Re: [PATCH 0/3] [PATCHSET] netlink error management

2007-03-22 Thread David Miller 
From: Thomas Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 20:57:54 +0100

> * David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-03-22 12:23
> > From: Thomas Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 00:18:01 +0100
> > 
> > > This series of patches simplifies the error management and
> > > signalization of dump starts of netlink_run_queue() message
> > > handlers. It touches a fair bit of nfnetlink code as the
> > > error pointer has been passed on to subsystems.
> > 
> > Thomas can you respin these patches?  They no longer apply
> > now that I put your other rtnl_link bits into net-2.6.22
> 
> I guess I've posted too many patches series, the patches should
> still apply, at least it works in my quilt tree, but depend on
> others. The series I've posted in the correct order are:

It doesn't, that's why I asked you to respin.

Perhaps "patch" would allow them with some fuzz, but git
definitely doesn't want to apply it.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH 0/3] [PATCHSET] netlink error management

2007-03-22 Thread Thomas Graf 
* David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-03-22 12:23
> From: Thomas Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 00:18:01 +0100
> 
> > This series of patches simplifies the error management and
> > signalization of dump starts of netlink_run_queue() message
> > handlers. It touches a fair bit of nfnetlink code as the
> > error pointer has been passed on to subsystems.
> 
> Thomas can you respin these patches?  They no longer apply
> now that I put your other rtnl_link bits into net-2.6.22

I guess I've posted too many patches series, the patches should
still apply, at least it works in my quilt tree, but depend on
others. The series I've posted in the correct order are:

[RESEND] rtnetlink message handler registration interface
  already applied
 
[RESEND] [NET] rules: Unified rules dumping
  already applied

[PATCH 0/5] [PATCHSET] Netlink Patches
  even though there have been objects because of nfnetlink
  at first, the patches can go in as-is

[NETFILTER] nfnetlink: netlink_run_queue() already checks
       for NLM_F_REQUEST

[PATCH 0/3] [PATCHSET] netlink error management
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH 0/3] [PATCHSET] netlink error management

2007-03-22 Thread David Miller 
From: Thomas Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 00:18:01 +0100

> This series of patches simplifies the error management and
> signalization of dump starts of netlink_run_queue() message
> handlers. It touches a fair bit of nfnetlink code as the
> error pointer has been passed on to subsystems.

Thomas can you respin these patches?  They no longer apply
now that I put your other rtnl_link bits into net-2.6.22

Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH 0/3] [PATCHSET] netlink error management

2007-03-21 Thread Thomas Graf 
This series of patches simplifies the error management and
signalization of dump starts of netlink_run_queue() message
handlers. It touches a fair bit of nfnetlink code as the
error pointer has been passed on to subsystems.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html