Re: [PATCH 07/17] net: stmmac: replace stmmac_mdio_busy_wait by readl_poll_timeout

2017-01-31 Thread Giuseppe CAVALLARO

On 1/31/2017 10:11 AM, Corentin Labbe wrote:

The stmmac_mdio_busy_wait() function do the same job than
readl_poll_timeout().
So is is better to replace it.

Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe 


I just wonder if you also tested it, this impacts all the platforms
where SMA block is used

if yes, pls consider my:

Acked-by: Giuseppe Cavallaro 


---
 drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_mdio.c | 33 ---
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_mdio.c 
b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_mdio.c
index c24bef2..d9893cf 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_mdio.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_mdio.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
 
***/

 #include 
+#include 
 #include 
 #include 
 #include 
@@ -38,22 +39,6 @@
 #define MII_GMAC4_WRITE(1 << MII_GMAC4_GOC_SHIFT)
 #define MII_GMAC4_READ (3 << MII_GMAC4_GOC_SHIFT)

-static int stmmac_mdio_busy_wait(void __iomem *ioaddr, unsigned int mii_addr)
-{
-   unsigned long curr;
-   unsigned long finish = jiffies + 3 * HZ;
-
-   do {
-   curr = jiffies;
-   if (readl(ioaddr + mii_addr) & MII_BUSY)
-   cpu_relax();
-   else
-   return 0;
-   } while (!time_after_eq(curr, finish));
-
-   return -EBUSY;
-}
-
 /**
  * stmmac_mdio_read
  * @bus: points to the mii_bus structure
@@ -70,7 +55,7 @@ static int stmmac_mdio_read(struct mii_bus *bus, int phyaddr, 
int phyreg)
struct stmmac_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
unsigned int mii_address = priv->hw->mii.addr;
unsigned int mii_data = priv->hw->mii.data;
-
+   u32 v;
int data;
u32 value = MII_BUSY;

@@ -82,12 +67,14 @@ static int stmmac_mdio_read(struct mii_bus *bus, int 
phyaddr, int phyreg)
if (priv->plat->has_gmac4)
value |= MII_GMAC4_READ;

-   if (stmmac_mdio_busy_wait(priv->ioaddr, mii_address))
+   if (readl_poll_timeout(priv->ioaddr + mii_address, v, !(v & MII_BUSY),
+  100, 1))
return -EBUSY;

writel(value, priv->ioaddr + mii_address);

-   if (stmmac_mdio_busy_wait(priv->ioaddr, mii_address))
+   if (readl_poll_timeout(priv->ioaddr + mii_address, v, !(v & MII_BUSY),
+  100, 1))
return -EBUSY;

/* Read the data from the MII data register */
@@ -111,7 +98,7 @@ static int stmmac_mdio_write(struct mii_bus *bus, int 
phyaddr, int phyreg,
struct stmmac_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
unsigned int mii_address = priv->hw->mii.addr;
unsigned int mii_data = priv->hw->mii.data;
-
+   u32 v;
u32 value = MII_BUSY;

value |= (phyaddr << priv->hw->mii.addr_shift)
@@ -126,7 +113,8 @@ static int stmmac_mdio_write(struct mii_bus *bus, int 
phyaddr, int phyreg,
value |= MII_WRITE;

/* Wait until any existing MII operation is complete */
-   if (stmmac_mdio_busy_wait(priv->ioaddr, mii_address))
+   if (readl_poll_timeout(priv->ioaddr + mii_address, v, !(v & MII_BUSY),
+  100, 1))
return -EBUSY;

/* Set the MII address register to write */
@@ -134,7 +122,8 @@ static int stmmac_mdio_write(struct mii_bus *bus, int 
phyaddr, int phyreg,
writel(value, priv->ioaddr + mii_address);

/* Wait until any existing MII operation is complete */
-   return stmmac_mdio_busy_wait(priv->ioaddr, mii_address);
+   return readl_poll_timeout(priv->ioaddr + mii_address, v, !(v & 
MII_BUSY),
+ 100, 1);
 }

 /**





Re: [PATCH 07/17] net: stmmac: replace stmmac_mdio_busy_wait by readl_poll_timeout

2017-01-31 Thread Giuseppe CAVALLARO

On 1/31/2017 11:39 AM, Corentin Labbe wrote:

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:13:49AM +0100, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote:

On 1/31/2017 10:11 AM, Corentin Labbe wrote:

The stmmac_mdio_busy_wait() function do the same job than
readl_poll_timeout().
So is is better to replace it.

Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe 


I just wonder if you also tested it, this impacts all the platforms
where SMA block is used


I have tested all patch in this series on my cubieboard2 (dwmac-sunxi) and my 
opipc/pine64/bpim2+ (dwmac-sun8i)
(Yes I could have said that in cover letter).
So this code was tested on two different stmmac glue driver.


perfect :-) thx for the clarification and consider my Acked-by.

peppe



if yes, pls consider my:

Acked-by: Giuseppe Cavallaro 


---
 drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_mdio.c | 33 ---
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_mdio.c 
b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_mdio.c
index c24bef2..d9893cf 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_mdio.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_mdio.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
 
***/

 #include 
+#include 
 #include 
 #include 
 #include 
@@ -38,22 +39,6 @@
 #define MII_GMAC4_WRITE(1 << MII_GMAC4_GOC_SHIFT)
 #define MII_GMAC4_READ (3 << MII_GMAC4_GOC_SHIFT)

-static int stmmac_mdio_busy_wait(void __iomem *ioaddr, unsigned int mii_addr)
-{
-   unsigned long curr;
-   unsigned long finish = jiffies + 3 * HZ;
-
-   do {
-   curr = jiffies;
-   if (readl(ioaddr + mii_addr) & MII_BUSY)
-   cpu_relax();
-   else
-   return 0;
-   } while (!time_after_eq(curr, finish));
-
-   return -EBUSY;
-}
-
 /**
  * stmmac_mdio_read
  * @bus: points to the mii_bus structure
@@ -70,7 +55,7 @@ static int stmmac_mdio_read(struct mii_bus *bus, int phyaddr, 
int phyreg)
struct stmmac_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
unsigned int mii_address = priv->hw->mii.addr;
unsigned int mii_data = priv->hw->mii.data;
-
+   u32 v;
int data;
u32 value = MII_BUSY;

@@ -82,12 +67,14 @@ static int stmmac_mdio_read(struct mii_bus *bus, int 
phyaddr, int phyreg)
if (priv->plat->has_gmac4)
value |= MII_GMAC4_READ;

-   if (stmmac_mdio_busy_wait(priv->ioaddr, mii_address))
+   if (readl_poll_timeout(priv->ioaddr + mii_address, v, !(v & MII_BUSY),
+  100, 1))
return -EBUSY;

writel(value, priv->ioaddr + mii_address);

-   if (stmmac_mdio_busy_wait(priv->ioaddr, mii_address))
+   if (readl_poll_timeout(priv->ioaddr + mii_address, v, !(v & MII_BUSY),
+  100, 1))
return -EBUSY;

/* Read the data from the MII data register */
@@ -111,7 +98,7 @@ static int stmmac_mdio_write(struct mii_bus *bus, int 
phyaddr, int phyreg,
struct stmmac_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
unsigned int mii_address = priv->hw->mii.addr;
unsigned int mii_data = priv->hw->mii.data;
-
+   u32 v;
u32 value = MII_BUSY;

value |= (phyaddr << priv->hw->mii.addr_shift)
@@ -126,7 +113,8 @@ static int stmmac_mdio_write(struct mii_bus *bus, int 
phyaddr, int phyreg,
value |= MII_WRITE;

/* Wait until any existing MII operation is complete */
-   if (stmmac_mdio_busy_wait(priv->ioaddr, mii_address))
+   if (readl_poll_timeout(priv->ioaddr + mii_address, v, !(v & MII_BUSY),
+  100, 1))
return -EBUSY;

/* Set the MII address register to write */
@@ -134,7 +122,8 @@ static int stmmac_mdio_write(struct mii_bus *bus, int 
phyaddr, int phyreg,
writel(value, priv->ioaddr + mii_address);

/* Wait until any existing MII operation is complete */
-   return stmmac_mdio_busy_wait(priv->ioaddr, mii_address);
+   return readl_poll_timeout(priv->ioaddr + mii_address, v, !(v & 
MII_BUSY),
+ 100, 1);
 }

 /**









Re: [PATCH 07/17] net: stmmac: replace stmmac_mdio_busy_wait by readl_poll_timeout

2017-01-31 Thread Corentin Labbe
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:13:49AM +0100, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote:
> On 1/31/2017 10:11 AM, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> > The stmmac_mdio_busy_wait() function do the same job than
> > readl_poll_timeout().
> > So is is better to replace it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe 
> 
> I just wonder if you also tested it, this impacts all the platforms
> where SMA block is used

I have tested all patch in this series on my cubieboard2 (dwmac-sunxi) and my 
opipc/pine64/bpim2+ (dwmac-sun8i)
(Yes I could have said that in cover letter).
So this code was tested on two different stmmac glue driver.

