And now:Ish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 14:26:48 -0600
>From: gina chiala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Peltier-letters needed
>X-Uns*bscribe: send a blank message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>12/14/98
>Dear Leonard Peltier supporters,
>
>Leonard wants to urge you to give one last effort to the "Singleton
>Decision".  If you have not written to the 10th circuit yet, please do so
>now!  If you have please urge your friends to do the same.  They are
>deciding on it now and we should give one last show of support.  Here is
>an explanation and sample letter.  Thank you!
>
>LPDC-staff
>
>Dear Leonard Peltier Supporters,                                               9/11/98
>
>Last July the 10th circuit court of appeals upheld a bribery statute 201
>(c)(2) which prohibits giving, offering, or promising anything of value to
>a witness for or because of his testimony.  Prior to this decision, this
>statute was not applied to the government despite the fact that the statute
>in no way discludes them.  And, therefore, it has become common practice
>for prosecutors to offer suspects immunity or other valuables in exchange
>for testifying against a "would be" co-defendant. This can render the
>testimony of such a person to be unreliable since such a person may be and
>often are, willing to say anything to avoid prosecution.   
>
>To make a long story short…  As you know we are working on many levels to
>try to gain freedom for Leonard Peltier, some of which we can not go into
>detail about.  Leonard asks that we start a letter writing campaign to the
>10th circuit and encourage them to uphold their decision once again.  The
>fact that prosecutors have been told that they must act under the same
>rules that the defense must act under has enraged many.  (prosecutors of
>course)  The 10th circuit will be deciding again on this issue in November.
> It is very important that we bury them with letters of support.  If we do
>not, they will surely overturn their prior decision. Remember, the
>government has endless resources and they are campaigning the 10th circuit
>also. 
>
>This is important!  Leonard says, "please trust me on this one, there are
>certain things we can not currently disclose, but please trust me."  We
>want letters from all over, but we especially need people who live in 10th
>circuit states to work hard on this one.  Below is a sample letter.  Thank
>you!!!!
>
>Gina Chiala
>The Leonard Peltier Defense Committee
>
>
>Dear Honorable Tenth Circuit Justices,
>
>As a citizen and a voter of the U.S. and the district of the 10th circuit,
>I would like to express my praise for your recent decision to uphold 201
>(c) (2) after hearing the Singleton case.  I understand that you will have
>to decide on it again this November and I want to urge you, as a concerned
>citizen, to uphold your first decision. It is my belief that such a
>decision will help to restore many citizens' faith in the U.S. justice
>system.  Because you have concluded that this statute applies equally to
>the government as it so clearly states, the scales of justice will now be
>more balanced.  When 201 (c) (2) is not applied and the government is
>allowed to offer leniency or anything else of value to a co-defendant or

>witness it truly makes his or her testimony unreliable therefore offering
>an upper hand to the prosecution that the defense does not have access to. 
>This thoroughly violates a defendant's Constitutional Right to due process.
>
>Of course, my concern is not only for the defendants who may be prosecuted
>unfairly, but also for the victims of those who are granted leniency or
>immunity for testifying.  Someone such as "Sammy the Bull" surely did not
>deserve to be rewarded for murdering nineteen people.  I find such deals to
>be appalling.    
>
>Because this statute has not been applied to the government for so long, I
>am concerned for many who have been convicted because of this method and
>have therefore not received due process.  I urge you to grant this recent
>motion to be made retroactive on their behalf and on the behalf of our
>Constitution so that these cases have a chance to be heard again to ensure
>that justice was given.  Thank you again for your perseverance to seek true
>justice. 
>
>Sincerely yours,
>
>
>Your name here
>
>
>10th circuit court of appeals:
>
>10th circuit states include: Kansas, Oklahoma, Colorado, New Mexico,
>Wyoming, and Utah—but all are encouraged to write.
>
>Byron White US court house
>1823 Stout St.
>Denver, CO 80257
>
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>To subscribe,   send a blank message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To unsubscribe, send a blank message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To change your email address, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   with your old address in the Subject: line
> 
          &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is
distributed without profit or payment
...http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
          &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
Tsonkwadiyonrat (We are ONE Spirit)
Unenh onhwa' Awayaton

http://www.tdi.net/ishgooda/       
                     `"`    `"`    `"`  `"`    `"`    `"`
                             

Reply via email to