Re: [PATCH 00/15] ARM: pxa: switch to DMA slave maps

2018-04-05 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 8:29 AM, Ulf Hansson  wrote:
> On 4 April 2018 at 21:56, Boris Brezillon  wrote:
>> On Wed, 04 Apr 2018 21:49:26 +0200
>> Robert Jarzmik  wrote:
>>
>>> Ulf Hansson  writes:
>>>
>>> > On 2 April 2018 at 16:26, Robert Jarzmik  wrote:
>>> >> Hi,
>>> >>
>>> >> This serie is aimed at removing the dmaengine slave compat use, and 
>>> >> transfer
>>> >> knowledge of the DMA requestors into architecture code.
>>> >> As this looks like a patch bomb, each maintainer expressing for his tree 
>>> >> either
>>> >> an Ack or "I want to take through my tree" will be spared in the next 
>>> >> iterations
>>> >> of this serie.
>>> >
>>> > Perhaps an option is to send this hole series as PR for 3.17 rc1, that
>>> > would removed some churns and make this faster/easier? Well, if you
>>> > receive the needed acks of course.
>>> For 3.17-rc1 it looks a bit optimistic with the review time ... If I have 
>>> all
>>
>> Especially since 3.17-rc1 has been released more than 3 years ago :-),
>> but I guess you meant 4.17-rc1.
>
> Yeah, I realize that I was a bit lost in time yesterday. Even more
> people have been having fun about it (me too). :-)

I occasionally still type 2.6.17 when I mean 4.17.

   Arnd


Re: [PATCH 00/15] ARM: pxa: switch to DMA slave maps

2018-04-05 Thread Ulf Hansson
On 4 April 2018 at 21:56, Boris Brezillon  wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Apr 2018 21:49:26 +0200
> Robert Jarzmik  wrote:
>
>> Ulf Hansson  writes:
>>
>> > On 2 April 2018 at 16:26, Robert Jarzmik  wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> This serie is aimed at removing the dmaengine slave compat use, and 
>> >> transfer
>> >> knowledge of the DMA requestors into architecture code.
>> >> As this looks like a patch bomb, each maintainer expressing for his tree 
>> >> either
>> >> an Ack or "I want to take through my tree" will be spared in the next 
>> >> iterations
>> >> of this serie.
>> >
>> > Perhaps an option is to send this hole series as PR for 3.17 rc1, that
>> > would removed some churns and make this faster/easier? Well, if you
>> > receive the needed acks of course.
>> For 3.17-rc1 it looks a bit optimistic with the review time ... If I have all
>
> Especially since 3.17-rc1 has been released more than 3 years ago :-),
> but I guess you meant 4.17-rc1.

Yeah, I realize that I was a bit lost in time yesterday. Even more
people have been having fun about it (me too). :-)

Kind regards
Uffe


Re: [PATCH 00/15] ARM: pxa: switch to DMA slave maps

2018-04-04 Thread Boris Brezillon
On Wed, 04 Apr 2018 21:49:26 +0200
Robert Jarzmik  wrote:

> Ulf Hansson  writes:
> 
> > On 2 April 2018 at 16:26, Robert Jarzmik  wrote:  
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> This serie is aimed at removing the dmaengine slave compat use, and 
> >> transfer
> >> knowledge of the DMA requestors into architecture code.
> >> As this looks like a patch bomb, each maintainer expressing for his tree 
> >> either
> >> an Ack or "I want to take through my tree" will be spared in the next 
> >> iterations
> >> of this serie.  
> >
> > Perhaps an option is to send this hole series as PR for 3.17 rc1, that
> > would removed some churns and make this faster/easier? Well, if you
> > receive the needed acks of course.  
> For 3.17-rc1 it looks a bit optimistic with the review time ... If I have all

Especially since 3.17-rc1 has been released more than 3 years ago :-),
but I guess you meant 4.17-rc1.

> acks, I'll queue it into my pxa tree. If at least one maintainer withholds his
> ack, the end of the serie (phase 3) won't be applied until it is sorted out.
> 
> Cheers.
> 
> --
> Robert



Re: [PATCH 00/15] ARM: pxa: switch to DMA slave maps

2018-04-04 Thread Robert Jarzmik
Ulf Hansson  writes:

> On 2 April 2018 at 16:26, Robert Jarzmik  wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This serie is aimed at removing the dmaengine slave compat use, and transfer
>> knowledge of the DMA requestors into architecture code.
>> As this looks like a patch bomb, each maintainer expressing for his tree 
>> either
>> an Ack or "I want to take through my tree" will be spared in the next 
>> iterations
>> of this serie.
>
> Perhaps an option is to send this hole series as PR for 3.17 rc1, that
> would removed some churns and make this faster/easier? Well, if you
> receive the needed acks of course.
For 3.17-rc1 it looks a bit optimistic with the review time ... If I have all
acks, I'll queue it into my pxa tree. If at least one maintainer withholds his
ack, the end of the serie (phase 3) won't be applied until it is sorted out.

