Re: [Nanog-futures] The Peering BOF and the Fallout?

2008-02-29 Thread michael.dillon
 I did swing by Radio Shack. It can be done, but then I 
 thought about it and the professional queue system was  
 $1500. I think that Merit should make an investment in it to 
 improve the conference and speaking experience. It would be 
 well worth it in terms of making things run smoother.

$1500!?

Go to ebay and pick up an old PocketPC for a tenth of that 
and install this speech timer freeware:
http://www.jimkofalt.com/modules/mydownloads/

Or get an old laptop (386 should do fine) and set it up
to flash cues to the speakers.

--Michael Dillon

___
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures


Re: [Nanog-futures] Countdown Timer

2008-02-29 Thread Matt Peterson
We could probably gain the countdown support with a hacked ybox2, see 
http://www.deepdarc.com/ybox2 
 .

As for the lapel mic support, I agree this would increase the  
professional value.  Please see my ASIN ACSP request 2008.9 which  
attempts to address this (FYI, ARIN contracts out to Merit to do their  
webcast's with same gear) http://www.arin.net/acsp/suggestions/2008-9.html 
 .

--Matt

On Feb 28, 2008, at 8:31 PM, William Norton wrote:

 They also found a way for the speaker not to have their laptop screen
 flipped open preventing the audience (or the video camera) from seeing
 their face.  They made sure the speaker didn't have their badge on, as
 it would flash the lights reflection to the video camera. I also like
 that they wired the clip on microphones under your shirt so you would
 see the wires nor pull out the microphone accidentally. Very
 professional.


___
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures


Re: [Nanog-futures] Countdown Timer (Was Re: The Peering BOF and the Fallout?)

2008-02-29 Thread Pete Templin
William Norton wrote:

 I also like that they wired the clip on microphones under your shirt
 so you would see the wires nor pull out the microphone accidentally.
 Very professional.

Not only professional, but if you run the wire around your body and have 
the beltpack end up in front, you minimize the chance of dropped signal. 
  Always seems like the RF 'bzzzt' comes through louder than the 
speaker, right?

pt

___
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures


Re: [Nanog-futures] Countdown Timer

2008-02-29 Thread Martin Hannigan
Thanks. The idea is to have a consistent, repeatable, staff run system
that is able to be used from the media station in the back of the room
independent of the PC. It's not their job to run the sound boards and
we pay for this service as part of the administration fee that Merit
charges against the revenue. The dsan (or other pro manufacturer)
systems are designed for conferences.

The question that is posed is do we want a professional and non
intrusive method of indicating time to a presenter, and if that
includes an improvement in broadcasting sound (mics), do we all agree
that this is a worthwhile investment?

I'd say yes.

-M


On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Matt Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 We could probably gain the countdown support with a hacked ybox2, see 
 http://www.deepdarc.com/ybox2
   .

  As for the lapel mic support, I agree this would increase the
  professional value.  Please see my ASIN ACSP request 2008.9 which
  attempts to address this (FYI, ARIN contracts out to Merit to do their
  webcast's with same gear) http://www.arin.net/acsp/suggestions/2008-9.html
   .

  --Matt

  On Feb 28, 2008, at 8:31 PM, William Norton wrote:
  
   They also found a way for the speaker not to have their laptop screen
   flipped open preventing the audience (or the video camera) from seeing
   their face.  They made sure the speaker didn't have their badge on, as
   it would flash the lights reflection to the video camera. I also like
   that they wired the clip on microphones under your shirt so you would
   see the wires nor pull out the microphone accidentally. Very
   professional.



___
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures


Re: [Nanog-futures] Countdown Timer

2008-02-29 Thread Joel Jaeggli
Martin Hannigan wrote:
 Thanks. The idea is to have a consistent, repeatable, staff run system
 that is able to be used from the media station in the back of the room
 independent of the PC. It's not their job to run the sound boards and
 we pay for this service as part of the administration fee that Merit
 charges against the revenue. The dsan (or other pro manufacturer)
 systems are designed for conferences.
 
 The question that is posed is do we want a professional and non
 intrusive method of indicating time to a presenter, and if that
 includes an improvement in broadcasting sound (mics), do we all agree
 that this is a worthwhile investment?

One of the key talents a good MC is a sense of timing that makes the 
events flow, If you put the clock in front of the speaker the mc should 
probably have some control over it. It's cue for the speaker not a 
precision timing instrument. The last time, I was up there with one 30 
minute session and three lighting talks the first speaker took only 15 
minutes for the preso. That did dictate how much time there was to take 
questions and when the mic's were cutoff.

 I'd say yes.

By professional I'm not sure if you mean regularized or if you mean more 
Johny Carson and less Don Rickles?

Having a facility the helps the speakers is desirable in my mind.

 -M
 
 
 On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Matt Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 We could probably gain the countdown support with a hacked ybox2, see 
 http://www.deepdarc.com/ybox2
   .

  As for the lapel mic support, I agree this would increase the
  professional value.  Please see my ASIN ACSP request 2008.9 which
  attempts to address this (FYI, ARIN contracts out to Merit to do their
  webcast's with same gear) http://www.arin.net/acsp/suggestions/2008-9.html
   .

  --Matt

  On Feb 28, 2008, at 8:31 PM, William Norton wrote:
  
   They also found a way for the speaker not to have their laptop screen
   flipped open preventing the audience (or the video camera) from seeing
   their face.  They made sure the speaker didn't have their badge on, as
   it would flash the lights reflection to the video camera. I also like
   that they wired the clip on microphones under your shirt so you would
   see the wires nor pull out the microphone accidentally. Very
   professional.


 
 ___
 Nanog-futures mailing list
 Nanog-futures@nanog.org
 http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
 


___
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures