Re: [nant-dev] NAnt delay on Mono/Linux Update (Aka: NDoc Discussion)
Hi, On Mar 10, 2010, at 7:20 AM, Charles Chan wrote: > Hello, > > I have also used Doxygen (mainly for C/C++), so here are a few > additional comments for consideration: > > 1) Does Doxygen share the same markup style as NDoc/3? Would > updating the markup to a new format create a large effort? Based on memory, Doxygen uses almost all of the same tags as NDoc. There are a few that it doesn't though. It's on their website. > > 2) Does the 'generate doc' task also create .CHM files? I know > Doxygen also relies on HTML Help Workshop to make .CHM -- which we > probably want to get away from as a dependency. > It can, but it can be turned off as an option. > Regards, > Charles > > --- On Wed, 3/10/10, Leszek Ciesielski wrote: > >> From: Leszek Ciesielski >> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] NAnt delay on Mono/Linux Update (Aka: NDoc >> Discussion) >> To: "Ryan Boggs" , "Charles Chan" >> > >, nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net >> Received: Wednesday, March 10, 2010, 7:51 AM >> Last time I checked, DOxygen beat all >> other documentation generators >> hands down. It had the documentation ready in 1/10 of the >> time the >> other programs needed (for a code base larger than >> NAnt). It does, >> however, look distinctly "doxygenic", which may be a >> show-stopper for >> some people. On the other hand, this output is fully >> skinable, it's >> just html after all. > > > > __ > Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr! > > http://www.flickr.com/gift/ > > --- > --- > --- > - > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > ___ > nant-developers mailing list > nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers -- Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ nant-developers mailing list nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
Re: [nant-dev] NAnt delay on Mono/Linux Update (Aka: NDoc Discussion)
Hi, On Mar 10, 2010, at 7:26 AM, Leszek Ciesielski wrote: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Charles Chan > wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I have also used Doxygen (mainly for C/C++), so here are a few >> additional comments for consideration: >> >> 1) Does Doxygen share the same markup style as NDoc/3? Would >> updating the markup to a new format create a large effort? > > Doxygen can parse standard C# xml documentation tags. > Yes, it can. But I don't think it can do vb.net yet. >> >> 2) Does the 'generate doc' task also create .CHM files? I know >> Doxygen also relies on HTML Help Workshop to make .CHM -- which we >> probably want to get away from as a dependency. >> >> Regards, >> Charles >> >> --- On Wed, 3/10/10, Leszek Ciesielski wrote: >> >>> From: Leszek Ciesielski >>> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] NAnt delay on Mono/Linux Update (Aka: NDoc >>> Discussion) >>> To: "Ryan Boggs" , "Charles Chan" >>> >> >, nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net >>> Received: Wednesday, March 10, 2010, 7:51 AM >>> Last time I checked, DOxygen beat all >>> other documentation generators >>> hands down. It had the documentation ready in 1/10 of the >>> time the >>> other programs needed (for a code base larger than >>> NAnt). It does, >>> however, look distinctly "doxygenic", which may be a >>> show-stopper for >>> some people. On the other hand, this output is fully >>> skinable, it's >>> just html after all. >> >> >> >> __ >> Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr! >> >> http://www.flickr.com/gift/ >> >> --- >> --- >> --- >> - >> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval >> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs >> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. >> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev >> ___ >> nant-developers mailing list >> nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers >> > > --- > --- > --- > - > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > ___ > nant-developers mailing list > nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers -- Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ nant-developers mailing list nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
Re: [nant-dev] NAnt delay on Mono/Linux Update (Aka: NDoc Discussion)
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Charles Chan wrote: > Hello, > > I have also used Doxygen (mainly for C/C++), so here are a few additional > comments for consideration: > > 1) Does Doxygen share the same markup style as NDoc/3? Would updating the > markup to a new format create a large effort? Doxygen can parse standard C# xml documentation tags. > > 2) Does the 'generate doc' task also create .CHM files? I know Doxygen also > relies on HTML Help Workshop to make .CHM -- which we probably want to get > away from as a dependency. > > Regards, > Charles > > --- On Wed, 3/10/10, Leszek Ciesielski wrote: > >> From: Leszek Ciesielski >> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] NAnt delay on Mono/Linux Update (Aka: NDoc >> Discussion) >> To: "Ryan Boggs" , "Charles Chan" >> , nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net >> Received: Wednesday, March 10, 2010, 7:51 AM >> Last time I checked, DOxygen beat all >> other documentation generators >> hands down. It had the documentation ready in 1/10 of the >> time the >> other programs needed (for a code base larger than >> NAnt). It does, >> however, look distinctly "doxygenic", which may be a >> show-stopper for >> some people. On the other hand, this output is fully >> skinable, it's >> just html after all. > > > __ > Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr! > > http://www.flickr.com/gift/ > > -- > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > ___ > nant-developers mailing list > nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers > -- Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ nant-developers mailing list nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
