Re: [PATCH] Revert "netpoll: Fix extra refcount release in netpoll_cleanup()"

2016-04-06 Thread Bart Van Assche

On 04/05/16 13:58, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:

This reverts commit 543e3a8da5a4c453e992d5351ef405d5e32f27d7.

Direct callers of __netpoll_setup() depend on it to set np->dev,
so we can't simply move that assignment up to netpoll_stup().

Reported-by: Bart Van Assche 
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas 


Tested-by: Bart Van Assche 

Thanks!

Bart.


Re: [PATCH] Revert "netpoll: Fix extra refcount release in netpoll_cleanup()"

2016-04-06 Thread Neil Horman
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 03:58:22PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> This reverts commit 543e3a8da5a4c453e992d5351ef405d5e32f27d7.
> 
> Direct callers of __netpoll_setup() depend on it to set np->dev,
> so we can't simply move that assignment up to netpoll_stup().
> 
> Reported-by: Bart Van Assche 
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas 
> ---
>  net/core/netpoll.c |3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/core/netpoll.c b/net/core/netpoll.c
> index a57bd17..94acfc8 100644
> --- a/net/core/netpoll.c
> +++ b/net/core/netpoll.c
> @@ -603,6 +603,7 @@ int __netpoll_setup(struct netpoll *np, struct net_device 
> *ndev)
>   const struct net_device_ops *ops;
>   int err;
>  
> + np->dev = ndev;
>   strlcpy(np->dev_name, ndev->name, IFNAMSIZ);
>   INIT_WORK(&np->cleanup_work, netpoll_async_cleanup);
>  
> @@ -669,7 +670,6 @@ int netpoll_setup(struct netpoll *np)
>   goto unlock;
>   }
>   dev_hold(ndev);
> - np->dev = ndev;
>  
>   if (netdev_master_upper_dev_get(ndev)) {
>   np_err(np, "%s is a slave device, aborting\n", np->dev_name);
> @@ -770,7 +770,6 @@ int netpoll_setup(struct netpoll *np)
>   return 0;
>  
>  put:
> - np->dev = NULL;
>   dev_put(ndev);
>  unlock:
>   rtnl_unlock();
> 
Acked-by: Neil Horman 



[PATCH] Revert "netpoll: Fix extra refcount release in netpoll_cleanup()"

2016-04-05 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
This reverts commit 543e3a8da5a4c453e992d5351ef405d5e32f27d7.

Direct callers of __netpoll_setup() depend on it to set np->dev,
so we can't simply move that assignment up to netpoll_stup().

Reported-by: Bart Van Assche 
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas 
---
 net/core/netpoll.c |3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/netpoll.c b/net/core/netpoll.c
index a57bd17..94acfc8 100644
--- a/net/core/netpoll.c
+++ b/net/core/netpoll.c
@@ -603,6 +603,7 @@ int __netpoll_setup(struct netpoll *np, struct net_device 
*ndev)
const struct net_device_ops *ops;
int err;
 
+   np->dev = ndev;
strlcpy(np->dev_name, ndev->name, IFNAMSIZ);
INIT_WORK(&np->cleanup_work, netpoll_async_cleanup);
 
@@ -669,7 +670,6 @@ int netpoll_setup(struct netpoll *np)
goto unlock;
}
dev_hold(ndev);
-   np->dev = ndev;
 
if (netdev_master_upper_dev_get(ndev)) {
np_err(np, "%s is a slave device, aborting\n", np->dev_name);
@@ -770,7 +770,6 @@ int netpoll_setup(struct netpoll *np)
return 0;
 
 put:
-   np->dev = NULL;
dev_put(ndev);
 unlock:
rtnl_unlock();