Cheers.

--
Robert


Re: [PATCH 00/15] ARM: pxa: switch to DMA slave maps

2018-04-03 Thread Ulf Hansson
On 2 April 2018 at 16:26, Robert Jarzmik  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This serie is aimed at removing the dmaengine slave compat use, and transfer
> knowledge of the DMA requestors into architecture code.
>
> This was discussed/advised by Arnd a couple of years back, it's almost time.
>
> The serie is divided in 3 phasees :
>  - phase 1 : patch 1/15 and patch 2/15
>=> this is the preparation work
>  - phase 2 : patches 3/15 .. 10/15
>=> this is the switch of all the drivers
>=> this one will require either an Ack of the maintainers or be taken by 
> them
>   once phase 1 is merged
>  - phase 3 : patches 11/15
>=> this is the last part, cleanup and removal of export of the DMA filter
>   function
>
> As this looks like a patch bomb, each maintainer expressing for his tree 
> either
> an Ack or "I want to take through my tree" will be spared in the next 
> iterations
> of this serie.

Perhaps an option is to send this hole series as PR for 3.17 rc1, that
would removed some churns and make this faster/easier? Well, if you
receive the needed acks of course.

For the mmc change:

Acked-by: Ulf Hansson 

Kind regards
Uffe

>
> Several of these changes have been tested on actual hardware, including :
>  - pxamci
>  - pxa_camera
>  - smc*
>  - ASoC and SSP
>
> Happy review.
>
> Robert Jarzmik (15):
>   dmaengine: pxa: use a dma slave map
>   ARM: pxa: add dma slave map
>   mmc: pxamci: remove the dmaengine compat need
>   media: pxa_camera: remove the dmaengine compat need
>   mtd: nand: pxa3xx: remove the dmaengine compat need
>   net: smc911x: remove the dmaengine compat need
>   net: smc91x: remove the dmaengine compat need
>   ASoC: pxa: remove the dmaengine compat need
>   net: irda: pxaficp_ir: remove the dmaengine compat need
>   ata: pata_pxa: remove the dmaengine compat need
>   dmaengine: pxa: document pxad_param
>   dmaengine: pxa: make the filter function internal
>   ARM: pxa: remove the DMA IO resources
>   ARM: pxa: change SSP devices allocation
>   ARM: pxa: change SSP DMA channels allocation
>
>  arch/arm/mach-pxa/devices.c   | 269 
> ++
>  arch/arm/mach-pxa/devices.h   |  14 +-
>  arch/arm/mach-pxa/include/mach/audio.h|  12 ++
>  arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa25x.c|   4 +-
>  arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa27x.c|   4 +-
>  arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa3xx.c|   5 +-
>  arch/arm/plat-pxa/ssp.c   |  50 +-
>  drivers/ata/pata_pxa.c|  10 +-
>  drivers/dma/pxa_dma.c |  13 +-
>  drivers/media/platform/pxa_camera.c   |  22 +--
>  drivers/mmc/host/pxamci.c |  29 +---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c|  10 +-
>  drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc911x.c   |  16 +-
>  drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c|  12 +-
>  drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.h|   1 -
>  drivers/staging/irda/drivers/pxaficp_ir.c |  14 +-
>  include/linux/dma/pxa-dma.h   |  20 +--
>  include/linux/platform_data/mmp_dma.h |   4 +
>  include/linux/pxa2xx_ssp.h|   4 +-
>  sound/arm/pxa2xx-ac97.c   |  14 +-
>  sound/arm/pxa2xx-pcm-lib.c|   6 +-
>  sound/soc/pxa/pxa-ssp.c   |   5 +-
>  sound/soc/pxa/pxa2xx-ac97.c   |  32 +---
>  23 files changed, 196 insertions(+), 374 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.11.0
>