Re: [nant-dev] NAnt delay on Mono/Linux Update (Aka: NDoc Discussion)
Hello, I have also used Doxygen (mainly for C/C++), so here are a few additional comments for consideration: 1) Does Doxygen share the same markup style as NDoc/3? Would updating the markup to a new format create a large effort? 2) Does the 'generate doc' task also create .CHM files? I know Doxygen also relies on HTML Help Workshop to make .CHM -- which we probably want to get away from as a dependency. Regards, Charles --- On Wed, 3/10/10, Leszek Ciesielski wrote: > From: Leszek Ciesielski > Subject: Re: [nant-dev] NAnt delay on Mono/Linux Update (Aka: NDoc Discussion) > To: "Ryan Boggs" , "Charles Chan" > , nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > Received: Wednesday, March 10, 2010, 7:51 AM > Last time I checked, DOxygen beat all > other documentation generators > hands down. It had the documentation ready in 1/10 of the > time the > other programs needed (for a code base larger than > NAnt). It does, > however, look distinctly "doxygenic", which may be a > show-stopper for > some people. On the other hand, this output is fully > skinable, it's > just html after all. __ Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr! http://www.flickr.com/gift/ -- Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ nant-developers mailing list nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
Re: [nant-dev] Problem running NAnt tests.
Hello Gert, I am using: nmake -f Makefile.nmake run-test Please give it a tried. If you can't repeat the problem, I can email you the output as a log file. Regards, Charles --- On Wed, 3/10/10, Gert Driesen wrote: > From: Gert Driesen > Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Problem running NAnt tests. > To: cchan...@users.sourceforge.net, nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > Received: Wednesday, March 10, 2010, 8:27 AM > Hey Charles, > > Are you running the tests using the "test" target, or using > the NUnit GUI ? > It's been a while since I ran the tests, but last time they > were just fine. > Can you send me an example of this "mal-formatted" output > ? > > Gert > > -- > From: "Charles Chan" > Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 6:24 AM > To: > Subject: [nant-dev] Problem running NAnt tests. > > > Hello, > > > > I have been trying to run the tests in the past few > days, and I see the output is mal-formatted. The line breaks > are not there and it's hard to see which tests are failing > (or the stacktrace). > > > > Can anyone confirm if they are seeing the following > when they run the tests? > > 1) formatting problem > > 2) some failing tests > > > > Just want to make sure it's not a simple mistake on my > part. > > > > Regards, > > Charles > > > > > > > > > __ > > The new Internet Explorer® 8 - Faster, safer, > easier. Optimized for Yahoo! Get it Now for > Free! at http://downloads.yahoo.com/ca/internetexplorer/ > > > > > -- > > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed > compiling, find bugs > > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel > performance. > > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during > beta. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > > ___ > > nant-developers mailing list > > nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers > > > > > > __ Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail. Click on Options in Mail and switch to New Mail today or register for free at http://mail.yahoo.ca -- Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ nant-developers mailing list nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
Re: [nant-dev] Problem running NAnt tests.
Hey Charles, Are you running the tests using the "test" target, or using the NUnit GUI ? It's been a while since I ran the tests, but last time they were just fine. Can you send me an example of this "mal-formatted" output ? Gert -- From: "Charles Chan" Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 6:24 AM To: Subject: [nant-dev] Problem running NAnt tests. > Hello, > > I have been trying to run the tests in the past few days, and I see the > output is mal-formatted. The line breaks are not there and it's hard to > see which tests are failing (or the stacktrace). > > Can anyone confirm if they are seeing the following when they run the > tests? > 1) formatting problem > 2) some failing tests > > Just want to make sure it's not a simple mistake on my part. > > Regards, > Charles > > > > __ > The new Internet Explorer® 8 - Faster, safer, easier. Optimized for > Yahoo! Get it Now for Free! at > http://downloads.yahoo.com/ca/internetexplorer/ > > -- > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > ___ > nant-developers mailing list > nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers > > -- Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ nant-developers mailing list nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
