Re: RFR: 8253100: Fix "no comment" warnings in java.base/java.net [v2]

2021-02-26 Thread Conor Cleary
On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 10:44:04 GMT, Rahul Yadav  wrote:

>> Daniel Fuchs has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
>> commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   Fixed comment
>
> LGTM!

Ran the changes through `-Xdoclint:missing` and there were no warnings 
outputted so looks good!

-

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2715


Re: RFR: 8253100: Fix "no comment" warnings in java.base/java.net [v2]

2021-02-26 Thread Rahul Yadav
On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 11:05:07 GMT, Daniel Fuchs  wrote:

>> Hi, 
>> 
>> Please find here a change that fixes "no comment" warnings generated by 
>> `javadoc -Xdoclint` for `java.base/java.net`
>
> Daniel Fuchs has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Fixed comment

LGTM!

-

Marked as reviewed by ryadav (Committer).

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2715


Re: RFR: 8253100: Fix "no comment" warnings in java.base/java.net [v2]

2021-02-25 Thread Daniel Fuchs
On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:59:07 GMT, Naoto Sato  wrote:

>> Daniel Fuchs has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
>> commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   Fixed comment
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/net/InetSocketAddress.java line 326:
> 
>> 324: /**
>> 325:  * Throws {@code InvalidObjectException}, always.
>> 326:  * @throws ObjectStreamException always
> 
> Is this correct? Seems to contradict each other.

`InvalidObjectException` is a subclass of `ObjectStreamException`.

-

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2715


Re: RFR: 8253100: Fix "no comment" warnings in java.base/java.net [v2]

2021-02-25 Thread Naoto Sato
On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 11:05:07 GMT, Daniel Fuchs  wrote:

>> Hi, 
>> 
>> Please find here a change that fixes "no comment" warnings generated by 
>> `javadoc -Xdoclint` for `java.base/java.net`
>
> Daniel Fuchs has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Fixed comment

src/java.base/share/classes/java/net/InetSocketAddress.java line 326:

> 324: /**
> 325:  * Throws {@code InvalidObjectException}, always.
> 326:  * @throws ObjectStreamException always

Is this correct? Seems to contradict each other.

-

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2715


Re: RFR: 8253100: Fix "no comment" warnings in java.base/java.net [v2]

2021-02-25 Thread Daniel Fuchs
> Hi, 
> 
> Please find here a change that fixes "no comment" warnings generated by 
> `javadoc -Xdoclint` for `java.base/java.net`

Daniel Fuchs has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
commit since the last revision:

  Fixed comment

-

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2715/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2715/files/2f039c6e..ff11d016

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=2715&range=01
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=2715&range=00-01

  Stats: 1 line in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 1 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2715.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/2715/head:pull/2715

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2715


Re: RFR: 8253100: Fix "no comment" warnings in java.base/java.net [v2]

2021-02-25 Thread Daniel Fuchs
On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 09:24:50 GMT, Patrick Concannon  
wrote:

>> Daniel Fuchs has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
>> commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   Fixed comment
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/net/HttpRetryException.java line 48:
> 
>> 46: 
>> 47: /**
>> 48:  * the URL to be redirected to.
> 
> Should this begin with a capital 't' like the previous comment above?

Good catch. Fixed.

-

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2715