Re: [PATCH 00/15] ARM: pxa: switch to DMA slave maps

2018-04-03 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 4:26 PM, Robert Jarzmik  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This serie is aimed at removing the dmaengine slave compat use, and transfer
> knowledge of the DMA requestors into architecture code.
>
> This was discussed/advised by Arnd a couple of years back, it's almost time.
>
> The serie is divided in 3 phasees :
>  - phase 1 : patch 1/15 and patch 2/15
>=> this is the preparation work
>  - phase 2 : patches 3/15 .. 10/15
>=> this is the switch of all the drivers
>=> this one will require either an Ack of the maintainers or be taken by 
> them
>   once phase 1 is merged
>  - phase 3 : patches 11/15
>=> this is the last part, cleanup and removal of export of the DMA filter
>   function
>
> As this looks like a patch bomb, each maintainer expressing for his tree 
> either
> an Ack or "I want to take through my tree" will be spared in the next 
> iterations
> of this serie.
>
> Several of these changes have been tested on actual hardware, including :
>  - pxamci
>  - pxa_camera
>  - smc*
>  - ASoC and SSP
>
> Happy review.

This looks really great overall, thanks for cleaning this up!

The SSP part is still a bit weird, as I commented, but I'm sure we can
figure something out there.

Arnd


[PATCH 00/15] ARM: pxa: switch to DMA slave maps

2018-04-02 Thread Robert Jarzmik
Hi,

This serie is aimed at removing the dmaengine slave compat use, and transfer
knowledge of the DMA requestors into architecture code.

This was discussed/advised by Arnd a couple of years back, it's almost time.

The serie is divided in 3 phasees :
 - phase 1 : patch 1/15 and patch 2/15
   => this is the preparation work
 - phase 2 : patches 3/15 .. 10/15
   => this is the switch of all the drivers
   => this one will require either an Ack of the maintainers or be taken by them
  once phase 1 is merged
 - phase 3 : patches 11/15
   => this is the last part, cleanup and removal of export of the DMA filter
  function

As this looks like a patch bomb, each maintainer expressing for his tree either
an Ack or "I want to take through my tree" will be spared in the next iterations
of this serie.

Several of these changes have been tested on actual hardware, including :
 - pxamci
 - pxa_camera
 - smc*
 - ASoC and SSP

Happy review.

Robert Jarzmik (15):
  dmaengine: pxa: use a dma slave map
  ARM: pxa: add dma slave map
  mmc: pxamci: remove the dmaengine compat need
  media: pxa_camera: remove the dmaengine compat need
  mtd: nand: pxa3xx: remove the dmaengine compat need
  net: smc911x: remove the dmaengine compat need
  net: smc91x: remove the dmaengine compat need
  ASoC: pxa: remove the dmaengine compat need
  net: irda: pxaficp_ir: remove the dmaengine compat need
  ata: pata_pxa: remove the dmaengine compat need
  dmaengine: pxa: document pxad_param
  dmaengine: pxa: make the filter function internal
  ARM: pxa: remove the DMA IO resources
  ARM: pxa: change SSP devices allocation
  ARM: pxa: change SSP DMA channels allocation

 arch/arm/mach-pxa/devices.c   | 269 ++
 arch/arm/mach-pxa/devices.h   |  14 +-
 arch/arm/mach-pxa/include/mach/audio.h|  12 ++
 arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa25x.c|   4 +-
 arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa27x.c|   4 +-
 arch/arm/mach-pxa/pxa3xx.c|   5 +-
 arch/arm/plat-pxa/ssp.c   |  50 +-
 drivers/ata/pata_pxa.c|  10 +-
 drivers/dma/pxa_dma.c |  13 +-
 drivers/media/platform/pxa_camera.c   |  22 +--
 drivers/mmc/host/pxamci.c |  29 +---
 drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c|  10 +-
 drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc911x.c   |  16 +-
 drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c|  12 +-
 drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.h|   1 -
 drivers/staging/irda/drivers/pxaficp_ir.c |  14 +-
 include/linux/dma/pxa-dma.h   |  20 +--
 include/linux/platform_data/mmp_dma.h |   4 +
 include/linux/pxa2xx_ssp.h|   4 +-
 sound/arm/pxa2xx-ac97.c   |  14 +-
 sound/arm/pxa2xx-pcm-lib.c|   6 +-
 sound/soc/pxa/pxa-ssp.c   |   5 +-
 sound/soc/pxa/pxa2xx-ac97.c   |  32 +---
 23 files changed, 196 insertions(+), 374 deletions(-)

-- 
2.11.0