
  3 69.63.252.222 [AS 812] 4 msec 0 msec 8 msec
  4 69.63.250.162 [AS 812] 4 msec 4 msec 4 msec
  5  *  *  *
  6  *  *  *
  7  *  *  *
  8  *  *  *
  9  *  *  *
 10  *  *  *

TOR2-CORE-R1#show ip bgp 66.185.85.29
BGP routing table entry for 66.185.80.0/20, version 13095115
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table default)
  Advertised to update-groups:
 14
  701 6461 812
205.205.23.121 from 205.205.23.121 (137.39.8.42)
  Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, external, best
TOR2-CORE-R1#


Thanks,

  - Mike


On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Mike Jackson  wrote:

> I can see the Google IP space (64.71.240.0/20) from Verizon/AS701, but
> not from Rogers/AS812 in Toronto.  I've done a few other test traceroutes
> through Rogers to verify that they didn't filter UDP/ICMP.  At this point
> nothing would surprise me from Rogers.
>
> AS701
> =
>
> TOR2-CORE-R1#traceroute www.google.com
> Translating "www.google.com"...domain server (8.8.8.8) [OK]
>
> Type escape sequence to abort.
> Tracing the route to www.google.com (74.125.26.99)
> VRF info: (vrf in name/id, vrf out name/id)
>   1 x.x.x.x [AS701] 4 msec 0 msec 0 msec
>   2 0.ge-11-0-0.XT4.TOR2.ALTER.NET (152.63.133.78) [AS 701] 4 msec 0 msec
> 4 msec
>   3 0.so-4-0-3.XT2.NYC4.ALTER.NET (152.63.0.73) [AS 701] 16 msec 16 msec
> 16 msec
>   4 TenGigE0-7-1-0.GW8.NYC4.ALTER.NET (152.63.21.125) [AS 701] 20 msec
> TenGigE0-5-1-0.GW8.NYC4.ALTER.NET (152.63.21.73) [AS 701] 16 msec
> TenGigE0-5-4-0.GW8.NYC4.ALTER.NET (152.63.18.206) [AS 701] 20 msec
>   5 72.14.238.232 [AS 15169] 16 msec 16 msec 20 msec
>   6 72.14.236.208 [AS 15169] [MPLS: Label 680976 Exp 4] 16 msec 16 msec
> 72.14.236.206 [AS 15169] [MPLS: Label 533197 Exp 4] 20 msec
>   7 209.85.249.11 [AS 15169] [MPLS: Label 16668 Exp 4] 24 msec
> 72.14.239.93 [AS 15169] [MPLS: Label 14644 Exp 4] 24 msec
> 209.85.249.11 [AS 15169] [MPLS: Label 13978 Exp 4] 24 msec
>   8 209.85.243.114 [AS 15169] [MPLS: Label 568789 Exp 4] 32 msec
> 209.85.241.222 [AS 15169] [MPLS: Label 632535 Exp 4] 32 msec 32 msec
>   9 216.239.48.159 [AS 15169] 36 msec 32 msec
> 216.239.48.59 [AS 15169] 32 msec
>  10 www.google.com (74.125.26.147) [AS 15169] 32 msec 32 msec 32 msec
>
>
>
> AS812 (Rogers Looking Glass https://supernoc.rogerstelecom.net/lg/)
> ===
>
> *Query:* *tr 64.71.249.45*
>
> Type escape sequence to abort.
> Tracing the route to 64.71.249.45
>
>   1 64.71.255.62 0 msec 0 msec 0 msec
>   2 ge-4-3-0.gw02.ym.phub.net.cable.ROGERS.com (66.185.82.237) 4 msec 4 msec 
> 4 msec
>   3 69.63.250.189 4 msec 4 msec 4 msec
>   4 69.63.250.174 4 msec 4 msec 4 msec
>   5  *  *  *
>   6  *  *  *
>   7  *  *  *
>   8  *  *  *
>   9  *  *  *
>  10  *  *  *
>  11  *  *  *
>  12  *  *  *
>  13  *  *  *
>  14  *  *  *
>  15  *  *  *
>  16  *  *  *
>  17  *  *  *
>  18  *  *  *
>  19  *  *  *
>  20  *  *  *
>  21  *  *  *
>  22  *  *  *
>  23  *  *  *
>  24  *  *  *
>  25  *  *  *
>  26  *  *  *
>  27  *  *  *
>  28  *  *  *
>  29  *  *  *
>  30  *  *  *
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>   - MJ
>
>
> -Original Message-
>> From: Grant Ridder [mailto:shortdudey...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: July-10-13 10:57 AM
>> To: John York
>> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
>> Subject: Re: google troubles?
>>
>> Does anyone have traceroutes showing where the issues are?
>>
>> -Grant
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:45 AM, John York
>> wrote:
>>
>> > We saw the same thing, but seems to be cleared up now. All our
>> > providers that routed to Google addresses in ATL had the issue. We
>> > have one provider that lands on Google addresses in DFW, and it was
>> working.
>> >
>> > ...And now I see that it isn't completely resolved. Some Google apps
>> > are still inaccessible via the Atlanta routes.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Blair Trosper
>> > > > >wrote:
>> >
>> > > Seeing lots of reports of people unable to get to many Google
>> 

