Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH 15/16] ipw2200: switch to the new ipw2200-fw-3.0 image format]

2006-03-14 Thread James Ketrenos 
Sam Leffler wrote:

 I don't see how to verify the image being loaded is appropriate for
 the operating mode.  The old fw header had a mode field (0 bss, 1
 ibss, 2 monitor) but the new one does not--unless it's encoded in the
 version field?

The filename alone indicates the mode with the new images.

James

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Fwd: Re: [PATCH 15/16] ipw2200: switch to the new ipw2200-fw-3.0 image format]

2006-03-13 Thread Sam Leffler 
 ---BeginMessage---
I don't see how to verify the image being loaded is appropriate for the 
operating mode.  The old fw header had a mode field (0 bss, 1 ibss, 2 
monitor) but the new one does not--unless it's encoded in the version field?


Sam

---End Message---