Re: RC6 (and later)
I am not on the Release Team or involved except as a user --- however, I greatly approve of _RC6 release, AND the additional time it will take for people to beat on it before it becomes the 10.0 release. We have more hardware to properly work on now (just for starters, all RPi up to 4 at least), etc, and many new chips for old arches (e.g. N200 for amd64) so when you look at the growing complexity, it makes sense to keep testing by as large a group as possible before 'release'. After all, when it comes right down to it, the Release is just a Number. Who cares what the number is -- it is the set of Stable Features that are of interest. I would encourage all to d/l _RC6 and bang on it, like I'm doing. Thanks, Mike On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 7:30 AM Rose wrote: > Because, that's too god damned many... > > RELEASE NOW > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 9:19 AM Vitaly Shevtsov > wrote: > > > Because they can. Why not? > > > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 3:17 PM Todd Gruhn wrote: > > > > > > There is now NetBSD-10.0RC6 -- I don't ever recall seeing RC5 or later
Re: RC6 (and later)
Oh, thanks. Maybe a prob I have will get fixed or sped-up... On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 8:28 PM John McCue wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 03:12:03PM +, Todd Gruhn wrote: > >" I am fine with this :) I have a very minor video issue with > > X on 10 and each RC the issue gets better. (PR was created) " > > > >What video card? nVideo? > > No, it is i915, from dmsg: > > i915drmkms0 at pci0 dev 2 function 0: Intel Sandy Bridge > (mobile) GT2+ Integrated Graphics Device (rev. 0x09) > > This is the PR I created: > > https://gnats.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-single.pl?number=57387 > > but I am toying with creating a new one and asking that one > to be closed. Also the issue happens on the Laptop screen. > > But with RC5, the corruption will go away once the heavy > process ends. So I will see if the issue occurs on RC6 > and maybe create a new PR if it does. > > John > > > > >On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 5:33?PM John McCue wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 09:16:38AM +, Todd Gruhn wrote: > >> >There is now NetBSD-10.0RC6 -- I don't ever recall seeing RC5 or later. > >> > > >> >Why so many *RC created this time? > >> > >> I am fine with this :) I have a very minor video issue with > >> X on 10 and each RC the issue gets better. (PR was created) > >> > >> With RC5, the issue hardly ever occurs, hoping with RC6 maybe > >> it is gone :) > >> > >> This is on a Thinkpad T420. > > -- > [t]csh(1) - "An elegant shell, for a more... civilized age." > - Paraphrasing Star Wars
Re: RC6 (and later)
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 03:12:03PM +, Todd Gruhn wrote: " I am fine with this :) I have a very minor video issue with X on 10 and each RC the issue gets better. (PR was created) " What video card? nVideo? No, it is i915, from dmsg: i915drmkms0 at pci0 dev 2 function 0: Intel Sandy Bridge (mobile) GT2+ Integrated Graphics Device (rev. 0x09) This is the PR I created: https://gnats.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-single.pl?number=57387 but I am toying with creating a new one and asking that one to be closed. Also the issue happens on the Laptop screen. But with RC5, the corruption will go away once the heavy process ends. So I will see if the issue occurs on RC6 and maybe create a new PR if it does. John On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 5:33?PM John McCue wrote: On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 09:16:38AM +, Todd Gruhn wrote: >There is now NetBSD-10.0RC6 -- I don't ever recall seeing RC5 or later. > >Why so many *RC created this time? I am fine with this :) I have a very minor video issue with X on 10 and each RC the issue gets better. (PR was created) With RC5, the issue hardly ever occurs, hoping with RC6 maybe it is gone :) This is on a Thinkpad T420. -- [t]csh(1) - "An elegant shell, for a more... civilized age." - Paraphrasing Star Wars
Re: RC6 (and later)
" I am fine with this :) I have a very minor video issue with X on 10 and each RC the issue gets better. (PR was created) " What video card? nVideo? On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 5:33 PM John McCue wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 09:16:38AM +, Todd Gruhn wrote: > >There is now NetBSD-10.0RC6 -- I don't ever recall seeing RC5 or later. > > > >Why so many *RC created this time? > > I am fine with this :) I have a very minor video issue with > X on 10 and each RC the issue gets better. (PR was created) > > With RC5, the issue hardly ever occurs, hoping with RC6 maybe > it is gone :) > > This is on a Thinkpad T420. > > -- > [t]csh(1) - "An elegant shell, for a more... civilized age." > - Paraphrasing Star Wars
Re: RC6 (and later)
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 09:16:38AM +, Todd Gruhn wrote: There is now NetBSD-10.0RC6 -- I don't ever recall seeing RC5 or later. Why so many *RC created this time? I am fine with this :) I have a very minor video issue with X on 10 and each RC the issue gets better. (PR was created) With RC5, the issue hardly ever occurs, hoping with RC6 maybe it is gone :) This is on a Thinkpad T420. -- [t]csh(1) - "An elegant shell, for a more... civilized age." - Paraphrasing Star Wars
Re: RC6 (and later)
Because, that's too god damned many... RELEASE NOW On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 9:19 AM Vitaly Shevtsov wrote: > Because they can. Why not? > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 3:17 PM Todd Gruhn wrote: > > > > There is now NetBSD-10.0RC6 -- I don't ever recall seeing RC5 or later
Re: RC6 (and later)
That is Effort toward Perfection On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 9:17 AM Todd Gruhn wrote: > There is now NetBSD-10.0RC6 -- I don't ever recall seeing RC5 or later. > > Why so many *RC created this time? > -- Justin Allen Parrott The Renegade of Fairfax, Va United, We are None. Divided, We are One.
Re: RC6 (and later)
Because they can. Why not? On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 3:17 PM Todd Gruhn wrote: > > There is now NetBSD-10.0RC6 -- I don't ever recall seeing RC5 or later. > > Why so many *RC created this time?
