Re: [PATCH] net: Fix vti use case with oif in dst lookups

2015-09-17 Thread David Miller
From: David Ahern 
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 15:10:50 -0700

> Steffen reported that the recent change to add oif to dst lookups breaks
> the VTI use case. The problem is that with the oif set in the flow struct
> the comparison to the nh_oif is triggered. Fix by splitting the
> FLOWI_FLAG_VRFSRC into 2 flags -- one that triggers the vrf device cache
> bypass (FLOWI_FLAG_VRFSRC) and another telling the lookup to not compare
> nh oif (FLOWI_FLAG_SKIP_NH_OIF).
> 
> Fixes: 42a7b32b73d6 ("xfrm: Add oif to dst lookups")
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Ahern 

Applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH] net: Fix vti use case with oif in dst lookups

2015-09-16 Thread Steffen Klassert
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 03:10:50PM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> Steffen reported that the recent change to add oif to dst lookups breaks
> the VTI use case. The problem is that with the oif set in the flow struct
> the comparison to the nh_oif is triggered. Fix by splitting the
> FLOWI_FLAG_VRFSRC into 2 flags -- one that triggers the vrf device cache
> bypass (FLOWI_FLAG_VRFSRC) and another telling the lookup to not compare
> nh oif (FLOWI_FLAG_SKIP_NH_OIF).
> 
> Fixes: 42a7b32b73d6 ("xfrm: Add oif to dst lookups")
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Ahern 

This works, thanks a lot for the quick fix!

> ---
> IPv6 does not show this problem for me. So no change is added for IPv6.
> If your mileage varies let me know and I'll take another look.

IPv6 works just fine as it is, so no change needed.

Acked-by: Steffen Klassert 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[PATCH] net: Fix vti use case with oif in dst lookups

2015-09-15 Thread David Ahern
Steffen reported that the recent change to add oif to dst lookups breaks
the VTI use case. The problem is that with the oif set in the flow struct
the comparison to the nh_oif is triggered. Fix by splitting the
FLOWI_FLAG_VRFSRC into 2 flags -- one that triggers the vrf device cache
bypass (FLOWI_FLAG_VRFSRC) and another telling the lookup to not compare
nh oif (FLOWI_FLAG_SKIP_NH_OIF).

Fixes: 42a7b32b73d6 ("xfrm: Add oif to dst lookups")

Signed-off-by: David Ahern 
---
IPv6 does not show this problem for me. So no change is added for IPv6.
If your mileage varies let me know and I'll take another look.

 drivers/net/vrf.c   | 3 ++-
 include/net/flow.h  | 1 +
 include/net/route.h | 2 +-
 net/ipv4/fib_trie.c | 2 +-
 net/ipv4/udp.c  | 3 ++-
 net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c | 2 ++
 6 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/vrf.c b/drivers/net/vrf.c
index e7094fbd7568..488c6f50df73 100644
--- a/drivers/net/vrf.c
+++ b/drivers/net/vrf.c
@@ -193,7 +193,8 @@ static netdev_tx_t vrf_process_v4_outbound(struct sk_buff 
*skb,
.flowi4_oif = vrf_dev->ifindex,
.flowi4_iif = LOOPBACK_IFINDEX,
.flowi4_tos = RT_TOS(ip4h->tos),
-   .flowi4_flags = FLOWI_FLAG_ANYSRC | FLOWI_FLAG_VRFSRC,
+   .flowi4_flags = FLOWI_FLAG_ANYSRC | FLOWI_FLAG_VRFSRC |
+   FLOWI_FLAG_SKIP_NH_OIF,
.daddr = ip4h->daddr,
};
 
diff --git a/include/net/flow.h b/include/net/flow.h
index acd6a096250e..9b85db85f13c 100644
--- a/include/net/flow.h
+++ b/include/net/flow.h
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ struct flowi_common {
 #define FLOWI_FLAG_ANYSRC  0x01
 #define FLOWI_FLAG_KNOWN_NH0x02
 #define FLOWI_FLAG_VRFSRC  0x04
+#define FLOWI_FLAG_SKIP_NH_OIF 0x08
__u32   flowic_secid;
struct flowi_tunnel flowic_tun_key;
 };
diff --git a/include/net/route.h b/include/net/route.h
index cc61cb95f059..f46af256880c 100644
--- a/include/net/route.h
+++ b/include/net/route.h
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ static inline void ip_route_connect_init(struct flowi4 
*fl4, __be32 dst, __be32
flow_flags |= FLOWI_FLAG_ANYSRC;
 
if (netif_index_is_vrf(sock_net(sk), oif))
-   flow_flags |= FLOWI_FLAG_VRFSRC;
+   flow_flags |= FLOWI_FLAG_VRFSRC | FLOWI_FLAG_SKIP_NH_OIF;
 
flowi4_init_output(fl4, oif, sk->sk_mark, tos, RT_SCOPE_UNIVERSE,
   protocol, flow_flags, dst, src, dport, sport);
diff --git a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
index 26d6ffb6d23c..6c2af797f2f9 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
@@ -1426,7 +1426,7 @@ int fib_table_lookup(struct fib_table *tb, const struct 
flowi4 *flp,
nh->nh_flags & RTNH_F_LINKDOWN &&
!(fib_flags & FIB_LOOKUP_IGNORE_LINKSTATE))
continue;
-   if (!(flp->flowi4_flags & FLOWI_FLAG_VRFSRC)) {
+   if (!(flp->flowi4_flags & FLOWI_FLAG_SKIP_NH_OIF)) {
if (flp->flowi4_oif &&
flp->flowi4_oif != nh->nh_oif)
continue;
diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
index c0a15e7f359f..f7d1d5e19e95 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
@@ -1024,7 +1024,8 @@ int udp_sendmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, 
size_t len)
if (netif_index_is_vrf(net, ipc.oif)) {
flowi4_init_output(fl4, ipc.oif, sk->sk_mark, tos,
   RT_SCOPE_UNIVERSE, sk->sk_protocol,
-  (flow_flags | FLOWI_FLAG_VRFSRC),
+  (flow_flags | FLOWI_FLAG_VRFSRC |
+   FLOWI_FLAG_SKIP_NH_OIF),
   faddr, saddr, dport,
   inet->inet_sport);
 
diff --git a/net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c b/net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c
index bb919b28619f..c10a9ee68433 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c
@@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ static struct dst_entry *__xfrm4_dst_lookup(struct net *net, 
struct flowi4 *fl4,
if (saddr)
fl4->saddr = saddr->a4;
 
+   fl4->flowi4_flags = FLOWI_FLAG_SKIP_NH_OIF;
+
rt = __ip_route_output_key(net, fl4);
if (!IS_ERR(rt))
return >dst;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html