google troubles?

2013-07-10 Thread Mike Jackson
I can see the Google IP space (64.71.240.0/20) from Verizon/AS701, but not
from Rogers/AS812 in Toronto.  I've done a few other test traceroutes
through Rogers to verify that they didn't filter UDP/ICMP.  At this point
nothing would surprise me from Rogers.

AS701
=

TOR2-CORE-R1#traceroute www.google.com
Translating "www.google.com"...domain server (8.8.8.8) [OK]

Type escape sequence to abort.
Tracing the route to www.google.com (74.125.26.99)
VRF info: (vrf in name/id, vrf out name/id)
  1 x.x.x.x [AS701] 4 msec 0 msec 0 msec
  2 0.ge-11-0-0.XT4.TOR2.ALTER.NET (152.63.133.78) [AS 701] 4 msec 0 msec 4
msec
  3 0.so-4-0-3.XT2.NYC4.ALTER.NET (152.63.0.73) [AS 701] 16 msec 16 msec 16
msec
  4 TenGigE0-7-1-0.GW8.NYC4.ALTER.NET (152.63.21.125) [AS 701] 20 msec
TenGigE0-5-1-0.GW8.NYC4.ALTER.NET (152.63.21.73) [AS 701] 16 msec
TenGigE0-5-4-0.GW8.NYC4.ALTER.NET (152.63.18.206) [AS 701] 20 msec
  5 72.14.238.232 [AS 15169] 16 msec 16 msec 20 msec
  6 72.14.236.208 [AS 15169] [MPLS: Label 680976 Exp 4] 16 msec 16 msec
72.14.236.206 [AS 15169] [MPLS: Label 533197 Exp 4] 20 msec
  7 209.85.249.11 [AS 15169] [MPLS: Label 16668 Exp 4] 24 msec
72.14.239.93 [AS 15169] [MPLS: Label 14644 Exp 4] 24 msec
209.85.249.11 [AS 15169] [MPLS: Label 13978 Exp 4] 24 msec
  8 209.85.243.114 [AS 15169] [MPLS: Label 568789 Exp 4] 32 msec
209.85.241.222 [AS 15169] [MPLS: Label 632535 Exp 4] 32 msec 32 msec
  9 216.239.48.159 [AS 15169] 36 msec 32 msec
216.239.48.59 [AS 15169] 32 msec
 10 www.google.com (74.125.26.147) [AS 15169] 32 msec 32 msec 32 msec



AS812 (Rogers Looking Glass https://supernoc.rogerstelecom.net/lg/)
===

*Query:* *tr 64.71.249.45*

Type escape sequence to abort.
Tracing the route to 64.71.249.45

  1 64.71.255.62 0 msec 0 msec 0 msec
  2 ge-4-3-0.gw02.ym.phub.net.cable.ROGERS.com (66.185.82.237) 4 msec
4 msec 4 msec
  3 69.63.250.189 4 msec 4 msec 4 msec
  4 69.63.250.174 4 msec 4 msec 4 msec
  5  *  *  *
  6  *  *  *
  7  *  *  *
  8  *  *  *
  9  *  *  *
 10  *  *  *
 11  *  *  *
 12  *  *  *
 13  *  *  *
 14  *  *  *
 15  *  *  *
 16  *  *  *
 17  *  *  *
 18  *  *  *
 19  *  *  *
 20  *  *  *
 21  *  *  *
 22  *  *  *
 23  *  *  *
 24  *  *  *
 25  *  *  *
 26  *  *  *
 27  *  *  *
 28  *  *  *
 29  *  *  *
 30  *  *  *


Cheers,

  - MJ


-Original Message-
> From: Grant Ridder [mailto:shortdudey...@gmail.com]
> Sent: July-10-13 10:57 AM
> To: John York
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: google troubles?
>
> Does anyone have traceroutes showing where the issues are?
>
> -Grant
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:45 AM, John York
> wrote:
>
> > We saw the same thing, but seems to be cleared up now. All our
> > providers that routed to Google addresses in ATL had the issue. We
> > have one provider that lands on Google addresses in DFW, and it was
> working.
> >
> > ...And now I see that it isn't completely resolved. Some Google apps
> > are still inaccessible via the Atlanta routes.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Blair Trosper
> >  > >wrote:
> >
> > > Seeing lots of reports of people unable to get to many Google
> services.
> > >  Seems to be affecting Comcast users disproportionately.  It's fine
> > > for
> > me,
> > > but a lot of my staff are basically out of luck...but according to
> > > the Google Apps Status page, everything is fine.
> > >
> > > It's anecdotal, but it would seem like there's an issue based on
> > > these reports.
> > >
> > > Oh, and this:
> > > http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/10/tech/web/google-down/index.html
> > >
> > > Anyone know what's up?  Fiber cut?  DC outages?
> > >
> > > -- blair
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > John York
> >
> > Information Technology | Network Administrator
> >
> > Phone: 615-399-7000 x:333
> >
> > Griffin Technology
> > 2030 Lindell Avenue Nashville, TN  37203 USA
> >
> > This message and any attachments should be treated as confidential
> > information of Griffin Technology, Inc.
> >
>
>
>
>


Re: google troubles?

2013-07-10 Thread Grant Ridder
tcptraceroutes working fine too?

On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Milt Aitken  wrote:

> We (were) peered with Google in Atlanta.
> We were unable to bring up web pages for google.com or gmail.com.
> Traceroute worked, though.
> I shut off the peering & my outbound route switched to Cogent, which
> works now.
>
> I'll try peering again tonight.  Maybe they'll have fixed it by then.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: N. Max Pierson [mailto:nmaxpier...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 11:00 AM
> To: Grant Ridder
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: google troubles?
>
> Traceroutes worked fine for me during the outage. Seems to have been
> something at L4-L7.
>
> --
> max
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Grant Ridder
> wrote:
>
> > Does anyone have traceroutes showing where the issues are?
> >
> > -Grant
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:45 AM, John York
>  > >wrote:
> >
> > > We saw the same thing, but seems to be cleared up now. All our
> providers
> > > that routed to Google addresses in ATL had the issue. We have one
> > provider
> > > that lands on Google addresses in DFW, and it was working.
> > >
> > > ...And now I see that it isn't completely resolved. Some Google apps
> are
> > > still inaccessible via the Atlanta routes.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Blair Trosper
>  > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > Seeing lots of reports of people unable to get to many Google
> services.
> > > >  Seems to be affecting Comcast users disproportionately.  It's
> fine for
> > > me,
> > > > but a lot of my staff are basically out of luck...but according to
> the
> > > > Google Apps Status page, everything is fine.
> > > >
> > > > It's anecdotal, but it would seem like there's an issue based on
> these
> > > > reports.
> > > >
> > > > Oh, and this:
> > > > http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/10/tech/web/google-down/index.html
> > > >
> > > > Anyone know what's up?  Fiber cut?  DC outages?
> > > >
> > > > -- blair
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > John York
> > >
> > > Information Technology | Network Administrator
> > >
> > > Phone: 615-399-7000 x:333
> > >
> > > Griffin Technology
> > > 2030 Lindell Avenue Nashville, TN  37203 USA
> > >
> > > This message and any attachments should be treated as confidential
> > > information of Griffin Technology, Inc.
> > >
> >
>


