Re: mail operators list
Mail seems to be one of those topics which is of interest to many nanog subscribers, but simultaneously annoying to many (presumably different) nanog subscribers. what large subject does not fall in this category? this is just life when you have a large community. randy
Re: mail operators list
The NANOG mailing list has never been in good order. The NANOG meetings have always had complaints. The NANOG community is composed of disparate parties with disparate interests, each convinced that their interests are the only ones of operation relevance. it would all be so much simpler if the humans were removed from the equation. such funny monkeys we. randy
Re: mlc files formal complaint against me
dunce cap on irrelevant to the mlc action, but ... as someone just pointed out to me, i was confusing two ex-ceos of qwest, joe nacchio, who is a convicted felon, with sol trujillo, who is not, but is currently the ceo of telstra. apologies. randy
Re: mlc files formal complaint against me
http://rip.psg.com/~randy/mlc-complaint.mbox
Re: More wiki questions...
Lynda wrote: I just hate politics, hurt feelings, and other stuff, so I'm asking here first. There's a nice NANOG 40 link on the front of the Wiki, but that's over. I'm thinking it ought not to disappear, but rather move off to a Prior NANOG Meetings (there's some great links to restaurants that I'd hate to see lost, and other useful stuff as well). Then there could be a NANOG 41 link instead (or perhaps a Current Meeting, which would lead off to NANOG 41 for now). sounds cool! good not to lose that stuff. It's also my intent to look at the old FAQ, see what's missing in the Wiki (and there are some things, for better or worse, that might be), and put it all in one spot. Then, I really, really, really think that the FAQ ought to go away, to be entirely replaced by the Wiki (which is now far more up to date). seems like a plan randy
Re: meeting in the Dominican Republic
I don't know how many people that attended NANOG in Toronto had to go through the international travel approval that some of us had to. probably not the canadians. this is NAnog, not USnog, so that's just gonna be a fact of life. perhaps we saw a huge attendance dip at Toronto the opposite randy
Re: Is there another NANOG somewhere?
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg45167.html is about volume. for me, it's not the volume, per se. it is the shameless and (should be) embarrassing self-promotion, the copying and reposting of others' ideas and work, ... and it's not only gadi, but he makes such a good example. randy