> 
> if yes, pls consider my:
> 
> Acked-by: Giuseppe Cavallaro 
> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_mdio.c | 33 
> > ---
> >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_mdio.c 
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_mdio.c
> > index c24bef2..d9893cf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_mdio.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_mdio.c
> > @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> >  
> > ***/
> >
> >  #include 
> > +#include 
> >  #include 
> >  #include 
> >  #include 
> > @@ -38,22 +39,6 @@
> >  #define MII_GMAC4_WRITE(1 << MII_GMAC4_GOC_SHIFT)
> >  #define MII_GMAC4_READ (3 << MII_GMAC4_GOC_SHIFT)
> >
> > -static int stmmac_mdio_busy_wait(void __iomem *ioaddr, unsigned int 
> > mii_addr)
> > -{
> > -   unsigned long curr;
> > -   unsigned long finish = jiffies + 3 * HZ;
> > -
> > -   do {
> > -   curr = jiffies;
> > -   if (readl(ioaddr + mii_addr) & MII_BUSY)
> > -   cpu_relax();
> > -   else
> > -   return 0;
> > -   } while (!time_after_eq(curr, finish));
> > -
> > -   return -EBUSY;
> > -}
> > -
> >  /**
> >   * stmmac_mdio_read
> >   * @bus: points to the mii_bus structure
> > @@ -70,7 +55,7 @@ static int stmmac_mdio_read(struct mii_bus *bus, int 
> > phyaddr, int phyreg)
> > struct stmmac_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> > unsigned int mii_address = priv->hw->mii.addr;
> > unsigned int mii_data = priv->hw->mii.data;
> > -
> > +   u32 v;
> > int data;
> > u32 value = MII_BUSY;
> >
> > @@ -82,12 +67,14 @@ static int stmmac_mdio_read(struct mii_bus *bus, int 
> > phyaddr, int phyreg)
> > if (priv->plat->has_gmac4)
> > value |= MII_GMAC4_READ;
> >
> > -   if (stmmac_mdio_busy_wait(priv->ioaddr, mii_address))
> > +   if (readl_poll_timeout(priv->ioaddr + mii_address, v, !(v & MII_BUSY),
> > +  100, 1))
> > return -EBUSY;
> >
> > writel(value, priv->ioaddr + mii_address);
> >
> > -   if (stmmac_mdio_busy_wait(priv->ioaddr, mii_address))
> > +   if (readl_poll_timeout(priv->ioaddr + mii_address, v, !(v & MII_BUSY),
> > +  100, 1))
> > return -EBUSY;
> >
> > /* Read the data from the MII data register */
> > @@ -111,7 +98,7 @@ static int stmmac_mdio_write(struct mii_bus *bus, int 
> > phyaddr, int phyreg,
> > struct stmmac_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> > unsigned int mii_address = priv->hw->mii.addr;
> > unsigned int mii_data = priv->hw->mii.data;
> > -
> > +   u32 v;
> > u32 value = MII_BUSY;
> >
> > value |= (phyaddr << priv->hw->mii.addr_shift)
> > @@ -126,7 +113,8 @@ static int stmmac_mdio_write(struct mii_bus *bus, int 
> > phyaddr, int phyreg,
> > value |= MII_WRITE;
> >
> > /* Wait until any existing MII operation is complete */
> > -   if (stmmac_mdio_busy_wait(priv->ioaddr, mii_address))
> > +   if (readl_poll_timeout(priv->ioaddr + mii_address, v, !(v & MII_BUSY),
> > +  100, 1))
> > return -EBUSY;
> >
> > /* Set the MII address register to write */
> > @@ -134,7 +122,8 @@ static int stmmac_mdio_write(struct mii_bus *bus, int 
> > phyaddr, int phyreg,
> > writel(value, priv->ioaddr + mii_address);
> >
> > /* Wait until any existing MII operation is complete */
> > -   return stmmac_mdio_busy_wait(priv->ioaddr, mii_address);
> > +   return readl_poll_timeout(priv->ioaddr + mii_address, v, !(v & 
> > MII_BUSY),
> > + 100, 1);
> >  }
> >
> >  /**
> >
> 


