RE: [nant-dev] Bug

2005-03-14 Thread Gert Driesen


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
 Behalf Of Geoff Horsey
 Sent: maandag 14 maart 2005 20:32
 To: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
 Subject: [nant-dev] Bug
 
 System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not
 set to an instance of an object.
at NAnt.VSNet.Reference..ctor(Solution solution,
 ProjectSettings ps, XmlElement elemReference,
 SolutionTask solutionTask, String outputDir)
at NAnt.VSNet.Project.Load(Solution sln, String
 projectPath)
at NAnt.VSNet.ProjectFactory.LoadProject(Solution
 sln, SolutionTask slnTask,TempFileCollection tfc,
 String outputDir, String path)
at NAnt.VSNet.Solution.LoadProjects()
at NAnt.VSNet.Solution..ctor(String
 solutionFileName, ArrayList additionalProjects,
 ArrayList referenceProjects, TempFileCollection tfc,
 SolutionTask solutionTask, WebMapCollection
 webMappings, FileSet excludesProjects, String
 outputDir)
 
at NAnt.VSNet.Tasks.SolutionTask.ExecuteTask()
at NAnt.Core.Task.Execute()
at
 NAnt.Core.Project.InitializeProjectDocument(XmlDocument
 doc)
at NAnt.Core.Project.Execute()
at NAnt.Core.Project.Run()
 
 Please send bug report to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This issue was fixed after the 0.84 release. Try using NAnt 0.85 RC2 or a
recent nightly build (http://nant.sourceforge.net/nightly/latest).

Gert



---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest  candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595alloc_id=14396op=click
___
nant-developers mailing list
nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers


RE: [nant-dev] Redesigned homepage

2005-03-14 Thread Gert Driesen
 

 -Original Message-
 From: Troy Laurin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: dinsdag 15 maart 2005 4:03
 To: Gert Driesen
 Cc: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
 Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Redesigned homepage
 
 Hi Gert, all,
 
 Responses inline.
 
   ... Also, it's currently impossible to tell which entries are
   links and which are just holders for child items, 
 without waving the
   mouse over each item... eg, Documentation and Contributing aren't
   links, but Releases and Nightly Builds are.  Modifying 
 the styles so
   links are more obvious is definitely (again imho) a must.
  
  Feel free to provide a proposal. GUI/Web design isn't 
 really my cup of tea.
 
 I won't manage time tonight, but I'll try to send something through
 tomorrow night.

No hurry.

   Also, the default size of the menu on the left is taller 
 than the page
   itself!  If using a similar menu system to this, it might be worth
   collapsing the user manual section by default, and also to combine
   Releases and Nightly Builds into a single Downloads section, also
   collapsed by default.
  
  The Release and Nightly Builds section do not just provide 
 downloads. They
  also contain links to the docs matching each release/nightly build.
  
   For the non-javascript people, the Downloads
   link would replace the Releases and Nightly Builds links, 
 since they
   go to the same page anyway.
  
  That was a mistake in my proposal. The Nightly Builds item 
 should have no
  link, or have the same links as the Archive section.
 
 Does the tree script support adding Collapse all and Expand all
 links to the bottom of the menu?  Useful for those times you just want
 to get it out of the way, or when you want to see everything so you
 can find what you're after... it also tends to make the default
 state (expanded, partially expanded, etc) of the menu less critical.

Just added them (see attached version).

 
   Then again, it might just be an excuse to
   put more content in the front page.
  
  Guess I'd prefer a good menu and more content ;-)
 
 Doesn't really sound like a bad thing, does it? :-)
 
   As a first cut, it certainly feels more functional (and 
 professional
   :-) than the current page.  I think it's certainly worth 
 ironing out
   any issues and updating the site with a trendy new look.
  
  For now, I'm only updating the home page itself. We'll need 
 to look into
  modifying the other pages, while keeping it maintainable.
 
 Definitely get it right before making changes everywhere :-)
 
 Does sourceforge support server-side includes?  That could be a simple
 way to get a common menu (and even the header) into every page in a
 consistent fashion.

Not sure, but most of our documentation is auto-generated, so we might be
able to use that.

 
 Alternatively, (and I'm reluctant to suggest this, mostly because of
 the people expected to access the site, as Orion suggested) you could
 modify the site to use a frameset... the menu could be moved into the
 left-hand frame, with the option for the header to be in a top frame,
 or in-line with the content.
 The benefits are that navigation is consistent for all pages, plus the
 download size for each page is much smaller, and the menu remembers
 its own state between pages (since it is never reloaded).  The
 drawbacks are of course that it is very hard to make a frames-based
 website friendly to non-frames-enabled browsers, without providing a
 second copy of the website that doesn't use frames... but does mean
 twice the website maintenance!

I'd like to avoid frames (at almost all cost).

 At the same time as I look at the styles for the menu links, I'll look
 at the site web, and see how inter-linked everything is, see how
 feasible it might be to create a site that's made for frames but still
 usable without frames... unless you (or Nant's users) really don't
 _want_ frames, of course.
 
   Let me know if you want a hand with the script behind the 
 hierarchical
   menus, I'm not exactly a web designer, but I've done my dash with
   javascript (including *shiver* cross-browser support) and would be
   willing to look at any issues.
  
  Have a look at the update I sent as reply to Orion's feedback.
 
 Excellent!  Works consistently under IE and FireFox... I don't use any
 other browsers, so can't say how it works in anything else :-)

Do you think I should bring it online in its current state (see attachment)
?

Gert


NAnt Home.zap
Description: Binary data