Re: [PATCH net-next 00/11] Start adding support for mv88e6390 family

2016-11-14 Thread David Miller
From: Andrew Lunn 
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 21:24:03 +0100

> I'm happy to respin, but i'm wondering why the don't apply.

Andrew, even though this issue has been resolved, it looks like Vivien
has some feedback for you to address with this series so I guess I'll
see a v2 or similar soon.

Thanks.


Re: [PATCH net-next 00/11] Start adding support for mv88e6390 family

2016-11-13 Thread David Miller
From: Andrew Lunn 
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 21:24:03 +0100

> What seems to be the issue is you said you have accepted:
> 
> [PATCH net-next 0/2] Fixes for port refactoring
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev=147880114928996=1
> 
> Yet i don't see these in net-next. And i based this patchset on a tree
> which included the fixes. Hence they are not applying.
> 
> Have the fixes really been accepted?

Accepted but not pushed out properly, sorry.

This should be sorted out now.


Re: [PATCH net-next 00/11] Start adding support for mv88e6390 family

2016-11-13 Thread Andrew Lunn
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 12:48:59AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Andrew Lunn 
> Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 03:53:32 +0100
> 
> > This is the first patchset implementing support for the mv88e6390
> > family.  This is a new generation of switch devices and has numerous
> > incompatible changes to the registers. These patches allow the switch
> > to the detected during probe, and makes the statistics unit work.
> > 
> > These patches are insufficient to make the mv88e6390 functional. More
> > patches will follow.
> 
> Andrew, this series doesn't apply cleanly to net-next, so you'll
> need to respin.

Hi David

I'm happy to respin, but i'm wondering why the don't apply.

What seems to be the issue is you said you have accepted:

[PATCH net-next 0/2] Fixes for port refactoring
https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev=147880114928996=1

Yet i don't see these in net-next. And i based this patchset on a tree
which included the fixes. Hence they are not applying.

Have the fixes really been accepted?

Thanks
Andrew


 


Re: [PATCH net-next 00/11] Start adding support for mv88e6390 family

2016-11-12 Thread David Miller
From: Andrew Lunn 
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 03:53:32 +0100

> This is the first patchset implementing support for the mv88e6390
> family.  This is a new generation of switch devices and has numerous
> incompatible changes to the registers. These patches allow the switch
> to the detected during probe, and makes the statistics unit work.
> 
> These patches are insufficient to make the mv88e6390 functional. More
> patches will follow.

Andrew, this series doesn't apply cleanly to net-next, so you'll
need to respin.

Thanks.


[PATCH net-next 00/11] Start adding support for mv88e6390 family

2016-11-10 Thread Andrew Lunn
This is the first patchset implementing support for the mv88e6390
family.  This is a new generation of switch devices and has numerous
incompatible changes to the registers. These patches allow the switch
to the detected during probe, and makes the statistics unit work.

These patches are insufficient to make the mv88e6390 functional. More
patches will follow.

Andrew Lunn (11):
  net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Take switch out of reset before probe
  net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Fix unused variable warning by using variable
  net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Add the mv88e6390 family
  net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Abstract stats_snapshot into ops structure
  net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Add comment about family a device belongs to
  net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Add mv88e6390 stats snapshot operation
  net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Add mv88e6390 statistics unit init
  net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Add stats_get_sset_count to ops structure
  net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Add stats_get_strings to ops structure
  net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Add stats_get_stats to ops structure
  net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Implement mv88e6390 get_stats

 .../devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/marvell.txt|   3 +-
 drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c   | 550 -
 drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/mv88e6xxx.h  |  53 +-
 3 files changed, 487 insertions(+), 119 deletions(-)

-- 
2.10.1