Re: JEP 110: leeway for API changes?
Hi, API changes are still possible. Sorry, I haven't gotten around to replying to all feedback, but I will do this week. Thanks Michael On 19/05/16 15:02, Simone Bordet wrote: Hi, On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Anthony Vanelverdinghe wrote: Hi With the JDK's "Feature Complete" milestone coming up next week: how much leeway is there still for API changes? I've made API suggestions (a.o. in [1]), ranging from changing HttpResponse.multiProcessor::onStart's return type (from BiFunction<..., Boolean> to BiPredicate), to building on the j.u.c.Flow API & eliminating HttpResponse.MultiProcessor. So I'm wondering what's still on on the table for JEP 110 w.r.t. API changes? I second that. I also made API change proposals, but no feedback.
Re: JEP 110: leeway for API changes?
Hi, On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Anthony Vanelverdinghe wrote: > Hi > > With the JDK's "Feature Complete" milestone coming up next week: how much > leeway is there still for API changes? I've made API suggestions (a.o. in > [1]), ranging from changing HttpResponse.multiProcessor::onStart's return > type (from BiFunction<..., Boolean> to BiPredicate), to building on the > j.u.c.Flow API & eliminating HttpResponse.MultiProcessor. So I'm wondering > what's still on on the table for JEP 110 w.r.t. API changes? I second that. I also made API change proposals, but no feedback. -- Simone Bordet http://bordet.blogspot.com --- Finally, no matter how good the architecture and design are, to deliver bug-free software with optimal performance and reliability, the implementation technique must be flawless. Victoria Livschitz
JEP 110: leeway for API changes?
Hi With the JDK's "Feature Complete" milestone coming up next week: how much leeway is there still for API changes? I've made API suggestions (a.o. in [1]), ranging from changing HttpResponse.multiProcessor::onStart's return type (from BiFunction<..., Boolean> to BiPredicate), to building on the j.u.c.Flow API & eliminating HttpResponse.MultiProcessor. So I'm wondering what's still on on the table for JEP 110 w.r.t. API changes? [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2016-March/009608.html Kind regards, Anthony