[PATCH 07/17] net: stmmac: replace stmmac_mdio_busy_wait by readl_poll_timeout

2017-01-31 Thread Corentin Labbe
The stmmac_mdio_busy_wait() function do the same job than
readl_poll_timeout().
So is is better to replace it.

Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe 
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_mdio.c | 33 ---
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_mdio.c 
b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_mdio.c
index c24bef2..d9893cf 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_mdio.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_mdio.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
 
***/
 
 #include 
+#include 
 #include 
 #include 
 #include 
@@ -38,22 +39,6 @@
 #define MII_GMAC4_WRITE(1 << MII_GMAC4_GOC_SHIFT)
 #define MII_GMAC4_READ (3 << MII_GMAC4_GOC_SHIFT)
 
-static int stmmac_mdio_busy_wait(void __iomem *ioaddr, unsigned int mii_addr)
-{
-   unsigned long curr;
-   unsigned long finish = jiffies + 3 * HZ;
-
-   do {
-   curr = jiffies;
-   if (readl(ioaddr + mii_addr) & MII_BUSY)
-   cpu_relax();
-   else
-   return 0;
-   } while (!time_after_eq(curr, finish));
-
-   return -EBUSY;
-}
-
 /**
  * stmmac_mdio_read
  * @bus: points to the mii_bus structure
@@ -70,7 +55,7 @@ static int stmmac_mdio_read(struct mii_bus *bus, int phyaddr, 
int phyreg)
struct stmmac_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
unsigned int mii_address = priv->hw->mii.addr;
unsigned int mii_data = priv->hw->mii.data;
-
+   u32 v;
int data;
u32 value = MII_BUSY;
 
@@ -82,12 +67,14 @@ static int stmmac_mdio_read(struct mii_bus *bus, int 
phyaddr, int phyreg)
if (priv->plat->has_gmac4)
value |= MII_GMAC4_READ;
 
-   if (stmmac_mdio_busy_wait(priv->ioaddr, mii_address))
+   if (readl_poll_timeout(priv->ioaddr + mii_address, v, !(v & MII_BUSY),
+  100, 1))
return -EBUSY;
 
writel(value, priv->ioaddr + mii_address);
 
-   if (stmmac_mdio_busy_wait(priv->ioaddr, mii_address))
+   if (readl_poll_timeout(priv->ioaddr + mii_address, v, !(v & MII_BUSY),
+  100, 1))
return -EBUSY;
 
/* Read the data from the MII data register */
@@ -111,7 +98,7 @@ static int stmmac_mdio_write(struct mii_bus *bus, int 
phyaddr, int phyreg,
struct stmmac_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
unsigned int mii_address = priv->hw->mii.addr;
unsigned int mii_data = priv->hw->mii.data;
-
+   u32 v;
u32 value = MII_BUSY;
 
value |= (phyaddr << priv->hw->mii.addr_shift)
@@ -126,7 +113,8 @@ static int stmmac_mdio_write(struct mii_bus *bus, int 
phyaddr, int phyreg,
value |= MII_WRITE;
 
/* Wait until any existing MII operation is complete */
-   if (stmmac_mdio_busy_wait(priv->ioaddr, mii_address))
+   if (readl_poll_timeout(priv->ioaddr + mii_address, v, !(v & MII_BUSY),
+  100, 1))
return -EBUSY;
 
/* Set the MII address register to write */
@@ -134,7 +122,8 @@ static int stmmac_mdio_write(struct mii_bus *bus, int 
phyaddr, int phyreg,
writel(value, priv->ioaddr + mii_address);
 
/* Wait until any existing MII operation is complete */
-   return stmmac_mdio_busy_wait(priv->ioaddr, mii_address);
+   return readl_poll_timeout(priv->ioaddr + mii_address, v, !(v & 
MII_BUSY),
+ 100, 1);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.10.2