RE: google troubles?

2013-07-10 Thread Milt Aitken
We (were) peered with Google in Atlanta.
We were unable to bring up web pages for google.com or gmail.com.
Traceroute worked, though.
I shut off the peering & my outbound route switched to Cogent, which
works now.

I'll try peering again tonight.  Maybe they'll have fixed it by then.

-Original Message-
From: N. Max Pierson [mailto:nmaxpier...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 11:00 AM
To: Grant Ridder
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: google troubles?

Traceroutes worked fine for me during the outage. Seems to have been
something at L4-L7.

--
max

On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Grant Ridder
wrote:

> Does anyone have traceroutes showing where the issues are?
>
> -Grant
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:45 AM, John York
 >wrote:
>
> > We saw the same thing, but seems to be cleared up now. All our
providers
> > that routed to Google addresses in ATL had the issue. We have one
> provider
> > that lands on Google addresses in DFW, and it was working.
> >
> > ...And now I see that it isn't completely resolved. Some Google apps
are
> > still inaccessible via the Atlanta routes.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Blair Trosper
 > >wrote:
> >
> > > Seeing lots of reports of people unable to get to many Google
services.
> > >  Seems to be affecting Comcast users disproportionately.  It's
fine for
> > me,
> > > but a lot of my staff are basically out of luck...but according to
the
> > > Google Apps Status page, everything is fine.
> > >
> > > It's anecdotal, but it would seem like there's an issue based on
these
> > > reports.
> > >
> > > Oh, and this:
> > > http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/10/tech/web/google-down/index.html
> > >
> > > Anyone know what's up?  Fiber cut?  DC outages?
> > >
> > > -- blair
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > John York
> >
> > Information Technology | Network Administrator
> >
> > Phone: 615-399-7000 x:333
> >
> > Griffin Technology
> > 2030 Lindell Avenue Nashville, TN  37203 USA
> >
> > This message and any attachments should be treated as confidential
> > information of Griffin Technology, Inc.
> >
>



Re: google troubles?

2013-07-10 Thread N. Max Pierson
Traceroutes worked fine for me during the outage. Seems to have been
something at L4-L7.

--
max

On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Grant Ridder wrote:

> Does anyone have traceroutes showing where the issues are?
>
> -Grant
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:45 AM, John York  >wrote:
>
> > We saw the same thing, but seems to be cleared up now. All our providers
> > that routed to Google addresses in ATL had the issue. We have one
> provider
> > that lands on Google addresses in DFW, and it was working.
> >
> > ...And now I see that it isn't completely resolved. Some Google apps are
> > still inaccessible via the Atlanta routes.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Blair Trosper  > >wrote:
> >
> > > Seeing lots of reports of people unable to get to many Google services.
> > >  Seems to be affecting Comcast users disproportionately.  It's fine for
> > me,
> > > but a lot of my staff are basically out of luck...but according to the
> > > Google Apps Status page, everything is fine.
> > >
> > > It's anecdotal, but it would seem like there's an issue based on these
> > > reports.
> > >
> > > Oh, and this:
> > > http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/10/tech/web/google-down/index.html
> > >
> > > Anyone know what's up?  Fiber cut?  DC outages?
> > >
> > > -- blair
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > John York
> >
> > Information Technology | Network Administrator
> >
> > Phone: 615-399-7000 x:333
> >
> > Griffin Technology
> > 2030 Lindell Avenue Nashville, TN  37203 USA
> >
> > This message and any attachments should be treated as confidential
> > information of Griffin Technology, Inc.
> >
>


Re: google troubles?

