[PATCH net-next V2 06/16] net: fec: don't clear all rx queue bits when just one is being checked
FEC_ENET_RXF is 3 separate bits, we only check one queue at a time. So, when the last queue is being checked, it is bad to remove the interrupt on the 1st queue. Also, since this is now done in the napi routine and not the interrupt, it is not needed. Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky --- drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c index 610cf6c..791f385 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c @@ -1338,8 +1338,6 @@ static int fec_rxq(struct net_device *ndev, struct fec_enet_private *fep, break; pkt_received++; - writel(FEC_ENET_RXF, fep->hwp + FEC_IEVENT); - /* Check for errors. */ status ^= BD_ENET_RX_LAST; if (status & (BD_ENET_RX_LG | BD_ENET_RX_SH | BD_ENET_RX_NO | -- 2.5.0
RE: [PATCH net-next V2 06/16] net: fec: don't clear all rx queue bits when just one is being checked
From: Troy Kisky Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 8:37 AM > To: netdev@vger.kernel.org; da...@davemloft.net; b38...@freescale.com > Cc: fabio.este...@freescale.com; l.st...@pengutronix.de; and...@lunn.ch; > trem...@gmail.com; li...@arm.linux.org.uk; linux-arm- > ker...@lists.infradead.org; l...@boundarydevices.com; shawn...@kernel.org; > johan...@sipsolutions.net; stillcompil...@gmail.com; > sergei.shtyl...@cogentembedded.com; a...@arndb.de; Troy Kisky > > Subject: [PATCH net-next V2 06/16] net: fec: don't clear all rx queue bits > when > just one is being checked > > FEC_ENET_RXF is 3 separate bits, we only check one queue at a time. So, when > the last queue is being checked, it is bad to remove the interrupt on the 1st > queue. > > Also, since this is now done in the napi routine and not the interrupt, it is > not > needed. > > Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c > b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c > index 610cf6c..791f385 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c > @@ -1338,8 +1338,6 @@ static int fec_rxq(struct net_device *ndev, struct > fec_enet_private *fep, > break; > pkt_received++; > > - writel(FEC_ENET_RXF, fep->hwp + FEC_IEVENT); > - We should clear the related rx queue ievent, not remove the code. Pls see commit: db3421c114cf that was submitted by Russell King. No ack the patch. > /* Check for errors. */ > status ^= BD_ENET_RX_LAST; > if (status & (BD_ENET_RX_LG | BD_ENET_RX_SH | > BD_ENET_RX_NO | > -- > 2.5.0
Re: [PATCH net-next V2 06/16] net: fec: don't clear all rx queue bits when just one is being checked
On 3/4/2016 2:11 AM, Fugang Duan wrote: > From: Troy Kisky Sent: Thursday, February 25, > 2016 8:37 AM >> To: netdev@vger.kernel.org; da...@davemloft.net; b38...@freescale.com >> Cc: fabio.este...@freescale.com; l.st...@pengutronix.de; and...@lunn.ch; >> trem...@gmail.com; li...@arm.linux.org.uk; linux-arm- >> ker...@lists.infradead.org; l...@boundarydevices.com; shawn...@kernel.org; >> johan...@sipsolutions.net; stillcompil...@gmail.com; >> sergei.shtyl...@cogentembedded.com; a...@arndb.de; Troy Kisky >> >> Subject: [PATCH net-next V2 06/16] net: fec: don't clear all rx queue bits >> when >> just one is being checked >> >> FEC_ENET_RXF is 3 separate bits, we only check one queue at a time. So, when >> the last queue is being checked, it is bad to remove the interrupt on the 1st >> queue. >> >> Also, since this is now done in the napi routine and not the interrupt, it >> is not >> needed. >> >> Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky >> --- >> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c | 2 -- >> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c >> b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c >> index 610cf6c..791f385 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c >> @@ -1338,8 +1338,6 @@ static int fec_rxq(struct net_device *ndev, struct >> fec_enet_private *fep, >> break; >> pkt_received++; >> >> -writel(FEC_ENET_RXF, fep->hwp + FEC_IEVENT); >> - > > We should clear the related rx queue ievent, not remove the code. > Pls see commit: db3421c114cf that was submitted by Russell King. > > No ack the patch. This is now done in patch #4 "net: fec: reduce interrupts" and you could argue that it should be squashed into that patch. But I like separating changes as much as possible. Russell, this patch and patch #4 will likely need your ack before it will be applied. Can you take a look please? http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg361927.html Thanks Troy
Re: [PATCH net-next V2 06/16] net: fec: don't clear all rx queue bits when just one is being checked
On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 09:18:19AM -0700, Troy Kisky wrote: > On 3/4/2016 2:11 AM, Fugang Duan wrote: > > From: Troy Kisky Sent: Thursday, February > > 25, 2016 8:37 AM > >> To: netdev@vger.kernel.org; da...@davemloft.net; b38...@freescale.com > >> Cc: fabio.este...@freescale.com; l.st...@pengutronix.de; and...@lunn.ch; > >> trem...@gmail.com; li...@arm.linux.org.uk; linux-arm- > >> ker...@lists.infradead.org; l...@boundarydevices.com; shawn...@kernel.org; > >> johan...@sipsolutions.net; stillcompil...@gmail.com; > >> sergei.shtyl...@cogentembedded.com; a...@arndb.de; Troy Kisky > >> > >> Subject: [PATCH net-next V2 06/16] net: fec: don't clear all rx queue bits > >> when > >> just one is being checked > >> > >> FEC_ENET_RXF is 3 separate bits, we only check one queue at a time. So, > >> when > >> the last queue is being checked, it is bad to remove the interrupt on the > >> 1st > >> queue. > >> > >> Also, since this is now done in the napi routine and not the interrupt, it > >> is not > >> needed. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky > >> --- > >> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c | 2 -- > >> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c > >> b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c > >> index 610cf6c..791f385 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c > >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c > >> @@ -1338,8 +1338,6 @@ static int fec_rxq(struct net_device *ndev, struct > >> fec_enet_private *fep, > >>break; > >>pkt_received++; > >> > >> - writel(FEC_ENET_RXF, fep->hwp + FEC_IEVENT); > >> - > > > > We should clear the related rx queue ievent, not remove the code. > > Pls see commit: db3421c114cf that was submitted by Russell King. > > > > No ack the patch. > > > This is now done in patch #4 "net: fec: reduce interrupts" and you could argue > that it should be squashed into that patch. But I like separating changes > as much as possible. > > > Russell, this patch and patch #4 will likely need your ack before it will be > applied. > Can you take a look please? I stopped caring about the FEC ethernet driver about 18 months ago, after I ended up dropping a significant pile of fixes on the floor through the huge number of conflicts and the shere effort of constantly trying to move them forward. My patch series tend to be large because I put concentrated effort into something for a month, which then gives a problem if conflicts come up later and the series has to be effectively rewritten from scratch. It was after the second or third time of facing an almost total rewrite that happened that I just gave up. I've toyed with the idea of forking the driver, but I wouldn't have time to maintain such a thing. So, right now I just put up with all the bad quirks, and reset/power cycle the boards when things go wrong. Right now, I just disable runtime PM support on the FEC to get stability here. :) Sorry, but I can't be of more help. -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.
Re: [PATCH net-next V2 06/16] net: fec: don't clear all rx queue bits when just one is being checked
On 3/4/2016 9:38 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 09:18:19AM -0700, Troy Kisky wrote: >> On 3/4/2016 2:11 AM, Fugang Duan wrote: >>> From: Troy Kisky Sent: Thursday, February >>> 25, 2016 8:37 AM >>>> To: netdev@vger.kernel.org; da...@davemloft.net; b38...@freescale.com >>>> Cc: fabio.este...@freescale.com; l.st...@pengutronix.de; and...@lunn.ch; >>>> trem...@gmail.com; li...@arm.linux.org.uk; linux-arm- >>>> ker...@lists.infradead.org; l...@boundarydevices.com; shawn...@kernel.org; >>>> johan...@sipsolutions.net; stillcompil...@gmail.com; >>>> sergei.shtyl...@cogentembedded.com; a...@arndb.de; Troy Kisky >>>> >>>> Subject: [PATCH net-next V2 06/16] net: fec: don't clear all rx queue bits >>>> when >>>> just one is being checked >>>> >>>> FEC_ENET_RXF is 3 separate bits, we only check one queue at a time. So, >>>> when >>>> the last queue is being checked, it is bad to remove the interrupt on the >>>> 1st >>>> queue. >>>> >>>> Also, since this is now done in the napi routine and not the interrupt, it >>>> is not >>>> needed. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky >>>> --- >>>> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c | 2 -- >>>> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c >>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c >>>> index 610cf6c..791f385 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c >>>> @@ -1338,8 +1338,6 @@ static int fec_rxq(struct net_device *ndev, struct >>>> fec_enet_private *fep, >>>>break; >>>>pkt_received++; >>>> >>>> - writel(FEC_ENET_RXF, fep->hwp + FEC_IEVENT); >>>> - >>> >>> We should clear the related rx queue ievent, not remove the code. >>> Pls see commit: db3421c114cf that was submitted by Russell King. >>> >>> No ack the patch. >> >> >> This is now done in patch #4 "net: fec: reduce interrupts" and you could >> argue >> that it should be squashed into that patch. But I like separating changes >> as much as possible. >> >> >> Russell, this patch and patch #4 will likely need your ack before it will be >> applied. >> Can you take a look please? > > I stopped caring about the FEC ethernet driver about 18 months ago, > after I ended up dropping a significant pile of fixes on the floor > through the huge number of conflicts and the shere effort of > constantly trying to move them forward. > > My patch series tend to be large because I put concentrated effort > into something for a month, which then gives a problem if conflicts > come up later and the series has to be effectively rewritten from > scratch. It was after the second or third time of facing an almost > total rewrite that happened that I just gave up. > > I've toyed with the idea of forking the driver, but I wouldn't have > time to maintain such a thing. So, right now I just put up with all > the bad quirks, and reset/power cycle the boards when things go wrong. > Right now, I just disable runtime PM support on the FEC to get > stability here. :) > > Sorry, but I can't be of more help. > I can sympathize, I've been almost ready to post my patches numerous times when a huge patch set would hit, and conflict everywhere. Including once about 18 months ago :) That's why I got trigger happy, and first posted my too large set before net-next was opened. It didn't help though, there was already a conflict in net. Troy
