Re: [PATCH v2] bpf: fix check of allowed specifiers in bpf_trace_printk

2018-11-23 Thread Daniel Borkmann
On 11/23/2018 05:43 PM, Martynas Pumputis wrote:
> A format string consisting of "%p" or "%s" followed by an invalid
> specifier (e.g. "%p%\n" or "%s%") could pass the check which
> would make format_decode (lib/vsprintf.c) to warn.
> 
> Reported-by: syzbot+1ec5c5ec949c4adaa...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Martynas Pumputis 

Applied to bpf, thanks!


[PATCH v2] bpf: fix check of allowed specifiers in bpf_trace_printk

2018-11-23 Thread Martynas Pumputis
A format string consisting of "%p" or "%s" followed by an invalid
specifier (e.g. "%p%\n" or "%s%") could pass the check which
would make format_decode (lib/vsprintf.c) to warn.

Reported-by: syzbot+1ec5c5ec949c4adaa...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Martynas Pumputis 
---
 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 8 +---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index 08fcfe440c63..9864a35c8bb5 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -196,11 +196,13 @@ BPF_CALL_5(bpf_trace_printk, char *, fmt, u32, fmt_size, 
u64, arg1,
i++;
} else if (fmt[i] == 'p' || fmt[i] == 's') {
mod[fmt_cnt]++;
-   i++;
-   if (!isspace(fmt[i]) && !ispunct(fmt[i]) && fmt[i] != 0)
+   /* disallow any further format extensions */
+   if (fmt[i + 1] != 0 &&
+   !isspace(fmt[i + 1]) &&
+   !ispunct(fmt[i + 1]))
return -EINVAL;
fmt_cnt++;
-   if (fmt[i - 1] == 's') {
+   if (fmt[i] == 's') {
if (str_seen)
/* allow only one '%s' per fmt string */
return -EINVAL;
-- 
2.19.1