2013-07-10 Thread Grant Ridder
Does anyone have traceroutes showing where the issues are?

-Grant

On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:45 AM, John York wrote:

> We saw the same thing, but seems to be cleared up now. All our providers
> that routed to Google addresses in ATL had the issue. We have one provider
> that lands on Google addresses in DFW, and it was working.
>
> ...And now I see that it isn't completely resolved. Some Google apps are
> still inaccessible via the Atlanta routes.
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Blair Trosper  >wrote:
>
> > Seeing lots of reports of people unable to get to many Google services.
> >  Seems to be affecting Comcast users disproportionately.  It's fine for
> me,
> > but a lot of my staff are basically out of luck...but according to the
> > Google Apps Status page, everything is fine.
> >
> > It's anecdotal, but it would seem like there's an issue based on these
> > reports.
> >
> > Oh, and this:
> > http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/10/tech/web/google-down/index.html
> >
> > Anyone know what's up?  Fiber cut?  DC outages?
> >
> > -- blair
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> John York
>
> Information Technology | Network Administrator
>
> Phone: 615-399-7000 x:333
>
> Griffin Technology
> 2030 Lindell Avenue Nashville, TN  37203 USA
>
> This message and any attachments should be treated as confidential
> information of Griffin Technology, Inc.
>


Re: google troubles?

2013-07-10 Thread John York
We saw the same thing, but seems to be cleared up now. All our providers
that routed to Google addresses in ATL had the issue. We have one provider
that lands on Google addresses in DFW, and it was working.

...And now I see that it isn't completely resolved. Some Google apps are
still inaccessible via the Atlanta routes.




On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Blair Trosper wrote:

> Seeing lots of reports of people unable to get to many Google services.
>  Seems to be affecting Comcast users disproportionately.  It's fine for me,
> but a lot of my staff are basically out of luck...but according to the
> Google Apps Status page, everything is fine.
>
> It's anecdotal, but it would seem like there's an issue based on these
> reports.
>
> Oh, and this:
> http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/10/tech/web/google-down/index.html
>
> Anyone know what's up?  Fiber cut?  DC outages?
>
> -- blair
>



-- 

John York

Information Technology | Network Administrator

Phone: 615-399-7000 x:333

Griffin Technology
2030 Lindell Avenue Nashville, TN  37203 USA

This message and any attachments should be treated as confidential information 
of Griffin Technology, Inc.


RE: google troubles?

2013-07-10 Thread BEN BROWN
I did have connectivity issues for mobile devices this AM between 
8:00am-10:00am EST. I am in NE Ohio.

Seems to be resolved now.

-Original Message-
From: Blair Trosper [mailto:blair.tros...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 10:28 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: google troubles?

Seeing lots of reports of people unable to get to many Google services.
 Seems to be affecting Comcast users disproportionately.  It's fine for me, but 
a lot of my staff are basically out of luck...but according to the Google Apps 
Status page, everything is fine.

It's anecdotal, but it would seem like there's an issue based on these reports.

Oh, and this:
http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/10/tech/web/google-down/index.html

Anyone know what's up?  Fiber cut?  DC outages?

-- blair


google troubles?

2013-07-10 Thread Blair Trosper
Seeing lots of reports of people unable to get to many Google services.
 Seems to be affecting Comcast users disproportionately.  It's fine for me,
but a lot of my staff are basically out of luck...but according to the
Google Apps Status page, everything is fine.

It's anecdotal, but it would seem like there's an issue based on these
reports.

Oh, and this:
http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/10/tech/web/google-down/index.html

Anyone know what's up?  Fiber cut?  DC outages?

-- blair